Anyone out there likely to go to WorldCon in August, not yet sorted for accommodation, and interested in a joint venture? I’m going on my own, and had in mind to look for a mid-range B&B close to a railway station, but am open to persuasion about other options.
Monthly Archives: January 2005
Julius Caesar
I’m reading Suetonius’ The Twelve Caesars at the moment, which starts with a bang with a fifty page biography of Julius Caesar. I realise how desensitised I have become to this remarkable story through too much grinding over the text of Shakespeare’s play at school. Caesar broke every law and custom of correct political practice in Rome; he shagged more or less anything that moved, male or female; but he was (and not just by Suetonius’ account) a talented military leader and gifted orator who inspired and reciprocated a strong sense of loyalty from his followers.
But the most dramatic bit of the story is the
The Interests Meme: More Answers
Quote
Hah, the Washington Times quoted me today.
Another nice link
From
Nebula nominations
On-line here, at
The Interests Meme: Answers
And I’ll remind those of you who haven’t done so that if you’ve asked a question, you’re supposed to post this meme in your own journal as well.
Interests meme
From
Scan my interest list and pick out the one that seems the most odd to you.
I’ll explain it.
Then you post this in your journal so other people can ask you about your interests.
Going the long way round
LJ outage – the best comment
here.
Meme
Farah Mendlesohn’s survey of what SF I read as a child, following on from coalescent here, papersky here, and yhlee here.
1. Name Nicholas Whyte
2. Current Age 37
3. Country or Countries in which you spent your first eighteen years. (give breakdown if appropriate) UK, apart from one year in the USA and one year in the Netherlands
4. Mother tongue. English
5. Sex at birth Male
6. Sex now. Male
7. Sexuality. Hetero
8. When did you start reading science fiction? Probably about as soon as I could read. Some things you can fix – for instance, I know I read the Narnia books when we were living in America, and I would have been six. Others, such as Le Guin or Heinlein, I just don’t remember when I started reading them but it was early.
9. Did you read sf written specifically for children? (ie. age 0-16yrs) Yes.
10. Name up to five authors of sf for children you liked. As named above: Lewis, Le Guin, Heinlein; also Nicholas Fisk, John Christopher. Am I allowed a sixth? If so it would be Diana Wynne Jones. If a seventh, it would be TH White – not just the Arthurian books but also The Master.
11. Name up to five authors of sf for children you did not like. Can’t think of any.
12. Name up to five authors of sf for children with the same nationality as the country in which you experienced the bulk of your reading childhood. If we mean UK writ large, then Lewis, Fisk, Christopher, Wynne Jones and White from the list above. If I go the other side of the border, the choices are fewer: Pat O’Shea, James Stephens, Eoin Colfer. Looking at my Irish sf list, I can add Cathal Ó Sándair and Darryl Sloan but that’s stretching Ireland a wee bit as well.
13. If you started reading sf meant for the adult audience before the age of 16, who were your favourite sf writers at that time? (Name up to five). Roger Zelazny; Arthur C Clarke; Isaac Asimov; Douglas Adams.
14. List up to five qualities that you think you looked for in science fiction when you read it as a child (under 13). Sensawunda. Writing that clearly showed a particular character’s viewpoint.
15. List up to five qualities that you think you looked for in science fiction when you read it as a teenager (13 and over). Sensawunda again. Political attitudes that challenged the received wisdom (of my heavily Catholic environment). Beautiful descriptive writing. Plot
16. List up to five qualities that you look for in science fiction now. Plot. Characterisation. Politics. Coherent writing.
17. Do you define yourself as a genre reader? Yes.
18. What proportion of your reading as a teenager was outside of the genre? Of my fiction reading, very little; perhaps 10-15%. I read a lot of non-fiction too though.
19. What proportion of your reading as a teenager was non-fiction? (what subjects or genres?) Aha. Probably about 30% or so. Mostly astronomy but a certain amount of history and politics, and also some light occult (if that is the right term): dowsing, ley lines, astrology.
20. How much of your reading outside of the genre was set by others? (and who were they?). Very little. We had several good local libraries and I was very self-directed.
21. Did science fiction influence your political views? In what ways? What books were most important to you? I think sf encouraged me to question received certainties, and to think that the world needn’t be as it is, that it can be changed. I work in politics and do find my sf readings feed into my thoughts about my day job, and vice versa. As to specifics: I think Robert Silverberg’s and Brian Aldiss’s approach to sexual politics informed my own thoughts most strongly; not that I necessarily agree with them, but my opinions are more firmly rooted as a result of having read them. And I think for someone graowing up in Belfast, there is a certain universalism about the sf view that pointed out how petty our local concerns were. (So, in that case, why did I stand for election in 1996 in the one part of Northern Ireland that suffered more than anywhere else in the Troubles? Good question, but I only got 4.1% of the votes!)
22. Did science fiction influence your religious views? In what ways? What books were most important to you? Apart from approaches to sexuality as noted above, not really (I’d define myself as a liberal Catholic now). I’ve found sf’s approaches to religion on the whole disappointing, with the exception of Philip K Dick, and I think he is really writing about consciousness.
23. Taking no more than 100 words, describe briefly how you chose books between the ages of 13 and 18, and how those books were acquired (ie libraries, friends, second hand books, new books). Mainly from the library, with a certain amount of buying for myself, or reading my brother’s books. Selected mainly on the basis of attractive covers – or else the yellow Gollancz ones!
Hmm, I’ve left out the influence of Doctor Who; think about that another day…
Fundraising for tsunami victims in Dublin
The Oxfam Bookshop on Parliament St is having a table quiz on January 27th at 8pm in the Teachers Club on Parnell Square. A reliable source tells me that “There will be prizes and questions to suit all tastes on the night, and the usual cut-throat ambience you only get at a table quiz.” Tables cost €30 and you can have a maximum of five people per table.
Basic flying rules
- Try to stay in the middle of the air.
- Do not go near the edges of it.
- The edges of the air can be recognized by the appearance of ground, buildings, sea, trees and interstellar space. It is much more difficult to fly there.
According to NASA.
Thanks to
January Books 5) Dangerous Visions
5) Dangerous Visions, ed. Harlan Ellison
Tried emailing this to LJ as well, but no sign of it. Meantime I posted the gist of it also to a relevant thread on RASFW.
I’ve bought and reread this because the next story on my list of joint Hugo and Nebula winners is in it, and also in the name of my continuing sfnal education. It’s a great collection, 33 stories, the majority of them still fresh.
However, only the Anderson and the Sturgeon stories still qualify as “dangerous”; although homosexuality is now much less of a taboo subject than when Anderson wrote, his portrayal of it in the context of a clash of cultures I think remains valid. Likewise Sturgeon’s portrayal of incest, though that if anything is probably even more of a taboo than it was in 1967.
Perhaps my brain has turned to mush, but I found both the Farmer and Emshwiller stories incomprehensible.
I’d classify the Del Rey, Hensley, and Knight stories as of the “Shaggy God” category, along with the Brand; making points about religion and/or God that seem pretty trivial now, but perhaps were more “dangerous” at the time of writing. Perhaps I have just been spoiled by Philip Pullman.
I would rate the Aldiss, Ballard, Brunner, Delany, Dick, Lafferty, Leiber, Pohl, Sladek, Spinrad and Zelazny stories as good to excellent samples of their writing, if not necessarily “dangerous”. I also thought the Bunch, “Cross”, Dorman, Eisenberg, and Rodman stories were pretty good though I’m less familiar with the authors’ oeuvres (indeed the various databases assert that these were the only sf short stories ever published by “Cross” and Rodman, though both published other material).
I did not enjoy the Silverberg and DeFord stories (which both turned out to be about the same future development in the criminal justice system), nor the Bloch/Ellison riffs on Jack the Ripper, because the violence was too gratuitously nasty for my taste.
I thought the Laumer, Neville, Niven and Slesar stories were very weak, taking in each case a silly premise and then failing to do much with it. Actually the Niven is promising enough for most of its length but is then killed by the punchline.
But basically, money well spent. The standout stories for me were Howard Rodman’s “The Doll’s House”, Anderson’s “Eutopia” and Dick’s “Faith of Our Fathers”.
January Books 4) Altered Carbon
4) Altered Carbon, by Richard Morgan
I actually finished this several days ago but have been so busy working on Kosovo that I can only now gather my thoughts. And livejournal having been down I tried submitting by email, twice, but it doesn’t seem to have worked. Anyway…
This is great fun. I did a little research on the sfnal pedigree of the key concept of human personalities being stored electronically and then reincarnated a few months ago. Here Richard Morgan takes the idea and puts it into a James Ellroy settling a few centuries into the future. It’s a little reminiscent of David Brin’s Kiln People or going further back Zelazny’s Isle of the Dead, but much better than either.
Lots of nasty violence and a couple of graphic sex scenes which won’t be to everyone’s taste, but I thought it was artistically justified. I have to object to one pedantic point – we are told that our narrator’s surname, Kovacs, is correctly pronounced with a “Slavic tch“. As those of us who deal with the remnants of the Habsburg empire know, the Slavic version of the sound is spelt cz, č or at a stretch ć; cs is clearly not Slavic but Magyar, and Kovacs is Hungarian for Smith. But this is great fun.
Bloggers born the same day as me
Trish Doller,
Andreas Gantenbein (on a break)
Titan stories
Posted these a while back but in the current state of LiveJournal who knows…
- Roger Zelazny’s short short story “The Bands of Titan”
- Kurt Vonnegut’s The Sirens of Titan
- Arthur C Clarke’s underrated Imperial Earth
- Greg Benford and Gordon Eklund’s over-rated If The Stars Are Gods
- John Varley’s eponymous trilogy
- Stephen Baxter, Titan
- Philip K Dick, The Game Players of Titan
- Edmond Hamilton, [Captain Future and] The Harpers of Titan
- James Patrick Hogan, Code of the Lifemaker
- Alan E Nourse, Trouble on Titan
- Ben Bova, As on a Darkling Plain
- Manley Wade Wellman, Sojarr of Titan
Also of course there’s the infamous film Saturn 3, with screenplay by Martin Amis of all people, starring Kirk Douglas, Harvey Keitel and Farrah Fawcett.
Birthdays
Hilarious
Stories from Pepys
So home to dinner, and in the afternoon to the office, and so to Sir W. Batten’s, where in discourse I heard the custom of the election of the Dukes of Genoa, who for two years are every day attended in the greatest state; and four or five hundred men always waiting upon him as a king; and when the two years are out, and another is chose, a messenger is, sent to him, who stands at the bottom of the stairs, and he at the top, and says, “Va. Illustrissima Serenita sta finita, et puede andar en casa.”—”Your serenity is now ended; and now you may be going home,” and so claps on his hat. And the old Duke (having by custom sent his goods home before), walks away, it may be but with one man at his heels; and the new one brought immediately in his room, in the greatest state in the world.
Another account was told us, how in the Dukedom of Ragusa, in the Adriatique (a State that is little, but more ancient, they say, than Venice, and is called the mother of Venice, and the Turks lie round about it), that they change all the officers of their guard, for fear of conspiracy, every twenty-four hours, so that nobody knows who shall be captain of the guard to-night; but two men come to a man, and lay hold of him as a prisoner, and carry him to the place; and there he hath the keys of the garrison given him, and he presently issues his orders for that night’s watch: and so always from night to night. Sir Win. Rider told the first of his own knowledge; and both he and Sir W. Batten confirm the last.
Ragusa is of course better known these days as Dubrovnik.
Blast from the past
Doing a bit of research on the Austrian State Treaty of 1955, I just came across the transcript of one of President Truman’s press conferences, and it’s surprisingly funny; Truman, obviously slightly deaf (or perhaps just suffering from poor acoustics), but entirely relaxed about just saying “I can’t answer that question”, “I have no comment”, or “I am not making any statement this morning”. Some particular jewels:
Q. Mr. President, I never know how to spell anybody’s name. Walter J. Donnelly, how does he spell it?
THE PRESIDENT. Well, I will spell it for you–D-o-n-n-e-l-l-y. You know how to spell “Walter,” don’t you?
On correspondence with congressmen:
Q: I understand that you recently received a letter from Congressman Cole of Kansas, relative to an RFC loan to Lustron, calling your attention to that. I wonder if you have any comment?
THE PRESIDENT. I have received no such letter. It is customary for Congressmen, when they are running for office, to write letters to the President and give them to the press long before he ever receives them.
And finally, showing a sensible attitude about delegating responsibilities:
Q. Mr. President, will the Secretary of State go to New York to attend the General Assembly meeting?
THE PRESIDENT. I have an idea that the Secretary of State will be there on occasion, if it is necessary. He is not a delegate necessarily, but he is always welcome if he wants to go there. He has my permission to go, if he wants to.
It’s particularly interesting to compare the crisp style of Truman’s delivery with the incumbent. Though to be honest I think it’s as much as anything a change in the habits of public presentation over the last fifty years; I’m sure Clinton’s press conferences, if I could be bothered to find the transcripts, would have a much stronger resemblance to Bush’s than Truman’s in style.
My only personal encounter with this kind of thing was at the time of President Clinton’s visit to Belfast in November 1995. I was one of the 2,000 or so invited to the audience for his morning speech at Mackie’s, and then was outside the City Hall for his turning on the Christmas lights that evening. I’ll always remember his historic words:
I got a letter from 13-year-old Ryan from Belfast. Now, Ryan, if you’re out in the crowd tonight, here’s the answer to your question. No, as far as I know, an alien spacecraft did not crash in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. And, Ryan, if the United States Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn’t tell me about it, either, and I want to know.
Shakespearean Looneations
The Joe Gordon saga
Did you hear the one about the guy who blogged about his workplace? He wrote about it here. Or you may have read about it here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, or here.
I have slightly mixed feelings. I work in a much more politically sensitive job than Joe Gordon did, so you won’t read me referring to my employers in quite the way he did, even in friends-locked posts, and I’ll try to avoid mentioning them explicitly at all; but at the same time, if any of my colleagues were to object to anything I’d written here, I would hope they would give me the chance to simply amend or delete in recognition of their sensibilities before they resorted to such drastic action. I think Waterstone’s action has brought them into much more disrepute than anything written by Joe Gordon, and therefore I will not buy books from them in future.
Bad news / good news
Bad news: Dave Barry has filed his last weekly column. (bugmenot)
Good news (for me anyway): My new copy of Dangerous Visions has arrived.
Tsunami child
I don’t know if anyone else has been getting the messages about the two-year-old in Phuket hospital, found near Khoa Lak. I’ve received them from a) a PR consultant in Brussels, b) a work colleague, c) a NATO mission in the Balkans and d) a presidential adviser in a different Balkan country (these last two only this afternoon, as people come back from Orthodox Christmas holidays I suppose).
The good news is that the child’s family has indeed been identified – see http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/children/hannes.asp (not working last time I checked) and http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6766709/ for more details. Unfortunately the mother is still missing.
One lesson here is that the family was actually identified as early as 29 December, and I’m still getting emails about it almost two weeks later. It’s always always worth checking out such emails with a quick google to see if someone has already solved the problem. And as a general rule, if you get an email asking you to forward it to everyone you know, it is never a good idea to do so.
ljArchive
I’m not too worried about the recent takeover of LiveJournal, but it has inspired me to install ljArchive and I’ve been having fun playing with it. My thousandth post was my review of England Swings SF, earlier this afternoon. My most used words (common words excluded) are:
2. political
3. president
4. ireland
5. european
6. election
7. list
8. john (mainly from lists of books and authors, with some help from the recent US election)
9. report
10. fiction
11. interesting
12. office
13. published
14. elections (combined with “election” would be far ahead of “actually”)
15. minister
16. today
17. stories
18. kosovo
19. someone
20. later
Alas, I can’t get the exciting sounding “regressive imagery analysis” to work.
Science Fiction and Fantasy
“The relationship between science fiction and fantasy is difficult and topically important. At present, there’s a good deal of serious dissension among sf writers, especially in the Science Fiction Writers’ Association of America. Obviously many readers of sf are attracted to it because it performs the same operation as fantasy—it provides Recovery and Escape and wonder. But when they invoke the word ‘Science,’ and use an element of scientific knowledge (very variable, sometimes, in scope and accuracy) authors nowadays are more easily able to produce suspension of disbelief. The legendary laboratory ‘professor’ has replaced the wizard.”
Who do you think said this, in an interview in 1966?
January Books 3) England Swings SF
3) England Swings SF, ed. Judith Merril
This was one of the influential sf anthologies of that long ago time, the 1960s, being Judith Merril’s project of familiarising an American audience with the British sf authors of the New Wave. I spotted it with glee in Boston in October, but also it fits in with my planned re-reading of the other rival great 60’s anthology, Dangerous Visions (supposedly even now on its way to me from the book dealer).
It would be very easy to make fun of this book. The gutter is too narrow, especially given the experimental placing of some of the margins. Some of the stories are very bad. One author admits that to write his story “I had to draw in some places on my acid/pot experiences as I think you will detect”. The introduction is earnest and breathless:
Introduction
You have never read a book like this before, and the next time you read one anything like it, it won’t be much at all.
It’s an action-photo, a record of process-in-change,
a look through the perspex porthole at the
momentarily stilled bodies in a scout ship boosting
fast, and heading out of sight into the multiplex mystery of inner/outer space.
I can’t tell you where they’re going, but
maybe that’s why I keep wanting to read what they write. The next time someone assembles the work of the writers in this – well, ‘school’ is too formal
… and ‘movement’ sounds pretentious…
and ‘British sf’ is ludicrously limiting –
so let’s just say, the work of these writers and/or others now setting out to work in this way,
it will probably have about as much resemblance to this anthology as this one does to any other collection of science fiction, social criticism,
surrealism – BEM’s, Beats, Beatles, what-have-you –
you have ever read or heard before. Meanwhile,
I think this trip should be a good one.
Judith Merril
Some of the authors have disappeared with little trace: the stories of “John Calder” and John Clark here apparently represent their only published work; the output of Michael Hamburger, Michael Butterworth, Bill Butler, Roger Jones, and Graham Hall has been pretty minimal.
However there are some fascinatong pieces as well: Kyril Bonfiglioli’s only recorded sf story (that is, recorded by ISFDB and Contento, though
Back
Had a good wander around the Trastevere district last night. I went to Mass in Santa Maria in Trastevere, which is also the base of the Sant’Egidio community who are of course of professional interest. Then I managed to locate the church of San Pietro in Montorio, way up on a hill behind the trendy streets nearer the river, where the tombs of the Earls are located. The church appears to be part of the Spanish Embassy complex of buildings, and by the time I got there it was closed (and I didn’t think it was appropriate to disturb the couple in the car parked outside the door) but at least I know where to go next time I’m in Rome and have time. Nice dinner in one of the many restaurants on Via della Lungaretta, reading England Swings SF. And so to bed, as the man says.
Then I had to get up early at *mumble* o’clock to get the 0720 flight, but the advantage is that I’ve got the whole weekend at home with the family, including my mother who is visiting. More later.
Rome conference
Have spent all day in Rome at a conference; there were only eleven of us, all males, and the food was not very impressive though the debate was good. Everyone else has other plans this evening so I am enjoying a walk around in the mild January twilight. And of course some updating of livejournal.