30 Days of Shakespeare: Day 16 – the first play you saw

I reported in an earlier entry that it was Hamlet, but on reflection that was wrong; it was a school production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream in 1979 when I was 12. My friend Padraig played the little Indian boy, in blackface. Those were different times.

The 30 days:
Day #1: Your favourite play
Day #2: Your favourite character
Day #3: Your favourite hero
Day #4: Your favourite heroine
Day #5: Your favourite villain
Day #6: Your favourite villainess
Day #7: Your favourite clown
Day #8: Your favourite comedy
Day #9: Your favourite tragedy
Day #10: Your favourite history
Day #11: Your least favourite play
Day #12: Your favourite scene
Day #13: Your favourite romantic scene
Day #14: Your favourite fight scene
Day #15: The first play you read
Day #16: Your first play you saw
Day #17: Your favourite speech
Day #18: Your favourite dialogue
Day #19: Your favourite movie version of a play
Day #20: Your favourite movie adaptation of a play
Day #21: An overrated play
Day #22: An underrated play
Day #23: A role you've never played but would love to play
Day #24: An actor or actress you would love to see in a particular role
Day #25: Sooner or later, everyone has to choose: Hal or Falstaff?
Day #26: Your favourite couple
Day #27: Your favourite couplet
Day #28: Your favourite joke
Day #29: Your favourite sonnet
Day #30: Your favourite single line

Posted in Uncategorised

Thing Explainer, by Randall Munroe

Second paragraph of third page (which is about a Heavy Metal Power Building):

Some of the metals they use can be found in the ground, but only in a few places. Other kinds can be made by people – but only with the help of a power building that’s already running.

About three years ago, Munroe (or possibly his fans) originated a meme where you had to describe your job using only the thousand most common words in English. I had a go; since then I’ve changed jobs, and now I would simply say that:

People pay me to tell their stories to important people who can help them.

Thing Explainer is in a way a one-joke book, about how we can break down complex questions into simple words. But it’s a brilliant challenge to any of us who use words for a living, which is probably most of you reading this, to keep our writing and speaking clear and simple, and not try to sound clever by using long words which we and our listeners may not completely understand. Some of Thing Explainer is a bit contrived – the technical explanations of machinery sometimes dumb down (though the nuclear power station is a good counterexample) and the cutesy interpretations of space probe names are not really very enlightening; but other bits are very impressive, my favourite being the United States Constitution, “The Laws of the Land”:

BEFORE WE START

Hi; we’re the people in these little countries called “states,” and we want to get together into a country. We want to make everything nice and quiet, keep anyone from hurting us, and make sure our kids will be free. That’s why we’re making a country. Here are its laws:

BOOK ONE: The Law Makers

Part One: Laws are made by a group called Law Makers. There are two rooms of Law Makers: the House and the Serious Room.

Part Two: The people pick Law Makers to send to the House for two years at a time. Bigger states get to have more people in the House. Oh, and the country needs to count its people sometimes so it can figure out how many chairs the room needs.

Part Three: Every state sends two Law Makers to the Serious Room for six years at a time. They can’t be too young.

Part Four: States make the laws about where and how people get together to pick leaders and decide what the country should do.

Part Five: When the Law Makers get together, they should write down what they talk about.

Part Six: Law Makers get paid. They can’t get in trouble for what they say at work, but they also can’t do any other job for the country while they’re Law Makers.

And so on. The geology bits are also pretty lovely, exploiting Munroe’s gift for illustration to the full. If you’re a fan of xkcd, this is a bit different and yet similar.

This rose simultaneously to the top of two of my lists: non-fiction as recommended by you guys, and graphic stories in English. The next book on the first list is The Cuckoo’s Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage, by Cliff Stoll; the next on the second is The Unwritten Vol. 6: Tommy Taylor and the War of Words, by Mike Carey.

30 Days of Shakespeare: Day 15 – the first play you read

Romeo and Juliet, taught in my English class in Belfast, the year I turned 12. Oddly enough I am back in Belfast this evening. We performed Act 3 scene 1, and I won a prize for acting Mercutio.

The 30 days:
Day #1: Your favourite play
Day #2: Your favourite character
Day #3: Your favourite hero
Day #4: Your favourite heroine
Day #5: Your favourite villain
Day #6: Your favourite villainess
Day #7: Your favourite clown
Day #8: Your favourite comedy
Day #9: Your favourite tragedy
Day #10: Your favourite history
Day #11: Your least favourite play
Day #12: Your favourite scene
Day #13: Your favourite romantic scene
Day #14: Your favourite fight scene
Day #15: The first play you read
Day #16: Your first play you saw
Day #17: Your favourite speech
Day #18: Your favourite dialogue
Day #19: Your favourite movie version of a play
Day #20: Your favourite movie adaptation of a play
Day #21: An overrated play
Day #22: An underrated play
Day #23: A role you've never played but would love to play
Day #24: An actor or actress you would love to see in a particular role
Day #25: Sooner or later, everyone has to choose: Hal or Falstaff?
Day #26: Your favourite couple
Day #27: Your favourite couplet
Day #28: Your favourite joke
Day #29: Your favourite sonnet
Day #30: Your favourite single line

Posted in Uncategorised

1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus, by Charles C. Mann

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Dobyns belonged to a research team led by his doctoral advisor, Allan R. Holmberg of Cornell, the Holmberg after whom I have unkindly named Holmberg’s mistake. Holmberg had persuaded Cornell to let him lease an old colonial estate in rural Peru (the Carnegie Corporation, a charitable foundation despite its name, provided the funds). The estate included an entire village, whose inhabitants, most of them Indian, were its sharecroppers. @It was really a form of serfdom,” Dobyns told me in a long conversation shortly before his death in 2009. “The villagers were just heartbreakingly poor.” Holmberg planned to test strategies for raising their incomes. Because land tenure was a contentious issue in Peru, he had asked Dobyns to finalize the lease and learn more about the estate’s history. With his adjutants, Dobyns visited a dozen archives, including those in the cathedral.

I got interested in this book from an extract that I reported in November, What really happened on Thanksgiving, which told the story of the Pilgrim Fathers from the Indians’ point of view: these incompetent Europeans arrived in a fertile area recently depopulated by plague, and eventually were co-opted by the locals into existing power struggles. It’s a really solid book, based on extensive research and reporting scholarly disputes and the evolution of interpretations of the evidence, combined with anecdata of Mann’s own encounters with both researchers and the descendants of the researched. (Incidentally, he reports that the latter generally identify with and use the term “Indians” to refer to themselves, so he follows their lead.)

I took three main points away from the book. First, that the series of plagues inflicted on the peoples of the Americas by Europeans was one of the most catastrophic events in human history. The lowest estimate of population decrease due to disease in what is now Latin America (home to two large and well-developed polities) in the 16th century is a whopping 90%. Disease spread much faster than Europeans, who often arrived (like the Pilgrims) into territory where the indigenous human activity had simply died off. It’s difficult to grasp the scale of the catastrophe.

Second, immense amounts of important human culture have therefore simply been lost. I was aware of the fact that only four Mayan manuscripts survive. I wasn’t aware that there are also eight from the Ñudzahui (Mixtec) culture, including the brilliant story of 8-Deer Jaguar Claw, which is surely ready for dramatization. I had certainly never heard of the Cahokia Mounds, in southern Illinois just across the Mississippi from St Louis, Missouri, which sound utterly fantastic. So little is known; so much has been destroyed.

Third, Mann makes the daring suggestion that American concepts of liberty and freedom actually owe much more to the influence of the Haudenosaunee confederacy (aka the Iroquois) than is generally relised. He quotes John Adams reminiscing about his relationship with local Indian chiefs in mid-18th-century Massachusetts, and points out that the ideals of personal freedom from oppression were practiced much more by Indians than by Europeans. He goes a step further, and wonders if it’s coincidence that slavery was generally practiced by Indians south of what became the Mason-Dixon line, but not by those to its north. I’m not sure about the latter point, but the rest of it is a very attractive concept.

Anyway, a book that thoroughly illuminated my own ignorance.

This book came simultaneously to the top of three of my reading lists: books acquired in 2015, unread non-fiction, and non-fiction recommended by you guys. The next book in both the first and second of those categories is The 4-Hour Workweek, by Timothy Ferriss; the next in the third was Thing Explainer, by Randall Munro, which I have since read and will report on shortly.

Posted in Uncategorised

The man with three passports

I've just been to the town hall to pick up my Belgian passport. This gives me a grand total of three. Article 1(vi) of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement recognises my right to both British and Irish citizenship; I also acquired Belgian citizenship back in 2008, but had not bothered getting a passport until today. (Neither the British nor Irish object to you acquiring Belgian citizenship; nor does Belgium require you to give up your previous citizenship before becoming Belgian).

So here are my three passports, showing signs of age (on two of the passports themselves, and in the photograph on the third).


I must say I'm fundamentally a bit libertarian about nationalities. It seems to me that if I want citizenship of a country, and they are prepared to grant it to me, it's not really anyone's business whether I am also a citizen of anywhere else. I'm glad that the UK, Ireland and Belgium are relaxed about this. And if the UK ever does leave the EU, I have not one but two backups.

Posted in Uncategorised

Interesting Links for 04-05-2016

Posted in Uncategorised

30 Days of Shakespeare: Day 14 – your favourite fight scene

It's a close run between this and the play I'm going to talk about tomorrow, but I think the end of Macbeth has it. It combines a strong dramatic closure to the violence of Macbeth's story with the punchline about Macduff. It's also the root of the Ngaio Marsh novel, Light Thickens, which I mentioned earlier.

Macbeth: Of all men else I have avoided thee:
But get thee back; my soul is too much charged
With blood of thine already.
Macduff: I have no words:
My voice is in my sword: thou bloodier villain
Than terms can give thee out!
[They fight]
Macbeth: Thou losest labour:
As easy mayst thou the intrenchant air
With thy keen sword impress as make me bleed:
Let fall thy blade on vulnerable crests;
I bear a charmed life, which must not yield,
To one of woman born.
Macduff: Despair thy charm;
And let the angel whom thou still hast served
Tell thee, Macduff was from his mother's womb
Untimely ripp'd.
Macbeth: Accursed be that tongue that tells me so,
For it hath cow'd my better part of man!
And be these juggling fiends no more believed,
That palter with us in a double sense;
That keep the word of promise to our ear,
And break it to our hope. I'll not fight with thee.
Macduff: Then yield thee, coward,
And live to be the show and gaze o' the time:
We'll have thee, as our rarer monsters are,
Painted on a pole, and underwrit,
'Here may you see the tyrant.'
Macbeth: I will not yield,
To kiss the ground before young Malcolm's feet,
And to be baited with the rabble's curse.
Though Birnam wood be come to Dunsinane,
And thou opposed, being of no woman born,
Yet I will try the last. Before my body
I throw my warlike shield. Lay on, Macduff,
And damn'd be him that first cries, 'Hold, enough!'
[Exeunt, fighting. Alarums]

Here's Patrick Stewart, being brutally killed by Michael Feast in a Stalinist version of eleventh-century Scotland. It’s pretty graphic.

The 30 days:
Day #1: Your favourite play
Day #2: Your favourite character
Day #3: Your favourite hero
Day #4: Your favourite heroine
Day #5: Your favourite villain
Day #6: Your favourite villainess
Day #7: Your favourite clown
Day #8: Your favourite comedy
Day #9: Your favourite tragedy
Day #10: Your favourite history
Day #11: Your least favourite play
Day #12: Your favourite scene
Day #13: Your favourite romantic scene
Day #14: Your favourite fight scene
Day #15: The first play you read
Day #16: Your first play you saw
Day #17: Your favourite speech
Day #18: Your favourite dialogue
Day #19: Your favourite movie version of a play
Day #20: Your favourite movie adaptation of a play
Day #21: An overrated play
Day #22: An underrated play
Day #23: A role you've never played but would love to play
Day #24: An actor or actress you would love to see in a particular role
Day #25: Sooner or later, everyone has to choose: Hal or Falstaff?
Day #26: Your favourite couple
Day #27: Your favourite couplet
Day #28: Your favourite joke
Day #29: Your favourite sonnet
Day #30: Your favourite single line

Posted in Uncategorised

JN-T: The Life and Scandalous Times of John Nathan-Turner, by Richard Marson

Second to fourth paragraphs of third chapter:

John [Nathan-Turner], never backward in coming forward, took advantage of tis to lobby [Bill] Slater about his aspirations to produce. “One day, during an annual interview,” he recalled in his memoirs, “I restated my ambition yet again. ‘Well, if you’re serious, you’d better learn the PUM’s job [Production Unit Manager] by doing it, then the script editor’s job, then we’ll talk again.’
‘When do I start?’
‘Tomorrow, as far as I’m concerned.’

There is no more controversial figure in the history of Doctor Who than John Nathan-Turner, the show’s producer for the last 11 years years of its first run. And, apart from the man himself, there can surely be few better qualified to write about it than Richard Marson, who cut his teeth as a teenage correspondent for Doctor Who Magazine and then went into television production himself. On the strength of this I went out and bought Marson’s biography of Verity Lambert.

It’s a very good biography, portraying its central character warts and all, through his own interviews, interviews with others at the time, interviews with his co-workers and friends and lovers specially for the biography (Peter Davison comes across as a particularly thoughtful commentator on Nathan-Turner, Doctor Who and what was really going on), and the copious documentary evidence that is available from various sources. It’s difficult to imagine anyone doing a better job (or indeed wanting to).

As in his own memoirs, JN-T comes across as a gifted but flawed character. He was addicted to spectacle and activity rather than plot, characterisation or reflection; without really trusting them sufficiently he relied too much on his script editors, the longest-serving of whom, Eric Saward, savagely and viciously turned on him. He was usually drunk by the afternoon and often bad-tempered (perhaps not unconnected). Some blame must attach to the BBC hierarchy, who could find nobody else to take on Doctor Who, and could find no other use for him, leaving both to slowly spiral into decline.

In a couple of memorable passages, Marson catalogues the sexual interactions between JN-T, his partner Gary Downie, and male fans in their late teens and early 20s. It’s clear that neither was a predator on the scale of Jimmy Savile, and also that Downie was a much more unpleasant character than JN-T. But, while one can have sympathy for the fact that the homosexual age of consent was still 21 until 1994, one can’t have much sympathy for JN-T’s exploitation of the relationship he had with enthusiastic young men, and even less so with Downie whose behaviour sounds like it crossed the line of what would be legal today (this is my view; Marson doesn’t seem to think so).

Marson’s forensic analysis of what actually happened during the Great Cancellation Crisis of 1986 is surely going to be the classic account; he recounts what happened in the last week of February 1985 almost hour by hour, JN-T stuck at a convention in America as the story raced out of control behind him. He also has a decently brief but clear account of the circumstances of Patrick Troughton’s demise. And the story of JN-T’s decline into ill health and early death (at 54, on 1 May 2002) is a very sad one of talent misdirected and eventually wasted.

Most of this book will only be really interesting to Who fans, because Doctor Who took up most of JN-T’s career (he was hired by the BBC in 1968, and worked on Doctor Who almost continuously from 1977 until he was fired in 1990). But I think there are some wider lessons as well, about the shift of BBC internal culture leaving some people behind who were not ready for change, about the interactions between show-runners and fans, and about the ways in which creativity can be a curse to individual creators.

Posted in Uncategorised

Interesting Links for 03-05-2016

Posted in Uncategorised

30 Days of Shakespeare: Day 13 – your favourite romantic scene

It's a skeevy play in some ways, but I do like the end of Much Ado About Nothing:

Benedick: Which is Beatrice?
Beatrice: [Unmasking] I answer to that name. What is your will?
Benedick: Do not you love me?
Beatrice: Why, no; no more than reason.
Benedick: Why, then your uncle and the prince and Claudio
Have been deceived; they swore you did.
Beatrice: Do not you love me?
Benedick: Troth, no; no more than reason.
Beatrice: Why, then my cousin Margaret and Ursula
Are much deceived; for they did swear you did.
Benedick: They swore that you were almost sick for me.
Beatrice: They swore that you were well-nigh dead for me.
Benedick: 'Tis no such matter. Then you do not love me?
Beatrice: No, truly, but in friendly recompense.
Leonato: Come, cousin, I am sure you love the gentleman.
Claudio: And I'll be sworn upon't that he loves her;
For here's a paper written in his hand,
A halting sonnet of his own pure brain,
Fashion'd to Beatrice.
Hero: And here's another
Writ in my cousin's hand, stolen from her pocket,
Containing her affection unto Benedick.
Benedick: A miracle! here's our own hands against our hearts.
Come, I will have thee; but, by this light, I take
thee for pity.
Beatrice: I would not deny you; but, by this good day, I yield
upon great persuasion; and partly to save your life,
for I was told you were in a consumption.
Benedick: Peace! I will stop your mouth.
[Kissing her]

Here's David Tennant and Catherine Tate. You're welcome.

The 30 days:
Day #1: Your favourite play
Day #2: Your favourite character
Day #3: Your favourite hero
Day #4: Your favourite heroine
Day #5: Your favourite villain
Day #6: Your favourite villainess
Day #7: Your favourite clown
Day #8: Your favourite comedy
Day #9: Your favourite tragedy
Day #10: Your favourite history
Day #11: Your least favourite play
Day #12: Your favourite scene
Day #13: Your favourite romantic scene
Day #14: Your favourite fight scene
Day #15: The first play you read
Day #16: Your first play you saw
Day #17: Your favourite speech
Day #18: Your favourite dialogue
Day #19: Your favourite movie version of a play
Day #20: Your favourite movie adaptation of a play
Day #21: An overrated play
Day #22: An underrated play
Day #23: A role you’ve never played but would love to play
Day #24: An actor or actress you would love to see in a particular role
Day #25: Sooner or later, everyone has to choose: Hal or Falstaff?
Day #26: Your favourite couple
Day #27: Your favourite couplet
Day #28: Your favourite joke
Day #29: Your favourite sonnet
Day #30: Your favourite single line

Posted in Uncategorised

Whispers Under Ground, by Ben Aaronovitch

Second paragraph of third chapter:

By five twenty that morning at least thirty of us had converged on Baker Street, so we started out for Ladbroke Grove en masse. A couple of DCs hitched a lift with me while Stephanopoulos followed on in a five-year-old Fiat Punto. I knew one of the detectives in my car. Her name was Sahra Guleed and we’d once bonded over a body in Soho. She’d also been one of the officers involved in the raid on the Strip Club of Doctor Moreau, so she was a good choice for any weird stuff.

I am really enjoying this series of occult detective stories set in contemporary London. This is a straightforward murder investigation of an American student who fell into bad company, except that the company is seriously strange and the student turns out to have had political connections back home. I like the way Aaronovitch continues to peel back the onion layers of multicultural London’s hidden communities; I didn’t think he handled the American elements quite as well, but that’s not the story he’s telling. Great fun – perhaps funnier and less grim than previous books in the series – and I look forward to the next one.

This was the top sf book from my unread pile recommended by you guys at the end of last year. In the course of the year so far, I also read the next six books on that list, Ancillary Mercy, Flatland, Uprooted, Ms Marvel v 2, Sorcerer to the Crown and The House of Shattered Wings, so my next in that category will be Frankenstein Unbound, by Brian Aldiss.

Posted in Uncategorised

Northern Ireland Assembly Election 2016

That’s the unimaginative title I have given to an ebook full of summaries of the material on the Northern Ireland Elections website, including also my piece for last Thursday’s News Letter. It is now available at an Amazon near you: .co.uk, .com, .ca, .au, .de, .fr, .es, .it, .nl, .jp, .br, .mx and .in. Buy it now, before Thursday’s election, so that you can follow the count on Friday and Saturday!

Posted in Uncategorised

30 Days of Shakespeare: Day 12 – your favourite scene

Pericles, Act 4 Scene 5, in its entirety.

Mytilene: a street before the brothel.

Enter, from the brothel, two Gentlemen

First Gentleman: Did you ever hear the like?
Second Gentleman: No, nor never shall do in such a place as this, she being once gone.
First Gentleman: But to have divinity preached there! did you ever dream of such a thing?
Second Gentleman: No, no. Come, I am for no more bawdy-houses: shall’s go hear the vestals sing?
First Gentleman: I’ll do any thing now that is virtuous; but I
am out of the road of rutting for ever.

Exeunt

OK, it’s not actually my totally favourite scene, but it does show Shakespeare at his humorous best: this is a play about shipwrecks and brothels and divine inspiration, and – in context – the conversion of the two Gentlemen by Marina’s virtue is both very serious and very funny.

I’m sorry to say that when asked about favourite scenes as such I tend to think of those where someone gets their comeuppance, like Malvolio in Twelfth Night III.iv or Falstaff in MWW V.v – other specific scenes are covered later in the meme.

Of the very few I did when I was at school in Belfast, I think my favourite was the Banquet scene in Macbeth, Act 3 Scene 4, where I played the title character, and Angela (now a lecturer in business in the north-west of England) played my queen while Eileen (who went on to work for Carmen Calill in London, and is now writing in central Ireland) made a ghostly appearance as Macduff. So I guess I’ll settle for that.

The 30 days:
Day #1: Your favourite play
Day #2: Your favourite character
Day #3: Your favourite hero
Day #4: Your favourite heroine
Day #5: Your favourite villain
Day #6: Your favourite villainess
Day #7: Your favourite clown
Day #8: Your favourite comedy
Day #9: Your favourite tragedy
Day #10: Your favourite history
Day #11: Your least favourite play
Day #12: Your favourite scene
Day #13: Your favourite romantic scene
Day #14: Your favourite fight scene
Day #15: The first play you read
Day #16: Your first play you saw
Day #17: Your favourite speech
Day #18: Your favourite dialogue
Day #19: Your favourite movie version of a play
Day #20: Your favourite movie adaptation of a play
Day #21: An overrated play
Day #22: An underrated play
Day #23: A role you’ve never played but would love to play
Day #24: An actor or actress you would love to see in a particular role
Day #25: Sooner or later, everyone has to choose: Hal or Falstaff?
Day #26: Your favourite couple
Day #27: Your favourite couplet
Day #28: Your favourite joke
Day #29: Your favourite sonnet
Day #30: Your favourite single line

Posted in Uncategorised

Man’s Best Friend: Episode 14 of Here Come The Double Deckers

Episode 14: Man's Best Friend
First shown: 12 December 1970 (US), 5 February 1971 (UK)
Director: Harry Booth
Writer: Melvyn Hayes
Appearing apart from the Double Deckers:
Melvyn Hayes as Albert

Note: sorry to have missed a couple of weeks. To be honest the last few episodes are more difficult to be enthusiastic about. But there are only three more after this one.

Plot

Albert is collecting tinfoil to raise money for a guide dog for the blind (a "seeing eye dog", as Sticks helpfully explains to American viewers). The gang put on a comedy and dance show for local kids, charging in foil rather than cash, and raise enough for a dog.

Glorious Moments

Some of the jokes are almost funny.

And the kids can actually dance.

Less glorious moments

This is a pretty poor episode, which smells of running out of time and ideas (though not money; see below). Low points include Sticks' impressions of a Chinese mandarin, the "black and white" joke, and the endless slapstick. It's also a little odd that the title song is adapted to be about being on a TV show, when that is not part of this episode, except meta-textually in the sense that they are on a TV show. I hope that the audience of small children (all white) were adequately rewarded for laughing in the right places.

A particularly incongruous element is the repeated resort to Americanisms for the US viewers. Sticks explains that a guide dog is a "seeing eye dog", as noted above; jokes depend on the American usage of "fall" to mean "autumn", and the American pronunciation of "missile" (for pun on mistletoe); and at the start, for no apparent reason the boys are wearing American football gear; I'm sure that was useful in London in 1970.

Melvyn Hayes is the butt of a lot of the slapstick, but as he wrote the episode we shouldn't feel too sorry for him.

What's all this then?

The Americanisms are presumably a sign that Fox, having bankrolled the series, was demanding its pound of flesh in terms of getting some US-friendly content. I shouldn't be too cynical; in her reminiscences, Gillian Bush-Bailey reminisces about how moved she was to get letters from isolated kids at the back end of nowhere who related to the Double Deckers as their TV friends.

The BBC children's programme Blue Peter has had a regular feature every couple of years about training guide dogs for over half a century. The first such feature, in 1964, was funded by an appeal for silver foil and milk bottle tops, as were several later ones. It was quite a phenomenon in popular culture, and viewers in their early teens in 1970 would have remembered the 1964 appeal well.

This is not the first time the kids put on a show. It is, however, the last.

Who's That?

This is the only episode of the 17 with no guest stars, if one counts Melvyn Hayes as a part-time regular but doesn't count Ivor Salter's policeman, seen briefly in Tiger Takes Off.

Bruce Clark (Sticks) has completely disappeared from public view since the making of Here Come The Double Deckers. He appeared in one more TV play in 1972 and then went back to the USA. There is a recent but rather indistinct interview with him available on YouTube.

David Gerber is credited as Executive Producer of all 17 episodes. Of course, this can mean anything from benign neglect to non-stop intervention. At the time, he was also executive producer on another British-themed show that was popular in the USA, Nanny and the Professor, as well as The Ghost and Mrs Muir. During his career he was president of the television division of 20th Century Fox, Columbia Pictures, and MGM. He is best known for the 1970s NBC series Police Story and Police Woman. Along with Harry Booth and Roy Simpson, his name appears on screen as the opening credits roll in every episode.

Where's that?

Entirely filmed in studio.

See you next week…

…for United We Stand.

Posted in Uncategorised