Mark Pack asks who should replace Diana Wallis as MEP for Yorkshire and the Humber? Her husband Stewart Arnold came second in the selection for the party’s candidates back in 2007, as shown in these figures taken from the offical results site.
Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | Stage 5 | Stage 6 | Stage 7 | Stage 8 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Prefs |
Surplus of Diana Wallis |
Exclusion of Veena Hudson |
Exclusion of Phil Kitchen |
Exclusion of Neil Poole |
Exclusion of Nader Fekri |
Exclusion of Jeanette Sunderland |
Exclusion of James Monaghan | ||||||||
Stewart Arnold |
60 |
+215.60 |
275.60 |
+9.16 |
284.76 |
+14.88 |
299.64 |
+15.20 |
314.84 |
+26.40 |
341.24 |
+30.96 |
372.20 |
+69.96 |
442.16 |
Nader Fekri |
32 |
+52.08 |
84.08 |
+11.60 |
95.68 |
+8.60 |
104.28 |
+8.48 |
112.76 |
-112.76 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Veena Hudson |
19 |
+30.24 |
49.24 |
-49.24 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Phil Kitchen |
11 |
+43.68 |
54.68 |
+3.12 |
57.80 |
-57.80 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
James Monaghan |
97 |
+77.28 |
174.28 |
+8.04 |
182.32 |
+7.60 |
189.92 |
+7.04 |
196.96 |
+11.84 |
208.80 |
+47.64 |
256.44 |
-256.44 |
– |
Neil Poole |
28 |
+36.40 |
64.40 |
+2.12 |
66.52 |
+5.48 |
72.00 |
-72.00 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Jeanette Sunderland |
90 |
+38.08 |
128.08 |
+2.12 |
130.20 |
+7.16 |
137.36 |
+10.04 |
147.40 |
+25.40 |
172.80 |
-172.80 |
– |
|
– |
Rebecca Taylor |
85 |
+85.68 |
170.68 |
+11.40 |
182.08 |
+10.84 |
192.92 |
+21.20 |
214.12 |
+34.60 |
248.72 |
+61.68 |
310.40 |
+123.08 |
433.48 |
Diana Wallis |
1082 |
-580.66 |
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
|
501.34 |
Non-transferable |
0 |
+1.62 |
1.62 |
+1.68 |
3.30 |
+3.24 |
6.54 |
+10.04 |
16.58 |
+14.52 |
31.10 |
+32.52 |
63.62 |
+63.40 |
127.02 |
Totals |
1504 |
|
1504.00 |
|
1504.00 |
|
1504.00 |
|
1504.00 |
|
1504.00 |
1504.00 | 1504.00 |
Stage | |||
---|---|---|---|
8 | |||
Stewart Arnold | 442.16 | Elected | |
Rebecca Taylor | 433.48 | ||
Diana Wallis | 501.34 | Elected | |
Non-transferable | 127.02 | ||
Totals | 1504.00 |
Candidate |
original |
transfers from |
transferred |
first prefs |
Stewart Arnold |
60 |
215.6 |
385 |
445 |
Nader Fekri |
32 |
52.08 |
93 |
125 |
Veena Hudson |
19 |
30.24 |
54 |
73 |
Phil Kitchen |
11 |
43.68 |
78 |
89 |
James Monaghan |
97 |
77.28 |
138 |
235 |
Neil Poole |
28 |
36.4 |
65 |
93 |
Jeanette Sunderland |
90 |
38.08 |
68 |
158 |
Rebecca Taylor |
85 |
85.68 |
153 |
238 |
It is straightforward if tedious to repeat this exercise for each of the counts and therefore to reconstruct the election result for the top spot on the ballot paper, as it would have been if Diana Wallis had withdrawn after the votes were cast but before they were counted. Incidentally, this is how vacancies are handled for the STV parliamentary elections in Malta, which also tend to feature lots of candidates, but a very topheavy pattern of first preference votes. (Also Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory, and Cambridge Massachusetts.)Fortunately the order in which the losing candidates would have been excluded is the same as in the real election.
Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | Stage 5 | Stage 6 | Stage 7 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Prefs |
Exclusion of Veena Hudson |
Exclusion of Phil Kitchen |
Exclusion of Neil Poole |
Exclusion of Nader Fekri |
Exclusion of Jeanette Sunderland |
Exclusion of James Monaghan | |||||||
Stewart Arnold |
445 |
+14 |
459 |
+25 |
484 |
+24 |
508 |
+33 |
541 |
+38 |
579 |
+99 |
678 |
Nader Fekri |
125 |
+16 |
141 |
+13 |
154 |
+12 |
166 |
-166 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Veena Hudson |
73 |
-73 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Phil Kitchen |
89 |
+4 |
93 |
-93 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
James Monaghan |
235 |
+12 |
247 |
+12 |
259 |
+11 |
270 |
+18 |
288 |
+56 |
344 |
-344 |
– |
Neil Poole |
93 |
+3 |
96 |
+9 |
105 |
-105 |
– |
|
– |
|
– |
|
– |
Jeanette Sunderland |
158 |
+3 |
161 |
+12 |
173 |
+14 |
187 |
+32 |
219 |
-219 |
– |
|
– |
Rebecca Taylor |
238 |
+18 |
256 |
+17 |
273 |
+30 |
303 |
+61 |
364 |
+85 |
449 |
+175 |
624 |
Non-transferable |
0 |
+3 |
3 |
+6 |
9 |
+14 |
23 |
+22 |
45 |
+40 |
85 |
+60 |
155 |
Totals |
1456 |
|
1456 |
|
1456 |
|
1456 |
|
1456 |
|
1456 |
|
1456 |
Stage | |||
---|---|---|---|
7 | |||
Stewart Arnold | 678 | Elected | |
Rebecca Taylor | 624 | ||
Non-transferable | 155 | ||
Totals | 1456 |
The figures for the very last stage have a couple of other possible mathematical permutations, but would not change the fact that Stewart Arnold was the winner; I have gone for the one I thought most likely given the transfer patterns of earlier counts (where Rebecca Taylor had gained almost twice as many transfers).
It’s fairly clear then that the next spot on the list is Stewart Arnold’s, fair and square; and while I’m not going to grind through the calculations again (it’s more complex to work out the lower places from the information given), I would be astonished if the next spot down does not fall to Rebecca Taylor by a fairly clear margin over James Monaghan or any of the others.
The legal position is pretty clear. As outlined by Richard Gadsden, once the Returning Officer for Yorkshire and thr Humber is notified that that there is a vacancy, the RO contacts the next person on the list and gives them a deadline. If they have responded saying they want the job by the deadline, and they have the approval of the nominating officer of their party, then they become an MEP forthwith. Otherwise, once the deadline expires (or if they write back refusing the seat), the Returning Officer writes to the next person on the list and so on until the list is complete. (If the seat doesn’t get filled at all, then there is a by-election by region-wide FPTP. The seat cannot stay vacant for more than six months.
So legally the place is Stewart Arnold’s, if he wants it and if the party approves. (And the party ought to approve if he wants it; procedurally, he is completely entitled to take up the seat.) But things have moved on since the candidate selection of 2007, and the optics of an MEP handing their seat over to their spouse are, frankly, pretty disastrous. I feel very sorry for the three people most concerned, Diana Wallis, Stewart Arnold and Rebecca Taylor, all of whom I know and like, and I am certain that Diana Wallis will not have resigned her seat other than with a heavy heart and after deep reflection. But I hope that there will be mature consideration in Hull this weekend about what happens next.
For a couple of the ones I’ve ticked, I haven’t actually seen the whole film (e.g. because I came across it while channel-hopping), but I’ve seen a substantial enough proportion to feel I have a good familiarity with it.