The Doctor Who webcasts

I resolved some time back that if I ever did a rewatch of New Who, i should start with The Curse of Fatal Death and should include all the dramatic presentations, to choose a potentially wideranging term, that fit into the general sequence. Before the glorious return of Doctor Who to the screens in the person of Christopher Eccleston, the BBC experimented with bringing it back as a webcast animation series. Four such stories were produced in 2001-2003, three of them featuring the last three established Doctors – Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and Paul McGann – and a fourth with Richard E. Grant as a new incarnation of the Doctor. My impressions of them at an episode a day are below.

Death Comes to Time (2001) was the first of the four webcasts produced in the first half of the last decade. I have to say that, rewatching it, I'm surprised we got any more. There is lots of portentous music and dramatic declamations, but the plot is rambling with many loose ends from the early episodes and a totally canon-busting ending, jvgu gur Qbpgbe irevnoyl xvyyrq naq Npr genafsbezrq vagb n Gvzr Ybeq. We have one key character rather gratuitously and horribly killed off, and a welcome if confusing return by the Brigadier at the end. By today's standards, or even the standards of Cosgrove Hall's animations for Scream of the Shalka, the visuals are rather crudely done (not to diss Lee Sullivan's artwork, but rather what is done with it). There are some great performances – McCoy, Aldred, Jon Sessions as the villain, Stephen Fry as the Minister of Chance, Kevin Eldon as new companion Antimony, the underused Jon Culshaw, Anthony Stewart Head and Jacqueline Pearce (and indeed Nicholas Courtney) – but this was never going to lead to a grand revival of the show.

See for yourself, starting here.

Real Time is a step forward – not least because the animation is much better. The story feels much more like Doctor Who than did Death Comes to TimeTomb of the Cybermen, but Gary Russell, who rarely gets it wrong, takes it in a direction of parallel timelines where the Cybermen dominate and partially Cyber-ised people, both themes which came back in New Who and Torchwood respectively but were new ground when Real Time was made. And there is more innovation; the Sixth Doctor appears here in a blue suit rather then the canonical multicoloured outfit, along with Evelyn Smythe, the history professor who is very well-known to Big Finish listeners as one of the best of the audio-only companions, but would have been completely new to fans who only knew the TV series. We also have the return of Yee Jee Tso from The Movie, though playing a mysterious Asian scientist who has a sinister secret (*sigh*), and rather bizarrely the comedians Lee and Herring playing a Robert Holmes-style double act of expedition personnel. It has its flaws – there are two very gory scenes in episodes 4 and 5, and I don't think Tso quite nails the character he is meant to be playing – but it is basically OK, if more a good advertisement for Big Finish rather than a new beginning for Who.

See for yourself, starting here.

The webcast version of Shada is the best of these four by some way, so it is unfortunate for the fate of the format that it also is the one story of the four that really looks back rather than forward. Of course, it benefits hugely from Douglas Adams' script, rounded off and updated by both Gary Russell and Nick Pegg; but it also uses the webcast format to full advantage, with some lovely background pieces – the prison planet Shada itself, the Doctor's Tardis from The Movie, and the Cambridge street scenes. The animation is a bit limited – there's a weird sequence of dialogues in the first episode where the character we see in "shot" is the one who is not speaking, and Skagra's face and body are always stretched vertically but not always consistently – but I forgive that for the very nifty animation of the eight Doctors' faces morphing into one another at the episode 1-episode 2 cliffhanger. And the cast are brilliant – Andrew Sachs in particular is superb as a much older, more sinister, more alien Skagra than Christopher Neame's Assange-like portrayal in the TV series. (With one crucial exception: McGann is not on top form, to be honest, and is outshone by Lalla Ward when the script permits. Though he sparks with his future girlfriend Susannah Harker, playing Claire. She is portrayed wearing what looks to my inexperienced eye like a fetish collar.)

See for yourself, starting here.

Scream of the Shalka is the reboot that didn't come off. It is a shame in some ways because it has its strengths – notably the animation, which is far ahead of the other three in quality, Paul Cornell's story-line of alien beings breaking into our world from an unexpected direction, and Sophie Okonedo's performance as one-off companion Alison, and Derek Jacobi, not for the last time, as the Master. (Also keep an ear out for a brief appearance by David Tennant as a minor character.) But the biggest problem is Richard E. Grant's Doctor, a pale and vampire-like presence whose arrogant character lies somewhere between the low point of Pertwee's Doctor and the mid-point of Colin Baker's for likeability. (Which is to say, not very high.) In the last episode we are told – by the Master, no less – that the Doctor is dealing with the scars of some dreadful conflict too awful to describe, an idea brought into NewWho also; and he gradually mellows throughout the story. In the end it feels a bit like The Movie, a false start, which relies a bit too much on continuity and does not do enough to make this about a character you would want to watch another seven, or twenty-six, or fifty years of. (For instance, Old Who fans will be baffled that the Master is now n sevraqyl ebobg; those new to Who will wonder why they are meant to care.) And there is an awful lot of screaming, though of course the clue is in the title.

See for yourself, starting here.

The webcasts tend to be forgotten these days. They started as a lure to get Who fans to explore the BBC website, and even now are only to be found in obscure corners of the Internet. But at the same time a lot of the people involved with the webcasts remained engaged with New Who, including particularly James Goss, who was involved with production of all four of these and has written some of the best New Who and Torchwood fiction. The webcasts may not have been a howling success, but they paved the way for the BBC Wales revival, and possibly demonstrated that there was still some life in the old franchise yet.

And tomorrow, I will watch Rose.

< The Curse of Fatal Death | The Webcasts | Rose – Dalek | The Long Game – The Parting of the Ways | Comic Relief 2006 – The Girl In The Fireplace | Rise of the Cybermen – Doomsday | Everything Changes – They Keep Killing Suzie | Random Shoes – End of Days | Smith and Jones – 42 | Human Nature / The Family of Blood – Utopia / The Sound of Drums / Last of the Time Lords & The Infinite Quest | Revenge of the Slitheen – The Lost Boy & Time Crash | Voyage of the Damned – Adam | Reset – Exit Wounds

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 19-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

December non-genre fiction

2006
The Reader, by Bernhard Schlink
White Eagles over Serbia, by Lawrence Durrell
The Crying of Lot 49, by Thomas Pynchon
Perfume, by Patrick Süskind
Crooked Little Heart, by Anne Lamott
Lord Jim, by Joseph Conrad
Casino Royale, by Ian Fleming

2007
Sodom and Gomorrah, by Marcel Proust

2008
The History of Henry the Fifth, by William Shakespeare
Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare
Much Ado About Nothing, by William Shakespeare
As You Like It, by William Shakespeare

2009
The Secret Garden, by Francis Hodgson Burnett
Mr Singh Has Disappeared: A Concussed Novel, by Horst Prillinger
Wild Sweet Love, by Beverly Jenkins

2010
The Falls, by Ian Rankin
Fair Play, by Tove Jansson

2011
The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest, by Stieg Larsson
Het Boek Van Alle Dingen / The Book of Everything, by Guus Kuijer

December seems to have been a rather sparse month for my non-sf fiction readings in years past. December 2006 was unusually good, but I can’t remember a lot about the novels I read that month – I do seem to have enjoyed them all apart from The Crying of Lot 49.

So I am picking only two novels in particular of the 19 above, but with a particularly numerous field of honourable mentions.

The Secret Garden, by Francis Hodgson Burnett – this was as good as I had hoped it might be, a story of healing from psychological and physical trauma through friendship and gardening.

The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest, by Stieg Larsson – this is for the whole trilogy which was excellent, compelling, absorbing reading for me last year, if not quite Great Literature.

Honourable mentions to Tove Jansson, Marcel Proust and six of the seven from December 2006.

All four of the Shakespeare plays I listened to in December 2008 are excellent, and actually I think in future postings of my past non-genre reads I will omit Shakespeare from this category; it is too much like comparing apples and oranges.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 18-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

December books 4) Sanctuary, by David McIntee

A New Adventure novel, with the Seventh Doctor and Benny ending up at the awful end of the Albigensian crusade; a rare case of a purely historical story, with the Tardis crew’s presence the only sfnal element.

I rather enjoyed it. I am a Benny fan, and the fact that she gets a decent, if doomed, romance was cause for cheer. (Apparently there are two other McIntee stories featuring her love interest – one audio, one novel. I shall look out for them.) There is a decent effort at gritty and vivid historical detail, and the Doctor gets to solve a locked-room murder mystery. Benny is surprisingly up-to-date with late twentieth-century Earth culture, but she is a woman of many talents after all. And as a partial reboot of the range, after the departure of Ace, who constituted half of the NAs’ continuity with Old Who, it did the job for me.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 17-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 16-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

My year on Twitter

This year is not over yet, of course, but I broke my personal record both for most retweets and for biggest potential readership of a retweet during 2012. (The figures below are assembled largely thanks to Crowdbooster, crosschecked with Twitter-on-the-web.)

My most retweeted post, picked up by 33 others with a total potential readership of 25,100, was posted just after midnight on 3 December:

Leveson on the 'clear evidence of misreporting on European issues' With detailed examples of the UK media's mendacit…

This was one of my many Tweets which came from my Delicious feed via If This Then That. It's a little embarrassing that it is a) truncated and b) has almost no original content. As with so many such cases, it probably helped that it was picked up and retweeted by Jon Worth (@jonworth) at an early stage.

One other tweet beat my previous record of 20 RTs (set by my "What happened to the Doctor Who companions?" LJ post in November 2010). It was on 17 November, in the aftermath of the appalling Savita case:

Research examines the ‘abortionist saints’ of medieval Ireland "…the concept of abortionist saints is unique to Ir…

another truncated Delicious post which got 25 retweets and a total readership of 22,000, more than half of whom are accounted for by Charlie Stross (@cstross).

On the other axis, three of my tweets about BSFA winners from Eastercon were picked up by Cory Doctorow, who had 230,000 followers at the time (and now has 270,000). Marginally the best of the three, in that another 650 people might have seen it through two others retweeting, was this:

#eastercon #bsfaawards Best Novel goes to "The Islanders" by Chris Priest! I voted for three winners out of four.

Cory's two other RTs are here and here.

Apart from those, two other tweets beat the previous record of 36,800 possible views, which had also been set by the "What happened to the Doctor Who companions" post in 2010. They were:

#cy2012eublogs "Citizen participation is at the heart of the European Union." Discuss.

from 26 July, which ironically picked up no replies at all but was RTed by people with a combined following of 206,000 – most of these, as with the BSFA tweets, coming from a single source, Alejandro Sanchez (@AlejandroSL) of whom I know nothing; and:

World Toilet Day is today And it's no joke.

from 19 November, which was picked up by two journalists with the Economist, one of whom (@eaterofsun, Oliver Morton) has 4,000 followers and the other (@mattbish, Matthew Bishop) 38,000.

None of these figures, either for potential readership or for total retweets, takes account of modified versions of my tweets which are then transmitted by others, so the real winning tweets may be quite different.

According to Crowdbooster, which I think is more reliable than Twitter on this one, I also broke my personal record for most reples to a single tweet in 2012, with this bad-tempered intervention during the French Presidential debate:

Sarkozy now openly racist. It's OK to give foreign vote to US and Canadian citizens, but not to Africans, especially Muslims.

Twitter itself doesn't record any replies at all, but I preserved some of them on Storify. Crowdbooster thinks that there were seven altogether.

What all this says to me is that Twitter has become much bigger for me this year as a focus of my online activity. I use Tweetdeck to read both Twitter and Facebook in a single column on my phone; and while a year or so ago, I guess I would see roughly equivalent numbers of posts to each, tweets now outnumber Facebook posts by a factor of at least five and maybe ten. It is increasingly the case that if you aren't on Twitter, you're not in the online conversation.

It has drawbacks as well. The sheer volume of information is such that one cannot read everything; I was always able to read my LJ friends feed, even back in the days when it was much bigger (and I have another post coming about that), but Twitter has too much and moves too fast. So you have to adapt to the fact that you will only be diiping in and out of the conversation as it suits you, and that you need to know how to retrieve posts that may be of interest. At least it is fairly straightforward to know when you are being addressed, quoted or otherwise invoked, and to then respond if you wish. But the lack of arhciving is a frustration (if not as bad as Facebook, and with promises that it will improve).

And if you aren't already, please do follow me at @nwbrux.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 14-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Small world

At a Northern Ireland event in Brussels, I get talking to a fellow attendee, who eventually reveals her unusual surname.

Me (not thinking it through quite quickly enough): That’s an unusual surname. Are you by any chance related to X?
Her: Yes, he is my cousin. Why, do you know him?
Me (with some reserve): Er, yes.
Her: He’s a total gobshite, isn’t he!
Me (with relief): Er, yes!

Posted in Uncategorised

The late great Sir Patrick Moore

When I was in my late teens, I was very active in the Irish Astronomical Association, which despite its name was largely a Northern Ireland body based in Belfast and Armagh (it had split from the all-Ireland Irish Astronomical Society in the mid-1970s). Most of the years of my involvement featured a ceremonial visit from Patrick Moore, who had been the founding director of the Armagh Planetarium fifteen years before; most of the older members of the IAA had worked with him in the mid-1960s, or in other capacities later, and Moore genuinely seemed to enjoy coming back and speaking to the public.

I had of course read all of the books by him available in the Belfast library system, including the Scott Saunders Space Adventures series and Bureaucrats and how to annoy them, written under the pseudonym of "R.T. Fishall", and I suppose this was my first real encounter with a genuine celebrity. He was true to his public persona of being a bit eccentric and grouchy, but the fact that I usually saw him in the company of his old friends no doubt made him both more comfortable and also more able to play up to an awestruck youthful audience (ie me). He was sardonic about the situation in Northern Ireland, from which he had departed before the Troubles started: "When I went to the golf club, they asked me if I was a Catholic or a Protestant. I said, 'I'm a Druid. Good-bye!'"

Towards the end of my involvement with the IAA (quite possibly the last time I saw him, probably in early 1986), I mentioned to him that I had got a place at Clare College, Cambridge, and this caught his interest; he too had been awarded a place at Clare in 1939 but joined the RAF instead. (Famous drop-outs from Clare include Richard Stilgoe, Thomas Merton and Siegfried Sassoon, but Patrick Moore was the only one I know of who turned them down.) I must also credit him, I think, for my enduring love of the music of Sibelius, who composed the theme for The Sky at Night as part of the incidental music for Pelléas et Mélisande, a play by Belgium's only winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature. If you want to remember him for five minutes, have a listen.

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 3) Ōoku: the Inner Chambers, vol 6, by Fumi Yoshinaga

Yet another in the alternate history series where most Japanese men are wiped out by a mysterious plague, and a chosen few are secluded in the Ōoku as personal attendants and occasional lovers of the shōgun, who in this version of history is a woman, women having taken over all leadership positions in society.

This volume crystallised some of the problems I have with the series for me. Because it is set in the Inner Chambers, we basically have a continuing repetition of new shōgun takes power, some internal politicking in the harem, a disputed process for producing and recognising an heir, a dead child or two, then the shōgun dies and we go back to the start of the cycle. It is getting a bit repetitive.

Also, it is now clear that this is actually meant to be not an alternate history but our own timeline, a secret history of the real reason why Japan chose centuries of isolation. All the history of Japan in the early modern period which we think we know, in other words, is actually about women rather than men. That will create problems when we reach the nineteenth century, but I guess one can go with the flow for now.

But I think you do need a better knowledge than I have of the “real” course of Japanese history to appreciate this; I suspect that some of the charm of the series must be to see how the author manages to gender-flip some of the dynastic dynamics of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries which are presumably well known to those who know anything about that period of Japanese history. Unfortunately I am not among their number, so it leaves me rather baffled. This volume concludes by promising that in the next, we will read of “the greatest scandal of the mid-Edo period, the Ejima-Ikushima affair”. I am afraid these are not words likely to entice me to get volume 7. So, unless someone persuades me otherwise, my exploration of Yoshinaga’s world will stop here.

Posted in Uncategorised

December non-fiction

2003
The Myth of Greater Albania, by Paulin Kola
The Music of the Primes: Searching to Solve the Greatest Mystery in Mathematics, by Marcus du Sautoy
Eats Shoots and Leaves by Lynne Truss

2004
A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility, by the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change
The Uncyclopedia, by Gideon Haigh

2005
‘with all faults’, by David Low
Pilate: The Biography of an Invented Man, by Ann Wroe
The Georgian Feast: The Vibrant Culture and Savory Food of the Republic of Georgia, by Darra Goldstein

2006
This Was Not Our War: Bosnian Women Reclaiming the Peace, by Swanee Hunt
The Great English Pilgrimage, by Christopher Donaldson
Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West, by Dee Brown
The Elusive Quest: Reconciliation in Northern Ireland, by Norman Porter
Ockham’s Razor: A Search for Wonder In An Age of Doubt, by Wade Rowland
Notes from a Small Island, by Bill Bryson
An Intimate History of Humanity, by Theodore Zeldin
Joan of Arc: The Image of Female Heroism, by Marina Warner

2007
About Time: The Unauthorised Guide to Doctor Who, 1980-1984, by Lawrence Miles and Tat Wood
Who’s Next: An Unofficial and Unauthorised Guide to Doctor Who, by Mark Clapham, Eddie Robson and Jim Smith
Back in Time: A Thinking Fan’s Guide to Doctor Who, by Steve Couch, Tony Watkins and Peter S. Williams
Time And Relative Dissertations In Space: Critical Perspectives on Doctor Who, edited by David Butler
Latin Palaeography: Antiquity & the Middle Ages, by Bernhard Bischoff, translated by Dáibhí Ó Cróinín & David Ganz
Slide Rule: An Autobiography, by Neville Shute

2008
The Diary of a Young Girl: The Defintive Edition, by Anne Frank
Ancient Wine: The Search for the Origins of Viniculture, by Patrick E. McGowan
Daughters of Britannia: the Lives and Times of Diplomatic Wives, by Katie Hickman
If I Had Been…: Ten Historical Fantasies, edited by Daniel Snowman
The Cecils: Privilege and power behind the throne, by David Loades
The Genius of Shakespeare, by Jonathan Bate

2009
The Jesuits, by Jonathan Wright
Don’t Mention the Wars: A Journey Through European Stereotypes, by Tony Connelly
Geschiedenis van het Nederlands, by Marijke van der Wal and Cor van Bree
Memoirs Of My Life, by Edward Gibbon

2010
Tintin and the Secret of Literature, by Tom McCarthy
Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Sex and Science, by Mary Roach
I, Who: The Unauthorized Guide to Doctor Who Novels, by Lars Pearson
I, Who 2: The Unauthorized Guide to Doctor Who Novels and Audios, by Lars Pearson
I, Who 3: The Unauthorized Guide to Doctor Who Novels and Audios, by Lars Pearson
The Space Race, by Deborah Cadbury
Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold Story of English, by John McWhorter

2011
Interpreting Irish History, edited by Ciaran Brady
Elisabeth Sladen: The Autobiography
Unrecognised States, by Nina Caspersen
Gulistān, by Sheikh Muṣleḥ-ʾiddin Saʿdī
Būstān, by Sheikh Muṣleḥ-ʾiddin Saʿdī
The Dalek Handbook, by Steve Tribe and James Goss
The John Nathan-Turner Memoirs
A Narrative of the Life of David Crockett, of the State of Tennessee
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Vols 5 and 6, by Edward Gibbon
Vanished Kingdoms, by Norman Davies

My top five, in chronological order of reading them:

Time And Relative Dissertations In Space: Critical Perspectives on Doctor Who, edited by David Butler – of the various books about Doctor Who as a phenomenon which I have read, this is the best collection of essays from an academic perspective, though almost entirely concentrating on Old Who.

The Diary of a Young Girl: The Definitive Edition, by Anne Frank – the extraordinary tale of a teenager in hiding from the Nazis, frankly describing her own arrival at adulthood in appalling circumstances.

Tintin and the Secret of Literature, by Tom McCarthy – for us fans of Hergé, it has always been clear that there is some deep meaning behind the best of the Tintin comics. McCarthy attempts to work out what that is, with some success.

Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Sex and Science, by Mary Roach – sex, of course, will never go out of fashion; and Roach reports on scientists’ desperate attempts to research it, with hilarious consequences.

The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire Vols 5 and 6, by Edward Gibbonpars pro toto here. Gibbon is wrong on many things, including his own basic theory (as far as he ever explains it), but always eloquently so, and the book is a delight to read. I did it over a two-year period, taking it a chapter a week, with frequent breaks.

Honourable mentions to:
The Georgian Feast: The Vibrant Culture and Savory Food of the Republic of Georgia, by Darra Goldstein
Slide Rule: An Autobiography, by Neville Shute
The Genius of Shakespeare, by Jonathan Bate
Memoirs Of My Life, by Edward Gibbon
Vanished Kingdoms, by Norman Davies

Posted in Uncategorised

Gosh

When I look back on the various interns who have worked for me over the last decade, there was one in particular who I thought was not a howling success; she was from a wealthy background in a former Soviet republic, not very political or interested in the Balkans which I mainly worked on at the time, rude to the secretarial and administrative staff, and wasn’t in the office as often as I would have liked. I tend to use her as the example of what not to look for when hiring (in particular, the fact that I put too much credence in a warm recommendation from a trusted colleague, who was friends with her very rich American husband but of course had no idea of her skills and interests).

To my surprise she got in touch with me from the USA this week, saying, “Those years in Brussels are among my fondest memories and working for you was one of the highlights.” It just goes to show that a particular incident can look very different from the other side of the equation, and also makes me feel that perhaps my mentoring efforts weren’t being completely wasted.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 08-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 06-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 05-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 04-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 2) Non-Stop, by Brian Aldiss

It must be around thirty years since I first (and last) read Non-Stop. There are still lots of things to like about it. It was a deliberate response to the Heinlein stories later published as Orphans of the Sky, taking the concept of people living on a generation starship, but who do not realise their real situation, to a new level. Where Heinlein’s protagonists were barely aware that they were on a spaceship at all, Aldiss’s know that they are on a long journey but very little else, and the fact that they have partial knowledge allows Aldiss to partially misdirect us so that the eventual conceptual breakthrough is all the more dramatic.

The gender perspective of the book is a little regrettable. The book starts with an argument between Roy Complain, the protagonist, and his lover; their relationship is pretty abusive, and when she is kidnapped we never hear of her again. We do a little better with Roy’s other lover, Vyann, who he first encounters as a security official from a more socially advanced group. I feel she rather loses agency as their relationship prospers and Roy gets to save her once of twice, but she does get the last word in the book:

‘Now they’ll have no alternative but to take us back to Earth,’ Vyann said in a tiny voice. She looked at Complain; she tried, woman-like, to guess at all the new interests that awaited them. She tried to guess at the exquisite pressures which would attend the adjustment of every ship-dweller to the sublimities of Earth. It was as if everyone was about to be born, she thought, smiling into Complain’s awakened face. He was her sort; neither of them had ever been really sure of what they wanted: so they would be most likely to find it.

Though that “woman-like” is rather jarring.

I was surprised to realise that there is quite a strong decolonisation metaphor at the core of the story. Complain and his fellow inhabitants of the ship turn out to have been denied agency by the rest of humanity, treated as subhumans – smaller, smellier and with much shorter lifespans – and in his climactic debate with Complain, the Earth agent Fermour actually invokes Albert Schweitzer as a good example. The ensuing conflict changed Complain’s world forever, and while it may not necessarily be for the better, it is from a position of superior understanding.

A final thought, on religion: the belief system of the starship turns out to be a set of completely invented and manipulated lies, but the priest Marapper is sincere. He also appears to die and return to life.

Non-Stop kicks off my reread of the BSFA, Clarke and Tiptree winners because it was given a retrospective award by the BSFA in 2008 as the best book of 1958. It beat The Big Time by Fritz Leiber, Have Spacesuit Will Travel by Heinlein, A Case Of Conscience and A Clash of Cymbals/The Triumph of Time by James Blish and Who? by Algis Budrys. I have read all but the last if these and I reckon the BSFA got it right. (I don’t recall voting myself.) I loved both the Leiber and Heinlein when I was younger, and A Case Of Conscience is trying to say something very earnestly, but Non-Stop, the first of Aldiss’s many novels, is really breaking new ground and establishing a fresh way of doing things. It has dated but was worth going back to.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 03-12-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Leveson on Europe

I had missed this, but am grateful to @dicknieuwenhuis on Twitter for flagging up a piece by Conor Brennan on the Business New Europe blog (which I had not previously heard of) quoting the Leveson report. The relevant paragraphs, in full:

9.53 Articles relating to the European Union, and Britain’s role within it, accounted for a further category of story where parts of the press appeared to prioritise the title’s agenda over factual accuracy. On Europe, Mr Campbell said:

“Several of our national daily titIes – The Sun, The Express, The Star, The Mail, The Telegraph in particular – are broadly anti-European. At various times, readers of these and other newspapers may have read that ’Europe’ or ’Brussels” or ’the EU superstate’ has banned, or is intending to ban kilts, curries, mushy peas, paper rounds, Caerphilly cheese, charity shops, bulldogs, bent sausages and cucumbers, the British Army, lollipop ladies, British loaves, British made lavatories, the passport crest, lorry drivers who wear glasses, and many more. In addition, if the Eurosceptic press is to be believed, Britain is going to be forced to unite as a single country with France, Church schools are being forced to hire atheist teachers, Scotch whisky is being-classified as an inflammable liquid, British soldiers must take orders in French, the price of chips is being raised by Brussels, Europe is insisting on one size fits all condoms, new laws are being proposed on how to climb, a ladder, it will be a criminal offence to criticise Europe, Number 10 must fly the European flag, and finally, Europe is brainwashing our children with pro-European propaganda! Of the UK press and the European institutions – I speak as something of a Eurosceptic by Blairite standards – it is clear who does more brainwashing. Some of the examples, may appear trivial, comic even. But there is a serious point: that once some of our newspapers decide to campaign on a certain issue, they do so with scant regard for fact. These stories are written by reporters, rewritten by subs, and edited by editors who frankly must know them to be untrue. This goes beyond the fusion of news and comment, to the area of invention.”

9.54 Although Mr Campbell’s evidence may have been exaggerated for effect, there is certainly clear evidence of misreporting on European issues. Mr Campbell drew attention to a Daily Mail story claiming that “the EU” was going to ban grocers from selling eggs by the dozen, followed by a story that there had been a U-turn and the ban would no longer take place. The reality is that there had never been a ban proposed and the original story was based on a deliberate or careless misinterpretation of EU proposals.

Full Fact drew attention to a number of further ‘anti-EU’ stories which misrepresented facts, including a Daily Express report on EU plans to ‘ban’ plastic shopping bags, when the reality was that a consultation had been launched to explore a variety of options, including a potential ban, for reducing waste from plastic bags.

9.55 The factual errors in the examples above are, in certain respects, trivial. But the cumulative impact can have serious consequences. Mr Blair explained that the misinformation published about Europe by some parts of the press made it difficult for him to adopt particular policies or achieve certain political ends in Europe that he might otherwise have done. He said:

“My distinction is between that and how you actually report the story as a piece of journalism. So if you take the issue to do with Europe, what I would say is that those papers who are Eurosceptic are perfectly entitled to be Eurosceptic. They’re perfectly entitled to highlight things in Europe that are wrong. What they shouldn’t do is, frankly, make up a whole lot of nonsense about Europe and dish that up to the readers, because that’s – I mean, how does the reader know that’s not correct?”

9.56 That, ultimately, is the foundation of the criticism made in this section: there can be no objection to agenda journalism (which necessarily involves the fusion of fact and comment), but that cannot trump a requirement to report stories accurately. Clause 1 of the Editors’ Code explicitly, and in my view rightly, recognises the right of a free press to be partisan; strong, even very strong, opinions can legitimately influence the choice of story, placement of story and angle from which a story is reported. But that must not lead to fabrication, or deliberate or careless misrepresentation of facts. Particularly in the context of reporting on issues of political interest, the press have a responsibility to ensure that the public are accurately informed so that they can engage in the democratic process. The evidence of inaccurate and misleading reporting on political issues is therefore of concern. The previous approach of the PCC to entertaining complaints only where they came from an affected individual may have allowed a degree of impunity in this area: in the context of misleading reporting on political issues, representative bodies are likely to be far better placed to monitor, and complain about, inaccuracies.

Leveson is, in fact, wrong about Alastair Campbell; he was not exaggerating at all.

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 1) The Colony of Lies, by Colin Brake

Took me much longer than usual to grind through this book, a tale of the Second Doctor, Jamie and Zoe on a frontier planet where various factions are in conflict with each other, and really little of much interest happens. There is a brief framing narrative with Ace and the Seventh Doctor, who intervenes at a crucial point to help his former self. Prose style starts off rather badly but settles down to reasonable standards with occasional info-dumps. Not really recommended except for completists like me.

Posted in Uncategorised