Christmas letter 2009

Nicholas: I continue to enjoy working as an Independent Diplomat. My office is in the shadow of the Berlaymont and I have been observing the EU’s development with considerable interest. As well as my ongoing work with the Turkish Cypriot team negotiating the reunification of the island – which is likely to accelerate dramatically come the New Year – I ended the year taking on the lead for ID’s work with the government of Southern Sudan, after a somewhat grueling visit to Juba. I went to a science fiction convention in Boston in February, and am also working up a small Irish history project on the side.

Anne: I was sorry to come to the end of the very enjoyable Dutch course just before Easter. Since then I have been busy doing odd jobs about the house. I was very pleased to discover that when Ursula needed specially adapted clothes I could make them myself. I also adapted a second hand television cupboard to try to protect the screen from Ursula. That is still a work in progress as the plexiglass in front of the TV is now covered in little scratches, but it’s a big improvement on what we had before.

We see Bridget as often as we can. Anne takes her for cuddly walks around the farmland where she lives; Nicholas likes to bring her to nearby parks for exercise. She seems to be happy in general. The staff at Delacroix work very hard to discuss any problems with us, look for creative solutions, and find activities that she will enjoy.

Fergal: I went away for a week’s holiday with my school this year, my first holiday without my family. I recently joined the local Scouts, where I’m able to see friends from my old school. I have the same teacher, classmates and classroom as last year, but I get to do music and stories as well as art, and “activity + new things in the activity = need for a new name”: last year it was ‘crea’ (short for ‘creativiteit’, which means ‘creativity’), now it’s called ‘Muzische vorming’ (education in the creative arts); next summer everything will change again.

Ursula too has stayed with the same teacher for one more year. She spends occasional weekends in Delacroix – the same building as Bridget but a different ‘house’ – and seems to enjoy the change of scene and the attention lavished on her by the staff. She spends a lot of time singing and dancing beautifully.

With our very best wishes and love for Christmas and the New Year,

Nicholas, Anne, Bridget, Fergal and Ursula

Posted in Uncategorised

Email scam

I was surprised to receive this distressing message just now, ostensibly from one of my cousins:

Hello

Am in a hurry writing you this mail, I want to seek your help on something very important and  you are the only one I can reach at this time and I  expect you come to my aid because something extremely terrible and horrible is happening to me now, I need a favour from you, I had a trip to Manchester (UNITED KINGDOM) for a research program.    

Unfortunately for me i was robbed on my way to the hotel where I lodged and the robbers went away with all i had on me alongside with my money, passport, travelling documents and dairy,and ever since then I have been without any money,right now i owe the hotel some money and they are on my neck for their money. So I have restricted access to Internet for now and the phone connections in my room were disconnected due to the bills and right now am so confused and don’t know were to go or what to do.       

Please I need you to help me with £1,850 pound sterling today so I can make preparations and go back home immediately because i have to pay the hotel here their bills and get a new ticket to return back home as soon as possible, I have spoken to the embassy here but they are not responding effectively to the matter i cant wait another day down here.

please I will return the money back to you as soon as I get home.       Please I will be waiting to hear from you soon so i will be able to tell you on how to send me the money and keep me in prayers because that matters a lot. Our first priority is safety because I do not feel safe or secured.

Thanks for reading

[Name]

There are numerous clues here to indicate that the message is a fake, the first being that it was sent to me at all – if one of my Irish cousins was really stuck in Manchester, there are at least a dozen other mutual relatives whom it would be more sensible to contact than me. Note also the complete lack of corroborating details (name of hotel, identification of embassy, salutation of recipient). Also my cousin is, as far as I know, unlikely to need to make a research trip to Manchester.

Assuming that my cousin’s email address has been hacked, it would be rather pointless to reply to the scam artist – or are these emails simply sent as harassment, without the expectation of pecuniary gain? I have alerted my aunt and my cousin’s sister, since they all live in the same town, and suggested that the Gardai also be alerted. Though I guess there is a good chance that the hacker lives a long way outside their jurisdiction.

Edited to add [ten hours later, sorry, I’ve been busy] the message originated from 41.217.65.4 which is an IP address registered to Zoom Mobile, a telcom company in, surprise surprise, Nigeria.

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 8) Mr Singh Has Disappeared: A Concussed Novel, by Horst Prillinger

This was pressed on me by the infamous quarsan, and his efforts have been duly rewarded; I really enjoyed it. It is a fairly short novel, told in fragmentary, disjointed style (150 chapters in 135 pages) about the narrator’s investigation of the disappearance of the head waiter of his favourite Indian restaurant. He spends a lot of time stuck down a well, in hospital, and musing on the precise nature of the vindaloo, the biryani and other Indian recipes. It is a real classic of surreal style, very funny in places. Interested to note that it was originally published in blog format earlier this year; the hard copy costs €10 and comes from amazon.de among other places.

Posted in Uncategorised

The overnights meme

List the towns or cities where you spent at least a night away from home during 2009. Mark with a star if you had multiple non-consecutive stays.

Newton, MA
Washington DC
New York, NY*
Nicosia, Cyprus*
Cluny, France*
Podgorica, Montenegro
Skopje, Macedonia
Ashford, Kent
Croydon, Gtr London
Loughbrickland, Co Down
Kidderminster, Worcestershire
Berlin, Germany
Juba, Sudan
Storrs, CT

A lot fewer than some years. But also addfour overnight flights – two transatlantic, two between Europe and Africa.

Posted in Uncategorised

I don’t have a vote in this one…

…but like a lot of people I’ll be watching with interest for the outcome of the selection process for the next Lib Dem candidate in Cambridge, now that David Howarth has announced his intention to return to his academic career (he is a specialist in tort, if that is the right way to put it). Of the six shortlistees (listed here and also here) the only one I know at all is Julie Smith. I know David Howarth rather better since we were actually next door neighbours during my second year, as well as being Lib Dem activists at the same college. David won in 2005 on his third attempt with a majority of 10%, having eaten substantially into both the incumbent Labour MP’s vote and into that of the Conservatives who held the seat from 1967 to 1992. Assuming (as seems likely) that the Labour vote tanks, the Lib Dems hold steady and the Tories rise but not dramatically, the seat should be holdable in next year’s election

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 7) Doctor Who and the Invasion from Space [by J.L. Morrissey]

I thought I was reasonably well-informed about the history of Doctor Who spinoff fiction, but was rather amazed to discover this 1966 46-page story, in the same format (and by the same publisher) as the Doctor Who annuals, in which the First Doctor prevents an invasion from the Andromeda galaxy with the help of a family who he has rescued (just before the story starts) from the Great Fire of London. Apparently the text is by J.L. Morrissey, who published half a dozen detective novels in the 1930s and 1940s; the artwork is by Walter Howarth, the World Distributors stalwart illustrator. The story itself is standard Who, let down by rather dodgy astrophysics and some awkward phrasing (note extract from first para here). But the characterisation of Hartnell’s Doctor is bang-on.

Posted in Uncategorised

ርሑስ በዓል ልደትን ሓድሽ ዓመትን

A friend of mine sent me this greeting:

which apparently means “Merry Christmas and Happy New Year” in his native language.

A special prize for the first person to identify that language!

(And a very special prize for anyone who knows how to pronounce it…)

ETA: Well done ! Others may guess anyway by clicking on “reply” without reading what others have written.

Posted in Uncategorised

Gibbon, Chapter XIII

  • Another very long chapter, but an excellent read, full of incident and character. Diocletian comes over as one of the best emperors so far – a slave from Illyria who rose to the top, managed it well, and retired in time to enjoy his later years plating cabbages by the Adriatic. In the meantime he puts down Carausius' rebellion in Britain, wins a war with Persia and sorts out the empire by dividing it into four. Of course, that simply meant new structures that could go wrong; but it was a good solution to the problem of unmanageability.
    (tags: gibbon)
Posted in Uncategorised

An Earthly Child – spoilers

I feel a bit mean posting this, because the other reviews I’ve seen so far of An Earthly Child are rather positive (without spoilers here and with spoilers here). I think Marc Platt’s scripts are a bit like Marmite – you love ’em or hate ’em. However, to explain why I didn’t like it requires a cut-tag and spoiler warning, thus:

SPOILERS BELOW

First off, I felt Susan was very badly served by the story. I did not think that her credulity in dealing with the aliens, and her naivety in going behind the back of the government, and then her swiftness to change sides against the aliens, were very believable for someone who has supposedly had her experience of travelling with the Doctor, being married to a freedom fighter and being a political activist herself. Essentially the plot is about her making a pretty huge mistake and the Doctor then rescuing her (and the Earth) from its consequences, and I don’t recall that happening in any of her TV stories.

I also thought that the way she and the Doctor treated Alex at the end was equally infantilising. Sure, parents and grandparents do sometimes treat their 17-year-olds like that, but the Doctor at his best is about emancipating his companions and letting them achieve their own maturity. It is extraordinary to have this out the same month as the end of Lucie Miller’s story in Death in Blackpool.

The scene with the lunar settlers coming back was a bit underwhelming.

Finally, I’m afraid I didn’t think Jake McGann was really up to it. He may well be a fine up-and-coming actor in his own right, but I wonder if (like John Barrowman) he finds it difficult to perform in the recording booth. In a couple of the crucial scenes he sounded rather like he was reading the lines in rehearsal.

Having said that, I thought that Leslie Ash and Carole Ann Ford did very well with the material, and the reunion scene between Susan and McGann’s Doctor was excellent. (Even though McGann was unaware of the back-story.)

As for Gallifreyan / human interbreeding? I detected a couple of hints that Alex is not Susan’s biological son, but adopted from a human mother. There were a couple of other lines pointing the other direction, but I thought the hints towards adoption were stronger. It was, however, unambiguous that Susan is the Doctor’s grand-daughter in Gallifreyan terms (though of course one can speculate about what those terms might be).

Posted in Uncategorised

Snowbound, and social media

It won’t have escaped notice that the weather has been a bit cold round here of late. Some (including one who works in the same building as me) think we should take it in our stride, and to an extent I agree that one should try and be slightly Zen about it. But sometimes this is not easy.

Thursday night was a bad night. I was rather enjoying myself at a Bosnian embassy reception when I bit awkwardly on a (really yummy) piece of Baklava and my tooth, re-filled only that morning, began hurting like the blazes. I made my excuses to the ambassadors (the one I was talking to at the time, and the one hosting the party) and hurried as fast as I could to the tram and the Gare du Midi / Zuidstation. Less than 40 minutes later I had reached Leuven station, only 7 km from home. But Leuven was snowbound; the rest of the journey took over two hours, as buses failed to show up and trains were cancelled; eventually I trudged to the warmth of the Novotel and called a cab from there, jaw still aching.

Since then it’s been OK here, but we were really alarmed to hear of the Channel Tunnel being closed – and 2000 passengers stuck inside it! – since we were due to head over to the in-laws’ tomorrow for a couple of days before Christmas. There is no reliable information available on the Eurostar / Eurotunnel site; but in the Twitter era, you cannot escape instant and public consumer feedback. It is clear that traffic is backed up for hours around Calais and Dover / Folkestone, and there are worrying reports of chaos at the loading ramps. There is no way we can take the risk of travelling with a severely autistic child (who will turn seven on Monday) and being stuck in traffic for hours, so we are not going tomorrow – particularly since the forecast is for more heavy snow precisely in western Belgium and the Pas-de Calais overnight – and quite likely will not go on Monday either. Alas, no pantomime for F, and no reunion with Anne’s cousins either. But sometimes you have to accept force majeure.

Posted in Uncategorised

Ow continued

It’s been a grim couple of weeks on the dental front. As reported previously, I went to the dentist two weeks ago for her to look at my upper left second molar (the upper left first molar was capped last year). She gave me mouthwash and painkillers to kill off the gum infection, and then did the root canal on Monday, filling half the tooth (commenting on how twisty my nerves were). As I left, feeling slightly euphoric in my morphine-induced daze, she said that if things didn’t get better she would have to look at the premolar on the other side of the capped tooth. Had a terrible night with pain that evening and went back to her first thing Tuesday. She drilled out the roots of the premolar, and put in a temporary filling which she then replaced properly on Thursday. At that point she also gave me antibiotics as my jaw is inflamed from some horrible infection. I am therefore off booze until Wednesday, and it still bloody hurts. The dentist expressed the hope that the antibiotics would sort it out, but I could tell that she wasn’t convinced, and she muttered about how I might need some more thorough investigation of my jaws in the New Year. Ow.

Posted in Uncategorised

Lots of Who (mostly audio)

It’s been a good few weeks for us Who fans who follow audio as well as TV. The last two parts of BBC audio The Hornet’s Nest, starring Tom Baker as the Fourth Doctor, shipped at the start of the month; for Fifth Doctor fans, we have had the last two of the three Big Finish audios set in Stockbridge and co-starring Sarah Sutton as Nyssa, and also a Companion Chronicle told by Mark Strickson as Turlough; the Sixth and Eighth Doctors both went to Blackpool, and the Eighth Doctor also went back to a future Earth to see his granddaughter; and for good measure I’m throwing in the animated story “Dreamland” and the audiobook “Day of the Troll”, both featuring David Tennant in his closing days as the Tenth Doctor. To put you out of your agony of suspense, I will reveal now that I thought the best and worst of these were the two Eight Doctor stories; read on to discover which was which. I believe I have avoided significant spoilers – though this is not always true of the reviews I have linked to.

I’m afraid my feelings about the five episodes of The Hornets’ Nest became steadily less enthusiastic as the story went on. Part 4, A Sting In The Tale sees Tom Baker’s Fourth Doctor investigating funny goings-on in a medieval convent. The plot was OK (no more than that) but I found some of the descriptions rather disgusting, and not in a fun way. My lapsed medievalist hackles did not particularly rise, but perhaps I wasn’t listening hard enough. The final episode, Hive of Horrors, explains why the Doctor chose Mike Yates, of all previous companions, to join him on this adventure as they join forces with the sinister Mrs Wibbsey to deal with the hornets. There was lots of potentially good stuff here and maybe it will have worked for some people, but I was not one of them. Somehow Baker’s performance and Paul Magrs’ script ended up as less than the sum of their parts; Richard Franklin doesn’t bring much to it as Yates (but I am not his biggest fan anyway). I think Baker needs a full cast to perform with and to; The Hornets’ Nest too often reminded me of Doctor Who and the Pescatons, which similarly had him doing both Doctor and narrator and other voices when necessary, and was the weaker for it.

Of the three Fifth Doctor audios in this batch, the best is the first in internal chronology, The Eternal Summer, the second of a trilogy of Doctor / Nyssa plays set in Stockbridge, which was the setting for a number of the Fifth Doctor comic strips in Doctor Who Monthly (and also for the wonderful “Autumn” segment of the Circular Time audio play). I only dimly remember the strips, but like Peter Davison I will now see if I can buy them; Jonathan Morris’ script combines nostalgia for those half-remembered stories with a decent sfnal plot which, even if it has been done several times before by Big Finish, is done well here. Particularly good also is Mark Walliams as UFOlogist Maxwell Edison, who falls in love with someone who is a fellow fan of Terry Pratchett. (Obviously that could never happen in real life, he said, waiting for the reactions of various parts of my friends list.)

The concluding part of the trilogy, Plague of the Daleks by Mark Morris, doesn’t really rise to the same heights. There’s a mysterious village with Something Going On, but the clue is in the title of the story. As cruelly comments, it might have been a better story without the actual Daleks.

The latest Companion Chronicle, Ringpullworld (another by Paul Magrs), stars Mark Strickson as Turlough telling a tale of travelling with the Fifth Doctor and Tegan. There is a very nice narrative device, with Alex Lowe oplaying one of the novelizers of Verbatim Six, telling, narrating and even shaping Turlough’s story. I was less overwhelmed by the actual plot, and poor Tegan gets a rough deal from Magrs’ script and Strickson’s imitation. The extra track of interview with Strickson, who now makes nature documentaries in New Zealand, is interesting though.

I was not hugely impressed by The Nightmare Fair, by Graham Williams, when I read the novelisation back in the summer, and I was not hugely impressed by Big Finish’s audio production of this unbroadcast Sixth Doctor script. has analysed why this doesn’t work in greater detail, but basically, the plot doesn’t make a lot of sense, the Toymaker’s own problems are puzzling and his fate rather incomprehensible, and I just couldn’t really care what was going on.

I’m going to save An Earthly Child for a separate post because I can’t properly discuss my reasons for not liking it without spoilers. But Death in Blackpool is very good, and I hope the new series of Eighth Doctor plays keeps up the standard. Alan Barnes has written some of the best Big Finish audios, and he is on form here again: this is a sort-of sequel to The Zygon Who Fell To Earth, which was for my money the best of the second season of Eight / Lucie plays and which ended with the revelation that Lucie’s beloved Auntie Pat was actually a Zygon. Death in Blackpool picks up the story years later, with veteran Helen Lederer turning in a storming performance as Auntie Pat, and Sheridan Smith doing Lucie’s departure beautifully. For a Christmas-themed play it is surprisingly bleak – not one to play to friends and family to get them in a good mood – but very effective, and gets my vote ahead of Eternal Summer and Day of the Troll as the best of this lot.

I haven’t seen The Infinite Quest, the first animated Tenth Doctor story, so was intrigued by the concept of Dreamland, with Tennant as the Doctor and Georgia Moffett as his girl sidekick. I was a bit disappointed. The quality of animation is not very much advanced from the Hanna Barbera shows of forty years ago. Phil Ford’s story is a fairly basic aliens-in-Nevada one; I guess for kids who are excited or excitable by the whole Roswell mythos it is fun to see Who going there, but it didn’t really grab me. I was particularly sorry that Moffett, whose acting presence is rather gripping in both The Doctor’s Daughter and the early Big Finish play Red Dawn, seemed a bit subdued here.

Famous Scottish actor David Tennant reads Simon Messingham’s story The Day of the Troll. Messingham is a good writer, Tennant is a good reader, and the story pushes lots of buttons and does it well – creepy monster under the bridge (the troll of the title), evil plant intelligence, freezing future Britain (listening to this during this week’s snow was a bit uncomfortable), European government which has originated as a response to crisis, vulnerable kid who the Doctor has to try and save. All very good and recommended.

Posted in Uncategorised

Most commented posts of the last year

Posts since I last counted that got more than 20 comments – 42 in total, top 21 bolded, top 14 and top 7 in larger fonts.

25 Dec: The Next Doctor – 30 comments (that day’s Who)
27 Dec: Two things I have been wondering – 31 comments (bananas and bluestockings)
31 Dec: 2008 books poll – 21 comments (books I read in 2008)
31 Dec: Books I haven’t read – 49 comments (what I didn’t read in 2008)

02 Jan: In praise of… – 23 comments (the Channel Tunnel)
10 Jan: January Books 8) Starship Troopers, by Robert A. Heinlein – 53 comments (the usual Heinlein debate, mostly)
17 Jan: Actually, never mind what I think… – 38 comments (first of several polls on the Guardian 1001 books list)
18 Jan: Guardian books: Crime – 26 comments (more from the Guardian 1001)
19 Jan: Guardian Books: Comedy – 25 comments (and more)
28 Jan: Maternity leave – 38 comments (Which country other than Lesotho, Liberia, Swaziland, and Papua New Guinea does not have statutory paid maternity leave?)

06 Feb: My name is Nicholas. – 28 comments (My name is not “Nick”.)
08 Feb: Andrew Wakefield’s faked research kills children – 42 comments (I feel strongly about this. Did you guess?)

02 Mar: Identity – 23 comments (why I don’t blog anonymously but others should be able to)
05 Mar: March Books 2) Angels and Demons, by Dan Brown – 60 comments (this year’s winner!)
11 Mar: Which of these films have you seen? – 34 comments (the films Obama gave Brown)

05 Apr: Reclaiming þorn – 29 comments (an alphabet post)

08 May: STV – British Columbia and Ireland – 28 comments (electoral systems and why ministers should not be members of parliament)
10 May: Lightsecond – 21 comments (query about a detail in an sf story I was reading)
27 May: Silence in the Library / Forest of the Dead – 27 comments (rewatching Who from 2008)
28 May: Midnight – 20 comments (more 2008 Who)

01 Jun: Transatlantic linguistics – 35 comments (are pasties for nipples or for eating?)
10 Jun: Hellboy II: The Golden Army – “Let’s go to Antrim!” – 34 comments (most of the discussion being about correct pronunciation of Irish names)
11 Jun: The Dark Knight – “This town deserves a better class of criminal, and I’m gonna give it to them.” – 21 comments (discussion of whether it was any good or not)
15 Jun: Tuigim anois – 22 comments (origin of the verb “to twig”)
18 Jun: Monotheism – 48 comments (how to pronounce it?)

01 Jul:  Weirdo email – 36 comments
11 Jul: The Torchwood debate – 41 comments (the debate being, as so often, “was it any good?”)
21 Jul: July Books 27) Misspent Youth, by Peter F. Hamilton – 23 comments (answering my question as to whther I should bothe with any other Hamilton books, the majority answering in the negative)
23 Jul:  Etiquette, again – 20 comments

11 Aug: Fannish five – 25 comments (many questions, few of which I answered)
21 Aug: Poll prompted by reading Swift’s Directions to the Footman – 27 comments (how to spell “oxter”)

13 Sep: September Books 12) England’s Troubles, by Jonathan Scott – 21 comments (the seventeenth century)
23 Sep: CD&V – not getting my vote – 30 comments (banning the burqa, and fining cyclists without fluorescent strips)

09 Oct: Nobel Peace Prize – 35 comments (we were all surprised)
29 Oct: Films of 1959 – 23 comments (which have you seen?)

02 Nov: Sparked by a conversation last night – 20 comments (have you heard of Ian Paisley?)
07 Nov: Riddle me this – 25 comments (use of the words “blond”, “ovate” and “willowy”)
22 Nov: Sudan – 26 comments (pictures)

05 Dec:  Kröd Mändoon and the Flaming Sword of Fire, and other bad TV shows – 33 comments (which have you seen, or even heard of?)
06 Dec: Pronunciation poll – 20 comments (how do you say “asia”?)
16 Dec: Livejournal v Dreamwidth – 35 comments (the genderfail scare)
17 Dec: Not everyone uses our calendar but most have a word for December – 42 comments

So it’s polls, controversial science fiction, and real life evil scientists that generate the most comments here.

One interesting thing (well, interesting to me) is that as Facebook starts to devour the internet, my posts of LJ entries to there are starting to spark discussion as well – and it is a completely different set of posts which get the most attention. More than ten comments were made on the following (there may have been others, but it is very tedious to chase these things down on Facebook):

07 Jul: One thing from last night’s Torchwood… – 12 comments (Queen Victoria erroneously described as HRH)
10 Jul: And so, shortly after his resurrection… – 13 comments (Torchwood again)
28 Jul: eBay etiquette – 11 comments (a troublesome seller)
01 Sep: Ireland: same-sex marriage – 36 comments (discussion became heated)
10 Sep: Unpopular belief – 13 comments (why the House of Lords should not be replaced with an elected body)
02 Oct: Referendum Day – 10 comments (deleted when the discussion got seriously derailed, but was originally about the Irish Lisbon referendum)
04 Nov: Cometh the hour, cometh the man – 10 comments (Herman Van Rompuy)
09 Nov: The Fall of the Wall, twenty years on – 11 comments (Berlin)
19 Nov: Didn’t see that coming… – 13 comments (Catherine Ashton’s appointment as EU foreign policy representative)
20 Nov: One interesting thing about Catherine Ashton… – 10 comments (she has a Dalek in her living room)

Now, six of these are fairly hard politics posts, and I guess my facebook readership, being more reflective of my professional environment, is more likely to comment on those. But I find it peculiar that of the various posts I made about Torchwood: Children of Earth, two scored high on Facebook but a completely different one scored on Livejournal. I guess it is sometimes just a matter of the post catching the attention of potential commenters; a matter more of luck than judgement.

Posted in Uncategorised

The results from yesterday’s poll

Thanks to the 97 people who have so far answered yesterday’s scripts poll. The results are rather neatly bunched into four groups: 14 could be seen by at least 83 of the 97; there were a further 8 in the 47-62 range; there is a cluster of 3 which could be seen by 15-21 people; and one outlier which only I could see when logged in using Firefox.

95 Δεκέμβριος Greek (10-20 mn)
94 Декабрь Russian (100-200 mn)
92 ธันวาคม Thai (50-100 mn)
92 ديسمبر Arabic (200-500 mn)
92 דצמבר Hebrew (5-10 mn)
90 दिसंबर Hindi (200-500 mn)
89 டிசம்பர் Tamil (50-100 mn)
89 Դեկտեմբեր Armenian (5-10 mn)
88 ਦਸੰਬਰ Punjabi (50-100 mn)
88 ડિસેમ્બર Gujarati (50-100 mn)
85 クリスマス Japanese (100-200 mn)
84 聖誕節 Chinese (over 1 bn)
83 크리스마스 Korean (50-100 mn)
83 დეკემბერი Georgian (2-5 mn)

Taking it for granted that everyone could see the Latin alphabet clearly, this list includes the correct scripts for nine of the world’s ten languages with most speakers, and 23 of the top 25. I’ll address the missing languages when I get to them; the odd inclusions here are Greek and Hebrew (understandable for cultural reasons), Armenian and Georgian (which despite their small number of native speakers are geographically convenient to the massive information technology hub of Russia, and also relatively easy to code) and Thai, which quite probably says something abut the relative openness of Thailand compared to some of its neighbours.

62 ডিসেম্বর Bangla (100-200 mn)
61 డిసెంబర్ Telugu (50-100 mn)
61 ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ Kannada (20-50 mn)
61 ഡിസംബര്‍ Malayalam (20-50 mn)
60 ޑިސެމްބަރު Divehi (200,000-500,000)
58 ܟܢܘܢ ܐ Aramaic (2-5 mn)
54 ᑎᓯᒻᐳᕆ Inuit (20,000-50,000)
47 ᏓᏂᏍᏓᏲᎯᎲ Cherokee (20,000-50,000)

Actually these eight subdivide pretty clearly into three groups. Bangla, Telugu, Kannada and Malayalam are South Asian scripts which somehow have not achieved the penetration that their number of speakers would have suggested. This is particularly striking for Bangla which unlike the other three is the sole official language of a sovereign state. Divehi (which is the official language of the Maldives) and Aramaic may not be obvious partners, but in fact both scripts are related to Arabic, so if you have coded for one you may as well code for the other. Inuit and Cherokee are the two least-spoken languages on the entire list, and I suspect that their alphabets may not be all that widely used even by native speakers (Latin transcription of both languages is fairly common), but like Georgian and Armenian they have the advantage of being relatively easy to code and on a convenient continent for coders.

21 ዲሴምበር Amharic (10-20 mn)
18 දෙසැම්බර් Sinhalese (10-20 mn)
15 បុណ្យណូអែល Khmer (5-10 mn)

The Ge’ez script is used for Tigrinya as well as Amharic, so may need to be bumped up a population category; notably it is the only indigenous African script in the list. All three of these score rather lower than one would expect for the official language of a sovereign state (two sovereign states if one counts Eritrea as well as Ethiopia).

1 ဒီဇင်ဘာ Burmese (10-20 mn)

Isn’t that shocking? Burmese script is not easy for us alphabet-users, but really is no more difficult than the other South Asian and South-East Asian scripts. I would be interested to know more about the politics and policies which have put Thai so far ahead and Burmese so far behind compared with their neighbours. You may remember that Cory Doctorow’s book Little Brother is to be translated into Burmese, Karen (which also uses Burmese script), Shin and Kachin; I think this survey rather illustrates why that is a good idea.

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 5) Frayed, by ‘Tara Samms’

Stephen Cole is one of the most consistently good Doctor Who writers, and I was glad to pick up this Telos novella when last in London – a range that has not always impressed me, but this is one of the good ones. It is a little odd – the old man and the girl who travels with them only decide at the end of the story that they will adopt the identities of “the Doctor” and “Susan”, and the story combines the fairly standard base-under-siege-by-telepathic-horror story with a rather subtly done reflection on establishing and keeping identity. Worth looking out for.

Posted in Uncategorised

Livejournal v Dreamwidth

Musing a bit more on yesterday’s kerfuffle, I think Livejournal come out of it rather well and Dreamwidth rather badly.

Livejournal’s senior manager responded to me with the words “this was a mistake” and assured me that the proposed change was not being implemented. Their Customer Care folks then followed up with an explicit statement that “We understand that gender is not binary, and intend to respect that understanding for our users.” That seems to me entirely satisfactory. Someone wrote something which did not suit the organisation for which they work, and it is therefore not being used. In the public policy environment where I work, that happens all the time, particularly if (as I suspect here) there are people of varying linguistic and cultural backgrounds involved. Indeed, what is unusual here is the level of transparency at the drafting stage – a rather courageous approach for which one sometimes (as in this case) pays a price.

The whole kerfuffle began with a post by one of Dreamwidth’s co-owners, a former Livejournal staffer, which inaccurately presented the coding change as a done deal, an irreversible decision. You will note also that in the comments on yesterday’s post, a Dreamwidth staffer accuses Livejournal of lying to me, without evidence; and also makes the shocking assertion that Livejournal has been listening to its users, as if this were in some way outrageous.

Dreamwidth have gained a number of extra customers from Livejournal out of all this, based on a report from their own leadership which turns out not to be true, with the flames of this controversy being further deliberately fanned by their own staff even after Livejournal had resolved it. It is very easy to whip up fears of oppression among people who experience it regularly. It is more difficult in such circumstances to admit that you were wrong. I don’t think this affair looks very good for a company which was supposed to represent a more ethical approach to the business of blogging.

I am also perturbed by comments I have seen here and there about this somehow being the fault of the Russians, including the fact that the senior Livejournal manager who responded to me and to many others does not write perfect English and has a foreign name (which looks Ukrainian rather than Russian to me, but what do I know). Really, folks, get a grip. You have no idea how privileged you are to be native speakers of the world’s main language of communication. In any case I seem to remember that the frequency of Livejournal screwups was much greater, and that they were handled far more ineptly, when it was owned by Americans. SUP are running a tighter ship; the President of Russia is one of their customers.

Posted in Uncategorised

Four counties, rather than six?

An occasional correspondent emails me to ask about this passage from the memoirs of H.H. Asquith, the British prime minister, of 24 July 1914 (which I have transcribed on my website:

Later we had a meeting at Downing Street – Redmond [the Irish Nationalist leader], Dillon [Redmond’s deputy], Ll[oyd] G[eorge], Birrell and I. I told them that I must go on with the Amending Bill, without the time limit: to which, after a good deal of demur, the Irishmen reluctantly agreed.’

I should explain that for some enthusiasts of Irish history, rerunning the partition of the island is a favourite pastime, and the most significant point of departure is the conference held at Buckingham Palace in July 1914, to try to get agreement on what parts of Ulster should be excluded from the jurisdiction of an autonomous Home Rule government in Ireland. Unionists wanted the permanent exclusion of all nine counties of Ulster; Nationalists were prepared to accept the temporary exclusion of the four counties with Protestant majorities. Asquith, as prime minister, rapidly settled on the six-county unit we have today as the obvious compromise, largely because the Unionists indicated that they too would settle for it. But the passage above indicates that on the day the negotiations broke down, Asquith was instead heading for “county option” the holding of referendums in each county. My correspondent asks:

As I read this, Redmond and Dillon were prepared to agree to ‘County Option’ permanently, rather than for only 6 years.  I think that, if implemented, this would have led to a 4-county Northern Ireland.  It does seem strange that this concession was not revisited when Lloyd George carried out his negotiations in 1916 [when he was asked to find a way of implementing Irish Home Rule immediately after the Easter Rising, but failed].  I would be interested in any comments you might have.

My reply:

I think it’s pretty clear that Carson et al – the Unionists in Ulster – were prepared to go to civil war – which they would have won – rather than give up Tyrone and Fermanagh. So Asquith would have been unable to sell such a deal to them and the British Conservatives in 1914. In any case I wonder how solid Redmond and Dillon’s agreement was – I don’t read it as more than assent that Asquith should try this course, but they had probably made the same calculation as I do above, ie that it would not fly with the Unionists. Having said that, of course your interpretation may be correct; there was a Nationalist delusion that any Northern Ireland state of any size would be economically unviable and would wither away. (Similar arguments were successfully used in Cyprus in the 2004 referendum campaign, but in both cases they proved incorrect.)

To be honest I think it was a lucky escape for all of us. The experience of such referendums elsewhere has not been happy. The very prospect of the vote would have been a spark for horrible violence, probably not restricted to Fermanagh and Tyrone. Since the UVF were better prepared than the Nationalists or the British Army in 1914, a referendum proposal would certainly have triggered mass displacements of Catholics by Loyalists from all over what would probably have become the Six (or Five and a Half) counties. The Upper Silesia plebiscite of 1921 shows what can happen. The Unionists had no interest in allowing due process to separate Tyrone and Fermanagh from the other four counties. The border as it was established reflected the balance of potential coercive force at the time it was drawn – as do most borders.

You also ask about 1916. Lloyd George was after a quick fix, and holding six county option referenda in the middle of a war is not a quick fix. He needed something that the leaders could agree to, and implement, right away. I imagine that if he had succeeded, there would have been no elections until after the war was over but Redmond would have been put immediately in charge of a 26-county administration of some kind.

That was my reply to my correspondent. The one point I should have added, of course, is that Asquith was rather prone to changing his mind, and what he thought he would do on 24 July might well have been a different matter the following week, even without the distraction of war breaking out in Europe.

Posted in Uncategorised

Livejournal *doesn’t* screw up shock

Like a number of you, I imagine, I woke this morning to find news of the latest livejournal screwup in several places on my friends list. Users, we were told, were henceforth to be forced to specify their gender as either "male" or "female", with no allowance for those who do not want to be identified by gender, for shared accounts, for robots or for Elder Gods. Shocked by this news, I did a post of my own, and emailed one of the higher-ups at LJ to register my dissatisfaction. I got this reply:

thank you for your feedback.

However, the code update that you refer to is not live and did not have any chance to go live. That was a beta release, we always push code to beta to see if everything works correctly. In many cases it does not and we either fix bugs or pull the code from the final release plan.

We were going to add a gender field to the sign up user flow, which is fine, but by mistake it became a mandatory "female/male" field for everyone. This is why this is not going live. And this is what beta releases are for, to see problems and solve them before any user faces a problem.

I would appreciate if you share this information with your friends that are also concerned. I am sorry that you were misinformed.

The source of the original story was here, which is an entry on the Dreamwidth account of a former Livejournal employee who is one of the founders of Dreamwidth, which is in direct competition with Livejournal for customers. Just sayin’.

Edited to add: I also received this response from LJ’s feedback team:

Thank you for taking the time to contact us with your concerns. We understand that gender is not binary, and intend to respect that understanding for our users.

At this time, the code you reference is not live on the site, and will not become so in the future. We know that you, and many other users, have serious concerns about any requirement to specify gender, so we’d like to take a moment to explain events and our position further.

The intention of this code was to change the sign-up process to include a field for the selection of gender; that the code would completely disable the “Unspecified” option at the same time was deemed unacceptable. While the code in question had gone to our beta (testing) server, it had not gone to our production server, and will not do so due to this problem. Furthermore, we’d like to clarify that code posted to the changelog community is not always final, as such code must then go through the beta testing process and can often be changed before actual implementation.

Additionally, some erroneous information has been spread regarding the potential public display of the gender field. We would like to clarify that gender is not currently publicly displayed on the profile, nor anywhere else on the site, and there are no plans to change this behavior.

Regards,
 LiveJournal Community Care Team

See also sensible contributions from in comments below.

Posted in Uncategorised

The Sowerby resonance

I’ve been encountering a lot of fictional people called Sowerby lately. The Sowerby family – Martha, Dickon, and their unnamed mother and ten siblings – play a large role in The Secret Garden. Farther south, Mrs Sowerby is one of a number of characters living in Stockbridge played by Susan Brown in Plague of the Daleks the latest Big Finish audio in their main Doctor Who series. And farther south again, I’m also reading Trollope’s Framley Parsonage, where there is a villainous Sowerby who I hope will come to a sticky end.

I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone of that name in real life.

Posted in Uncategorised

December Books 4) The Jesuits, by Jonathan Wright

This is not a terribly impressive book. It is a more or less chronological account of details of history featuring the Jesuits, with no deep analysis and rather few hard facts – nothing at all to explain their internal structure, miserably brief accounts of how they were founded in 1534 and re-established in 1814. Wright is slightly better on the various political controversies that Jesuits have been involved in, though even here his analysis basically amounts to there being two sides of the story. He is good on the Jesuits’ contribution to science. He is wholly inadequate on their contribution to colonialism. I can’t really recommend this book.

Posted in Uncategorised

Paul McGann on Susan and the Doctor

I found this interesting discussion between Paul McGann and one of the Big finish team (not good at recognising voices and he doesn’t introduce himself) in the bonus track to "An Earthly Child", the new Big Finish play with him as the Eighth Doctor and Carole Ann Ford reprising Susan. (download extract here):

McGann: And I didn’t know either that it’s an old character, or at least that the idea that the Doctor had a family goes right back to the beginning, doesn’t it, right back to the early 60s, during Bill Hartnell’s reign.
Interviewer: It does. I mean, the very first episode of Doctor Who was William Hartnell as the Doctor with his granddaughter Susan, played by Carole Ann Ford, and that –
McGann: Of course – Carole Ann who’s in this now!
Interviewer: Yes!
McGann gasps.
Interviewer: She’s the same character.
McGann: Now that, I didn’t realise.
Interviewer: Yeah!
McGann: So there’s all this, sort of, symmetry…
Interviewer: Yeah!
McGann: God, how fantastic! It’s the next generation of where she left off.
Interviewer: Yeah! It picks up from exactly the same place where she left the series in 1965.
McGann: That’s… just too spooky. But kind of great as well, isn’t it!?
Interviewer: Marc [Platt]’s done a pretty seamless job in carrying on the story from where it finished.
McGann: But tell me why, em – let me interview you for a minute – why did we… I mean, I’ve played Doctor Who, why didn’t I know that Doctor Who had ever had kids, that there was a family involved? Is it something that people are coy about, is it something that’s not spoken of, is it a bit of a taboo subject?
Interviewer: I don’t know, actually. I suppose it’s a bit of an area of the show that some producers have chosen not to go in.
McGann laughs.
Interviewer: I have to say Russell T Davies and the team at Cardiff were very supportive of us doing this story, I mean they were very helpful. So it is –
McGann: Initially I felt, well, is it because somehow the Doctor over the years has become a kind of ascetic figure, you know, there’s something… we can’t imagine the Doctor having, we can’t imagine the Doctor having sex, or something. There’s something el- you know what I’m saying, so, is that the reason? I’m just trying to figure out why, why don’t people talk about this kind of thing?
Interviewer: I suppose what it could be is, if the Doctor has a family, it domesticizes him…
McGann: Perhaps.
Interviewer: …in a way, so it gives him roots and ties him down, whereas he’s always portrayed as this wanderer, and quite an isolated figure at times.
McGann: Right.
Interviewer: So…
McGann: It’s me that’s sex-obsessed, then.
Interviewer laughs.
McGann: But that’s a good point, then isn’t it – that it perhaps somehow goes against the grain, and also it kind of rings true, you can see, you know, even, presumably as Bill Hartnell’s character developed and then later on into the other actors that played him, it was more impotant that the Doctor, as you say, remains a kind of wanderer, you know, someone who –
Interviewer: A drifter.
McGann: A drifter, yeah. Somebody essentially quite rootless.

Funny that McGann, though obviously very aware of Hartnell’s Doctor, had never before heard the Susan parts of the back story. But I think he and the other guy successfully identify why the Doctor has never since been portrayed as having a family.

Posted in Uncategorised

2009 memes I: the first post of each month

This is the simplest of the end-of-year memes: post the first sentence of your first post for each month of the year. I add a short explanation though this is not traditional.

January: We had a rather quiet New Year’s Eve last night. A post about the turn of the year.
February: A story of a young boy who becomes involved in a secret romance – some similarity with McEwan’s Atonement, though the outcome is quite different. My review of The Go-Between, by L.P. Hartley.
March: Big Finish have returned to an old theme in Who: the search for the Key to Time, as originally carried out by the Fourth Doctor and his Time Lady companion Romana in 1978. Review of three Doctor Who audio plays.
April: Not mine, but ‘s of Bujold, starting here, and ‘s of The Lord of the Rings, starting here. Two series of Tor.com blog entries about rereading great sf/fantasy.
May: Dreamwidth: nwhyte. My little-used Dreamwidth account.
June: When you see the word “pasties”, do you think of: food? nipples? both? neither? One of my occasional linguistic polls.
July: Locked entry about an encounter with a weird person.
August: AP piece about my work – would be interested to know if it is in the print as well as the on-line version of the New York Times: (link). Big media story about my job.
September: Okay Then: Health Care : Whatever. My link to Scalzi.
October: Pathetic Motorways. My link to another cool site.
November: Sit down for breakfast. Local vegetation by the Nile.
December: More often than not, I complete the last leg of my morning commute by train, arriving at the railway station at Brussel/Bruxelles-Schuman, which is within a hop, skip and jump of my office. forensic railway archæology.

Posted in Uncategorised