From Susan Stepney

Panel — Byzantium at our Borders in the 21st century: the Future of Europe

Would we have needed a different past to have a different future? What would be the consequences if “recognition of Europe’s Christian heritage” is inserted into the constitution.

Jon Courtenay Grimwood, Patrick J. Gyger, Nicholas Whyte, Harry Turtledove, Keith Brooke

[panel]
  • PJG — SF museum of Europe
  • I don’t think that we could have got here any other way
  • looking at Europe from across the water — it’s a different scale — complaining about the distance to Brussels — I’m looking at cultures compressed into a v small scale
  • smallness defines us and defines how we feel — are boundaries wiggly or straight: it tells you how the country was formed
  • the only boundary in Europe that makes sense on linguistic, cultural, whatever grounds is that between England and France — all the rest are the ebb and flow of various empires
  • more people voted on Big Brother than in the European elections
  • how much of the history we learn in school is real — Trafalgar, Waterloo — how can we have a united Europe if we all have different histories?
  • lots of small countries bickering — like spoiled courtiers knifing each other in the back — as power shifts
  • what I think of as being English, and what others think, are v different things
  • we ought to “recognise the Christian heritage”, because it exists, but I don’t want it written in, because it excludes many people now, and ignores other important heritages: Jewish, Islamic, …
  • national history gets used by politicians — buttons can be pushed — not history in any sense an historian would understand
  • Yugoslavia — saw the messes of the whole country replaying themselves — is there no way off this wheel?
  • prejudices remain, but nowhere near as important
    • don’t need to take Sun/Mirror seriously — but Daily Mail readers think it is a serious paper
  • changing linguistic regime in Europe
    • Canadian approach — “bilingual” — include a paragraph in a bad version of the other language
    • European — speak own, pretend to understand other
    • Swiss — 4 languages — use English as a common language to unite us in an artificial way
  • JCG — Arabesk trilogy — liberal strand of Islam, does exist now, but not nearly as strong as it was 70 years ago — came out of two photos from 1905, one in Croydon, one in Turkey, almost identical — only difference was religion — middle class families with nearly everything else in common
  • Nazis make wonderful villains — were really really evil, and they really really lost
    • alternatives: victory, or three cornered standoff
    • WWII breaking out over Sudetenland — a year earlier, with Poland on Germany’s side
  • if Germany won WWI — wouldn’t have run out all scientists under the Kaiser — would have got bomb first
  • war against terrorism
  • votes on European constitution — turning away from Federal Europe
    • French no vote — it was a rejection of the the constitution, not of the Union — just wanted a different one — 200 pages! — should be three pages, a few points — nothing written by 300 people that couldn’t be written better by three
  • UK pulled in two directions — Europe: proximity, history — North America: history, linguistic
    • European feeling increasing, because of feeling less in common with US — so Europe needs to be stronger
  • what does it mean to “feel European”? politically? culturally? …?
    • rest of Europe is investing in English speaking culture
    • in Scotland, tradition to view England as the enemy, tradition of looking to Europe — Auld Alliance
  • I come from Belfast, which is the only place people call themselves British before anything else
  • I’m Norwegian, European — the EU is trying to steal my identity
  • Ryan Air, Easy Jet — have changed our view of Europe
  • what will happen in Europe with Turkey is like US+Mexico
  • in LA, two of the three radio stations are Spanish speaking — the US is not monolingual
  • in the 19th century, it made a lot of sense for a cultural or linguistic body to be a nation — we need to tease out the relationship between culture, nation, government — separate church and state, maybe need to separate state and culture – same currency and road signs, but own cultures
  • I’d feel more European if Europe didn’t define itself as “not American”
  • Brits are more likely to have relatives in India/Pakistan than in Canada/Australia
  • I was at a wedding in deepest Hampshire — huge big Irish/Bengali affair — that was my cousin, marrying an Englishman
  • welcome Turkey in Europe, for getting over the Christian heritage
  • Byzantium — orthodox Christianity + Greek language — could do what you wanted, but stay a local bum
  • Islamic Spain — three religions existing side by side
  • US is a patchwork of cultures — Europe could keep local cultures, doesn’t need to be homogenised

Posted in Uncategorised

From

Saturday 10:00 Fractured: Is British Politics too Broken to Stay Together?

Is British politics Broken?

The first panel of the day wasn’t as busy as some of the ones I had been too before, but I came in sufficiently as it was starting to not be able to get a seat too close to the front. Hence the one crappy picture I got from this panel.

As with a number of panels that I ended up attending there was some overlap. So this panel to some degree fit with the Race/Migration panel from the previous day (the idea of language and religion and economic migrants) and the one that followed which was about The Future of Europe. The panel was made up of James Lovegrove, Ian R. MacLeod, Ian McDonald and Nicholas Whyte.

Both McDonald and Whyte have Irish backgrounds, so Ireland once again featured – how the split into Ireland and Northern Ireland changed things like football, and with Irish as one of the languages of Northern Ireland there was the generation of Ulster Scots for the other side.

That follows into religion, with some discussion of how an event like Guy Fawkes day is about the religious divide, and how comments are made on both sides about the conflict between Catholic and Protestants stemming from hundreds of years ago.

By contrast to the previous panel, the migrants being talked about this time were moving into mainland Europe, instead of those from mainland Europe coming into Britain. The contrast of how the poor come here for jobs and to fill skills shortages versus the better off Brits who by houses in Spain or France for the better weather. One of the conclusions regarding this idea was that it was a good thing, opening up Britain and allowing a wider viewpoint of the world and of Europe on the doorstep.

Regards government, there was some discussion about Scotland and Wales gaining more devolved power. How parties like the Conservatives are really a South of England party with very little real representation in the rest of the United Kingdom. Which brought discussion briefly back to Northern Ireland, and how the mainland UK parties had made no impact on Irish politics. In turn it was suggested the reason why regional assemblies in England have been turned down is because people prefer the idea of a remote government, one that can’t meddle in their affairs.

Saturday 11:00 Byzantium at our Borders in the 21st Century: the Future of Europe.

Byzantium at out Borders in the 21st Century

Nicholas Whyte chaired this panel, which was nominally about alternate histories and alternate futures. Though more specifically it was about Europe, the key events that have and will shape Europe, and how those could have been different. Harry Turtledove was present as a writer of alternate histories and as someone who comes from family driven out of Europe. Jon Courtenay Grimwood has also written alternate futures, and travelled round the world extensively. Keith Brooke seemed to have been given the role of insular Brit, he is a SF writer, though also the man behind the Infinity Plus website. Which leaves Patrick J. Gyger from the Swiss science fiction museum.

Byzantium at out Borders in the 21st Century

To some extent the discussion started with how European people felt. Despite being part of the European landmass Gyger insisted that Switzerland wasn’t part of Europe, with several audience members saying the same about their home of Norway. This led to discussion about borders and the development of Europe, and how these things are defined. Whyte works in the European parliament, and as well as having grown up in Ireland has also been involved with Yugoslavia and the resulting splinters that came from there – so he shared some of his insights into conflict and progress.

Byzantium at out Borders in the 21st Century

Developing the discussion in the direction of the alternate history base line, each member of the panel talked about what they considered to be key moments in European/World history and how those could have gone differently and what the effect might have been. If the UUSR had won the cold war. If the US and USSR had actually had a nuclear war. If World War II had started a little earlier. If World War I had been won by Germany, then we might have just finished the German century rather than the American.

One of the overall ideas was how little things have changed really. With the suggestion that the same powers that shaped the world 100 years ago are the same powers shaping it now; with the Austro-Hungarian Empire having been replaced by America in the scheme of things. From there, one of the biggest things affecting world borders today is the 3rd world versus 1st. Part of the conversation covering the debate over Turkey and whether it should join the European community, with Turtledove making the comparison between Turkey and Europe and Mexico and America.

Posted in Uncategorised

August Books 7) A Very British Genre

7) A Very British Genre: A Short History of British Fantasy and Science Fiction, by

A nice short book, ten years old now, looking at the history of sf in Britain, though the title is contradicted by the first sentence, “Science Fiction is not a distinctly British genre.” I found this useful as a contextualisation of a lot of the stuff I’ve already read and as a pointer for other writers I might enjoy -indeed, am surprised by the large number of writers singled out as significant who I haven’t yet tried. Paul makes a lot of sweeping statements (Wells “perhaps the single most important writer in the history of science fiction”, Aldiss “probably the most literarily varied and inventive writer since Wells”) which I struggled with for a moment or two before deciding that I actually agree with him. One or two omissions – Dan Dare gets a mention, but no other comics, and I’d have thought 2000AD (and the Dave Gibbons Doctor Who strips) are significant in this. Also because of the concentration on the UK, Flann O’Brien is left out, but is in. And when one chapter began with the deaths of Aldous Huxley and C.S. Lewis on the same day as John F. Kennedy, I was hoping that it might end with a reference to another significant event in the history of British sf the following day; but it didn’t. Still, you can’t really complain; 41 pages of text, and (particularly appreciated) a comprehensive reading list and index at the back.

Posted in Uncategorised

August Books 6) Like A Velvet Glove Cast In Iron

6) Like A Velvet Glove Cast In Iron, by Daniel Clowes

I’ve enjoyed Daniel Clowes’ other work, and heard good things about this, so snapped it up from the dealers’ room in Worldcon. I’m afraid I was very disappointed; it seemed to me completely disjointed and rambling, and to be honest not even that well drawn. The moment with Tina’s fish eggs was memorable, though.

Posted in Uncategorised

August Books 5) The World Inside

5) The World Inside, by Robert Silverberg

I first read this as a hormonal teenager and was deeply impressed by Silverberg’s portrayal of a future society where most of the world’s population lives in apartment blocks which are three kilometres high and, more importanlty, everyone is not just allowed but encouraged to have sex with everyone else, written up in erotic detail. Now, rereading it twenty years later, I realise that it is actually a dystopia; sexual freedom comes with a total ban on contraception, and instant capital punishment without trial for marital disagrements. It is a deeply repressive society whose rulers appear cynical. Naturally, the viewpoint characters all have serious doubts about fitting in; one ends up brainwashed into submission; another is executed, a third commits suicide. There is a society outside the tower blocks, cultivating the fields for the vast amount of food needed for a global population of 75 billion, but it is equally defective. As the title makes clear, this is not so much a novel about overpopulation or about sex as about personal frustration with society. Very interesting.

Posted in Uncategorised

The Empty Child

Since this is the episode currently rated best on the dynamic rankings site – even ahead of The Talons of Weng-Chiang and Genesis of the Daleks, and everyone was telling me at Worldcon how great it was (but sadly it was broadcast when I was at the wedding), I was very much looking forward to it. And there are lots of fantastic moments – Jack’s “nice bottom” lines, the “Marxism in action or a West End musical” line, the “mauve alert” were all very funny; and the “Are you my mummy” child was every bit as scary and effective as I had guessed it must be. Plus also a decent cliff-hanger, and good sense of pacing. Good summaries here and here.

But there were two bits that jarred. The “psychic paper” seemed straight out of Coupling, by the same author of course, and indeed had a certain similarity to the Truth Snake. And the Doctor’s “tiny damp island” speech really grated for me; completely out of place with the normal tone of DW.

And I never caught the “Bad Wolf” reference, if there was one. Anyone care to enlighten me?

So, operationally, what episode should those of us who care about these things collectively throw our weight behind in the nominations for next year’s Hugo for Best Dramatic Presentation (Short Form)? I still haven’t seen The Doctor Dances, but I don’t think it will change my view that the one to back is Dalekfive separate posts around the time of the first broadcast). Of course, youse can all nominate what you like; but I think a little discussion ahead of time does no harm at all!

Posted in Uncategorised

August Books 4) Nineteen Eighty-Four

4) Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell

Managed to read this on the way to Worldcon and in the rare insomniac moments while there. Of course I must have read it a couple of times as a teenager but it’s always interesting to come back to it. Just a few things that struck me on rereading:

  1. It’s not so much a novel as a set of political statements framed as tragedy.
  2. There is, however, a genuine moment of suspense for the first time reader when we don’t know if O’Brien is really a counter-revolutionary or not.
  3. Julia as a character is better drawn than I remembered. I think that when I first read the book I was hoping she would “really” be as ideological as Winston, but in fact her approach is an important contrast to his. “You are only a revolutionary from the waist down” is one of the most important lines in the book.
  4. Room 101, taken on its own, actually isn’t very terrifying – it only acquires its impact from what has come before. But it does give the plot another element of suspense after the main question – will they manage to overthrow Big Brother or not? – has been answered.
Little more need be said.
Posted in Uncategorised

Post-worldcon friends list

Again, bolded those of you who I’ve actualy met; rather a change compared with two weeks ago.

ajshepherd, akicif, alarielle, alexmc, alliemay, andwatagain, andyhat, ang_grrr, annafdd, artw, autopope, aynathie, banskid, barsine, blonde222, bouncingbelle, bricoleur, bring_back_food, brisingamen, britzkrieg, burkesworks, busarewski, butterbee, captain_wesker, ccfinlay, cdpoint, ceemage, chance88088, chernikovsun, cherylmorgan, chess, chilperic, coalescent, communicator, crazysoph, creaney, crystalfrog, cwgerard, cygny, dace_holenfor, daegaer, davesangel, davidstewart, deadspeaker, deannawol, dear_hubby, deborah_c, despotliz, djm4, dougs, eastethnia, eiko82, eimear_rose, elise, ephiriel, etherealfionna, eugie, eyeliner297, feorag, fjm, flemmarde, fluffcthulhu, flyingsauce, givali, grahamsleight, greengolux, gummitch, h0pal0ng, habseligkeit, hawkida, hddod, hedgetrimmer, hells_librarian, hfnuala, ianmcdonald, ias, inner_storm, irishlass04, jacobsmills, james_nicoll, jdigital, jere7my, juleske, kate_nepveu, kcjones, kenmaher, kharin, kradical, kulfuldi, las, lauriemann, leedy, leex, leila_azziza, liadnan, lopt, lostcarpark, luned, major_clanger, marykaykare, megolas, mevennen, mik_yesha, minny, mireille21, mr_renaissance, msisolak, mylescorcoran, nalsa, nancylebov, natural20, new_brunette, nhw, nickbarnes, ninebelow, nmg, nrivkis, nyphur, omegar, original_kaos, papersky, peake, pickwick, pnh, politicinternet, prosewitch, purple_pen, purplecthulhu, purplepooka, pvaneynd, qatsi, qdbii, rangerdewshine, redbird, rfmcdpei, rozk, rparvaaz, sammywol, sbisson, scattyme, sdn, seawasp, sevenorora, shsilver, shutters_i, silk_noir, sinclair_furie, sisterdew, skyra123, slovobooks, smhwpf, sneerpout, srk1, stellanova, stilldancer, sugarimp, sulkyblue, susansugarspun, swisstone, synan, tamaranth, theferrett, thette, ticking_fool, tnh, vnp, watervole, wiselamb, wwhyte, wyvernfriend, yhlee, yonmei, yourownmeretrix, zhaneel69.

I noticed , and in passing at Worldcon but didn’t quite manage to talk to them.

Posted in Uncategorised

Loot

Books (Fiction), including comics:
Brian Aldiss, Cultural Breaks
R Scott Bakker, The Darkness That Comes Before
Daniel Clowes, Like a Velvet Glove Cast in Iron
L Sprague de Camp and Fletcher Pratt, The Compleat Enchanter
Samuel R Delany, Babel-17
Samuel R Delany, Dhalgren
Guy Gavriel Kay, Sailing to Sarantium
Paul Kearney, The Way to Babylon
Paul Leonard, Doctor Who: Genocide
Kelly Link, Magic for Beginners
Frank Ludlow and , eds, Emerald Eye
, King of Morning, Queen of Day
Tom Reamy, Blind Voices
Robert Silverberg, The World Inside
Clifford D Simak, City
E.E. “Doc” Smith, First Lensman
E.E. “Doc” Smith, Galactic Patrol
E.E. “Doc” Smith, Triplanetary
Norman Spinrad, The Druid King
, Accelerando
, The Family Trade
James Tiptree Jr, Star Songs of an Old Primate

Books (Non-Fiction):
Andrew M Butler and , eds, The True Knowledge of Ken MacLeod
Malcolm Hulke and Terrance Dicks, The Making of Doctor Who (first edition)
, A Very British Genre
David Langford, Up Through An Empty House of Stars
David Pringle, The Ultimate Guide to Science Fiction
M.J. Simpson, Hitchhiker: A Biography of Douglas Adams
Splitting Infinity (Worldcon souvenir book)

Magazines:
Albedo [One] #30
Foundation #94, Summer 2005
Locus #534, July 2005
Matrix #174, July/August 2005
Meta #2, August 2005
Mimosa #27, 2001
Vector #242, July/August 2005

Videos:
Doctor Who: The Chase
Doctor Who: Remembrance of the Daleks

Proper dust jacket for With Stars in My Eyes by Peter Weston

I have a very tolerant wife.

Posted in Uncategorised

Worldcon final

We resume on Sunday afternoon, when I returned from lunch to find myself witnessing the official photograph of the official signing of the official contract for the new edition of The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, by John Clute, Dave Langford and Peter Nicholls. I was pleased to learn later from Dave Langford that he is fairly optimistic it can be completed fairly quickly (whatever that means), and positively thrilled to hear that the new Encyclopedia will be primarily a low-cost subscription on-line resource, capable of being continually updated. OK, I do like dead trees as a medium, but for a work like The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction the extra benefits of on-line searches and perhaps also hyperlinks to external information will be huge.

I mainly just hung around for the next few hours, bumping into (at last!), Conor Kostick, and and her mother who had come over to present the James White Award. Had a good chat with , and . Then it was time to go to the Hugos.

I’ve already written up the Hugo results, but just want to note that I felt a small lump in my throat at the ceremony. I’ve been writing various web pages about the Hugos for five years now, and at last I was actually there. More prosaically, as well as a particularly high percentage of UK-bsed winners, I have a suspicion (which I will check some time) that a higher proportion (or at least number) of women won Hugos this year than is usual. (I calculated three years ago that a third of Nebulas in the fiction categories had been won by women, but only a quarter of Hugos.) More number-crunching to follow.

Met up with for a post-Hugo drink, and we witnessed the cheers and applause of the Moat House bar as a kilted strode in bearing his Hugo. We then repaired to the Hilton, admiring of ‘s success at crowd control, and looked around for parties. The Hugo nominees party was rumoured to be a) the place to be and b) opening to all after half an hour; neither of these rumours turned out to be true, and we tried out the Spruotlore/Irish party before eventually gravitating to the Finns. Somehow the Finns had managed to put together the ingredients of a fine time, lots to drink (including a particularly addictive liquorice flavoured vodka), lots of people, and what appeared at the time (though my memory as time goes on is increasingly blurred) to be good conversation. I eventually found my room mate (whose blog I have now syndicated as ) talking to Ken and Carole MacLeod, and we returned to our lodgings.

On Monday morning I bumped into and on my way in, and wandered round the dealer’s room with (who was somewhat the worse for wear) to buy presents for my family (sadly the picture of the Very Hungry Cthulhu had already been bought) before my 11 o’clock panel. This was supposed to be on the future of politics, chaired by Caroline Mullan, but wandered off a bit into the decline of the Swedish social model, since there seemed to be a lot of Scandinavians both on the panel and in the audience. It was also my last panel as a participant.

My one comment on programming – which in general I greatly enjoyed – would be that, if possible, moderators should have a bit more input into both the description and personnel of their panels. I did seven panels throughout the con; the one I myself moderated had an extraordinarily ambiguous description which left it unclear as to what it was supposed to be about; another had a moderator whose views were completely different to those of the other three panellists, which distorted the discussion; two had at least one panellist who really had no interesting ideas about the topic of the panel (and in one of those two cases the panellist in question was me). I appreciate that it’s not an exact science; also in comparison to the many many such events I do for work, I’d say that Worldcon panellists are without exception (of the panels I attended) clever enough and articulate enough to rise above the petty problems I mention, and that Worldcon audiences are among the most forgiving, appreciative and intelligent I have ever addressed. In terms of the logistics of the panels on which I myself appeared I have no complaints, but we were all just talking heads; I noted problems elsewhere with overhead projectors and slide projectors.

Wandered into a conversation with and , who introduced me to and . The latter persuaded me to attend an extraordinary presentation by Duncan Lunan about the Green Children of Woolpit, a 12th century mystery which he reckons points to a high-level conspiracy involving Henry II and the Vatican to conceal the fact that the children had been transported from a human colony on another planet. I shared with those present certain information I received earlier this year from an Eastern European foreign minister which seems to me to undermine one of the key arguments of Duncan Lunan’s thesis, but I will say no more of that here.

and were still at the same table an hour after I’d left them, and we were joined by Julian West as we munched on sandwiches. Then it was time for the Closing Ceremony. As Robert Sheckley was absent through illness, and Jane Yolen had already left, it was up to Chris Priest to respond to the convention on behalf of the professional community, which he did eloquently and gracefully. Though he finished with a good-natured dig at – “I think that in years to come, we shall look back to Charlie winning his Hugo last night, and say to ourselves that that was the moment when science fiction changed for the w- I mean, when science fiction changed forever!”

I seemed to spend the afternoon helping with the dismantling of the Science Fiction Foundation stall, then, long chat with and various other luminaries of British fandom. very kindly invited me to join a literary dinner, but my plane flight did not allow for this, and I ended up finishing my worldcon with a slightly grotty chicken tikka masala in Glasgow airport in the company of and Enid.

Minor logistical complaint – I put a bid in on one of the scanner/printer sets that the con was trying to get rid of, but come the crucial moment nobody seemed to be able to tell me if I had won the auction or indeed where the equipment physically was, so I dropped the issue. I would certainly have had difficulty humping it onto the plane, so perhaps it’s just as well.

Apart from the two very minor grumbles noted above, I had a great time. Apologies to those weren’t there and who’ve had to endure these ramblings over the last few days. Apologies to anyone I met and haven’t mentioned. See you all again soon.

Posted in Uncategorised

Hugos in summary

Well, I don’t think I can really complain. Of the stories I put top of my own list, River of Gods appears to have come second to Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell; “The Clapping Hands of God” came second to “The Faery Handbag”; and “The Concrete jungle” and “Travels With My Cats” both won. As did the Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, which is excellent. (With Peter Weston’s book second.)

Longer post tomorrow; now I have to go and join the long long queues for a) getting my stuff back from the cloakroom and b) getting a bus to the Hilton.

Posted in Uncategorised

More more Hugos

Best Professional Editor: Ellen Datlow. Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form: “33”, Battlestar Galactica. Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form: The Incredibles

Posted in Uncategorised

Worldcon, again

Yesterday was my heavy panel day, in that I was on one with , Ian McLeod and James Lovegrove at 10 am on “The Breakup of Britain”, and then moderating another with a more European theme at 11 with Harry Turtledove, Jon Courtenay Grimwood, Keith Brooke and Patrick Gyger. The first one was fairly full; the second, in a much bigger hall with over 200 seats, was completely packed. I did wonder how many were there just to hear Harry Turtledove and Jon Courtenay Grimwood, but the audiences in both cases seemed to appreciate my own contributions. In fact there was an interesting overlap of themes between the two.

Then I actually sat in on my first serious discussion panel of sf, ‘s “Not the Hugo Awards” discussion, with the panellists being four well-known editors. There were significant disagreements about what ought to win, but a surprising consensus on what will win – Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, by Susannah Clarke; “Winterfair Gifts”, by Lois McMaster Bujold; “The Faery Handbag”, by Kelly Link; and “The Best Christmas Ever”, by James Patrick Kelly. We shall see this evening; I’ve already made my own views sufficiently well known. I did at least meet (howver briefly) Chance, which means the only lj person I am still on the lookout for is .

Lunch followed, with Chris Beckett again, and then I had a look around the art show, enjoying it so much (see my post yesterday about the Very Hungry Cthulhu) that I missed getting into ‘s presentation on 3-D images of Mars. Everyone who went said it was fantastic, and I should have anticipated the crowds. I looked in on the Eurocon business meeting and duly voted for ‘s bid for Ireland in 2007, but as it turned out the Danes won.

However, rather than hang around for the result I headed over to the Moat House Bar, where I encountered and a couple of other Scottish fans (one being Michael Ross) who’d been to both my morning panels, and wanted to continue the discussion while plying me with real ale, which almost made up for missing Mars. Eventually we bestirred ourselve to go to David A Hardy’s video presentation cutting between 1950’s space movies and the 1960’s footage of the real thing. I will never get tired of watching the first moon landing – it always brings a tear to my eye – but it was very interesting to see the extent to which the 1950s film-makers had foreshadowed the way we think about it. (Apart from the very silly scene from Destination Moon where we saw the newly landed astronauts trying to call New York.)

I got a bit tired of it after a while though and nipped across the corridor to a showing of “Father’s Day”, with Paul Cornell answering questions from the audience about it; great fun but soon over. Then bumped into and ended up going for a decent Chinese dinner with him, (we whose usernames are only three letters should stick together!), Andrew Butler and Elizabeth Wein. Then on to the party which was great fun; and I quit while I was ahead, having slept badly the first couple of nights, came back and got nine hours more or less uninterrupted.

Had a good chat with my room-mate, Alaskan author David Marusek over breakfast. The experience of Worldcon for me as a fan seems so very different from what a full-time writer is here for in terms of personal professional development. Then got here, and heard the sad news about Robin Cook.

Next was my heavy panel, “Is the American Empire on the Verge of Collapse”, with three acknowledged lefites (me, Ken McLeod, and here. The Azerbaijan elections are the first week of November. Go, sign up! (Though I’ll have to find out the details about Sweden in the next few days.)

After that I sat in on a second serious sf panel, part of the academic track, Tania Scott on Lord Dunsany, Mike Cosgrave on Home Rule and the Unionist mistakes of the late 19th century, and Michael Johnson on C.S. Lewis – a nice little trinity of Irish themed papers, all brief but thought-provoking.

Then I decided to come and update my livejournal, at no doubt huge expense in the business centre. Am seeing an old friend from Belfast for lunch and will be back in the afternoon.

Posted in Uncategorised

Worldcon

It’s all a bit of a blur, so far. Arrived Thursday, regstered; went (with ) to the panel on how to enjoy Worldcon; did panel on “The Digital Divide” which was efficiently and academically chaired by Renee Sieber, the other two panellists being and and (who has already written it up) and also feauring and Ken MacLeod; then an hour’s break mostly talking to but also following up on the strange story of a George Washington portrait which I shall write up properly some time; then the panel I was most nervous about, on Doctor Who, chaired by Paul Cornell who wrote “Father’s Day”. But in fact it went really well, and as Paul I think said, it must be very difficult to run a bad panel on Doctor Who at an event like this.

After that I was free to spend (not too much) more money in the dealers’ room; went to Dave Langford’s presentation on Ansible with and about The Prize in the Game, and then to bed.

I now have two panels consecutively at 10 and 11 and am moderating the second of them. After that will exploit the rest of the day!

Posted in Uncategorised

AKICILJ: digital camera

There’s a problem with my (cheap Fuji) digital camera – possibly two problems: everything on the screen is inverted (upside down, reversed). When I turn it on to try and take pictures, it tells me (in mirror writing upside down) that there is a “zoom error”, which I imagine is connected with the backwards problem, though it may not be.

On of the games on my mobile phone sometimes has this effect on the display, in which case I just turn it off and turn it on again. Is there an equivalent “hard reboot” for a digital camera?

Posted in Uncategorised

Dinner

Eating with and her beau. We tried to recognise the bearded guy at next table. Then Terry Pratchett put his hat on.

Posted in Uncategorised

Story so far

Good to be here – and to see many of you guys again/for the first time in the flesh!

Decent hotel, given the very low price – it does at least have an en suite bathroom, and internet access for £4 an hour, which is not super value but better than you get in some places. Also my room-mate’s flight was cancelled so he is spending 24 hours extra in Alaska, and I have the room to myself this evening.

I have already spent far too much in the dealers’ room. And I will be going back.

Posted in Uncategorised

From

18:02 – Panel – The Digital Divide
Arrive at panel, find seat, shove Lilian towards the front and realise that I’m about to attend my first ever Worldcon panel.  Huzzah!
Panel actually rather good.  Nicholas Whyte works for some kind of institute researching politics and democracy in the Balkans, and has a large supply of fascinating insights and anecdotes.  One of the other panellists has lots of experience working with mature students who aren’t quite so internet-manic as the young-uns, so there’s much discussion of what it’s like when ‘outdated’ channels are closed down in favour of the internet, as well as the effect it has on countries that are new to the internet – while vast numbers of languages are now supported, English is frequently seen as a politically neutral second language shared by everyone.  How politically neutral English actually is is another matter…

Posted in Uncategorised