One thought on “Links I found interesting for 29-07-2013”
I suspect it might be something closer to Proto-Celtic, as evidenced in early Gaulish inscriptions. Not much good evidence for a serious Q-Celtic presence in that area that early (unless you buy into diffusionism, which I don’t. I’m on the John Hines side of that debate.) If it was the south-west, then some Q-Celtic influence is more plausible, just about. But if people must do pan-Celticism (and I really, really, really wish they wouldn’t, then Proto-Celtic is the safest choice in fiction).
I suspect it might be something closer to Proto-Celtic, as evidenced in early Gaulish inscriptions. Not much good evidence for a serious Q-Celtic presence in that area that early (unless you buy into diffusionism, which I don’t. I’m on the John Hines side of that debate.) If it was the south-west, then some Q-Celtic influence is more plausible, just about. But if people must do pan-Celticism (and I really, really, really wish they wouldn’t, then Proto-Celtic is the safest choice in fiction).