Doctor Who: The Tenth Doctor Adventures Volume 03

I got hold of this Big Finish box set to acompany my cycling through the forest in recent days, and realised only when I started writing this up that although I had already listened to Volume One of this series a couple of years ago, I had actually missed Volume Two. Oh well, more pleasures in store I guess.

All three stories here bring David Tennant back together with Catherine Tate as Donna Noble. The first one, No Place by James Goss, also brings back Jacqueline King as Donna's mother Sylvia and Bernard Cribbins as her grandfather Wilf. They are posing as a nuclear-ish family (ie the Doctor and Donna are pretending to be married) investigating a haunted house in collaboration with a TV show called Haunted Makeovers. As my regular reader knows, I rate Goss very highly as perhaps the best regular current Who writer who has never written for TV. I'm afraid this didn't quite work for me; I guess I am not familiar enough with the subgenres of makeover TV or ghost movies to really get the joke, and the plot didn't make a lot of sense in its own terms. The actors all seemed to be having fun, which is important I guess. You can get it here.

One Mile Down, by Jenny T. Colgan, worked a lot better – an underwater city, where humans and fish people are attempting to find an uneasy modus vivendi, is disrupted, possibly fatally, by Judoon on a mission. There is lots of high and low politics going on, and I found the plot intricate but consistent and compelling. Also very welcome to hear the voice of Rakie Ayola, who played the tragically unnamed hostess in Midnight, one of my favourite Tenth Doctor TV stories. You can get it here.

The Creeping Death, by Roy Gill, is set in the Great London Smog of 1952You can get it here. I had only come across one other piece by Roy Gill, the first Class audio, which was also very good. I'll look out for more by him.

The box set as a whole includes the usual amusing behind-the-scenes banter, but also another disc celebrating David Tennant's association with Big Finish, which goes back to 2001you can do that here.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Raiders of the Lost Ark

I've jumped ahead in my sequence of Hugo and Oscar-winning films because Raiders of the Lost Ark was on TV the other day, and I thought, why not?

Raiders won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation for 1982, beating Dragonslayer, Excalibur, Outland and Time Bandits. I think the only other one I've seen is Time Bandits. IMDB users rank it the top film of 1981 both here and here, with that year's Oscar winner, Chariots of Fire, some way down – I find that a little odd, I thought Chariots was a very good film; but I'll discuss that when I get to it in my Oscars sequence. Raiders did get a nomination for best Picture, and won four Oscars, for Best Sound, Best Art Direction, Best Film Editing and Best Visual Effects. Steven Spielberg was also nominated for Best Director.

It's a tremendous bit of escapism. The stunts are spectacular, the staging is breathtaking, and the music incredibly earwormy. Just in case you have no idea what it's about, here's a trailer:

The film is set in 1936, where mild-mannered archaeology professor Indiana Jones, played by Harrison Ford, takes a break from stealing relics from indigenous peoples to attempt to prevent a Nazi expedition from digging up the Ark of the Covenant in Egypt. This requires him to retrieve his late mentor's daughter, who he has a previous toxic relationship with, from Nepal and then fight off well-organised bad guys. The Nazi group defeats him after many twists and turns, capture the Ark and are destroyed by divine forces emanating from the Ark when they open it. There's a particularly memorable chase sequence in the streets of Cairo (actually in Tunisia), at the end of which a planned lengthy fight sequence was cut short during filming because Ford's digestive system had collapsed and he could not go through with it as scripted, giving us one of the most iconic scenes of the movie.
There are many ridiculous things about the story, but the most ridiculous is that the ancient Egyptians happen to have left instructions for finding the Ark in just exactly the right places for Jones (and nobody else) to put the pieces together, and then left the actual hidey-hole well stocked with snakes which have survived three thousand years without any visible food souirce. The Nazis veer more towards comedic than genocidal. Many of the actors playing Arabs (and Asians) are browned up, most notably John Rhys-Davies, who barely attempts to conceal his Welsh accent as Sallah. The fact that the Nazis might have issues with Jews is mentioned precisely once. It does not even pass step one of the Bechdel test (there is only one named woman character, played by Karen Allan, Marion, a peril monkey, whose one remarkable characteristic is that she has a good head for liquor). But it is tremendous fun all the same.

As usual, I'm going to note actors who appeared in Doctor Who as well as here. (I haven't spotted any crossovers yet between Raiders and other Oscar-winning or Hugo-winning films that I have already reached in this sequence. There are of course plenty such to come.) They are all fairly minor characters, mostly playing races other than their own. The most visible, because he has two roles in Raiders, is Vic Tablian, who plays both the dubious guide in Peru and the man with the monkey in Cairo; a couple of years earlier, he was Ahmed in Pyramids of Mars.

Sonny Caldinez appeared four times in Doctor Who, once unmasked as Kemel in The Evil of the Daleks (1967) and three times as an Ice Warrior; in Raiders he is the Mean Mongolian in the Nepal bar scene.


Tutte Lemkow appeared in three William Hartnell stories, one of which is completely lost, but his roles as Kuijiu in Marco Polo (1964) and Ibrahim in The Crusade (1965) survive. In Raiders he plays the Imam who tells Jones how to reduce the height of the staff (advice that is clearly ignored, to no great disadvantage).


Kiran Shah plays Abu in Raiders, and has twice been in New Who, but obscured by costume, as the Unknown Figure in Listen (2014) and an emojibot in Smile (2017). He was already in his twenties when playing a child in Raiders.

And finally, John Rees plays a German sergeant here and also played space crewman Hardy in Frontier in Space (1973)

Back to normal order now, I think – next in sequence is actually The French Connection which won the Oscar in 1971.

Posted in Uncategorised

The Blake’s 7 Annuals

Back in the day there were three Blake's 7 annuals, for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981. By 1982, of course, the show had ended with everyone being killed, so there wouldn't have been much point in another annual. The first two of them are pretty easy to get hold of; the third is rarer but accessible for the determined. No writing or art credits are given for any of the three, which is a big shame because the writing is OK and the art in places rather good. They were published by World Distributors, who also did the Doctor Who annuals for 1979, 1980 and 1981, so it's likely that the same team was involved – we know that Paul Crompton was the main artist for the 1979 and 1980 Doctor Who Annuals, and Glenn Rix for 1981, but I don't think we have any information about who wrote the stories. Surprisingly, there is no mention of the annuals on the Blake's 7 Wiki.

1979 Annual (original price £1.50) – second paragraph of third story ("The Body Stealers"):

Blake peered over the edge of the tower at the dark shapes swarming through the stormy Vemos night below. Cally clipped the bracelet shut on the thin wrist of the semi-conscious figure propped up in front of her against the tower wall. A flash of lightning lit up Rask's cruel features. Thin lips, hollow cheeks, a long sharp nose and two glazed oval eyes, staring with hatred at Cally from under a mass of lank hair whipped forward by the wind.

Fiction accounts for 49 pages out of 63. The stories are OK for what they are, nicely illustrated with two of them featuring alien race who have been inspired by Meso-American culture. The rest is mostly mathematical puzzles, with two pages introducing the Liberator crew, and four pages of rather imaginative detail for the Blake's 7 expanded universe (click to embiggen):


1980 Annual (original price £1.75) – second paragraph of third story ("Sabotage"):

Blake shivered as he watched Vola's gloved fingers working deftly on the lock. He'd expected it to be cold, but not this cold.

Maybe the least good value of the three, here we have only 39 pages of fiction out of 62, and the rest is entirely filled with astronomy and space facts, some of which were already out of date by 1980. The illustrations are good, though most seem reminiscent of publicity pictures.

1981 Annual (original price £1.95) – second paragraph of third story ("The Island"):

“Power banks 4 and 5 down to 20%,” called Cally, reading of her instrumental panel. “We can't take much more of this.”

We're back up to 50 pages of story out of 63 now, which is better. This is the most continuity-heavy of the three annuals (not difficult), set during the third series in that the crew includes Dayna and Cally, with Zen and the Liberator, and references to the recent destruction of Star One. Again, decent interior art. By the time the annual was in the shops for Christmas shopping, however, Zen and the Liberator had been destroyed on screen at the end of March, so it was several months out of date. However, I appreciate the fan service. The art is decent, and the non-fiction part of the annual is filled out with more space and astronomy facts.

If you want, you can get the 1979 annual here, the 1980 annual here and the 1981 annual here.



Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Excession, by Iain M. Banks

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Amorphia wandered amongst the dead and dying of Hill 4. The battle had by this time moved on; the few defenders who'd survived and repelled the initial rush had been ordered to pull back just as the next wave of opposing troops had appeared out of the cannon smoke and fallen upon them; they had been slaughtered almost to a man and the victors had swept on to the next redoubt across the shallow valley beyond. Shattered palisades, lines of stakes and bunkers had been chewed up by the initial bombardment and later by the hooves of the cavalry. Bodies lay scattered like twisted, shredded leaves amongst the torn-up grassland and the rich brown-red soil. The blood of men and animals saturated the grass in places, making it thick and glossy, and collected in little hollows like pools of dark ink.

I was disappointed with the last Banks noel I revisited, but I very much enjoyed the return journey here. Excession is one of the culture novels in which humans, bloodthirsty aliens, and super-evolved AIs become entangled in a quest to control an artifect which appears to have come from another, far more advanced universe. Somehow I felt that the various plot strands wove together in a very satisfactory way, with the story fundamentally based on sensawunda – the Culture is already massively further evolved than we are; yet it too quakes when confronted with something unimaginably further advanced. The plot appears to move rather slowly, but in fact it's mostly justifiable setup for the dramatic denouement, or else excusable extra colour for the Culture universe. It works rather well for me, and if you don't have it, you can get it here.

Excession won the BSFA Award for 1996, beating that year's Hugo winner, Blue Mars, by Kim Stanley RobinsonHoly Fire, by Bruce Sterling; Interface, by Stephen Bury; The Memory Palace, by Gill Alderman; and The Stone Canal, by Ken MacLeod. I think I have read all except the Alderman, and I think Excession is the most memorable. Apart from Blue Mars, there was no overlap with the Clarke or Tiptree shortlists; those awards were won by The Calcutta Chromosome and The Sparrow/"Mountain Ways" respectively. The Sparrow also won the Clarke and BSFA Awards for the following year, so next up in this series I'll be looking at the joint 1998 Tiptree winners, Black Wine by Candas Jane Dorsey and “Travels With the Snow Queen” by Kelly Link.

Posted in Uncategorised

December 2005 books

This is the latest post in a series I started five months ago, anticipating the twentieth anniversary of my bookblogging which will fall in 2023. Every six-ish days I've been revisiting a month from my recent past, noting work and family developments as well as the books I read in that month. I've found it a pleasantly cathartic process, especially in current circumstances when we are all somewhat distracted. If you want to look back at previous entries, they are all tagged under bookblog nostalgia.

December 2005 was an unusual month in that I did not travel – a planned day-trip to France was cancelled at the last moment. The overnights meme says I had spent the night in 21 different places away from home during the year; I seem to have missed Berlin from the list. I certainly visited 17 countries in the course of the year (going by today's borders – ie counting Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo separately). I forgot to note that in November we had put out reports on the rigged elections in Azerbaijan, and also on EU visa policy in the BalkansMontenegro's imminent independence referendum. My Armenian intern A left (she later set up her own business) and I head-hunted her Greek replacement K from the internal media team.

At home, we celebrated little U's third birthday (she got an Etch-a-Sketch) and Anne's brother and sister both joined us for Christmas, in time for David Tennant's first full episode of Doctor Who. I seem to have pictures of them and the kids, but none of Anne or me. We had a full house, especially when Anne's parents and my sister and her husband all turned up.


During the Christmas break I did my own little historical project, transcribing my great-grandfather's diary of his 1858 pilgrimage to the Holy Land.

This was the first year that I did a year-end roundup of the books that I had read. I hadn't yet developed consistency in format and counting, so the number I tallied then is different to my new tally below.

December 2005 books:

Non-fiction 3; 2005 total 42
'with all faults', by David Low
Pilate: The Biography of an Invented Man, by Ann Wroe
The Georgian Feast: The Vibrant Culture and Savory Food of the Republic of Georgia, by Darra Goldstein

Non-genre fiction 0; 2005 total 9

sf (non-Who) 4; 2005 total 79
Erewhon, by Samuel Butler
Sevenacide, by Robert Shuster
Triplanetary, by E.E. "Doc" Smith
Numbers Don't Lie, by Terry Bisson

Doctor Who 3; 2005 total 5
The Well-Mannered War, by Gareth Roberts
Human Nature, by Paul Cornell
Lungbarrow, by Marc Platt

Comics 1; 2005 total 8
Boulevard of Broken Dreams, by Kim Deitch with Simon Deitch

2,500 pages; 2005 total 46,400 – this number soared once I started commuting by train in 2007
2/11 by women; 2005 total 30/144 (21%) – a standard proportion until I started to make efforts to read more diversely
None by PoC; 2005 total 4/144 (3%) – likewise.

Best books of the month for me were The Georgian Feast, which I'm still cooking from and you can get here, and Paul Cornell's Human Nature, which you can get here in a new edition and of course later became the only original Who novel to be later adapted to television. (Other formats adopted to television: a game book, a comic strip, a couple of short stories, more loosely a couple of Big Finish plays.) Several of these bounced off me, most thoroughly the rather dismal Sevanacide collection, which you can get here.


2005 books roundup

I make that 143 books in total in 2005, a bit less than the 149 I tallied for 2004 (and lower than any year since).

SF 79 (55% – highest percentage I have recorded for any year, though perhaps not if you count Doctor Who books as well)

The one you haven't heard of: Cultural Breaks, by Brian W. Aldiss

Non-fiction 42 (29% – higher than some recent years)
Best of 2005: The Island at the Centre of the World, by Russell Shorto, Better to Have Loved: The Life of Judith Merril, by Judith Merril and Emily Pohl-Weary, The Orientalist: solving the mystery of a strange and a dangerous life, by Tom Reiss
The one you haven't heard of: Bradt Travel Guide to (North) Macedonia, by Thammy Evans
Worst of 2005: The Truth About The Armed Conflict In Slovenia, by Col. Nikola Popović, Col. Ivan Matović, and Lt-Col. Stanoje Jovanović

Non-genre 9 (6% – very low; this was when I decided to start reading a bit more classic fiction)
Best of 2005: The Days of the Consuls/Bosnian Chronicle/Travnik Chronicle, by Ivo Andrić, Skinny Dip, by Carl Hiassen
Worst of 2005: The Da Vinci Code, by Dan Brown

Comics 8 (6% – on a par with the lower end of recent years)
Best of 2005: Bone, by Jeff Smith, Nu We Toch Hier Zijn, by Barbara Stok
Worst of 2005: Like A Velvet Glove Cast In Iron, by Daniel Clowes

Doctor Who 5 (3% – I was only just getting started)
Best of 2005: Human Nature, by Paul Cornell, The Dying Days, by Lance Parkin
Worst of 2005: Genocide, by Paul Leonard

Book of the year 2005: The Island at the Centre of the World, by Russell Shorto, a brilliant history of Nieuw Amsterdam, the Dutch colonial town that became New York. You can (and should) get it here.

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith

Second paragraph of third chapter (brace yourselves, it’s a long one):

There are some sorts of industry, even of the lowest kind, which can be carried on nowhere but in a great town. A porter, for example, can find employment and subsistence in no other place. A village is by much too narrow a sphere for him; even an ordinary market-town is scarce large enough to afford him constant occupation. In the lone houses and very small villages which are scattered about in so desert a country as the highlands of Scotland, every farmer must be butcher, baker, and brewer, for his own family. In such situations we can scarce expect to find even a smith, a carpenter, or a mason, within less than twenty miles of another of the same trade. The scattered families that live at eight or ten miles distance from the nearest of them, must learn to perform themselves a great number of little pieces of work, for which, in more populous countries, they would call in the assistance of those workmen. Country workmen are almost everywhere obliged to apply themselves to all the different branches of industry that have so much affinity to one another as to be employed about the same sort of materials. A country carpenter deals in every sort of work that is made of wood; a country smith in every sort of work that is made of iron. The former is not only a carpenter, but a joiner, a cabinet-maker, and even a carver in wood, as well as a wheel-wright, a plough-wright, a cart and waggon-maker. The employments of the latter are still more various. It is impossible there should be such a trade as even that of a nailer in the remote and inland parts of the highlands of Scotland. Such a workman at the rate of a thousand nails a-day, and three hundred working days in the year, will make three hundred thousand nails in the year. But in such a situation it would be impossible to dispose of one thousand, that is, of one day’s work in the year. As by means of water-carriage, a more extensive market is opened to every sort of industry than what land-carriage alone can afford it, so it is upon the sea-coast, and along the banks of navigable rivers, that industry of every kind naturally begins to subdivide and improve itself, and it is frequently not till a long time after that those improvements extend themselves to the inland parts of the country. A broad-wheeled waggon, attended by two men, and drawn by eight horses, in about six weeks time, carries and brings back between London and Edinburgh near four ton weight of goods. In about the same time a ship navigated by six or eight men, and sailing between the ports of London and Leith, frequently carries and brings back two hundred ton weight of goods. Six or eight men, therefore, by the help of water-carriage, can carry and bring back, in the same time, the same quantity of goods between London and Edinburgh as fifty broad-wheeled waggons, attended by a hundred men, and drawn by four hundred horses. Upon two hundred tons of goods, therefore, carried by the cheapest land-carriage from London to Edinburgh, there must be charged the maintenance of a hundred men for three weeks, and both the maintenance and what is nearly equal to maintenance the wear and tear of four hundred horses, as well as of fifty great waggons. Whereas, upon the same quantity of goods carried by water, there is to be charged only the maintenance of six or eight men, and the wear and tear of a ship of two hundred tons burthen, together with the value of the superior risk, or the difference of the insurance between land and water-carriage. Were there no other communication between those two places, therefore, but by land-carriage, as no goods could be transported from the one to the other, except such whose price was very considerable in proportion to their weight, they could carry on but a small part of that commerce which at present subsists between them, and consequently could give but a small part of that encouragement which they at present mutually afford to each other’s industry. There could be little or no commerce of any kind between the distant parts of the world. What goods could bear the expense of land-carriage between London and Calcutta? Or if there were any so precious as to be able to support this expense, with what safety could they be transported through the territories of so many barbarous nations? Those two cities, however, at present carry on a very considerable commerce with each other, and by mutually affording a market, give a good deal of encouragement to each other’s industry.

I am not especially well versed in economics, so I had been looking forward to reading this classic text. I’m afraid I lasted only about a hundred pages. The content is all good and well argued, but Smith is not Gibbon (coincidentally, I had a distant cousin whose maiden name was Smyth and married a man whose name was Gibbon) and without the delights of Gibbon’s style, the detailed prose was a bit wearing, especially given my general state of mind, driven by the current situation; I am looking for comfort reading, not education at the moment. Some day I shall invest in a nice readable Economics 101 text book and educate myself properly in the dismal science, which I guess may also have moved on a bit since the eighteenth century. If you want, you can get this here.

This was the non-fiction book that had lingered longest unread on my shelves. Next on that pile is The European Parliament, by Richard Corbett, Francis Jacobs and Michael Shackleton.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Red Notice, by Bill Browder

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Based on countless viewings of the movie Animal House, I decided that if I was going to go to a party school, I might as well do it right and join a fraternity. I pledged the Delta Upsilon fraternity and, after the requisite hazing, was accepted as a member. Everyone had a nickname there—Sparky, Whiff, Doorstop, Slim—and mine, on account of my curly, black hair, was Brillo.

This is an impressive first-person account of one businessman who was ruthlessly targeted by the Kremlin for trying to operate freely in Russia. Browder managed to make a lot of money in Eastern Europe in the wild days immediately after the fall of Communism, but ran foul of the Russian authorities, who used the full force of bad law to strip his assets (of which he had a lot) and, much worse, arrested Browder's legal adviser Sergei Magnitsky, who then died as a result of his mistreatment in jail. Browder's is not the only such story, but it is very well told, and he has vindicated Magnitsky's memory by getting legislation passed in various jurisdictions allowing direct sanctions against those who have abused human rights. One or two people who I know personally show up in the narrative (in a good way!) which is always interesting too. Recommended. You can get it here.

This was my top unread non-fiction book. Next on that list is The Ode Less Travelled: Unlocking the Poet Within, by Stephen Fry.

Posted in Uncategorised

Thursday reading

Current
Gideon the Ninth, by Tamsin Muir
Oathbringer, by Brandon Sanderson
The European Parliament, by Francis Jacobs, Richard Corbett and Michael Shackleton

Last books finished
The Moomins and the Great Flood, by Tove Jansson
A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess
A Prayer for Owen Meany, by John Irving

Next books
The First Men in the Moon, by H. G. Wells
Wiske, by Willy Vandersteen

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Hugo final ballot Goodreads/Librarything statistics

I have not tracked systematically how good a guide this is to the likely winner of the awards, but it's a useful yardstick for how far finalists have managed to penetrate the general market. In each table I have ranked the books by geometric average of their number of owners on Goodreads and LibraryThing, and bolded the highest average ranking in each category.

Best Novel

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
The Ten Thousand Doors of January, by Alix E. Harrow 139037 4.11 647 4.14
Gideon the Ninth, by Tamsyn Muir 73792 4.25 546 4.19
Middlegame, by Seanan McGuire 70258 4.08 328 4.18
A Memory Called Empire, by Arkady Martine 43577 4.18 437 4.14
The City in the Middle of the Night, by Charlie Jane Anders 38557 3.58 404 3.76
The Light Brigade, by Kameron Hurley 16359 3.99 196 3.8

Seanan McGuire scoring notably better on Goodreads than LibraryThing. Gideon the Ninth getting the best average rating on both.

Best Novella

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
"Anxiety Is the Dizziness of Freedom", by Ted Chiang (Exhalation) 93782 4.3 656 4.19
This Is How You Lose The Time War, by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone 87078 4.01 534 3.82
In an Absent Dream, by Seanan McGuire 32887 4.2 331 4.26
The Deep, by Rivers Solomon 46868 3.77 214 3.86
To Be Taught, If Fortunate, by Becky Chambers 30503 4.23 285 4.14
The Haunting of Tram Car 015, by P. Djèlí Clark 7639 4.08 164 4.14

For Ted Chiang's story, I am giving the numbers of Exhalation, the collection it was published in. This Is How You Lose The Time War has more Goodreads owners than all but one of the Best Novel finalists, and more LibraryThing owners than all but two of them.

Best Related Work

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
The Lady from the Black Lagoon, by Mallory O'Meara 18450 4.05 171 3.92
Becoming Superman, by J. Michael Straczynski 4842 4.65 84 4.58
The Pleasant Profession of Robert A Heinlein, by Farah Mendlesohn 165 4.02 34 4.2
Joanna Russ, by Gwyneth Jones 75 4.2 11 3.83
Worlds of Ursula K. Le Guin, by Arwen Curry
John W. Campbell Award Acceptance Speech, by Jeannette Ng

One of these is a documentary film and another was a speech, so no numbers can be given. The ratings for Becoming Superman are very high indeed.

Best Graphic Story or Comic

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
Mooncakes, by Wendy Xu & Suzanne Walker 29842 3.9 108 3.56
Monstress, Vol. 4: The Chosen, by Marjorie Liu (writer), Sana Takeda (artist) 8218 4.24 136 4.13
Paper Girls, Vol 6, by Brian Vaughan (writer), Cliff Chiang & Matt Wilson (artists) 7513 4.19 93 4.03
Die, Vol. 1: Fantasy Heartbreaker, by Kieron Gillen (writer), Stephanie Hans (artist) 5223 4.1 89 3.98
The Wicked + The Divine, Vol. 9: Okay, by Kieron Gillen (writer), Jamie McKelvie, & Matt Wilson (artists) 4524 4.26 69 4.18
LaGuardia, by Nnedi Okorafor (writer), Tana Ford (artist) , James Devlin (colours) 1526 4.08 38 3.88

Mooncakes has clearly tickled the Goodreads community much more than the LibraryThing community; and yet also has the lowest average ranking on both systems. The final installment of The Wicked + The Divine has the highest rating on both.

Lodestar

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
The Wicked King, by Holly Black 211351 4.44 663 4.34
Dragon Pearl, by Yoon Ha Lee 25020 3.82 271 3.79
Deeplight, by Frances Hardinge 9436 4.24 52 4.13
Minor Mage, by T. Kingfisher 5489 4.18 61 4.02
Catfishing on CatNet, by Naomi Kritzer 2220 4.13 83 4.63
Riverland, by Fran Wilde 1324 4.03 33 4.13

Massive lead for The Wicked King on all metrics. One other indicator though is the ratio of the more fannish LibraryThing readers to the more general Goodreads users, where Naomi Kritzer is well in front.

Retro Best Novel

Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
Sirius: A Fantasy of Love and Discord, by Olaf Stapledon 3096 3.9 419 3.91
The Golden Fleece, by Robert Graves 2185 4.04 510 3.74
The Wind on the Moon, by Eric Linklater 2255 3.95 301 3.8
Land of Terror, by Edgar Rice Burroughs 1178 3.72 295 3.47
The Winged Man, by A. E. Van Vogt and E. Mayne Hull 256 3.44 187 2.87
Shadow Over Mars/The Nemesis from Terra, by Leigh Brackett 150 3.28 75 3.45

Sirius has the most GR readers and the highest ranking from LT users; The Golden Fleece has the most LT readers and the highest ranking from GR users. For Leigh Brackett I amalgamted the GR readings for both titles of the book, which is catalogued separately there – it still has the lowest GR rating of any book here. (And The Winged Man has the lowest LT ranking.)

Strange times, and not quite four months to go.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

My BSFA votes (big long post)

Other things being equal, I wold have been looking forward to Eastercon at the end of this week – a welcome return to the Birmingham Hilton where I have had various good times over the years. The last few times I attended Eastercon I got (not very reluctantly) roped into counting the votes for the BSFA Awards; the voting deadline this year has now been extended to the 24th, with an online ceremony promised in early May. But I had been expecting to make my mind up this week, and I have decided my votes in all four categories, as follows.

Best Art

Well, precisely one of my nominations made it to the final five. These are all nice pieces, but I found them quite easy to rank. (In each case, click to embiggen.)

5) Charlotte Stroomer – Cover for The Rosewater Redemption by Tade Thompson (Orbit)

Interesting geometry which however doesn’t say much to me.

4) Chris Baker (Fangorn) – Cover for Wourism and Other Stories by Ian Whates (Luna Press)

Interesting future city, possibly dystopian, or do we only think that because of the dark buildings and the weather?

3) Julia Lloyd – Cover for Fleet of Knives by Gareth L Powell (Titan Books)

Was one of the ones I almost nominated but I am bumping it down a bit on reflection. I love that the ships in the fleet do look a bit like knives.

2) Richard Wagner – Cover for Interzone #284 (Interzone)

This grew on me, looking at it again – there is clearly an interesting story in the picture. (Not sure that it relates to any of the actual stories in the magazine though.)

1) Aitch & Rachel Vale – Cover for Deeplight by Frances Hardinge (UK edition) (Macmillan Children’s Books)

Very interesting, and really made me want to read the book – what is with the porous heart, in the middle of various marine objects? All intriguingly drawn, not crowded, very suggestive. Got one of my nominations, and gets my vote.

Best Non-Fiction

Five finalists here, but I have only read four; I am not going to invest in Sideways in Time: Critical Essays on Alternate History Fiction as it costs more than all the rest of the shortlist combined (in all categories). Sorry. If you want to, you can get it here.

4) Away Day: Star Trek and the Utopia of Merit, by Jo Lindsay Walton. Second paragraph of third section, with footnote:

When Saadia describes what work is like in the Federation, he also implies that the resources that pour from the Federation cornucopia are allocated by some system of reciprocity.11 Just by itself, this claim doesn’t tell us much – there are so many different kinds of reciprocity! But Saadia narrows it down by (quite reasonably) emphasizing the more informal, forgiving, and egalitarian forms of reciprocity. That is, he emphasizes mutual aid, where what is paramount is the care and respect for one’s neighbours (or for those who might one day become one’s neighbours). Gift‑giving is focused on greatest need, and over time the accumulating networks of storied obligations fulfil an emergent function, gradually cultivating a discerning, generous, and fiercely cohesive community. Mutual aid has associations with anarchism – for instance, in Ursula Le Guin’s classic critical utopia The Dispossessed (1974) – but Saadia doesn’t go that far; the Federation does have laws and regulations!
11 Or to put it another way, drawing on Jürgen Habermas’s suggestive terminology, the Federation operates through the communicative rationality of a shared lifeworld, rather than formal systems of bureaucratic and market power. Just by itself, this claim doesn’t tell us much – there are so many different possible states for our shared lifeworld to be in!

A blog essay on the economics of the Star Trek universe which I am afraid did not interest me much, leaning on the work of authors who I have not read. You can read it here for free.

3) About Writing, by Gareth L. Powell. Second paragraph of third chapter:

The truth though, as you’ve probably already realised, is a lot more complicated.

This is a nicely done short account of the experience of being a writer, with recommendations to colleagues and aspiring writers. Quite a lot of it is self-care in one way or another, and that’s advice we all probably need, especially in these days when many of us are unexpectedly working on our own rather than in a communcal environment. It’s a good book, and in fact was the only thing I nominated that made it to the final ballot, but the other two (which I did not read until after the second round deadline had passed) are fundamental contributions to our understanding of the genre. You can get it here.

2) H.G. Wells: A Literary Life, by Adam Roberts. Second paragraph of third chapter:

The Time Machine is, of course, the more famous of Wells’s first two novels, and for good reason. It is, quite simply, a masterpiece. Henley paid £100 to serialise it [in] The New Review over Christmas and New Year 1894–95; and a strange sort of Christmas story it must have made. William Heinemann advanced Wells £50 for book publication rights, and Wells’s first book-length fiction emerged into the world in May 1895. Despite being only 152 pages long (some scenes from the serialised version were cut for the one-volume edition), Heinemann nonetheless had enough confidence in the book commit to an initial print-run of 10,000 and a 15% royalty—generous, given that Wells at this time was a relatively unknown writer. Just how unknown is reinforced by the American first edition of The Time Machine, which was published by Holt & Co in New York as by ‘H.S. Wells’.

This seems to be a synthesis and revision of the blog posts by Roberts which were collectively nominated in this category two years ago. It is a straightforward sequencing of Wells’ novels, looked at through the lens of what was going on in his life at the time. Wells wrote a lot of novels and lived a long life, so it’s quite a long book, though for the sf fan the interest goes off the boil after the first few chapters. I definitely felt I learned more from this than from David Lodge’s A Man of Parts. One technical point – rather more proof-reading errors than I would have expected from a professional publisher – note eg missing preposition in the third sentence of my extract above. You can get it here.

1) The Pleasant Profession of Robert A. Heinlein, by Farah Mendlesohn. Second paragraph of third chapter:

The sections of this chapter and the next do not represent an even or ordered mapping. Heinlein’s work followed a spiral path, and elements that I wish to identify turn up, are discarded, and then returned to again in later work. But there are three clear divisions in terms of the rhetorical techniques Heinlein uses: the cinematic, the didactic and the picaresque.

I was a huge fan of Heinlein's writing in my teenage years, but the last awful novels came out just around that time and somewhat tainted the memory of the pleasure I'd had a few years earlier. I have gone back to his work a couple of times in recent years, but bounced off it as often as not.

But here Farah Mendlesohn approaches Heinlein with a redemptive eye. It is an interesting comparison with Roberts' Wells book – it is shorter, because Heinlein didn't write as much despite living a bit longer; it is more consciously fannish; but it's a much deeper analysis of what Heinlein thought he was doing with his writing, grouped more thematically than by time line. Heinlein's politics, for good or ill, had much more influence on later science fiction than Wells'. Possibly Heinlein actually had more to say than Wells, even if Wells said more of it.

I learned a lot from this, including in particular what Heinlein thought he was doing with Farnham's Freehold and how it went so badly wrong. It gets my vote. You can get it here.

Best Short Fiction

6) "For Your Own Good" (Wourism and Other Stories), by Ian Whates. Second paragraph of third section:

To my left the land sloped abruptly downwards. I gazed at the waxy-leafed crowns of orange trees and, beyond them, the white walls of a villa. Without consciously deciding to leave the track, my feet carried me down between the trees, almost slipping on the dry loose surface, my fingers reaching out instinctively in passing to drag along the rough grey-brown bark, as they had so often during those long ago days of boyhood.

A story of man vs machine consciousness. Failed to grab me.

5) This is How You Lose the Time War, by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone. Second paragraph of third chapter:

Other pilgrims wander here, in saffron robes or homespun brown. Sandals shuffle over rocks, and high winds whistle around cave corners. Ask the pilgrims how the labyrinth came to be, and they offer answers varied as their sins. Giants made it, this one claims, before the gods slew the giants, then abandoned Earth to its fate at mortal hands. (Yes, this is Earth—long before the ice age and the mammoth, long before academics many centuries downthread will think it possible for the planet to have spawned pilgrims, or labyrinths. Earth.) The first snake built the labyrinth, says another, screwing down through rock to hide from the judgment of the sun. Erosion made it, says a third, and the grand dumb motion of tectonic plates, forces too big for we cockroaches to conceive, too slow for mayfly us to observe.

Also failed to grab me, though everyone else seems to love it. A bit like Good Omens, the story of two adversaries who find that they have bonded. Obviously that theme appeals to a great many people; I'm just not one of them.

4) The Survival of Molly Southbourne, by Tade Thompson. Second paragraph of third chapter:

It has been quiet, the kind of quiet that makes you think the danger has passed, the kind that makes you go soft, less vigilant.

I very much enjoyed the first of this series, The Murders of Molly Southbourne, which was on the BSFA shortlist two years ago. The sequel felt a bit less surefooted to me, with the rules of the world not being as coherent and the means and motivation of the protagonist less clear. Still, I liked the crackling prose.

3) Ragged Alice, by Gareth Powell. Second paragraph of third chapter:

The headland to the north had a steep path leading up from the end of the concourse to a small chapel overlooking the town. Holly and Scott were met at the top of the path by a uniformed constable in his midthirties.

I liked this a lot – police procedural meets horror, as with a lot of popular UK-based writing at the moment, but this time in Wales rather than London (Cornell/Aaronovitch). Some bits didn't quite make sense, in terms of policce procedure – how come the protagonist gertscalled in so quickly? How come nobody in her chain of command spots the resonaces with her own personal history? – but it was a compelling if chilling read.

2) To Be Taught, If Fortunate, by Becky Chambers. Second paragraph of third chapter:

Looking in the mirror, I wasn’t sure I liked what that equated to. I was almost eleven years older than when I'd left Earth. That’s not so much time, but the changes of ageing had largely escaped my notice, distracted as I was by the more dramatic differences of somaforming. I didn’t mind the lines in my face, but I also didn’t remember their development. My hair hadn’t grown too much in the five years spent in torpor, but the frequent shaving meant I never saw it much longer than maybe a centimetre. Now, I saw frequent threads of wintry grey among the black tufts. My body was average, healthy, nothing out of the ordinary. That was the problem. Without the glitter, I felt dull; without the brawn, puny. To my eyes, I looked ill, and the sight made me sink.

What I love about Chambers is that she digs deep into good old sensawunda, and comes out with a new 21st century sensibility. Here a human crew adapts themselves to the environments they are exploring, far from a home planet that has gone awfully silent on them; and they have to move and grow in a newly strange universe. Somewhat downbeat ending which I see other reviewers compaining about, but it worked for me.

1) "Jolene", by Fiona Moore (Interzone #283). Second paragraph of third section:

I shook my head. “Sorry to disappoint you,” I said, “but she wouldn’t talk with me either.”

Somehow this just ticked my boxes – the shortest of the stories on the list, a noir tale involving a near-future London woman detective and a rogue intelligent car; it achieves just what it has to do in the space it has to do it in. Gets my vote.

There are six short pieces to choose from here, which is high but not unprecedented; there were seven in this category last year, and eight novels five years ago.

Best Novel

5) Atlas Alone, by Emma Newman. Second paragraph of third section:

It’s so broad a request I suspect this is actually just a test of my ability. I wouldn’t put it past her to seed some rogue data in there just to see how I respond to it. She says I can take a couple of days if I need to. I decide I’ll get it to her in half the time.

Rather failed to convince me, I'm afraid. The protagonist is at the centre of a vast multi-planet political conspiracy, and spends her time playing immersive computer games. The intelligent AI which turns out to be Behind It All is just powerful enough to keep the plot going and not powerful enough to resolve everything. Didn't work for me.

4) Fleet of Knives, by Gareth L Powell. Second paragraph of third section:

My crew.

I liked all the rest of the shortlisted novels. Fleet of Knives is the sequel to last year's winner, Embers of War, which I really enjoyed. There is a nice theme of the double identity of one of the protagonists, whose two roles are war criminal and dissident poet. In the end, though, MilSF isn't quite my thing and the book slipped down my ballot accordingly.

3) The Green Man’s Foe, by Juliet E McKenna. Second paragraph of third section:

Just after eleven, by the Land Rover’s dashboard clock, I saw a left-hand fork signposted to Bourton, Aylworth and Ashgrove. That last village was where Ben had told me Brightwell’s new owner, Edmund Franklin, lived. As I hit the indicator and followed the road down into the valley, I soon found Bourton under Ashes.

Now it gets very difficult to choose. I found The Green Man's Foe very helpful and hopeful comfort reading. It's the sequel to a book I haven't read, a contemporary fantasy about an English chap with magical relatives, dealing with dark forces and teenagers going off the rails. I am marking it down a bit because the villain was pretty one-dimensional, or at least the protagonist's perception was, which weakend the investment I was ready to make in the characters.

2) Children of Ruin, by Adrian Tchaikovsky. Second paragraph of third section:

He had downplayed the possible biochemistry aspect in his reports to Baltiel, while simultaneously knowing that the man would not be fooled. It created a convenient fiction between them that they could show to later auditors. Baltiel was sharper than Senkovi had initially thought. After his big presentation about 834g, Senkovi had asked the man, ‘How did you get through all that fast enough to make the decision?’ and Baltiel had just said, ‘I’ve seen your appraisals and tolerances. You wouldn’t stake your career on a bad bet. All I needed to see was that you were staying the hell off my planet.’ And he had smiled blandly, and Senkovi had learned a lot about his boss from that expression. An inclination to play God was part and parcel of wanting to go out and terraform other worlds, but good practice was to at least play nicely with the rest of the pantheon. Senkovi had met Avrana Kern once – it had been hard to avoid her – and there was a woman who was her own Zeus, Odin and Yahweh all in one. Baltiel’s role had only ever been intended as a subordinate Vulcan, but now he had found a new lease of divinity, a project Kern could not reach across the abyss to dictate.

I hugely enjoyed Children of Time when I finally got around to reading it recently, and this was a really good sequel, with some very vivid non-human aliens and great action between planets. I think this one wins the sensawunda contest among the novels.

1) The Rosewater Insurrection, by Tade Thompson. Second paragraph of third section:

He looks up, and sees the filtering of sunlight through the dome. The light has a blue tinge today. In his mind he queries the xenoforms for conditions outside the dome, in Rosewater and beyond. Nothing unusual. The humans are walking and driving back and forth. Buying food, selling food, fighting, fucking, living, dying. No military build-up, no imminent attack. The religious factions seem calm. The weather is stable, no elevated seismic activity.

Also a sequel to one of last year's finalists, Rosewater, which I ranked top last year and I am ranking this one top again this year. Near-future Nigeria (like other parts of the world) has been subject to an alien intrusion; this plays out on the ground in micropolitics, including sexual politics, for an interesting and intelligent exploration of what it actually means to be human in an unforgiving and rapidly changing world. I think of all the books it's the one that speaks to today's situation most clearly, and it gets my vote.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

  • Mon, 21:23: RT @sturdyAlex: Today is exactly 14 days since Greece went into a lockdown much stricter than UK. Many rebuked it as premature, illiberal,…
  • Mon, 21:27: RT @jburnmurdoch: NEW: Mon 6 April update of coronavirus trajectories Daily new deaths: • US has averaged 1,000 deaths per day over the la…
  • Mon, 22:32: RT @RozKaveney: The thing about social media is…you don’t actually have to press the button. You can type the thing, look at it for a bi…
  • Tue, 10:45: Best Practices for Filming with a Mobile Device https://t.co/xGPF2mIIk1 Obvious, but worth repeating, from @APCOWorldwide colleagues.
  • Tue, 11:40: RT @neilhimself: I am so proud of @CoNZealand. Making a WorldCon happen is hard enough. Making a WorldCon happen that you are then going t…

Posted in Uncategorised

Twenty days of lockdown

Ten days since my previous update, a briefer set of notes on what has been happening.

First off, I had a bad bug last week – I had actually had an upset stomach a few days previously, and thought I had recovered, but then started a course of antibiotics on Monday evening and perhaps that over-triggered the body defences; at any rate, I slept very badly on Tuesday night and woke on Wednesday knowing I was not getting out of bed that day. On Thursday I felt even worse and of course worried that I was coming down with the Big Rona; but I called our GP who pointed out to me that I had no trouble breathing and no temperature, and more importantly neither Anne nor F was showing any symptoms at all, so it was just one of those things. I stayed in bed on Friday as well and was better at the weekend. Read quite a lot on Wednesday and Friday, didn't have the energy for it on Thursday but watched a classic film in bed, in stages. Back at work today with a mountain of backlog, of course.

More positively, we've been able to Skype with little U every couple of days, and she now understands what is going on – at first she obviously thought that she was seeing a passive video, but she eventually realised that it was "real". (We get regular updates on B, who is fine, but there is no point in tryingto Skype with her.) When we talk to U, it's with my iPad held at arm's length, so it can get a bit crowded at our end of the call. You will see that we have been joined by Upsy Daisy and Igglepiggle.

I am glad to say that the Big Rona has yet to hit my own immediate circle. The former prime minister of Somalia, who I met a few years ago, sadly succumbed to it; we have also lost the great Mhamed Khadad, but as far as I know it wasn't Coronavirus that got him. I have been fortunate; I know from Facebook and Twitter that a number of my friends have had sadder experiences. I have had no update on ex-president Ahtisaari, but another friend in his 70s who had been hospitalised in Sweden has been released and is still recovering at home.

Belgium appears to be at or even slightly past the peak, at least of this round. Today the number of COVID-19 patients in intensive care decreased for the first time since the crisis started, and the expectation is that the death rate (which sadly reached another maximum today) should start to fall in a week. Whether this means we can start going back to business on 19 April is another matter. I think it's more likely that we will be asked to tough it out until 3 May, or perhaps have a partial relaxation in the last ten days of this month.

The situation in the USA continues to horrify me. I know, I know, states' rights and all that; it simply means that there are 50+ different outbreaks which are simply not being co-ordinated, with no national leadership and the highest daily death rate of anywhere as of current writing. But the crazy thinig is that the objective evidence of Trump's failure to deal with the issue appears to have no effect on the internal narrative – in fact, his approval rating seems to be higher than at any time since January 2017. Cause for despair.

Meanwhile, when I have not been ill I have found it easy enough to disappear into the spare room to do Werk and then emerge at the end of the day. Next weekend will be a long one again – remember Easter? My plan to do more videos about the neighbourhood was hit by illness last week, but I hope to revive it. We are fortunate enough to live near the woods, and get out often enough.

Stay well, everyone!

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

November 2005 books

November 2005 was a heavy month for travel. I started in Montenegro, went from there for Vienna and then on to Kyiv, my first ever visit to Ukraine (I enjoyed visiting the Bulgakov house and the Scythian gold exhibition at the Museum of National Historical Treasures); and then at the end of the month I went to Berlin and from there to New York. I also found time for an informational interview with my current employers; I thought it went rather well, but it was almost eight and a half years before they got back to me!

Back at home, the local riding school put on a show of small pets including rabbits. One of the rabbits, a Flemish Giant, was very big indeed.

With all that travel, I read quite a lot of books in November 2005, comparable to one of the better months of recent years.

Non-fiction 3 (YTD 39)
The Jewel-Hinged Jaw, by Samuel R. Delany
Never Eat Alone, by Keith Ferrazzi with Tahl Raz
Up Through an Empty House of Stars: Reviews and Essays 1980-2002, by David Langford

Non-genre 1 (YTD 9)
The Days of the Consuls/Bosnian Chronicle/Travnik Chronicle, by Ivo Andrić

sf 10 (YTD 75)
Moving Mars, by Greg Bear
Olympos, by Dan Simmons
A Feast for Crows, by George R.R. Martin
Hogfather, by Terry Pratchett
Lords and Ladies, by Terry Pratchett
Smoke and Mirrors, by Neil Gaiman
Magic for Beginners, by Kelly Link
The Wind's Twelve Quarters, by Ursula K. Le Guin
The Darkness That Comes Before, by R. Scott Bakker
Counting Heads, by David Marusek

Doctor Who 2 (YTD 2)
Genocide, by Paul Leonard
The Dying Days, by Lance Parkin

Comics 1 (YTD 7)
Safe Area Goražde: The War in Eastern Bosnia 1992-95, by Joe Sacco

7,200 pages (YTD 43,900)
2/17 by women (YTD 28/133)
1/17 by PoC (YTD 4/133)

Links above to my reviews, below to Amazon.

Best books of the month were Le Guin's The Wind's Twelve Quarters, a welcome reread, which you can get hereBosnian Chronicle/Travnik Chronicle/The Days of the Consuls, which you can get here. Massively underwhelmed by Dan Simmons' Olympos, but you can get it here if you want.


Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

A Clockwork Orange

A Clockwork Orange won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation in 1972. It was up against two other films, The Andromeda Strain and THX 1138; a Firesign Theatre LP, I Think We’re All Bozos on This Bus; and “L.A. 2017”, an sfnal episode of the non-sf TV series The Name of the Game, directed by a very young Steven Spielberg and written by veteran Philip Wylie. Up to now, it had been rather rare for films to win the BDP Hugo – A Clockwork Orange was only the fourth to get it after the award was inaugurated in 1958. The category was simply skipped in 1964 and 1966, voters chose No Award in 1959, 1963 and 1974, it went to The Twilight Zone in 1960, 1961 and 1963 and to Star Trek in 1967 and 1968, and in 1970 of course it was won by the real-life moon landings of 1969. The three previous films to have won were The Incredible Shrinking ManDr Strangelove and 2001: A Space Odyssey, giving Stanley Kubrick two out of three; A Clockwork Orange makes it three out of four. From here on, the dynamic changed and films won the Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation every year until 1993, with one exception when the voters chose No Award. So that’s going to slow down my film-watching project, especially once I start counting the Nebula winners as well.

IMDB users rank A Clockwork Orange as the best film of 1971 on both of their systems, with that year’s Oscar winner, The French Connection, ranked 4th and 8th respectively. I think it is better than any of the (few) other 1971 films that I have seen. I hadn’t seen it before, but took advantage of a day last week when I felt too porly even to read (don’t worry, not the Big Rona, just a stomach bug that knocked me out) and watched it in bed.

As you’re probably aware, it’s a brutal film, with two rapes and some nasty physical violence and torture. I won’t go into gruesome detail. It’s the story of Alex, a youth in the very near future, who likes doing damage to people and property with his friends. He is caught, jailed, and subjected to horrible brainwashing in order to condition him to be repulsed by sex and violence, and also by Beethoven, previously his favourite composer. When he gets out he finds himself a political football, torn between those who have abused him and those he has abused. The film is fantastically made, portraying a totally convincing dystopian environment with an eerie soundtrack combining classics and Moog synthesiser versions of the same. The visuals are striking and memorable.

There are also quite a lot of breasts. The central character is deeply misogynist, living in a sexist society, and though we do in fact see his penis at one point, the topless and naked women and depictions of women are what stick in the mind. Almost all of the sex (apart from the final cowboy scene) is male-dominant missionary, including the threesome with the girls from the record shop. A particularly telling moment is the press conference at the end, in which there are only two women in the crowd of journalists and photographers, both stuck at the back. This may be a film of genius, but it is not exactly a feminist work.

vlcsnap-2020-04-03-17h53m11s399.png

The whole thing is carried by Malcolm McDowell as Alex, combining menace, partial self-awareness, and a weird sort of innocence as the grownups start doing things to him in return for his crimes. I had only seen a few of his later films, but it’s clear why he plays such good villains, right from the start of his career.

His gang of droogs, to my surprise, include Warren Clarke, decades before he became a national treasure, second from the left.

On the far left is James Marcus, who had two minor roles in Doctor Who: in Invasion of the Dinosaurs (1974) he was a medieval peasant brought forward to modern times, and in Underworld (1978) he was the nasty security officer Rask. Sorry, not brilliant pictures in either case.

Two other roles that really jumped out at me, from actors who I do not remember seeing before but both seemed to slip into it tremendously comfortably: Anthony Sharp as the evil Minister, and more briefly Barry Cookson as Dr Alcott who admits Alex to the Ludovico Centre.

We have only one returning actor from a past Oscar winner, Michael Bates who is the chief prison guard here after being Monty in last year’s Patton.

And we have one returnee from 2001: A Space Odyssey, the previous film to win the Hugo (also by Kubrick) – Margaret Tyzack, who is the unnamed woman conspirator here and was the Russian scientist Elena who Heywood Floyd meets in orbit.:

Apart from John Marcus, there are a number of crossover Doctor Who appearances. Virginia Weatherall is the sexual temptress for Alex’s post-treatment test; back in 1963 she was Dyoni in the story now known as The Daleks.

Godfrey Quigley is the prison chaplain here; in the second Peter Cushing movie (1966), he was the disabled scientist Dortmun.

Neil Wilson, who checks Alex into prison, was a hairier Seeley in Spearhead from Space the previous year (1970):

A couple of years later, John J. Carey, one of the policemen who beats Alex up, became Bloodaxe in The Time Warrior (1974), also with a lot more hair.

Further on again, Adrienne Corri, one of the gang’s victims, whose face we don’t really get a good shot of here, was to be Mena in The Leisure Hive (1980):

Margaret Tyzack’s co-conspirator is played by John Savident, who is briefly seen as the Squire in The Visitation (1982) but also had a couple of roles in Blake’s 7.

And yes, sitting with him in the Clockwork Orange shot is David Prowse, later the Green Cross Man and the body of Darth Vader.

Finally in terms of Who, and with the biggest time gap, future enfant terrible Steven Berkoff is the other policeman who beats Alex up, and four decades later was the evil Shakri in The Power of Three (2012).

A couple of notes from other fandoms. The nurse who is interrupted while having sex when Alex wakes from his coma is none other than Carol Drinkwater, who achieved fame a few years later as Helen Herriot in the TV series All Creatures Great and Small. Unfortunately I couldn’t get a clip from the film that shows her face as clearly as her breasts, so you’ll just have to imagine it. And a rare crossover with the Rocky Horror Picture Show: Gaye Brown, the sophisto woman who sings in the milk bar, is one of the Transylvanians.

I don’t think I’ll rush to watch this again, but I am very glad to have ticked this box of my cinematic education.

The book is very short, but the paragraphs are long; here is the second one from the third chapter:

We got out at Center and walked slow back to the Korova Milkbar, all going yawwwww a malenky bit and exhibiting to moon and star and lamplight our back fillings, because we were still only growing malchicks and had school in the daytime, and when we got into the Korova we found it fuller than when we’d left earlier on. But the chelloveck that had been burbling away, in the land, on white and synthemesc or whatever, was still on at it, going: ‘Urchins of deadcast in the way-ho-hay glill platonic time weatherborn.’ It was probable that this was his third or fourth lot that evening, for he had that pale inhuman look, like he’d become a thing, and like his litso was really a piece of chalk carved. Really, if he wanted to spend so long in the land, he should have gone into one of the private cubies at the back and not stayed in the big mesto, because here some of the malchickies would filly about with him a malenky bit, though not too much because there were powerful bruiseboys hidden away in the old Korova who could stop any riot. Anyway, Dim squeezed in next to this veck and, with his big clown’s yawp that showed his hanging grape, he stabbed this veck’s foot with his own large filthy sabog. But the veck, my brothers, heard nought, being now all above the body.

When I first read it in 2006, I wrote:

I was complaining a few days ago about authors who make you work hard to read their fiction, and how I expect to be adequately rewarded. With A Clockwork Orange I do feel adequately rewarded. It’s a very short novel about the violence of youth, based a little I guess on the famous battles between mods and rockers of the 1960s. But Burgess manages to lift it into the realm of the universal by two straightforward but brilliantly executed gimmicks.

The first of these, of course, is the nadsat used by Alex and his friends. Rather than use contemporary teenage slang, Burgess invented his own. My Russian is pretty vestigial but sufficient to get through most of the book without worrying too much – in particular I think he’s managed to catch a few genuine Russian nuances and insert them subversively into English, like chelloveck, which basically means “chap”, from человек. Another good bit of wordcrafting is tolchock, which is originally толчок, the Russian noun for “shove”, but in Burgess becomes either a sustained push or a sudden blow, as when Alex and friends are disposing of a stolen car in the canal: “we got out and, the brakes off, all four tolchocked it to the edge of the filthy water that was like treacle mixed with human hole products, then one good horrorshow tolchock and in she went.” I’ve heard people in Ireland used the word “feck” as a verb with similar meaning. And horrorshow (ie хорошо) for “good” is a lovely riff on “wicked”. (There were a lot of other nice touches; I’ll just mention oddy-knocky for одинокий, “lonesome”.)

The second is his choice of classical music as Alex’s personal fixation. Actually I rather get the impression that Alex is unusual even among his peers in his preference. The two girls he lures home are much more into “pathetic pop-discs”, and he doesn’t listen to music with his friends. (No mention of going to actual live musical performances at all – though there are “worldcasts” where everyone gets to watch the same entertainment around the world, closer to Edward Bellamy than Bob Geldof I think.) However, the fact that the music Alex listens to is (mostly) already known by the general reader helps us to get through the barrier created by the language, and his description of why he likes Beethoven’s Ninth is something anyone else who likes it can relate to.

After all that, the book itself? Plot is easy to summarise: Alex is a very nasty and violent boy; he is imprisoned and subjected to mind control which removes his ability to do evil; after public protest the process is reversed; but he finds that he is growing up anyway. The use of nadsat slang actually makes the descriptions of violence in the early part of the book more bearable than it would be if graphically expressed in standard English. The violence of youth is, of course, universal.

Libertarians may jump with glee on the sinister role of the State in all this, the brutal millicents/милиции, but I think the involvement of the State is almost incidental; Burgess’ point is about redemption, and that it must come from within, cannot be imposed from outside. In the last chapter Alex realises this for himself, bumping into his old friend Pete who is now married, and reflecting that “I am not young, not no longer, oh no. Alex like groweth up, yes.” According to Blake Morrison in the introduction of my Penguin edition, the last chapter was actually deleted from the first American version of the book as the publishers felt it was too upbeat (!). Bizarre.

Anyway, a fascinating, horrible and well-constructed book.

Kubrick did not realise that there was a last chapter, so the film ends on a less upbeat note than the book (which has Alex achieving at least a partial redemption). Apart from that, it really does the book justice – some details are changed to make a more coherent screenplay, but in fact the three sections of the book each are treated in about a third of the film’s length. Sometimes the movie can do a book favours by cutting bits out (eg Oliver!), but with a short intense book like A Clockwork Orange, it made sense to take what was there and lift almost all of it into a new dimension.

You can get the film here and the book here. Next film on my list is The French Connection, which won the Oscar for this year; the next Hugo winner is Slaughterhouse-Five.

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Strategic Europe, ed. Jan Techau

Second paragraph of third essay (John Kornblum, "Six Vignettes about Europe"):

2. In today's Europe, as Marshall McLuhan put it: "the medium is the message." Raised on Europe's mantra of peace and stability, many Europeans actually feel a sense of superiority from the success of what they see as their innovative "peace policy." They believe that their multilateral institution-building has "erased the threat of war forever," and that this method can be applied across the globe. Even the euro was sold not as a tool for a dynamic financial future but as guarantee that Europe would never fight another war.

One of the advantages of a job like mine is that I often get exposed to top-level thinking about What Is Really Going On; one of the disadvantages of my lifestyle is that it often takes years to get around to reading analysis that I have picked up along the way. Jan Techau was the first director of the Brussels office of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; his successor, Tomáš Valášek, just got elected president of the Slovak parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee; and the new director, my good friend Rosa Balfour, took over this week. This book is the fruit of one of Jan Techau's early initiatives in the job, in 2011; he got a bunch of leading European thinkers to write short pieces on the theme "Time for Strategic Europe" for the Carnegie website, and then collected them in this book, published in 2012 and acquired by me then, but unread until now.

It's weird to look back a mere eight years and see what signals were seen and which were missed even by people who are generally good at this sort of thing. Brexit simply isn't mentioned. The threat of populism more generally is hinted at, but not in any very analytical way. The 2014 Ukraine crisis was unimagined. The Arab Spring was beginning to unfold, but the EU's failure to respond to it positively was not foreseen. (There is one particularly optimistic piece on that.)

One positive point was also not foreseen – the EU's involvement with the Iran nuclear deal, however shortlived that may turn out to be.

Back in 2011, of course, the real problem with EU external policy was a widespread concern about the performance of Catherine Ashton, the first High Representative under the Lisbon Treaty. It's telling that her name doesn't appear anywhere in the book either. There are some reflections on institutional tinkering and making the most of the new structures, but none of them really gets to the meat of the question.

Fundamentally, the reason the EU doesn't collectively pack more of a foreign policy punch is because member states have been reluctant to let it (contra the Brexiteer myth of the nascent EU army). It would have been interesting to explore why this was the case, and what arguments could be used to get Berlin and Paris in particular, but also Warsaw, Madrid, Rome and The Hague, not to mention the easterners, to let the shared institutions accrue more authority; or alternatively, to be realistic about the limits of what can be achieved.

Anyway, it'a always worth thinking about these things, and right or wrong there is a lot of informed comment in this book. You can get it for free here. Carnegie still maintains a Strategic Europe blog.

This was the shortest book on my unread shelf of those I acquired in 2012. Next on that list is A Sacred Cause: The Inter-Congolese Dialogue 2000-2003, by Philip Winter.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised

Thursday reading

Current
A Prayer for Owen Meany, by John Irving

Last books finished
(A long week, including the last two days in bed, and some very short books)
An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith – did not finish
The Winged Man, by E. Mayne Hull
Excession, by Iain M. Banks
A Memory Called Empire, by Arkady Martine
Blake’s 7 Annual 1979
Blake’s 7 Annual 1980
The Haunting of Tram Car 015, by P. Djélì Clark
Blake’s 7 Annual 1981
The Wind on the Moon, by Eric Linklater
Minor Mage, by T. Kingfisher
Prophet of Bones, by Ted Kosmatka
The Wicked King, by Holly Black

Next books
Oathbringer, by Brandon Sanderson
The Moomins and the Great Flood, by Tove Jansson

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted in Uncategorised