An update to my previous post, surveying the 2016 Hugo votes in viction categories published by bloggers. I think that one of the categories has a very clear winner. It's also clear that there is a serious Rabid Puppy attempt to generate a block vote, with two other bloggers (and who knows how many others) following the lead set by Vox Day (whose post I missed in my previous roundup).
Best Short Story
"Cat Pictures Please" has extended its lead, with literally twice as many votes as the rest combined.
“Cat Pictures Please” by Naomi Kritzer: 19½
No Award: 6
Space Raptor Butt Invasion by Chuck Tingle: 3
“Asymmetrical Warfare” by S. R. Algernon: 1
“Seven Kill Tiger” by Charles Shao: ½
“If You Were an Award, My Love” by Juan Tabo and S. Harris: 0
Best Novelette
"Obits" has overtaken "And You Shall Know Her by the Trail of Dead" for second place, partly due to the Puppy vote.
“Folding Beijing” by Hao Jingfang, trans. Ken Liu: 14½
“Obits” by Stephen King: 8
“And You Shall Know Her by the Trail of Dead” by Brooke Bolander: 7½
No Award: 1
“Flashpoint: Titan” by Cheah Kai Wai: 0
“What Price Humanity?” by David VanDyke: 0
Best Novella
Binti has extended its lead as well, but Penric's Demon has a good second place (with Puppy help).
Binti by Nnedi Okorafor: 15
Penric’s Demon by Lois McMaster Bujold: 8
Perfect State by Brandon Sanderson: 4
Slow Bullets by Alastair Reynolds: 2
The Builders by Daniel Polansky: 0
Best Novel
Brandon Kempner predicts that Uprooted will win. It also has Puppy support. However, The Fifth Season has extended its lead in my survey. Down the table, Seveneves has overtake Ancillary Mercy for third place.
The Fifth Season by N.K. Jemisin: 10⅓
Uprooted by Naomi Novik: 6⅓
Seveneves by Neal Stephenson: 4
Ancillary Mercy by Ann Leckie: 3⅓
The Cinder Spires: The Aeronaut’s Windlass by Jim Butcher: 0
Unfortunately I'll be on the road from Thursday to Sunday next week, so I probably won't be able to post my usual instant analysis of Hugo and Retro-Hugo results. Y'all have fun with out me, you hear?
One of the things that I’ve found fascinating this last year – having started reading several Doctor Who review/commentary sites – is the total lack of consistency of what is ‘good Who’ and what is ‘bad Who’.
For example, Sandifer and his commenters generally regard the Lawrence Miles-conceived parts of the Faction Paradox stories to be brilliantly clever and original and The Ancestor Cell to be an abomination that completely ruins the concept, while others think…differently.