February Books 19) Chicks Dig Time Lords, edited by Lynne M. Thomas and Tara O’Shea

I was unreasonably grumpy about having to order this book physically from a real bookshop last year. It was well worth going to some extra trouble to get hold of it. It’s a lovely collection of 27 essays by fans of Doctor Who, ranging from the gleeful to the mildly profound (as far as one can be in less than ten pages), ranging over various aspects of the fannish experience – watching the show, watching the show with your family (including one on what it feel like if your brother grows up to be Captain Jack Harkness, and two which caught at my heartstrings in which Who fans find themselves parenting children with special needs), conventions, fanzines, costuming, fan fiction, feminism, race, and lots and lots of references to Livejournal. Several of the contributors discuss how it was that New Who was more attractive to female fans than the ghosts of Old Who pre-2005, and I found it interesting at the time (and interesting again to review) how New Who’s success led to a revival of interest in Old Who and to it being appreciated and dissected in new ways.

I think I’ve only met one of the contributors – Kathryn Sullivan, who I was on a panel with at the 2005 Worldcon, and who writes here about fanzines – but I finished the book feeling tremendously warmed by a strong sense of community with the authors, and I strongly recommend it to anyone who is interested in Who of any period.

One thought on “February Books 19) Chicks Dig Time Lords, edited by Lynne M. Thomas and Tara O’Shea

  1. I just gave up on Vengence on Varos which felt pretty poor really, and prior to that they showed Earthshock which had pretty awful pacing in the first 2 episodes. I think that may have been a problem with trying to pace stories with so many companions.

    Paradise Towers I don’t really remember, although there is the Bonnie Langford issue there.

    Dragonfire I’d need to watch again.

    Remberance. I remembered being annoyed at the daylight thing when I saw it first time. The lack of reference to the Kennedy Assassination is lazy too. 1963 though? I think the NO IRISH stuff had definitely been left off in favour of other immigration? Wasn’t that more 1950s?

    Apart from that the pacing was excellent, some of the effects held up well, the general story hangs together and the breadcrumbs of the Cartmell Storyline were excellent.

Comments are closed.