Martin McGuinness has today added his support to the notion of cutting the Northern Ireland Assembly to 90 seats from the current 108, ie to five per constituency instead of six.
How would this have affected the 2011 election?
2011 outcome | 2011 last elected | 5-seat projection | |
Lagan Valley | 4 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 Alliance | DUP | 3 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 Alliance |
Strangford | 3 DUP, 2 UUP, 1 Alliance | UUP | 3 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 Alliance |
North Antrim | 3 DUP, 1 SF, 1 TUV, 1 UUP | TUV | 3 DUP, 1 SF, 1 UUP |
East Antrim | 3 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 Alliance, 1 SF | SF | 3 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 Alliance |
East Belfast | 3 DUP, 2 Alliance, 1 UUP | UUP | 3 DUP, 2 Alliance |
South Antrim | 3 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 SF, 1 Alliance | DUP | 2 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 SF, 1 Alliance |
East Londonderry | 3 DUP, 1 SF, 1 SDLP, 1 Ind | DUP | 2 DUP, 1 SF, 1 SDLP, 1 Ind |
South Belfast | 2 SDLP, 1 DUP, 1 Alliance, 1 UUP, 1 SF | SDLP | 1 SDLP, 1 DUP, 1 Alliance, 1 UUP, 1 SF |
Newry and Armagh | 3 SF, 1 SDLP, 1 UUP, 1 DUP | SF | 2 SF, 1 SDLP, 1 UUP, 1 DUP |
Foyle | 3 SDLP, 2 SF, 1 DUP | SDLP | 2 SDLP, 2 SF, 1 DUP |
West Belfast | 5 SF, 1 SDLP | SF | 4 SF, 1 SDLP |
There are some cases where it gets a bit trickier – especially if the last elected and the runner-up came from the same party or from similar community backgrounds, it’s likely that their combined votes would actually have excluded someone else. I make that call in the following cases:
2011 outcome | Un v Nat | 2011 last elected | 5-seat projection | loser | note | |
North Down | 3 DUP, 1 Alliance, 1 UUP, 1 Green | Un 57%, Nat 4%, Oth 39% | Green | 3 DUP, 1 Alliance, 1 UUP | Green | This is really difficult to call between DUP and Greens |
Upper Bann | 2 DUP, 2 UUP, 1 SF, 1 SDLP | Un 55%, Nat 39%, Oth 7% | SDLP | 2 DUP, 1 SF, 1 UUP, 1 SDLP | UUP | Nat transfers enough for two seats. |
North Belfast | 3 DUP, 2 SF, 1 SDLP | Un 49%, Nat 44%, Oth 7% | DUP | 3 DUP, 2 SF | SDLP | Unionist transfers certain to save third DUP; SDLP way behind SF. |
Fermanagh and South Tyrone | 3 SF, 2 DUP, 1 UUP | Un 46%, Nat 50%, Oth 4% | SF | 3 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP | DUP | Nat transfers enough for three seats. |
West Tyrone | 3 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 SDLP | Un 33%, Nat 59%, Oth 8% | UUP | 3 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP | SDLP | Unionists scrape last seat, SDLP far behind |
Mid Ulster | 3 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 SDLP | Un 32%, Nat 64%, Oth 4% | SF | 2 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP, 1 SDLP | SF | This one’s really tight, but in the end I think the SDLP scrape that last seat. |
South Down | 2 SDLP, 2 SF, 1 DUP, 1 UUP | Un 29%, Nat 66%, Oth 5% | SDLP | 2 SDLP, 2 SF, 1 DUP | UUP | Nat transfers enough for four seats. |
In general, one expects a broad reform reducing the number of seats to hit the largest parties most in absolute terms, and the smallest parties most in relative terms. But this is not what I see happening here. The losers by my count are disproportionately from the medium-sized parties. Starting with the smallest groups, Jim Allister would not have won the TUV’s sole seat in North Antrim had there been only five seats there, and the Greens would probably not have retained their seat in North Down. But the late David McClarty would have still won in East Londonderry, and, perhaps rather surprisingly, all eight Alliance seats would have been safe enough – in a couple of cases, they would have benefited from Nationalist transfers which in the real election went to runners-up.
All of the big parties would lose four seats each – the DUP down from 38 to 34 (if the Greens are unlucky in North Down), SF down from 29 to 25, the UUP from 16 to 12 and the SDLP from 14 to 10. Unionist membership of the Assembly remains at 52%, the Nationalist proportion dips imperceptibly from 40% to 39%. This would not have affected the allocation of ministries in the Executive between parties. But it would certainly have affected the relative dominance of the largest two parties within their respective groups.
It has to be said that these numbers are very speculative, and also vulnerable to small variations. The UUP and SDLP both had a pretty lousy election in 2011, and a small uptick in their support could shift the notional results quite a bit. But the point remains that raising the quota from 14.3% to 16.7% particularly affects parties whose support is at around that level in a lot of constituencies.