Tuesday reading

Posted on by

Current
Nebula Awards Showcase 2011, ed. Kevin J. Anderson
Bland Ambition, by Steve Tally
The Slender-fingered Cats of Bubastis, by Xanna Eve Chown
Space Opera, by Catherynne M. Valente

Last books finished
Feersum Endjinn, by Iain M Banks
The Ginger Man, by J. P. Donleavy
The Invasion, by Peadar O Guilin
Record of a Spaceborn Few, by Becky Chambers
The Big Finish Companion, vol. 2, by Kenny Smith
Rosemary and Rue, by Seanan McGuire

Next books
Sovereign by R.M. Meluch
Will Supervillains Be On The Final?, by Naomi Novik, art by Yishan Li

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

The Good Doctor, by Juno Dawson

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter:

‘Oh I think it just might be.’ The Doctor paused for a moment. She hopped from foot to foot. Ryan knew this dance too. It was the do we run away from this or towards it dance. And he knew exactly which she’d choose. ‘Come on, let’s take a little look. There’s only two things I don’t believe in, and one’s coincidence.’

Apparently the first published of the three recent Thirteenth Doctor books, by Juno Dawson (possibly the first out trans writer to contribute to the official Whoniverse; she also did a couple of Torchwood audios for Big Finish in 2017). It’s really rather good – the story starts at the end of an adventure, following which the Doctor and friends return to the same planet centuries later, to discover that their first visit has become the founding myth of the dominant oppressive religious cult, with Graham remembered as the Doctor, the Doctor herself largely forgotten, and their own past used to justify slavery. It is very well done and packs a lot of action and thought into 227 pages. Recommended. You can get it here.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

Around The World in 80 Days (1956); and book by Jules Verne

Posted on by

Around The World in 80 Days won the Oscar for Best Motion Picture of 1956, and picked up another four, Best Cinematography, Color (Lionel Lindon), Best Film Editing (Gene Ruggiero and Paul Weatherwax), Best Music, Scoring of a Dramatic or Comedy Picture (Victor Young) and Best Writing, Best Screenplay, Adapted (John Farrow, S. J. Perelman, and James Poe). It was also nominated in Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Color; Best Costume Design, Color; and Best Director. Interestingly, none of the actors was nominated despite the all-star cast. The other contenders for Best Motion Picture that year were The King and I (which I have of course seen) and Friendly Persuasion, Giant, and The Ten Commandments (which I haven’t).

IMDB users rank Around The World in 80 Days 14th or 10th of the films of 1956. Ranked ahead of it in both cases are: The Ten CommandmentsThe KillingThe SearchersThe King and IThe Man Who Knew Too MuchForbidden PlanetInvasion of the Body SnatchersGiant. Of those, apart from The King and I, I have also seen Forbidden Planet. The only other 1956 film I think I have seen is Moby Dick. It’s a pretty good year; I liked all of them. Here’s a contemporary trailer.

I thought this was generally very good fun. In case you didn’t know, it’s the story of a chap called Phileas Fogg in 1872, who bets his London clubmates that he can travel around the world in eighty days. He brings with him his recently hired manservant, Passepartout, and also acquires en route an Indian princess who he saves from suttee and a detective who suspects him of bank robbery. The journey gives the excuse for lots of brief portrayals of exotic settings, both in the original 1872 book and spectacularly in the 1956 film. It’s not a deep film, but it’s very entertaining. I’m a bit of a fan of David Niven anyway, having greatly enjoyed his two autobiographies which I read as a teenager. I’ve also loved the book since I was a child.
As usual I’ll start with the bits of the film I didn’t like so much.

Whitewashing: as usual, I’m afraid. The lead female role is the Indian princess Aouda, played by the thoroughly Caucasian Shirley MacLaine (aged 22, in her third film). Though, of course, even in the original book we are told on first seeing her that Aouda is “as fair as a European”.

The film can hardly avoid Asian characters in the Indian, Chinese and Japanese segments – though of the credited actors, Robert Cabal, of European and Polynesian heritage, plays the unnamed Indian elephant driver; Philip Ahn, a Korean, plays a passer-by in Hong Kong). But there isn’t a single sub-Saharan African or African-American visible anywhere. (It is implied that Achmed Abdullah is North African; he is played by the Mexican Gilbert Roland.) It’s striking that in the scenes set in San Francisco, there is not a single non-white face to be seen – not in the election parade that starts this section of the film, not in Clancy’s saloon. The book, on the other hand, singles out Chinatown as one of the sights of San Francisco, and mentions that the hotel waiters were “negroes of darkest hue” – which is not brilliant, but in the film they are not there at all.

Stereotypes: Of course this is a film which relies on stereotypes for the humour of its (Oscar-winning) script, as indeed did the book. The French of the 1870s and the Americans of the 1950s are alike in finding English reserve and snobbery alien and mockable (and an excuse to look at someone else’s failings). I found it striking just how closely the film stuck to the book in this regard (with a couple of big additions, which I will get to, and the deletion of the scene with the Mormon preacher, which would have been less funny for 1950s Americans than for 1870s French readers). Oddly enough the weak point here is David Niven, who was a naturally warm and slightly vulnerable actor, and could not really carry off the impervious, on-the-spectrum Phileas Fogg.

The film does lampshade this, of course. In the closing seconds, Aouda appears at the Reform Club.

Fogg: My dear, I must ask you to leave these precincts at once. No woman has ever set foot in the club.
Aouda: Why not?
Fogg: Because that could spell the end of the British Empire.

(various crashes as Passepartout arrives through the window.)
The Governor of the Bank of England [Robert Morley]: This is the end.
(closing titles.)

Music: It’s inoffensive (though Oscar-winning) stuff, the catchy theme tune being a minor hit with the instrumental version from the film on the A side and Bing Crosby crooning it on the B side. Rule Britannia is of course the theme for the British sections, but I was very amused that the French sections raid Gershwin’s An American in Paris – no doubt from the film that had won the Best Picture Oscar only five years before.

Cast: There are 1302 named actors here. The number of cameos is breathtaking. You may have already spotted Marlene Dietrich running the San Francisco saloon. Here’s Noel Coward (who wrote the 1932-33 Best Picture) and John Gielgud as the head of an employment agency and Phileas Fogg’s recently sacked manservant.

Here’s Frank Sinatra playing the piano in Marlene Dietrich’s bar.

Here’s Buster Keaton as the train conductor in the Wild West.

I am not enough of a film buff to really appreciate them all, but it’s a remarkable array.

I think it’s also unfair that none of the cast were nominated in any of the acting categories. Cantinflas in particular shines as Passepartout (and was apparently given top billing, ahead of Niven, in Spanish-speaking countries where he was better known).

I do I’m afraid have my issues with Robert Newton, who is a bit too chunky for the cadaverous Inspector Fix (and of course died of alcoholism several months before the film was actually released).

Spectacle: The whole thing looks fantastic. The two early inserted sequences, not in the original book, are the balloon out of Paris and the bullfight. The balloon is utterly gratuitous to the plot, but allows the film to be in Paris and to have some amazingly well contructed shots. It’s a gorgeous sequence. (Of course, real balloonists would have needed to be more warmly dressed.)

Bullfighting is of course a terrible thing, but the point was that Cantinflas had actually been a bullfighter and was able to pull it off.

I’ve mentioned the establishment shot of San Francisco already. Everywhere is convincingly portrayed, the American bits best obviously. Passepartout is rescued from the Indians off-screen in the book but on-screen in the film:

And I had totally forgotten about the wind-propelled railcar in the book, which again looks great on screen.

This was very enjoyable. I’m putting it a quarter of the way down my list, just below All About Eve and above From Here To Eternity. You can get it here.

Next up is Bridge on the River Kwai, which is also based on a novel originally written in French but is a lot less funny.

This is of course not the only adaptation of Verne’s novel for the screen, though it is probably the best. You may remember the 2004 version with Jackie Chan getting top billing as Passepartout and Steve Coogan in second place as Fogg, also featuring Jim Broadbent as a villainous Lord Kelvin and Arnold Schwarzenegger as an Oriental prince. It varies just a little further from the book than the 1956 version did. Here’s a trailer:

Those of you who go back as far as I do may recall an Australian animated series in which Fogg is proving himself worthy of the love of Belinda, and Fix is an agent of his potential father-in-law. This opening sequence may jog your memory.

Back to the original novel, then. Second paragraph of third chapter:

Phileas Fogg se rendit aussitôt à la salle à manger, dont les neuf fenêtres s’ouvraient sur un beau jardin aux arbres déjà dorés par l’automne. Là, il prit place à la table habituelle où son couvert l’attendait. Son déjeuner se composait d’un hors-d’œuvre, d’un poisson bouilli relevé d’une « reading sauce » de premier choix, d’un roastbeef écarlate agrémenté de condiments « mushroom », d’un gâteau farci de tiges de rhubarbe et de groseilles vertes, d’un morceau de chester, — le tout arrosé de quelques tasses de cet excellent thé, spécialement recueilli pour l’office du Reform-Club.He repaired at once to the dining-room, the nine windows of which open upon a tasteful garden, where the trees were already gilded with an autumn colouring; and took his place at the habitual table, the cover of which had already been laid for him. His breakfast consisted of a side-dish, a broiled fish with Reading sauce, a scarlet slice of roast beef garnished with mushrooms, a rhubarb and gooseberry tart, and a morsel of Cheshire cheese, the whole being washed down with several cups of tea, for which the Reform is famous.

It’s striking that both “Reading sauce” and “mushrooms” are in English in the original French text. I can understand there not being a French equivalent for the former, but what’s wrong with “champignons”?

I last re-read the book in 2004, fifteen years ago, and wrote this:

After watching the dismal Steve Coogan/Jackie Chan film on the plane a couple of weeks ago, I realised I had the novel on my PDA and decided to re-read it. And, well, it’s good. There’s a little bit of the nerdishness recently satirised here, in that every means of transport is described in total detail. There are one and a half total implausibilities in the plot. But basically, this is a story of its time, full of the new wonders available in 1872 – the Suez Canal had been open for only three years, so had the rail link across the United States,and of course the whole point of the book is that the railway across India opened only that year. And this is an India only fifteen years on from the 1857 Mutiny – as far as we are from the fall of Communism; a Japan that has just experienced the Meiji restoration; a United States recovering from the Civil War, and doing its best to deal with the Mormons. And of course this is written by an author whose own native France has been devastated by a catastrophic military defeat the previous year, and is a determined attempt to look outwards and forwards.

The half implausibility I mentioned above is this. The whole basis of the story is that as a result of the trans-Indian railway being completed, our hero, Phileas Fogg, makes a bet that he can go around the world in eighty days. Well, when he gets to India, it turns out the railway hasn’t been completed; and he has to complete the rest of the journey by elephant, rescuing the beautiful Aouda on the way. Now come on; the whole basis of the bet was that the railway was there, and surely the gap between Kholby and Allahabad is sufficient cause to call the bet off?

The complete and total implausibility is the punchline of the entire book, where we are asked to believe that in the course of 26 days travel between the International Date Line and London, none of our leading characters had actually checked the date and realised that they were a day ahead of themselves. So they saw no newspapers and experienced no weekends in America or between Cork and Dublin or Liverpool and London; and the schedule of steamers in New York and railways in Ireland and England was utterly insensitive to the day of the week? Come off it! Of course the plot simply doesn’t work unless you are prepared to overlook this gaping hole in it, and most people do.

And how come all the bells in London strike at ten to nine anyway? Philip José Farmer had an explanation of this in The Other Log of Phileas Fogg, an otherwise completely forgettable effort. Apart from the points noted above, this is really fun and everyone should read it.

Re-reading it now I was even more struck by the cutting-edge aspects of the text. “Bungalows” are exotic buildings found only in India. The (American) Indian raid on the railway train is a cliche of the Western genre which had only recently come into existence (the dime novels Malaeska and Seth Jones both first appeared in mass circulation in 1860). I guess balloons out of Paris were still a painfully recent memory, or Verne would probably have put one in. It’s a short book with lots of fun spectacle. You can get it here.

Winners of the Oscar for Best Picture

1920s: Wings (1927-28) | The Broadway Melody (1928-29)
1930s: All Quiet on the Western Front (1929-30) | Cimarron (1930-31) | Grand Hotel (1931-32) | Cavalcade (1932-33) | It Happened One Night (1934) | Mutiny on the Bounty (1935, and books) | The Great Ziegfeld (1936) | The Life of Emile Zola (1937) | You Can’t Take It with You (1938) | Gone with the Wind (1939, and book)
1940s: Rebecca (1940) | How Green Was My Valley (1941) | Mrs. Miniver (1942) | Casablanca (1943) | Going My Way (1944) | The Lost Weekend (1945) | The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) | Gentleman’s Agreement (1947) | Hamlet (1948) | All the King’s Men (1949)
1950s: All About Eve (1950) | An American in Paris (1951) | The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) | From Here to Eternity (1953) | On The Waterfront (1954, and book) | Marty (1955) | Around the World in 80 Days (1956) | The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957) | Gigi (1958) | Ben-Hur (1959)
1960s: The Apartment (1960) | West Side Story (1961) | Lawrence of Arabia (1962) | Tom Jones (1963) | My Fair Lady (1964) | The Sound of Music (1965) | A Man for All Seasons (1966) | In the Heat of the Night (1967) | Oliver! (1968) | Midnight Cowboy (1969)
1970s: Patton (1970) | The French Connection (1971) | The Godfather (1972) | The Sting (1973) | The Godfather, Part II (1974) | One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975) | Rocky (1976) | Annie Hall (1977) | The Deer Hunter (1978) | Kramer vs. Kramer (1979)
1980s: Ordinary People (1980) | Chariots of Fire (1981) | Gandhi (1982) | Terms of Endearment (1983) | Amadeus (1984) | Out of Africa (1985) | Platoon (1986) | The Last Emperor (1987) | Rain Man (1988) | Driving Miss Daisy (1989)
1990s: Dances With Wolves (1990) | The Silence of the Lambs (1991) | Unforgiven (1992) | Schindler’s List (1993) | Forrest Gump (1994) | Braveheart (1995) | The English Patient (1996) | Titanic (1997) | Shakespeare in Love (1998) | American Beauty (1999)
21st century: Gladiator (2000) | A Beautiful Mind (2001) | Chicago (2002) | The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) | Million Dollar Baby (2004, and book) | Crash (2005) | The Departed (2006) | No Country for Old Men (2007) | Slumdog Millionaire (2008) | The Hurt Locker (2009)
2010s: The King’s Speech (2010) | The Artist (2011) | Argo (2012) | 12 Years a Slave (2013) | Birdman (2014) | Spotlight (2015) | Moonlight (2016) | The Shape of Water (2017) | Green Book (2018) | Parasite (2019)
2020s: Nomadland (2020) | CODA (2021) | Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) | Oppenheimer (2023)

My tweets

Posted on by

Posted in Uncategorised

BrexitBites May 2019

Posted on by

Is the end actually nigh? For two years now, we have expected Brexit to take place on schedule on 29 March. But the proposed Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration have yet to secure approval by the British Parliament, which on 14 February inflicted another defeat on Theresa May’s government on a resolution which did little more than approve of her handling of Brexit. The Labour Party’s proposals were also rejected by Parliament on 27 February, shifting the party’s policy to support for anew referendum.

The British Attorney-General, Geoffrey Cox, has assumed the de facto role of chief negotiator for the UK in teasing out any possible changes or additions to the “backstop”, the proposed mechanism to prevent the return of a hard Irish border in the event that the UK is not able to move quickly to a new trade agreement with the EU. The British have apparently dropped demands for the right to unilaterally abandon the backstop, or for a firm time limit, which apparently still leaves plenty to talk about

It’s very difficult to see that any conceivable tweaks that Cox secures from Brussels could gain approval from the European Research Group, which has appointed a group of eight parliamentary lawyers (including the Democratic Unionist Party’s Nigel Dodds) to scrutinise any new proposals. On the other hand Brussels and Dublin have been equally clear that there is some but not much room for manoeuvre. The EU has little patience left for the British.

(More embarrassment: the UK’s No-Deal contingency supply agreement with a ferry company that had no boats collapsed, and the courts then ordered the government to pay Eurotunnel to settle a compensation claim over the deal. And the Japanese car-makers Honda are closing their factory in Swindon, claiming unconvincingly that this has nothing to do with Brexit.

Currently scheduled for next week are three parliamentary votes: potential approval of the current deal as tweaked, on 12 March; a straight vote for or against leaving the EU without a deal on 13 March; and then a vote on whether or not to ask for an extension of the 29 March deadline, to take place on 14 March. No vote on a new referendum is currently planned; it’s difficult to see such a vote passing, as the number of Labour MPs opposed to such a vote is rather large.

Very few observers expect anything other negative results to the first two of next week’s planned resolutions, with Parliament again rejecting both of the options currently on the table – particularly now that the government for the first time has conceded that an extension of the Brexit period is possible, a concession that triggered yet another government resignation.

However, given the continuing uncertainty, the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier now accepts that a delay will be needed even if the deal is approved on 12 March, simply to pass the necessary legislation.

Over the first few days of March, a number of commentators claimed to have detected signs of movement; that formerly Eurosceptic Tories are moving towards support for the deal with the forthcoming tweaks, and that there is therefore a chance that the 12 March vote may actually pass. A 5 March survey of London banking analysts found that 37% of them believe this will be the outcome, with 54% expecting a postponement and only 9% contemplating No Deal. Personally I think they are optimists. The numbers are not there.

I want to close by noting a few pieces by articulate British people whom I know, who feel bereft and betrayed by Brexit and are coming to terms with it in their own ways. Gareth has become Belgian. Andrew has moved to Dublin. Natalie grieves for the loss of her sense of community in Britain. Paul feels the same about his home in Italy. Personally, I am fortunate enough to have three citizenships, of the UK, Ireland and Belgium. My British passport expired in February 2017; I did not renew it, and I don’t think I ever will.

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

Dark Lord of Derkholm, by Diana Wynne Jones

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter:

The two of them preceded Querida and Barnabas up the straight drive (for, despite working until after midnight, Derk had not found room to make the drive wander as he wanted) and to the enormous terrace, where they politely bowed the two wizards up the steps. It was perhaps unfortunate that the moving around of the garden had resulted in the clump of man-eating orchids arriving at a bed just beside these steps. They made a dart at Querida as she passed, all several dozen yellow blooms at once. Querida turned and looked at them. The orchids drew back hastily.

This came to me strongly recommended as a superior example of the great Diana Wynne Jones’ work. It didn’t completely grab me, but I still quite liked it. The setting is a fantasy world which has been taken over by a commercial tour company from a world like ours; inhabitants are expected to dress up and engage in mock fantasy activities for the benefit of the tourists, and the unfortunate Derk is appointed Dark Lord of Derkholm in an effort to lead his world’s response to the problem, which at the same time dealing with some complicated teenage family dynamics where not all of the teenagers are human.

DWJ was always particularly deft and sympathetic at portraying family relations (perhaps The Ogre Downstairs is her high point) and that’s certainly the strength of this book, where quite a lot is shown rather than told. My difficulty was with the fantasy setting, where on the one hand we are invited to dislike the tourists from “our” world who don’t take it seriously (or take it too seriously), and yet the characters veer a little too closely to early Pratchett in their own appreciation of their setting. In Farah Mendlesohn’s terminology, it veers between several different rhetorics – liminal, immersive and portal (and possibly a kind of reverse intrusive) – without really settling on any of them. It’s also rather longer than the story really deserves. As mentioned above, I still quite liked it. You can get it here.

This was the top unread sf book on my shelves (excluding previous award winners and current Hugo finalists). Next on that list is Grimm Tales, by Philip Pullman.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by

Posted in Uncategorised

A Sunless Sea, by Anne Perry

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter:

A group of men passed him, trudging along the road towards the docks. A vegetable cart passed the other way, piled with carrots and greens of one sort or another, and a few ripe apples.

Honestly not sure why I picked this up. It turns out to be 18th in s series of 24 (so far) novels about a Victorian detective, William Monk, who here gets sucked into an 1864 London murder, linked to the government’s involvement in the opium trade. I bounced off a number of points. The nicer characters have much too sympathetic political views for their time (for comparison, there is an awful chapter in the otherwise not too bad The Next Generation, by John Francis Maguire MP, published in 1871, about the Chinese and opium). The middle-class women of the book seemed to me rather more politically emancipated than could really have been expected in 1864. The actual murder plot was a bit improbable, and the motivation of the suspect who is first arrested for the crime seemed incomprehensible to me. On the other hand, there is a good and sensitive appreciation of London’s geography. And on doing a bit more digging, I discovered that the author knows at first hand what it’s like to be a woman on trial for murder. However, I don’t think I will look out for more of her work based on A Sunless Sea. If you want, you can get it here.

This was my top unread book acquired in 2015. Next on that list is The Ghosts of Heaven, by Marcus Sedgwick.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by

Posted in Uncategorised

The Weather on Versimmon, by Matthew Griffiths

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Hordenza started. She’d been engrossed in the icefield analysis and hadn’t realised the signal from Versimmon was getting through. ‘Ah – Minister Hordenza here,’ she said. ‘Over?’

This is a novel in the Bernice Summerfield continuity, set during the Road Trip audio sequence (not that you’d really notice). It’s a short book set on a world with no native animals, entirely ruled by trees; Bernice and three other women from the human colonising power have to make sense of it all. Another reviewer compared it favourably with Ann Leckieget it here.

Next in this sequence is The Slender-fingered Cats of Bubastis, by Xanna Eve Chown.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by

  • Wed, 11:42: RT @nickeardleybbc: Brutal for Change UK. Their top candidate in Scotland – David McDonald – is now backing the Lib Dems at the European el…

Posted in Uncategorised

Tuesday reading

Posted on by

Current
Feersum Endjinn, by Iain M Banks
The Ginger Man, by J. P. Donleavy
The Big Finish Companion, vol. 2, by Kenny Smith

Last books finished
The TARDIS Handbook, by Steve Tribe
The Calculating Stars, by Mary Robinette Kowal
Around the World in Eighty Days, by Jules Verne
Infomocracy, by Malka Older

Next books
Bland Ambition, by Steve Tally
Nebula Awards Showcase 2011, ed. Kevin J. Anderson

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

Alarums and Excursions: Improvising Politics on the European Stage, by Luuk van Middelaar

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter (on the migration crisis):

The demand for action had a different character from that which accompanied previous crises. The Ukraine crisis of 2014–15 was a matter of war and peace; the Union itself had hardly any resources or powers to bring the conflict under control, so active intervention by the member states jointly was an obvious necessity. Moreover, application of the magnetic forces provided by the Brussels diplomatic toolkit, the showpiece being the association agreement with Kiev, had worked out badly. No one at that point, therefore, disputed the primacy of events-politics. In the fields of asylum and migration, by contrast, the Union had quite a few competences and regulations. The situation became unmanageable because the regulatory framework collapsed under divergent strategic interests and because of the disruptive impact of the situation on public opinion. For a long time Brussels was blind to the gap between what was administratively possible and what, in this exceptional situation, was politically required. Engagement by the highest political authority needed for events-politics was even actively hindered by some institutions, reinforcing the impression of a loss of control, of powerlessness.

This book came out only last month in English translation (originally published two years ago in Dutch as De nieuwe politiek van Europa, but clearly updated as it includes many references to events of late 2017 and 2018). I vaguely know the author, and tidying up the house at the weekend found an invitation to a dinner we both attended several years ago. He was the speechwriter for the first full-time President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, but apart from that is political scientist, a philosopher and a perceptive analyst of what is really going on – constructively critical of the stories that the EU tells itself. I drew very much on the book in preparing my own recent talk on Brexit. In March, the Irish Times published a nice précis of his views, especially as applied to Brexit.

Several years ago, a senior (and British) EU official quipped to me that the EU’s triumph is to convert difficult political issues into boring technical details. Van Middelaar dismantles this EU self-perception in forensic detail, first of all outlining several crucial recent cases where the politics was everything, and technical details held crucial political importance – the EU crisis, the Ukraine crisis, the refugee crisis, and the EU’s response to Trump and Brexit – and then delving deeper into the EU’s system of governance, showing that technocracy is not enough to satisfy the public’s requirements for accountability.

I found particularly useful his point that the EU system was not built to include internal constructive opposition. It was deliberately and politically constructed as a massive peace project, removing the incentives for future conflict in Europe through economic co-operation. The EU works by consensus, expertise, technocracy, and grand coalitions. Even though almost all decisions by member states in the Council of Ministers are theoretically taken by qualified majority, in fact there are very few votes; there is a strong incentive to find a consensus. The same is true in the European Parliament, where unlike in a national parliament there is no group of members representing a potential alternate government.

This is both a strength and a weakness. Van Middelaar looks at the failures of the European federalist model (Commission as sole executive, Parliament as sole legislature) and analyses where opposition actually does happen in the current system: among governments, from the European Parliament, from national parliaments, from groups of opposition parties and from maverick forces. The EU has not yet accommodated all of these voices in its own political order, and it will take a certain change of mind-set in its leadership for that to happen. Van Middelaar doesn’t say so directly, but it’s more likely than not that the EU will adapt to the reality it has created; that’s what has always happened before.

It’s a book which will be of more interest to those who support the EU project than to those who oppose it (and of very little interest to those who don’t much care one way or the other). Strongly recommended. You can get it here.

Posted in Uncategorised

Doctor Who: the Episode Guide, by Mark Campbell

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third section (as usual in these books, it's about The Edge of Destruction):

Observations: This unusual two-parter, featuring only the four regular cast members and the Tardis interior, was written to offset overspends on the previous stories, to introduce a 'sideways' narrative (instead of 'past' or 'future'), and to complete the series' probationary run of 13 episodes.

I picked this up in 2010 and did not get around to reading it until now. I didn't miss much. It's a Lofficier-style recounting of every Who story to date (so through the end of the first Matt Smith season), with a pretty bare-bones approach. The work of key designers is credited in the episode descriptions rather than in the rubric. TV and webcast spinoffs are listed at the end, in not much detail. This was behind the curve in 2010. If you want, you can get it here.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
  • Thu, 12:07: RT @alexstubb: Never take things for granted. The EU exists for 3 reasons: 1. Peace. 2. Security. 3. Prosperity. Let’s keep working at it,…
  • Thu, 12:56: RT @DmitryOpines: Thinking you can have a “clean-break Brexit” is like believing you can divorce a spouse of 30 years with whom you share a…
  • Thu, 13:04: RT @fatbadger442: Ffs. I know we’re supposed to expect to have a universities minister who hasn’t got much of a clue about how academia wor…
  • Thu, 15:38: RT @AdamsonPaul: I do get the sentiment about the need for the EU to speak with one voice ‘on the world stage’ but there is a certain irony…
  • Thu, 16:05: But will they listen? https://t.co/W74qYdzSaB
  • Thu, 17:04: I get a couple of lines in a Foreign Policy article on Europe’s far right parties – or rather, countries where ther… https://t.co/ob1jFu0Uu0
  • Thu, 18:17: Arthur C. Clarke Award – Goodreads/LibraryThing stata https://t.co/bXH06G88nC
  • Thu, 19:23: RT @alanbeattie: Spitzenkandidaten process so self-evidently a bad idea you wonder which secret eurosceptic saboteur is behind it. Robert C…
  • Thu, 21:18: RT @CharleneWhite: To post a pic picturing a 3-day old baby of mixed heritage as a monkey, then claim it was a joke? That’s old-school prej…
  • Fri, 10:45: RT @TheNewsQuiz: Lots of people have asked if we can share the bit of @AngelaBarnes talking about proposals to ask victims of sexual assaul…
Posted in Uncategorised

Arthur C. Clarke Award – Goodreads/LibraryThing stats

Posted on by
Goodreads LibraryThing
owners av rating owners av rating
Rosewater, by Tade Thompson 22604 3.82 226 3.8
Frankenstein in Baghdad, by Ahmed Saadawi 13710 3.52 249 3.55
Semiosis, by Sue Burke 13517 3.95 179 3.86
Revenant Gun, by Yoon ha Lee 8018 4.2 171 4.08
The Electric State, by Simon Stålenhag 4169 4.41 74 4.3
The Loosening Skin, by Aliya Whiteley 328 3.91 5 3.5
Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
  • Wed, 12:55: RT @BenLowry2: This ought to be self evident but apparently isn’t,eg a voter might dislike a party that has 3 candidates but not mind one o…
  • Wed, 12:56: RT @JoatStewart: Jack Cohen died peacefully on 6 May. He was a close friend and colleague for 30 years, and I will always remember him with…
  • Wed, 15:55: Well done @epc_eu for gender-balanced panel on Montenegro. https://t.co/lJmUMJtVXd
  • Wed, 16:35: RT @MelisssfMelissa: Should schools in the UK be forced to teac Arabic numerals as part of the curriculum?
  • Wed, 18:16: The Botany of Desire, by Michael Pollan https://t.co/tb0rkJ7g7r
  • Wed, 19:22: RT @jasonomahony: Only one person in this photo can never be head of state of either the United Kingdom or the United States, and the only…
  • Wed, 21:59: RT @WeyandSabine: Great read – fascinating reminder of the 1950s debate on „customs union vs FTA“ pitching UK against EEC6. And I’d forgott…
  • Thu, 10:45: Lyra McKee’s partner: Theresa May ‘derelict in her duties to Northern Ireland’ https://t.co/kYT5hnKsfw Hard to disagree with any of this.
Posted in Uncategorised

The Botany of Desire, by Michael Pollan

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Living things have always had to make their way in a wild garden of flowers and vines, of leaves and trees and fungi that hold out not only nourishing things to eat but deadly poisons, too. Nothing is more important to a creature's survival than knowing which is which, yet drawing a bright line through the middle of the garden, as the God of Genesis found, doesn't always work. The difficulty is that there are plants that do other, more curious things than simply sustain or extinguish life. Some heal; others rouse or calm or quiet the body's pain. But most remarkable of all, there are plants in the garden that manufacture molecules with the power to change the subjective experience of reality we call consciousness.

A great little book looking at four plants and how they have affected us humans as well as vice versa. The plants are the apple, the tulip, marijuana and the potato, and their respective desires a sweetness, beauty, intoxication and control. The best chapter is probably the third, on marijuana, which looks at how the War On Drugs has actually forced producers to innovate genetically and geographically, to the point that the marijuana now available is way stronger than you could get before the government started to crack down on its possession. But I found myself flicking to Wikipedia to check all kinds of other facts, such as the Kazakh origin of the apple tree, and the lack of genetic diversity among domesticated potatoes (which made the Irish population of the 1840s so vulnerable to a single fungus). Lots of tasty sweet stuff. Recommended. You can get it here.

This was my top unread book acquired last year (one of Anne's Christmas presents) and my top unread non-fiction book. Next on those lists respectively are The Paying Guests, by Sarah Waters, and Becoming, by Michelle Obama.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
Posted in Uncategorised

Tuesday reading

Posted on by

Current
The Calculating Stars, by Mary Robinette Kowal
The TARDIS Handbook, by Steve Tribe
Feersum Endjinn, by Iain M Banks

Last books finished
The Cruel Prince, by Holly Black
A Sunless Sea by Anne Perry
Dark Lord of Derkholm, by Diana Wynne Jones
The Good Doctor, by Juno Dawson
Ursula K. Le Guin: Conversations on Writing, by Ursula K. Le Guin with David Naimon
Animate Europe Plus, by David Shaw, Marta Okrasko, Juliana Penkova, Bruno Cordoba and Paul Rietzl

Next books
The Ginger Man, by J. P. Donleavy
Bland Ambition, by Steve Tally

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by
  • Mon, 12:56: RT @gerrylynch: So hope for a great sea-change On the far side of revenge. Believe that further shore Is reachable from here. Believe in mi…
  • Mon, 16:05: RT @ConorGallaghe_r: Every few years the NYT has an article marveling that Irish people don’t sleep on dirt floors and eat turf for dinner…
  • Mon, 16:56: RT @DPhinnemore: Not sure Raab was really listening to Barnier: Raab ‘We need to know how the backstop ends, it needs to be short, finite…
  • Mon, 17:11: Centre parties have captured a significant number of seats from both nationalists and unionists at the local electi… https://t.co/rtexFIPnFY
  • Mon, 18:34: The Day She Saved the Doctor, by Jacqueline Rayner, Jenny T. Colgan, Susan Calman, Dorothy Koomson https://t.co/KGNzRH1TiI
  • Mon, 19:04: RT @StevePeers: This is a seriously false claim. The UK has an opt out from the single currency, and the CJEU has confirmed that no Member…
  • Mon, 19:06: NI Council Results Map – salmonofdata https://t.co/G1wzaeQA0U Again from @peterdonaghy, this is truly gorgeous.
  • Mon, 20:09: Special thank you to my 197 new followers from UK., Ireland, USA, and more last week. https://t.co/KsKgiTjUtt
Posted in Uncategorised

The Day She Saved the Doctor, by Jacqueline Rayner, Jenny T. Colgan, Susan Calman, Dorothy Koomson

Posted on by

Second paragraph of third story (“Clara and the Maze of Cui Palta”, by Susan Calman):

Clara sighed heavily, turned to face him, placed her hands very deliberately on her hips and spoke in a tone that warned of impending annoyance. ‘What? Why do you keep staring at me? Have I grown a horn from the middle of my forehead?’

Four pretty good stories, two by established Who writers Jacqueline Rayner and Jenny T. Colgan (Colgan of course much better known for her other writing) and two by established writers who are new to the Whoniverse (Susan Calman and Dorothy Koomson), each featuring a companion (Sarah Jane, Rose, Clara, Bill) who makes a crucial difference to the plot. My favourite was the Twelve-and-Bill story, “Bill and the Three Jackets” by Dorothy Koomson, which had a neat bit of identity-swapping and body horror tying into Bill’s own back story; I’ll look out for more of her work. You can get them all here.

Posted in Uncategorised

My tweets

Posted on by

Posted in Uncategorised