Shakespeare was Shakespeare

There was a period when I wasted my precious spare time in debate on the true authorship of Shakespeare. (I’m particularly pleased with my killer arguments on Shakespeare’s knowledge of astrology/astronomy , the unlikelihood of Hamlet drawing from Sophocles, and the Bohemian coast.) Tom Veal now has written a long but worthwhile review of Scott McCrea’s The Case for Shakespeare, which basically should (but won’t) end the debate.

This entry was posted in Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Shakespeare was Shakespeare

  1. irishkate says:

    Excellent, another person I know will be there. That makes…um, 6.

    Should be good.

Comments are closed.