A 1960s photo mystery

I re-watched the 1966 Doctor Who story The War Machines last night, in preparation for tomorrow – it's the last surviving complete story with William Hartnell as the Doctor, and introduces Michael Craze and Anneke Wills as new companions Ben and Polly, while also writing out Jackie Lane as regular companion Dodo (of whom I have written before).

Googling around, I came across these pictures in the Getty Images collection, all three supposedly featuring Jackie Lane and two of them also supposedly showing Michael Craze. They are identified, in French, as actors from the British science fiction series Doctor Who, and the photographs are dated to around 1960, ie six years before The War Machines was shown and three before the start of Doctor Who. (Click on each picture for licencing details.)

Fellow fans will immediately spot a complication: the people in the pictures are not the actors from the British science fiction series Doctor Who. Here are Michael Craze, Jackie Lane (middle) and Anneke Wills (right) in their first scene together in The War Machines.

Jackie Lane is shorter than the woman in the pictures. Michael Craze was blond while the man in the pictures is dark-haired.

Now, I think I can solve half the problem. There is more than one Jackie Lane. The very glamorous Jocelyn Lane, four years older than the Doctor Who actress (starred with Elvis in Tickle Me, eventually married a prince), is often referred to as Jackie, and her hair style of the late 1950s makes her look very like the woman in the Getty pictures. Here she is in The Gamma People (1956) with Paul Douglas and Leslie Philips, and in These Dangerous Years (1957) (pictures from IMDB).

So what about the man in the pictures? He's clearly an artist, I would venture to say a British artist from the sensible pullover and jeans (or possibly French given the languiage of the Getty Images description). But I don't really pick up any other clues. Presumably the picture that he is painting was eventually finished and is on display somewhere.

The photographs appear to be credited to Giancarlo Botti (1931-2009), a very successful photographer best known for his black and white work. However, I found one collection of his photographs with a number of colour pics from around 1960: so that checks out. It’s a little unusual for Botti, who generally went for portraits rather than action shots; of course this was rather early in his career.

I also venture a guess that the photographs are from the 50s rather than as late as 1960. By 1960, Jocelyn Lane had adopted a much more bouffant hairstyle, and also I think she looks very young, possibly still a teenager, in the Getty photos (she was born in 1937). However, against that I must admit that I have not found any photos by Botti dated from before 1960. Still, he would have been 29 in that year and must surely have been using a camera for some time.

I briefly entertained the possibility that the man in the Getty pictures might be Botti himself, going by the pictures on his Facebook fan page. On balance, I think not; Botti had a stronger chin than the artist, whose hair is darker and curlier. What do you think?

Update 12 February 2018: I have contacted Getty and they have rewritten the descriptions of the photographs to agree with my conclusions.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Sunday reading

Current
The World of Yesterday, by Stefan Zweig
Brave New Worlds: Dystopian Stories, ed. John Joseph Adams

Last books finished
Aliénor: La Légende Noire, vol 3, by Arnaud Delalande and Simona Mogavino, art by Carlos Gomez
Fear Itself, by Nick Wallace

Next books
The Autumnlands, Vol. 1: Tooth and Claw, by Kurt Busiek
The Fall of Hyperion, by Dan Simmons
A Life in Pieces, by Dave Stone, Paul Sutton & Joseph Lidster

Posted in Uncategorised

Which lines of longitude and latitude pass through the most countries?

This is an update from last week's post, where I considered a slightly different version of the first part of this question. I have illustrated this with some nice maps, all taken from Google, but with the latitude and longitude grid developed by Bill Chadwick of the Bracknell District Caving Club (a really neat idea which nobody else seems to have implemented).

Which line of longitude passes through the most countries?

The first part of the question is, which line of longitude, a straight line from North Pole to South Pole, passes through the most countries?

Well, my answer last week was wrong. In fact there is quite a wide band, between the westernmost point of Bulgaria at 22°21’36.2″E, and the easternmost point of Slovakia at 22°33'32.1", which passes through no less than 26 countries. This is 22 km wide at the equator, but obviously narrows as you get closer to the poles. It intersects:

    1) Norway
    2) Finland
    3) Sweden

    (Baltic Sea)

    4) Estonia (the islands of Hiiumaa and Saaremaa)
    5) Latvia
    6) Lithuania
    7) Russia (the Kaliningrad exclave)
    8) Poland
    9) Slovakia (the easternmost edge)
    10) Ukraine (just)
    11) Hungary (just)
    12) Romania
    13) Serbia (just)
    14) Bulgaria (the westernmost edge)
    15) Macedonia (just)
    16) Greece

    (Mediterranean Sea)

    17) Libya
    18) Chad
    19) Sudan (just)
    20) Central African Republic
    21) Democratic Republic of Congo
    22) Angola
    23) Zambia (just)
    24) Namibia (the Caprivi Strip)
    25) Botswana
    26) South Africa

(The line is drawn wider than it really is on the map to the left.)

The biggest settlement this passes through is Lublin, in Poland, whose population is 350,000; I'd say from a glace at the map that between a half and a third of them live on the line. Here it is passing through Europe (Norway and Sweden cut off at the top) – drawn to scale on this map:

Three of the westernmost spurs of Bulgaria are south of thirteen countries and also north of thirteen countries, Serbia counting both times.

Here's the line passing through central Africa, to scale again, showing how it intersects both Sudan and Zambia. A corner of Libya is visible at the northern edge. The two countries on the southern edge are Namibia and Botswana, with South Africa off the map.

This is a lucky confluence of frontiers at different latitudes. To the east, within less than half a degree you lose Slovakia, Serbia, Russia/Kaliningrad, Hungary and Macedonia before you gain Belarus and South Sudan, and then you lose Poland, Chad, Angola and Sweden. To the west, you lose Bulgaria, Ukraine, Zambia and Sudan before you gain Kosovo, and then you lose Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Macedonia.

I can't imagine that any meridian that does not pass through Europa and Africa can come close to this total. In the Americas, Asia and Oceania, the countries tend to sprawl east-west as much as north-south, and they are generally bigger anyway.

Which line of latitude passes through the most countries?

So, that's longitude sorted. What about latitude?

I found this much more tricky, but I believe I have identified two parallels of longitude which arguably pass through 27 countries. (Arguably, because one of them passes through what could be considered a 28th country, and the other passes through two territories which belong to different constituent parts of the same kingdom, so possibly should be counted together rather than separately). As far as I can tell, these are the band between 11°08'02.4"N and 11°08'25.8"N, defined by the northern frontier of Togo and the southern shore of Tobago (so I will call it the Togo-Tobago line); and the slightly wider northern band between 12°11'03.7"N and 12°11'34.4"N defined by the shores of Bikar Island in the Pacific Ocean (so I will call it the Bikar line).

As I list them below, I put the ordering of each country in the form (a/b) where it's the a'th country on the Togo-Tobago line and the b'th country on the Bikar line. If it's a country on one line but not the other, I put an asterisk for the line it isn't on.

These are actually really tight strips of the earth's surface. I reckon the Togo-Tobago line is about 700 metres from north to south, and the Bikar line just under a kilometre. Going east from the Atlantic, they hit the African coast at Guinea-Bissau (1/1) (the Bikar line just misses Senegal) and then head inland to Guinea (2/2), Mali (3/3) and Burkina Faso (4/4). The Togo/Tobago line passes through the southern suburbs of Burkina Faso's second city, Bobo-Dioulasso, but misses Côte d'Ivoire.

Now we get to a weird bit of colonial map-making. The border between Ghana and Burkina Faso plays hide and seek with the 11th parallel before Ghana (5/*) lurches north in the region of Kulungugu. The border of neighbouring Togo (6/*) also has a peculiar northern kink, just enough to define the northern edge of the Togo-Tobago line. The two lines are shown to scale below.

Farther north, the Bikar line hits Niger (*/5) before both lines pass into Benin (7/6), Nigeria (8/7), the northern spike of Cameroon (9/8), and Chad (10/9). The Togo-Tobago line just misses the Central African Republic, and both lines then pass through Sudan (11/10), South Sudan (12/11, a close shave for the Bikar line), Ethiopia (13/12) and Djibouti (14/13, a close shave for the Togo-Tobago line).

The Togo-Tobago line passes from Djibouti into the northern part of Somalia (15/*), hitting both Somaliland and Puntland (we'll get back to that later). The Bikar line just misses Eritrea to the north and Somalia to the south, but does intersect the island of Abd al Kuri and its main settlement Kilmia, part of the Socotra archipelago which belongs to Yemen (*/14). The lines on the map here are to scale.

Both lines now cross the Indian Ocean, intersecting India (16/15), Myanmar/Burma (17/16), Thailand (18/17), Cambodia (19/18), Vietnam (20/19) and the Philippines (21/20). I have not investigated the various claims on the Spratly Islands, because as far as I can tell none of them is intersected by either line. The Bikar line passes over (or at least very near) the holy hill of Arunachala in Tamil Nadu.

That takes us to the Pacific Ocean, where I have gone over the geography of the Marshall Islands (22/21) in some detail. This next map, uniquely, is not from Google but from Wikipedia, showing the various Marshallese atolls and archipelagoes. The lines are not to scale – the distances here are pretty huge.

As far as I can tell, the Togo-Tobago line just scrapes part of Ailiningae Atoll – it grazes the southern edge of Sifo Island, completely covers Manchinikon Island, and passes through the middle of Charaien Island. It also grazes Taka Atoll, but passes between the islands of Waatwerik and Lojrong without making landfall. I'm posting the satellite view of Ailiningae Atoll as well as the map view below; doesn't it look beautiful?

The tiny island of Charaien, at the eastern end of the atoll, is less than a kilometre from north to south.

A little further north and east, the Bikar line is defined by the island of Bikar, part of the much smaller Bikar Atoll, very little of which is above water level.

After a long landless passage, over 11,000 km, across the Pacific, we reach the Americas. Both lines make landfall in southern Nicaragua (23/22), and the Togo-Tobago line then dips in and out of Costa Rica (24/*). The lines cross the southern Caribbean to Colombia (25/23) and Venezuela (26/24).

The Bikar line finishes its run of countries by passing through Curaçao (*/25), Bonaire (*/26) and Grenada (*/27). The two lines are shown to scale in all three maps below.

The Togo-Tobago line, true to its name, just scrapes the southern edge of Tobago, the northern and smaller island of Trinidad and Tobago (27/*).

I think it's this map, rather than the Togo or Pacific island maps, that brings home just how narrow the Togo-Tobago line is. You can almost see the trucks parked in the plantations.

Now for the caveats. First, I don't think it's clear that you can count Curaçao and Bonaire separately – while Curaçao is a separate constituent part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and Bonaire is a Dutch municipality, Curaçao notably does not have foreign policy or defence powers separate from the Netherlands (and therefore Bonaire); these are surely important attributes if we are distinguishing between states. So the Bikar line ends up with a fairly impressive 26 countries for sure, the 27th being a matter for experts on Dutch constitutional law.

Second, my personal view is that Somaliland should be counted separately from the rest of Somalia. Empirically, Somaliland behaves more like and is treated more like a state than is Curaçao, so if we count the latter we should count the former as well. It may not have been formally recognised as an independent state by any other country (neither of course has Curaçao), but it does have foreign policy and defence capabilities; I have myself attended meetings of Somaliland's diplomatic representatives and ministers with European officials, and am proud to say that I had a small hand in negotiating the 2013 Special Arrangement for Somaliland, so it is clearly engaged in foreign relations; and the co-operation of Somaliland's defence forces with international anti-piracy efforts in the Gulf of Aden is not much discussed but quietly recognised by the international community. Given that the Togo-Tobago line passes through both Somaliland, at its frontier with Djibouti, and Somalia/Puntland, just south of Cape Guardafui, which are undisputedly part of Somalia (Puntland is not seeking independence), I personally will count it as the winner with 28 countries.

(Incidentally, I hadn't realised that the Doumeira Islands, off the coast of Djibouti and Eritrea, are among the rare parts of the world without any formally recognised sovereignty, though in fact Djibouti is in administrative control. They are just too far north to make a difference to my count, however.)

A final thought – it’s interesting to compare this with the Datagraver map of world population by latitude and longitude. Their biggest population spike by longitude is a little to the east of mine, around 31° East (Cairo, Kiev, St Petersburg). Their biggest population spike by latitude is around 21° North, which looks like several Mexican cities, plus Nagpur and Hanoi.

Trivia question to finish with: how many countries lie entirely south of the Tropic of Capricorn?

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

The Great Ziegfeld (1936)

The Great Ziegfeld won the Academy Award for Outstanding Production in 1937; there were nine other nominees, Anthony Adverse, Dodsworth, Libeled Lady, Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, Romeo and Juliet, San Francisco, The Story of Louis Pasteur, A Tale of Two Cities and Three Smart Girls. I have not seen any of them. It got nominations in six other categories and won two, Luise Rayner getting Best Actress as Ziegfeld’s first wife Anna Held, and the “A Pretty Girl Is Like a Melody” sequence winning for best Dance Direction. IMDB users rate it a measly 19th of the films of 1936, with The Petrified Forest top and Modern Times second.

Ziegfeld must be the first person to appear in fictional form in two Oscar-winning films – “Francis Zanfield”, obviously based on him, is the crucial stage producer of The Broadway Melody. The film is about his life from early days in Chicago in the 1890s to the present day (making it the third Oscar-winning film to cover this time period, after Cimarron and Cavalcade). Made by agreement with his widow in order to clear the debts of his estate, it presents him as a single-minded showman who used up money and women with little regards for the consequences. I have to say that I found Ziegfeld an unattractive character, and did not really feel he was worth three hours of my company. Here’s a contemporary trailer, which, like the film, goes on a bit too long.

A few interesting actors (interesting to me, anyway) among the cast: Frank Morgan, who plays Ziegfeld’s rival and eventual funder Jack Billings, and dancer Ray Bolger, who plays himself, both turn up a few years later in The Wizard of Oz as the Wizard and the Scarecrow respectively. Several of the leads also appear in the previous year’s The Thin Man, which I haven’t seen. The only actor from the film who is still living, as far as I can tell, is Ann Gillis, who plays Ziegfeld’s young friend Mary Lou in an early scene. Born in 1927, she did very little acting after the second world war, and oddly enough her last recorded film role was Frank Poole’s mother in 2001: A Space Odyssey. (She is only ten years older than Gary Lockwood, who plays Poole and was born in 1937. Maybe she’s meant to be his stepmother.)

This is one of those films where I begin to see the strength of the argument that I should have tried a different film project. I was sufficiently underwhelmed that I’m not going to bother detailing the difficulties I had with it: in brief, there’s the usual erasure of minorities (Fanny Brice is Jewish and funny, and there are two black speaking parts, Libby Taylor as Flossie, Audrey’s uncredited maid and an unnamed second maid; there’s also a chap in blackface singing “If You Knew Susie”); the central character is not all that interesting, apart from his core commitment to objectifying women; his second wife, as played by Myrna Loy under the supervision of the person she was playing, isn’t all that interesting either; and the stage spectaculars, while spectacular, can’t completely make up for the absence of much in the way of plot.

To be a little more positive, Luise Rayner is funny and moving as first wife Anna Held, and was the first actor to win Oscars two years running (she won for The Good Earth the following year). Her crucial scene is here, where she congratulates Ziegfeld on his second marriage:

And although there is far too much of it, the dancing and singing is generally great. Here’s the Oscar-winning dance number, “A Pretty Girl Is Like A Melody” – deeply creepy words, but watch the choreography and staging, from about 1:20 onwards:

1920s: Wings (1927-28) | The Broadway Melody (1928-29)
1930s: All Quiet on the Western Front (1929-30) | Cimarron (1930-31) | Grand Hotel (1931-32) | Cavalcade (1932-33) | It Happened One Night (1934) | Mutiny on the Bounty (1935, and books) | The Great Ziegfeld (1936) | The Life of Emile Zola (1937) | You Can’t Take It with You (1938) | Gone with the Wind (1939, and book)
1940s: Rebecca (1940) | How Green Was My Valley (1941) | Mrs. Miniver (1942) | Casablanca (1943) | Going My Way (1944) | The Lost Weekend (1945) | The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) | Gentleman’s Agreement (1947) | Hamlet (1948) | All the King’s Men (1949)
1950s: All About Eve (1950) | An American in Paris (1951) | The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) | From Here to Eternity (1953) | On The Waterfront (1954, and book) | Marty (1955) | Around the World in Eighty Days (1956) | The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) | Gigi (1958) | Ben-Hur (1959)
1960s: The Apartment (1960) | West Side Story (1961) | Lawrence of Arabia (1962) | Tom Jones (1963) | My Fair Lady (1964) | The Sound of Music (1965) | A Man for All Seasons (1966) | In the Heat of the Night (1967) | Oliver! (1968) | Midnight Cowboy (1969)
1970s: Patton (1970) | The French Connection (1971) | The Godfather (1972) | The Sting (1973) | The Godfather, Part II (1974) | One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) | Rocky (1976) | Annie Hall (1977) | The Deer Hunter (1978) | Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)
1980s: Ordinary People (1980) | Chariots of Fire (1981) | Gandhi (1982) | Terms of Endearment (1983) | Amadeus (1984) | Out of Africa (1985) | Platoon (1986) | The Last Emperor (1987) | Rain Man (1988) | Driving Miss Daisy (1989)
1990s: Dances With Wolves (1990) | The Silence of the Lambs (1991) | Unforgiven (1992) | Schindler’s List (1993) | Forrest Gump (1994) | Braveheart (1995) | The English Patient (1996) | Titanic (1997) | Shakespeare in Love (1998) | American Beauty (1999)
21st century: Gladiator (2000) | A Beautiful Mind (2001) | Chicago (2002) | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) | Million Dollar Baby (2004, and book) | Crash (2005) | The Departed (2006) | No Country for Old Men (2007) | Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

My tweets

  • Sat, 11:10: RT @RCorbettMEP: It’s suddenly dawned on Rees-Mogg that, outside the EU, Britain will end up “having to accept laws without any say-so”. H…
  • Sat, 11:11: RT @kevinhorourke: If the main reason for potential conflict between EU member states is that they have different sectoral interests to de…
  • Sat, 11:49: Fascinating how David Davis dwindles from a marginal irritant to complete irrelevance in the course of this narrati… https://t.co/zMFKy11P86

Posted in Uncategorised

Arthur C. Clarke, 16 December 1917 – 19 March 2008

As a teenager growing up in a city riven by religious conflict, I found Arthur C. Clarke one of the early guides to a more rational way of thinking. I loved his early short stories, I loved his mid-period novels, and I forgave the later collaborations. Sometimes his wit could baffle translators, but his compassionate vision of the future of humanity was always clear.

I was deeply honoured to carry on his vision as one of the judges of the 2015 Arthur C. Clarke Award. He created our world in so many ways.

Alexander the Corrector, by Julia Keay

Second paragraph of third chapter:

He arrived at Halnaker in early June 1729. Although Lord Derby was apparently at home, he did not immediately send for his new French reader, so Cruden had time to settle in and find his way about. Set amidst gracious acres of parkland complete with obligatory herd of deer, Halnaker* was more a venerable mansion than a truly stately home, but it boasted a medieval great hall with ornate panelling and stained glass windows, a long picture gallery, a sizeable chapel, a wonderful library and quite enough space and splendour to live up to his expectations. It also boasted a large household ruled by the lofty Mr Clayton, the Earl’s chamberlain, and the not quite so lofty Mr Frederick, his steward. Cruden was given to understand that as French reader to the Earl, his position in the domestic hierarchy would be below Mr Clayton, more or less on a level with Mr Frederick and the Earl’s chaplain Mr Ball, and comfortably above the butlers, footmen, valets, housekeepers, cooks and their assorted underlings. Since this corresponded almost exactly with his position as tutor in previous households, he was quite content. But when he dis-covered that, in addition to his own room, he would have the use of a book-lined sitting-room where meals would be served to him by the younger servants, he knew that his prayers had indeed been answered. As soon as he had unpacked his belongings, been introduced to such members of the house-hold as were deemed worthy of his acquaintance, and been taken on a tour of the grounds by the amiable Mr Ball, he sat down to spread the news.

Cruden’s Concordance is an amazing work. For those who are not familiar with it, it’s a listing of every word (apart from the most common) used in the Bible, in the context where it is used, working from the Authorised Version. It has never been out of print since it was first published in 1737. Alexander Cruden, who compiled it, wrote a great deal else, about the need to improve the nation’s morals through correct spelling and grammar, and about several of his spells of incarceration for mental illness. Julia Keay argues that he was perfectly sane, and was a victim of local politics in Aberdeen and of his romantic rivals in London. I have to say that her case is not made out thoroughly convincingly. What is missing is a wider consideration of insanity in 18th century Britain (Cruden grew up in Aberdeen but spent most of his working life in London), and indeed a contextualisation of Cruden’s work with his peers more generally would have been helpful – was he unusual in his obsession with the line-by-line approach to Scripture, or in the mainstream? did others agree with his notion of correcting the nation’s morals by correcting its grammar? Overall the book leans too heavily on Cruden’s own writing, though there is some interesting detective work about his youth in Aberdeen.

This was the non-fiction book that had lingered longest on my unread shelf. Next on that pile is Nine Gates: Entering the Mind of Poetry, by Jane Hirshfield.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

The Most Dangerous Book: The Battle for James Joyce’s Ulysses, by Kevin Birmingham

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Pound began attending Yeats’s Monday dinner gatherings in London. He dashed about with his wild mane of hair, flung himself into fragile chairs, and leaned back in luxuriant repose. His black velvet jacket and facial hair — a long mustache and a tuft on his chin trimmed to a point — were part of his poetic regalia. His flowing capes, open-necked shirts and billiard-green felt trousers rankled London’s staid sensibilities. At one of Yeats’s gatherings, Pound began plucking the petals off the red tulips on the table and, one by one, he ate them. When the conversation paused, Pound asked, “Would anyone mind having the roof taken off the house?” At which point he stood up and began reading one of his poems in his unabashed American accent.

I picked this up for a pound or two in a remainder shop, but it was well worth it. I am vaguely familiar with Joyce and Ulysses; I must say I had not appreciated just how strong the censorship regimes were in both the UK and the USA at the turn of the century, and the extent to which literary innovation was tied into political radicalism – The Little Review, which initially serialised Ulysses in America, was closely linked to Emma Goldman and generally sympathetic to anarchism. I also hadn’t realised the crucial role of Ulysses in the origins of Random House. It’s a fascinating story, well told.

Joyce himself comes across as a demanding, self-centred individual, constantly needing financial subvention from (mostly female) donors, his body riddled by venereal disease, driving his family mad. But there’s something about his prose that catches your soul, and while there are parts of Ulysses that miss the mark, there are parts that very much hit it. Birmingham makes the very strong case that censorship was wrong and unjustifiable in principle, but the fact that it was being used against a work as hefty (in many ways) as Ulysses made the case for continued censorship weaker (though not in Ireland, where Ulysses was never formally tested but there was a tough regime for censorship of books from 1929 to 1967,, parts lasting until 1998).

This was the top unread book recommended by you last year. (As previously mentioned, I don’t think I will be soliciting recommendations in the same way this year.) Next on that list, if I get there, is Script Doctor by Andrew Cartmel.

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

The Bounty Trilogy, by Charles Nordhoff and James Norman Hall

Second paragraph of third chapter of Mutiny on the Bounty:

A month sounds an age to be crowded with more than forty other men on board a small vessel at anchor most of the time, but I was making the acquaintance of my shipmates, and so keen on learning my new duties that the days were all too short. The Bounty carried six midshipmen, and, since we had no schoolmaster, as is customary on a man-of-war, Lieutenant Bligh and the master divided the duty of instructing us in trigonometry, nautical astronomy, and navigation. I shared with Stewart and Young the advantage of learning navigation under Bligh, and in justice to an officer whose character in other respects was by no means perfect, I must say that there was no finer seaman and navigator afloat at the time. Both of my fellow midshipmen were men grown: George Stewart of a good family in the Orkneys, a young man of twenty-three or four, and a seaman who had made several voyages before this: and Edward Young, a stout, salty-looking fellow, with a handsome face marred by the loss of nearly all his front teeth. Both of them were already very fair navigators, and I was hard put to it not to earn the reputation of a dunce.

Second paragraph of third chapter of Men Against the Sea:

As I looked about me I was reminded of certain lonely coves I had seen along the Cornish coast, on just such nights, and I found it hard to realize how vast an ocean separated us from home.

Second paragraph of third chapter of Pitcairn’s Island:

Although the Bounty’s stores had been shared with the mutineers who remained on Tahiti, there was still a generous amount on board: casks of spirits, salt beef and pork, dried peas and beans, an abundant supply of clothing, kegs of powder and nails, iron for blacksmith work, lead for musket balls, and the like. There were also fourteen muskets and a number of pistols. The livestock consisted of half a dozen large crates of fowls, twenty sows, two of which had farrowed during the voyage, five boars, and three goats. The island being small, it was decided to free both the fowls and the animals and let them fend for themselves until the work of house-building was under way.

The Bounty trilogy by Nordmann and Hall was the basis of the Oscar-winning movie, Mutiny on the Bounty, particularly the first of the three books (a few scenes are taken from the second and third). As mentioned previously, I have read several other treatments of the story (and found David Silverman’s 1967 Pitcairn Island on the shelves the other day), but not for quite a long time, so the 1935 film was the freshest in my mind.

The three books are pretty distinct. The first, Mutiny on the Bounty, is narrated by Byam, the fictional midshipman played by Franchot Tone in the film; the Bligh of the book is if anything even more monstrous than the Bligh of the film, and the confusion of the mutiny itself – a ten-minute spurt of late-night impulse which had long-lasting effects – better conveyed. The Tahitians are referred to invariably as “Indians”, but otherwise treated as a dignified culture which the English sailors disrupt by their presence; the only cannibal joke is directed against the cheapskate purveyors of Portsmouth, who allegedly look out for black sailors to add to their mix.

However, it’s an anti-Semitic novel – an aspect completely dropped from the film. At Spithead, when we first encounter the Bounty, “sharp-faced Jews, in their wherries, hovered alongside, eager to lend money at interest against pay day, or to sell on credit the worthless trinkets on their trays” and the second in command declares that “I’d like to sink the lot of those Jews”. Samuel, Bligh’s clerk, is described as “a smug, tight-lipped little man, of a Jewish cast of countenance” and later explicitly as “a London Jew”. In fact, the real Samuel appears to have been from Edinburgh, where a George Samuel was a burgess in 1699; so this anti-Semitism is entirely gratuitously introduced to the historical record by Nordhoff and Hall. (As indeed are many of Bligh’s portrayed acts of tyranny.)

Given what is said about so many historical characters, it’s a bit odd that Nordhoff and Hall chose to disguise the real midshipman Peter Heywood as the fictional Alexander Byam.

One of the shock moments in the film is that when the Pandora comes to Tahiti to arrest the mutineers, it turns out that Bligh is in command. In the book, as in history, he was by then on another assignment elsewhere. Otherwise the film sticks pretty closely to the book.

I read Men Against the Sea during a particularly insomniac night; it’s the shortest of the three books, told in the voice of the (historical) surgeon’s mate of the Bounty, Thomas Ledward, explaining the epic 41-day, 6,500 km journey taken by Bligh and 18 others in an 7-metre long open boat from the site of the mutiny (near Tofua, one of the Tonga islands) to Kupang at the western end of Timor, avoiding the potentially hostile shores of Australia and other islands – one man was killed at the very beginning, on Tofua. It is an extraordinary feat of navigation, and Nordhoff and Hall succeed in spinning it out; the internal tensions among the 18 survivors are easy to imagine and well portrayed. The impact of their ordeal on the men’s digestive systems also is a disturbing but reasonable detail. Interestingly, Samuel is portrayed here as just another crew member; the previous book’s anti-Semitism has disappeared. The book ends with Ledward taking his leave of Bligh, who is on his way back to London. In real life, Ledward was one of the five crewmen who died very soon after they reached Batavia (where they all went shortly after arriving in Timor).

Pitcairn’s Island, unlike the other two volumes, has no narrator, apart from the last three chapters which are told by Alexander Smith aka John Adams. Of the fifteen men (nine English and six Tahitians) who landed at Pitcairn in 1789, he was the only survivor when the island was eventually discovered by the American ship Topaz in 1808; Smith/Adams himself gave several different accounts of what had happened during the remaining two decades of his life, and one of the women who moved there in 1789 eventually returned to Tahiti and gave her own account. It’s a messy story of violence, alcoholism, and sexual confusion, in an earthly paradise – Pitcairn has the natural resources to support a couple of hundred inhabitants, but even so the small settlement disintegrated fatally.

Nordhoff and Hall dramatise some parts – Fletcher Christian here lives for a few agonising days after the inevitable killing starts, whereas most historical accounts agree that he was one of the first to die – and undersell others – I would very much like someone to write the story from the Tahitian women’s perspective, given that they outnumbered the men by three to one after the first spate of killings, and by twelve to one from 1800 when the second last mutineer died. It’s also striking that the society was a very young one – Fletcher Christian was 24 when the mutiny took place, and 28 when he was killed; the other mutineers (and presumably the Tahitian men and women they brought with them to Pitcairn) must have been mostly the same age or even younger. Nordhoff and Hall fall back on the clichés of the veteran tars, the unsophisticated “Indians” or “Maori”, and their statesmanlike leader, rather than the possible truth of the confused young men and women in an extraordinary situation. But the moment of discovery of the island by the Topaz is particularly well done, and is almost worth the read in itself.

1920s: Wings (1927-28) | The Broadway Melody (1928-29)
1930s: All Quiet on the Western Front (1929-30) | Cimarron (1930-31) | Grand Hotel (1931-32) | Cavalcade (1932-33) | It Happened One Night (1934) | Mutiny on the Bounty (1935, and books) | The Great Ziegfeld (1936) | The Life of Emile Zola (1937) | You Can’t Take It with You (1938) | Gone with the Wind (1939, and book)
1940s: Rebecca (1940) | How Green Was My Valley (1941) | Mrs. Miniver (1942) | Casablanca (1943) | Going My Way (1944) | The Lost Weekend (1945) | The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) | Gentleman’s Agreement (1947) | Hamlet (1948) | All the King’s Men (1949)
1950s: All About Eve (1950) | An American in Paris (1951) | The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) | From Here to Eternity (1953) | On The Waterfront (1954, and book) | Marty (1955) | Around the World in Eighty Days (1956) | The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) | Gigi (1958) | Ben-Hur (1959)
1960s: The Apartment (1960) | West Side Story (1961) | Lawrence of Arabia (1962) | Tom Jones (1963) | My Fair Lady (1964) | The Sound of Music (1965) | A Man for All Seasons (1966) | In the Heat of the Night (1967) | Oliver! (1968) | Midnight Cowboy (1969)
1970s: Patton (1970) | The French Connection (1971) | The Godfather (1972) | The Sting (1973) | The Godfather, Part II (1974) | One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) | Rocky (1976) | Annie Hall (1977) | The Deer Hunter (1978) | Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)
1980s: Ordinary People (1980) | Chariots of Fire (1981) | Gandhi (1982) | Terms of Endearment (1983) | Amadeus (1984) | Out of Africa (1985) | Platoon (1986) | The Last Emperor (1987) | Rain Man (1988) | Driving Miss Daisy (1989)
1990s: Dances With Wolves (1990) | The Silence of the Lambs (1991) | Unforgiven (1992) | Schindler’s List (1993) | Forrest Gump (1994) | Braveheart (1995) | The English Patient (1996) | Titanic (1997) | Shakespeare in Love (1998) | American Beauty (1999)
21st century: Gladiator (2000) | A Beautiful Mind (2001) | Chicago (2002) | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) | Million Dollar Baby (2004, and book) | Crash (2005) | The Departed (2006) | No Country for Old Men (2007) | Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Guided by the Beauty of Their Weapons, by Philip Sandifer

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Phil Sandifer: Yeah, we literally organized Shabcast 6 about thirty seconds ago.

This is a book of essays and other pieces by Philip Sandifer, all I think from 2015, the first four of which (comprising the first third of the book) address the Puppies controversy, and the rest being writings on various sf subjects, some of which I know about, some of which I don’t.

It’s not very long since the Puppy problems, and yet it seems like a very long time ago. Sandifer’s first, very long essay makes a lot of interesting points about the ideology behind the Puppies; the next two pieces, however, are a transcript of a conversation between him and Vox Day, and then a transcript of another conversation about that conversation, which now seems very self-indulgent (and indeed felt a bit that way at the time). It’s an issue that has passed for now.

The other very long piece in the book (taking up more than a fifth of its total length) is an excerpt from Sandifer’s ongoing work on Alan Moore, in this case analysing V For Vendetta, which I read earlier this year. I found this very interesting, explaining some of the elements of the book that had sailed past me on raeding it, and also elucidating very clearly the complicated circumstances in which the story was written and published.

That is followed by a piece about and two interviews with Peter Harness, author of the recent Doctor Who stories Kill the Moon and The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion. Unlike Sandifer, I am firmly in the camp that sees Kill the Moon as one of the worst Who stories ever, possibly the worst of New Who; the story’s take on the true nature of the Moon threw me completely out of any suspension of disbelief, and no amount of insistence on the fascinating points of the author’s artistic vision can fix that for me. However, I very much liked and enjoyed The Zygon Invasion/The Zygon Inversion, and the exploration of how the same mind could generate two stories which I rected to so very differently is well worth reading.

The book ends with more self-indulgence (not that that is necessarily a bad thing) in which Sandifer merges his own occult philosophy with the history of Doctor Who and the format of a Choose Your Own Adventure book. It doesn’t make a lot of sense, but it doesn’t need to.

Sandifer sensibly writes what he wants to, and quite often it’s been what I want to read. (I am looking forward to the next collected volumes of Tardis Eruditorum.)

This was the top book left over from last year’s recommendation lists. (Incidentally, I think Livejournal has now declined to the point that I won’t be asking for reading recommendations at the end of this year.) Next on that pile, if I get to it, is Spirit by Gwyneth Jones.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

The Lies of Fair Ladies, by Jonathan Gash

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Think of the price of stamps and melons. I was having a blazing row about a melon. Savvy Savvy’s a supermarket. Their only superlatives are their blinking prices.

I read a bunch of Lovejoy books back in 2012-2013, and eventually gave up because I couldn’t take the narrator’s narcissism and misogyny. On impulse I thought I’d try one more, and although Lovejoy himself is still very annoying, I felt that the author was pointing and laughing at him, perhaps more than in some of the other books, and that his revolting behaviour led to visible consequences. The plot is a decently intricate murder mystery, resolved by Lovejoy with minimal help from the police, against a background of seedy local politics around the river Deben.

Speaking of that river, I want to give a shout to Lord Deben, formerly John Selwyn Gummer, who as a Conservative minister was one of the bogeymen of my youth, but has now become an eminently sane voice against Brexit. How times change, eh?

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Sunday reading

Current
Re: Collections, ed. Xanna Eve Chown

Last books finished
Guided by the Beauty of Their Weapons: Notes on Science Fiction and Culture in the Year of Angry Dogs, by Philip Sandifer
The Bounty Trilogy, by Charles Nordhoff and James Norman Hall
The Most Dangerous Book: The Battle for James Joyce's Ulysses, by Kevin Birmingham
Alexander the Corrector: The Tormented Genius Whose Cruden's Concordance Unwrote the Bible by Julia Keay

Next books
The World of Yesterday, by Stefan Zweig
Brave New Worlds: Dystopian Stories, ed. John Joseph Adams
A Life in Pieces, by Dave Stone, Paul Sutton & Joseph Lidster

Posted in Uncategorised

What line of longitude passes through most countries?

Over on Facebook, Pete has an interesting question:

From which town/city of more than 50,000 inhabitants, would you pass through the most number of countries (added together) if you headed due north to the North Pole and due south to the South Pole, with an equal number of countries to the north and south of your starting point?

Well.

It's pretty clear from a casual glance at the map that the answer lies somewhere around 30° East. Indeed, Wikipedia confirms that both 27°East and 28° East pass through 21 countries:

Norway
Finland
Russia
Estonia
Latvia
Belarus
Ukraine
Moldova
Romania
Bulgaria
Turkey
Greece (Aegean islands)
Egypt
Sudan
South Sudan
Central African Republic (27° only)
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Botswana
South Africa and
Lesotho (28° only).

So, the next question is, can we find a range of longitudes where there are 22 countries on the meridian?

Yes we can. I'm glad to report that the easternmost point of the Central African Republic is at 27°27'29.9"E, whereas the westernmost point of Lesotho is at 27°00'40.5"E. So anywhere between those two longitudes is on a meridian which passes through 22 different countries.

Actually the range is even tighter than that, and depends on the Russian islands in the Baltic – Gogland, whose easternmost point is at 27°01'43.9"E; Bolshoi Tyuters, which spreads from 27°10'32.3"E to 27°13'41.3"E; and the land frontier between Estonia and Russia, which starts at 27°19'23.9"E. So the three bands of longitude which pass through 22 countries are:

27°00'40.5"E to 27°01'43.9"E (westernmost point of Lesotho to easternmost point of Gogland)
27°10'32.3"E to 27°13'41.3"E (Bolshoi Tyuters)
27°19'23.9"E to 27°27'29.9"E (westernmost point of mainland Russia to easternmost point of Central African Republic)

(Namibia doesn't quite go far enough east to be helpful. The disputed territory of Abyei is too far east and anyway is either part of Sudan or of South Sudan. If we go far enough east for Rwanda and Burundi, we lose the Baltics. In Antarctica, Queen Maud Land is either part of Norway or not a country.)

Peter's question is a bit more demanding. If you start from the easternmost point of the island of Kos, at 27°21'21.0"E, there are parts of Turkey both north and south of you, so there are eleven countries between you and the North Pole – Norway, Finland, Estonia, Russia, Latvia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey – and eleven between you and the South Pole – Turkey again (I think you just scrape the tip of the Datça peninsula), Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, South Africa and Lesotho.

However, Kos very clearly does not have 50,000 inhabitants – only 33,000, according to the usual sources – and the vast majority of them live further west than the end of the Datça peninsula which barely overlaps the eastern end of Kos (if at all; now I look at it more closely I'm not even sure that it does).

So I think the closest answer to Pete's question is the Turkish city of İzmir (ancient Smyrna), which has nearly three million inhabitants and parts of which definitely fall into all three ranges of longitude (it's a fairly sprawling place); it wouldn't surprise me if the İzmirians (ex-Smyrneans?) living in the ranges of 27°00'40.5"E to 27°01'43.9"E, 27°10'32.3"E to 27°13'41.3"E and 27°19'23.9"E to 27°27'29.9"E are in total many more than 50,000. They live immediately south of parts of Norway, Finland, Estonia, Russia, Latvia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Romania, and Bulgaria, which is ten countries; and immediately north of parts of Greece, Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, South Africa and Lesotho, which is eleven.

There, aren’t you glad you know that?

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My travels in 2017

Every year since 2005, I have posted a list of the cities where I have spent a night away from home in that calendar year. (Both last year and the year before, I then found myself doing one more trip to a new place later in December. I'm just back from my second last trip to London of the year, and nothing more is planned, so hopefully this list will be definitive.) Previous years: 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016.

My list for 2017, then, is:

*London, UK
Tirana, Albania
*Belfast, UK
*Helsinki, Finland
Birmingham Airport, UK
*Loughbrickland, UK
Strasbourg, France
Andorra-La-Vella, Andorra
Berlin, Germany
Meriden, UK
Canterbury, UK
Remilly Aillicourt, France
*Kidderminster, UK
*Brussels, Belgium
Oxford, UK
*Sofia, Bulgaria
Johannesburg, South Africa
*Washington, USA
New York, USA
Amsterdam, Netherlands

That's 20, less than 2016 or 2015 but more than most, in 11 countries. I also transited Ireland and Spain by road, and Austria in the airport, without staying overnight, so the country total for the year is 14, one of which was new to me (South Africa). Slightly surprised that I avoided Luxembourg en route to and from Strasbourg (due to missing the more direct trains in both directions, alas).

Edited to add: Of course, after this was written, I ended up making an unexpected day trip to Milan. So my country total ends up at 15, though the overnights list remains unchanged.

It's very much a north-west Europe map apart from the obvious outliers (East Coast, Andorra/Barcelona, Albania, Bulgaria, Finland, Johannesburg).

You can tell which route we take when we drive to Northern Ireland. The weird triangle with Brussels on its left angle is from my two choices of railway line in and out of the city in the morning.
My London happens mostly between St Pancras International and Westminster, with particular concentration around our Covent Garden office. Outposts include the Georgian restaurant in St John's Wood, London Film and Comic Con at Kensington Olympia, the Sci-Fi London film festival in Stratford, and the Tower.

And my Brussels is a city of railway stations, and working the offices and eateries of the European Quarter. I think of myself as someone who avoids Place Luxembourg relative to most of my colleagues: clearly I have not been very successful!

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My Daily Life Comics, by Renee Rienties

Third page:

A short booklet by Dutch comics artist Renee Rienties, mostly one- or two-page reflections on the life of the artist, which I bought at Brussels Comic Con earlier in the year.. I think it's not actually representative of her best work, more of which can be found on her website.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

  • Fri, 08:50: RT @LibDemPress: Incredible that the government has done an impact assessment on the the songs played by ice cream vans but not how Brexit…
  • Fri, 08:51: RT @jonworth: Thin gruel. Some of this is more clearly laid out in today’s text than Monday’s, but there is no substantial difference. htt…
  • Fri, 08:51: RT @ottocrat: The Commission needs to stop beating itself up about its comms. Compared to the UK, it’s knocking it out of the park. https:/…
  • Fri, 09:08: RT @CharlesMichel: This deal is an important step forward! An intelligent #Brexit deal is in interest of our citizens and companies. #UK is…
  • Fri, 09:08: RT @jfmouthonlegs: And to think I cannot even get a �10K grant for youth work without an impact assessment. https://t.co/QjFBtveeuK
  • Fri, 09:11: RT @bricelafontaine: Plus de 50.000 manifestants à #Bruxelles (dépassant les prévisions) pour la démocratie en #Catalogne. Je lis dans les…
  • Fri, 09:12: RT @jdportes: Irony: the mythical EU “benefit tourists” will do much better out of Brexit than they would have if Cameron’s renegotiation h…
  • Fri, 09:28: RT @Berlaymonster: “Full alignment” means the UK will, having taken back control, of its own free will and in total self-determining sovere…
  • Fri, 10:55: RT @krishgm: UK will obey EU regulations without any say in them, European Court supremacy in some areas and EU payments continue for years…

Posted in Uncategorised