Linkspam for 26-6-2009

One thought on “Linkspam for 26-6-2009

  1. My turn to apologise for slow response – it has been a busy couple of days.

    I accept your apology. We will have to agree to differ about the extent to which the report’s findings are valid. If you read all my entries you will see my take on Saville’s approach to the evidence in general and Martin McGuinness in particular. But I guess we must leave it there.

Comments are closed.