Nebula Awards

Best Novel: Among Others, by Jo Walton – HOORAY!!!!
Best Novella: “The Man Who Bridged the Mist,” by Kij Johnson
Best Novelette: “What We Found,” by Geoff Ryman
Best Short Story: “The Paper Menagerie,” by Ken Liu
Ray Bradbury Award for Outstanding Dramatic Presentation: Doctor Who: “The Doctor’s Wife,” written by Neil Gaiman, directed by Richard Clark
Andre Norton Award for Young Adult Science Fiction and Fantasy Book: The Freedom Maze, by Delia Sherman

Grand Master Award to Connie Willis.
Solstice Awards to John Clute and posthumously to Octavia Butler.
Service to SFWA Award to Bud Webster.

Congratulations to !!! (And to the others of course.

Jo Walton, Ken Liu, and (slightly to my surprise) Geoff Ryman are all first-time Nebula winners. Kij Johnson had won twice before, making this her third. (Years of birth: 1951, 1960, 1964, 1976; but not necessarily in that order.) Neil Gaiman had of course won two Nebula Awards for written fiction, but this is his first Bradbury Award (he had been nominated for Best Script for Princess Mononoke.

Posted in Uncategorised

Supercalorific banana chocolate cake

Banana-chocolate chip cake

100g butter

200g sugar

2 to 3 medium size ripe bananas, pureed

2 eggs

1 tsp vanilla extract

250g flour

1 tsp baking soda

125 ml natural unsweetened yogurt

½ tsp salt

100g chocolate chips

Grease a cake pan with a little butter and flour. Preheat your oven at 180°C.

Whip the butter and slowly add the sugar until the mixture is creamy. Add the banana puree, the eggs and the vanilla. Mix well.

In a big bowl, mix the flour, the baking powder, the salt and the chocolate chips then add this to the first mixture. Mix everything together.

Slowly add the yogurt and mix well. Pour the batter in the cake pan and bake for 30-40 minutes or until a knife point comes out clean. Let cool for 5 minutes, remove from the cake pan and let the cake cool a little bit more before serving it.

With many thanks to Laura Carre-Diaz.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 18-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 16-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

On this day in 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007

A couple of people have been looking back at their blog posts on this day over the last five years, so I thought, why not?

15 May 2011: I commemorated the death of Peter Grimwade (among other Whoniversaries), wrote up a Doctor Who audio starring Mary Tamm and quoted Neil Gaiman on Who.

15 May 2010: I gave a grudging yes to the new British coalition government, reported that Northern Ireland's local government reform was to be delayed yet again (it has just been restarted), and reviewed a Hugo-nominated novel that didn't much impress me.

15 May 2009: I complained about twitterbots from British Columbia, reviewed Shakespeare's The Tempest and The Wizard of Oz, and added a thought about the links between the Tin Woodman and the Cybermen.

15 May 2008: I wished my wife a happy birthday (I was in Albania I think), and mourned the demise of the daily RFE/RL news bulletin.

15 May 2007: I reviewed the second volume of Proust's In Search of Lost Time, an Iain Banks novel and an early Doctor Who story.

So, what about you?

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 15-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 14-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

May Books 8) How to Sharpen Pencils, by David Rees

I decided I really wanted this book after the ever-excellent Bookslut tipped me off to this interview with the author. It mostly succeeds; it is the story of a man going through intense emotional crisis and working it out by writing a book about pencil sharpening, except that almost everything apart from the pencil sharpening has been taken out. Rees is good at capturing the tone of how-to manuals, especially when describing really obvious and easy tasks. There are a couple of points when he wanders far off-topic and the humour did not work for me, even taking it as intentionally ironic. On the other hand, I loved the sequence about how best to help your friend use an electric pencil sharpener (by breaking into their house and smashing it). I suspect that most readers will dip into it rather than go through from start to end, and that may be best.

Posted in Uncategorised

May Books 7) The Moon and the Sun, by Vonda McIntyre

It may be ten years or so since I read this, and I had forgotten how good it is. Set at the Versailles court of Louis XIV, it is the story of Marie-Josèphe de la Croix and a captive sea monster, destined for slaughter for royal entertainment, and how her realisation of the captive’s personhood revolutionises Marie-Josèphe’s world, all in lush yet intense prose. Presumably it was one of the sources at the back of Neal Stephenson’s mind for the Baroque series set around the same time.

The Moon and the Sun won the 1998 Nebula for Best Novel, one of those years when the Nebula process came up with an admirable choice from a strong field. I have read three of the other shortlisted books, and two of them – Bujold’s Memory and George R.R. Martin’s A Game of Thrones – are particular favourites of mine, though perhaps less obvious Nebula winners. I have also read (though was much less impressed by) Connie Willis’ BellwetherKing’s Dragon by Kate Elliott, Ancient Shores by Jack McDevitt, and City on Fire by Walter Jon Williams. (Blue Mars and Forever Peace won the Hugos around this time.)

Posted in Uncategorised

2012 Hugos: Best Novel

Fortunately none of this year’s Hugo nominees is actually a bad book, an improvement on some previous years (no Willis, no Sawyer). Even so, I found it pretty easy to rank the nominees as follows:

6) Deadline, by “Mira Grant”. I’m a little sorry about this, because it is an enjoyable book that kept me turning the pages. But the fact is that it’s the middle book of a trilogy, in which the characters spend most of their time running around a devastated zombie-infested America and the plot isn’t actually resolved. For me it fails the test of whether I would be embarrassed if it won the Hugo, especially given the quality of some of the competition, so with regret it goes bottom of the list.

5) No Award. I may be being a bit harsh on Deadline4) A Dance With Dragons, by George R.R. Martin. I enjoyed this one very much as well, and it will almost certainly win the award as it is so far ahead of the field in terms of name recognition. But it’s the fifth book of an ongoing series, and judged on its own merits (as opposed to the series as a whole so far) I reckon there are three better books on the ballot.

3) Leviathan Wakes, by “James S.A. Corey”. The only traditional sf book on the list, with asteroid mines, spaceships, and evil businessmen exploiting alien tech and fomenting war. Not hugely adventurous in style and vision but a good old sensawunda romp.

2) Embassytown, by China Miéville. A hugely ambitious novel about language, aliens, war and revolution. Doesn’t quite match the level of its ambition with unattractive central characters and a plot that gets derailed towards the end. I expect it won’t do as well as it deserves in the vote as it is a difficult (but rewarding) read.

1) Among Others, by Jo Walton. A superb novel about being an sf fan in a hostile world, something many Hugo voters will relate to, though perhaps fewer will have had to deal with an evil sorceress mother into the bargain. Particularly grabbed me because of the late 1970s setting in a liminally Celtic environment, not very distant from my own. I expect it will lose to A Dance With Dragons, but I do hope that those voters who take the trouble to read the entire shortlist respond to it as strongly as I did.

NB that three out of five of these feature dead girls in frequent conversation with central characters. In two cases it is the narrator’s sister.
See also: Best Short story, Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form)

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 10-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

May Books 6) Deadline, by Mira Grant

Last of the Hugo nominees for this year for me; a sequel to last year’s Feed, taking forward the story of newsbloggers in a near-future USA covering the aftermath of the zombie apocalypse. Lots of action and capers, but I did not enjoy it as much: the previous book’s narrator is here present only as a voice in her brother’s head, there is no presidential campaign subplot, and most of all the story is left unresolved at the end, with a massive plot twist setting us up for the next volume, so it’s not a complete work. With some regret, this goes at the bottom of my Hugo ballot.

Posted in Uncategorised

May Books 5) The Heart of the Buddha’s Teaching, by Thich Nhat Hanh

A book by a prominent Buddhist monk outlining key teachings of Buddhism. I started off rather liking it as an approach to mindfulness and how to process suffering and the good things about life. But after he Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path, I started to get a bit irritated with the constant discovery of new lists of important spiritual things, from the Two Truths up to the Twelve Links of Interdependent Co-Arising; it seems to me that over-describing the undescribable is fundamentally a mistake. I also started wondering to what extent Thich Nhat Hanh is presenting a mainstream account of Buddhism or his own particular take (or his school’s). And I wonder also if there is much sense of the numinous in Buddhism; there didn’t seem a lot here. Anyway, it is still the most interesting book by a Buddhist on Buddhism that I have read.

Posted in Uncategorised

Re-jigging the ticket: the precedents for Biden not being on the ticket

We’ve just been re-watching the West Wing episode “Stirred”, in which the White House team discuss replacing the Vice-President in Bartlet’s bid for re-election, and it occurred to me that Joe Biden turns 70 in November; only five of his predecessors held that office at a greater age (Elbridge Gerry, John Nance Garner, George Clinton, Charles Curtis and Alben Barkley, two of who died in office). If he is re-elected and serves until January 2017, he will be older than all of them but Barkley. He may decide not to bother.

If so, this will probably be depicted as a blow to Obama’s presidency. Actually the precedents for presidents switching running-mates after their first term are largely positive; where an incumbent has rejigged the lower half of the ticket and lost, usually the original election had been a bit peculiar. The full list of such elections is as follows:

0) 1800 – Adams / Jefferson: Thomas Jefferson had served four years as John Adams’ Vice-President, but because of the problematic electoral system originally written into the constitution he was effectively leader of the opposition. Adams chose a formal running-mate (Charles Pinckney) going into the 1800 election, as did Jefferson (Aaron Burr), and the latter won.

1) 1804 – Jefferson / Burr: a very clear case where Burr was dumped after shooting Alexander Hamilton dead in a duel. Jefferson chose George Clinton as his new running-mate and was re-elected.

2) 1828 – Adams / Calhoun: because of the messy 1824 election, John Quincy Adams, like his father, ended up with a Vice-President who was effectively in opposition to the administration. In 1828 Calhoun ran with the defeated challenger from 1824, Andrew Jackson, and for the second time an incumbent President Adams was defeated by a ticket including his own Vice-President.

3) 1832 – Jackson / Calhoun. Jackson must have regretted teaming up with Calhoun; the relationship went rapidly sour, culminating when Jackson’s nominee for ambassador in London failed to get approval in the Senate on Calhoun’s casting vote. The unlucky nominee, Martin Van Buren, was chosen to replace Calhoun who thus became the only Veep to be disowned by two successive presidents. Jackson and Van Buren won re-election; Calhoun resigned the Vice-Presidency before his term would have expired.

4) 1864 – Lincoln / Hamlin: with the Civil War at full spate, Abraham Lincoln deemed it better to balance his ticket with a Democrat rather than a fellow Republican, and Hannibal Hamlin was replaced with Andrew Johnson; they won, and Johnson became President on Lincoln’s death.

5) 1872 – Grant / Colfax. Schuyler Colfax, elected with Grant in 1868, got involved with a financial scandal, and Grant replaced him with Henry Wilson. Grant and Wilson were elected; Wilson died, quite literally in his office, in 1875.

6) 1892 – Harrison / Morton. Harrison had been elected in 1888 despite having a smaller popular vote than the incumbent Cleveland; Levi P. Morton failed to deliver for Harrison in the Senate, and was dumped for one Whitelaw Reid, who was defeated along with Harrison in the 1892 election. Morton lived to his 96th birthday.

7) 1912 – Taft / Sherman: this is a slightly odd case, in that Vice-President James Sherman, duly re-nominated as the Republican candidate, none the less had to be replaced on election day because he had inconsiderately died the previous week. Taft and his hastily drafted new running-mate Nicholas Murray Butler came third, which is an impressive result for an incumbent ticket in a two-party system.

8 & 9) 1940 & 1944 – Roosevelt / Garner & Wallace. Franklin Roosevelt was elected President four times with three differemt running-mates. John Nance Garner, who served with him for his first two terms, was judged surplus to requirements and relaced with Henry Wallace in 1940; Wallace turned out to be too left-wing and was similarly replaced in the 1944 election by Harry S Truman, who of course succeeded Roosevelt on the latter’s death. Garner lived to within a month of his 98th birthday.

10) 1976 – Ford / Rockefeller. Again this is a slightly marginal case: though Gerald Ford was the incumbent president in 1976, he had not even been on the ballot in 1972, but was appointed Veep after Vice-President Spiro Agnew resigned in 1973 and then took the top spot after Nixon’s resignation in 1974. His choice for Veep was Nelson Rockefeller, but Rockefeller apparently did not enjoy it and ceded the position of 1976 running-mate to Bob Dole. Ford lost anyway.

So, basically, the portents for re-jigging the ticket are not bad. Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Grant and Roosevelt (twice) changed running-mates and got re-elected. For Adams père et fils, Taft and Ford there are extenuating circumstances which make it an unfair test. The only President who voluntarily rejigged the winning ticket of his first term and then lost his bid for re-election was Benjamin Harrison.

Part of the picture here is that there was no way to replace a Vice-President before 1967. For more than a third of the elections up to 1964, there was no incumbent Veep; seven, including Sherman in 1912, died in office, and eight succeeded to the presidency after a presidential death. (1832 doesn’t count here as Calhoun resigned after the election.)

Incidentally we also tried the first episode of the new Veep series last night, but when we realised we had lost count of the jokes about disability in the first ten minutes we turned it off.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 09-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 08-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Armenia, Serbia, Greece, France

Four countries were holding national elections today (sorry, I have no views on Schleswig-Holstein or the Italian local councils).

In Armenia, President Sargsyan's party has got 44% of the votes, up 33% from the 2007 election, and will presumably stay in power with their coalition partners who got 29%, though I suppose they could take their pick of partners from the three parties which craped into the parliament with 5-6% of the vote. Shout out to my former colleague Levon Zourabian, who was running the campaign for former president Ter-Petrossian's party, which came third with just over 6%.

In Serbia exit polls show President Tadić a nose ahead of his right-wing challenger Tomislav Nikolić in the presidential election (29% to 28%), but his party several points shy of the top spot (23% to 27%). That will go to a second round in two weeks. Last time round, in 2008, Nikolić was ahead on the first round by 40% to 35%, but Tadić pulled off a major recovery and won by 50% to 47% in the second round. There are several minor parties in the mix who will try to play king-maker, though the expectation is that enough will line up with Tadić to keep him in power.

In Greece, the exit polls are pretty catastrophic for the two main parties, New Democracy and the left-wing PASOK. ND are down from 33% in 2009 (itself a historic low) to around 20%; PASOK have crashed from 44% to around 15%, and may have even come third behind the far-left Syriza who have trebled their vote from 15%. The Greek system is proportional with the quirk that the largest single party gets a bonus of 50 of the 300 total seats, but this will not be enough to give ND a majority. The Communists are on 9% or so, possibly behind the right-wing Independent Greeks who may be on 10%. The far-right Golden Dawn are next on 7% and the leftish DIMAR on 6%. LAOS, a right-wing party which was in the out-going coalition, is stuck with the Greens and Dora Bakoyannis's new liberal party on 3%. I imagine the most likely outcome is that the outgoing ND-PASOK coalition continues – they should just about have enough seats between them – though perhaps they will co-opt some new partners, and PASOK will demand what it can get. I am not a huge fan of the ND leader Samaras who will probably end up prime minister. (See results from Ekathimerini.)

And I'm watching the live coverage from France, where François Hollande has won the Presidential election, the first time the Socialists have won since 1988. It was tight enough at the end – 51.9% to 48.1% for the incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy – but actually it's a better margin than either Mitterand or Giscard managed in their contests in 1974 and 1981. I saw Sarkozy's concession speech, notable for his efforts to calm a still-enthusiastic crowd, and am standing by for Hollande's victory speech (which I imagine will be characteristically solid but unexciting) as the crowds rejoice in the Place de la Bastille (where I have an obscure family connection). It does seem to me, though, that with a result this close there is every chance that the Socialists will fail to get a clear majority in the coming parliamentary elections, and that the National Front will enjoy their potential as kingmakers in swing constituencies. (NB that the Socialists promise to bring in proportional representation to avoid this sort of thing in future.)

Isn't it sensible to hold elections on Sundays, and to close the polls at 8 pm?

Posted in Uncategorised

Survivors in Space

I realised that in the course of my catch-up of current Doctor Who audios, I hadn't finished the recent Serpent Crest series of plays by Paul Magrs, starring Tom Baker as the Fourth Doctor; this one also with David Troughton standing in for his late father. I had very much enjoyed the fourth episode in this series, The Hexford Invasion, and had been hoping that the climax would reach the same standards. It didn't, quite; the resolution of why there are two Doctors was pretty much as I had expected, though Tom Baker gets some marvellous carpet-chewing moments, and the resolution of the entire plot of the series does knit up the ravelled strands rather well. But it's vaguely satisfying rather than terribly exciting, and alas we have Richard Franklin returning as Mike Yates to try and carry the narrative. I rather hope that this marks the end of this particular run; it was good to get Tom Baker back in business, but the Big Finish plays he has been doing more recently show more promise.

Full set of Magrs plays:
Hornet's Nest: 1 The Stuff of Nightmares, 2 The Dead Shoes, 3 The Circus of Doom, 4 A Sting in the Tale, 5 Hive of Horror
Demon Quest: 1 The Relics of Time, 2 The Demon of Paris, 3 A Shard of Ice, 4 Starfall, 5 Sepulchre
Serpent Crest: 1 Tsar Wars, 2 The Broken Crown, 3 Aladdin Time, 4 The Hexford Invasion, 5 Survivors in Space

Posted in Uncategorised

May Books 3) Bay of the Dead, by Marc Morris

A Torchwood novel where Cardiff is assailed by a zombie invasion and Jack, Gwen, Ianto, Rhys and Policeman Andy have to sort it out. Entertaining enough, with some decently tense horror passages, but no big surprises. By coincidence I was reading this at the same time as another much longer zombie novel, Mira Grant's Deadline

Posted in Uncategorised

The Renaissance Man

At last the new Fourth Doctor adventures have found their feet, with the prolific Justin Richards very much on form, delivering a brilliant weird tale for Toma Baker, Louise Jameson and Ian McNeice as the sinister Harcourt (which was also his character's name in Edge of Darkness back in 1985). The Doctor brings Leela to the famous Moravanian Museum for the sake of her education, but finds instead a peculiar manor house where nothing is as it seems. The setting is one that has been done in many Who stories, but rarely this well, and the particular twists here are inventive; also Baker is on top form as clown, magician and moral leader. If you just want to sample the new Fourth Doctor range, this is where to start.

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 05-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised

Links I found interesting for 04-05-2012

Posted in Uncategorised