1969 Stormont election












































































Party


Vote share


seats

     

Prot U


3.8%



Ind U’s


2.5%



Unionist (anti-O’Neill)


17.1%


13


Unionist (pro-O’Neill)


31.1%


23

     

Ind Unionist (pro-O’Neill)


12.9%


3

     

NILP


8.1%


2


Lib


1.3%


     

Inds (Hume, Cooper, O’Hanlon)


3.9%


3


PD


4.2%



Rep Lab


2.4%


2


Nat Dem


4.6%



Nat


7.6%


6


PPP


0.5%



(NB: 6 Unionists and 1 Nationalist returned unopposed)


1982 Assembly Election




























































Party


vote share


seats

     

DUP


23.0%


21


UUP


29.7%


26


UPUP


2.3%


1


UUUP


1.8%



Oth U


1.6%


1

     

Alliance


9.3%


10


WP


2.7%



Oth


0.7%


     

SDLP


18.8%


14


SF


10.1%


5


 


 


 


2003 Assembly Election












































































Party


vote share


seats

     

DUP


25.6%


30


UUP


22.7%


27


PUP


1.2%


1


UKUP


0.7%


1


Oth U


2.3%


0

     

Alliance


3.7%


6


Deeney


0.9%


1


NIWC


0.8%

 

Green


0.4%

 

SEA


0.3%

 

WP


0.3%

 

Oth


0.6%

 
     

SDLP


17.0%


18


SF


23.5%


24

Posted in Uncategorised


The Colour of the Fringe: What are/were the non-confessional parties?


We’re here today to talk mainly about smaller parties within Northern Ireland’s political system. As Jenny has noted in her introductory paper, very little work has been done on this topic – and those small parties which have attracted the attention of journalists or researchers have tended not to be the ones we are interested in here, ie those which can be linked to the centre ground politically, or the “non-confessional” parties.


Some may question the value of even bothering to look at this topic. I don’t. Some of you will have known my father, and most of you will have read his books: when I was a teenager he would occasionally catch me poring over election results (I suppose that gives some idea of what kind of teenager I was), and he would always encourage me to pay attention to the smaller parties’ results as well as the bigger ones. I don’t know if it was a phrase of his own coining, but he used to say that “you can tell a lot about the carpet by the make-up of the fringe”. Perhaps we’ll be testing that assertion today.


Northern Irish politics currently appears to be pretty rigidly divided. It is a five-party system, with two or three different political spaces. The DUP and UUP together dominate the Unionist political space, the SDLP and Sinn Fein together dominate Nationalist political space, and there is a more difficult to define centre ground, occupied by the Alliance Party and others.


But it is easily forgotten just how recent this constellation is. I thought it would be worth exploring just for a moment the historical roots of the Northern Irish political system. The turning points, in terms of political party development, don’t always happen where you might expect, and I hope I’m offering a slightly new way of thinking about it when I suggest that we should consider the present political party structures of Northern Ireland as essentially dating from 1982.


For a start, pre-1969 Northern Ireland had a slightly more colourful political spectrum than it is sometimes given credit for. True, the Unionist party dominated political life, and never won fewer than 33 seats out of the 53 in the Stormont House of Commons. True, the second largest party was the Nationalist party, winning between 6 and 11 seats at each election – oddly enough, the low point of 6 seats was hit only twice, in the first devolved election in 1921 and in the last one in 1969.


But within the gap between the two, and around the edges, there was room for manoeuvre. This was particularly so in Belfast, where no Nationalist Party candidate won a contested election after 1938, and no Nationalist Party candidate even stood after 1945. In particular, the Northern Ireland Labour Party established itself in several Belfast seats as the only alternative to the Unionist party, and the election results do indicate actual shifts of votes from Unionist to Labour, and then of course back again. The Belfast Dock seat is particularly interesting as it alternated between Unionist to some variety of Labour, be that the NILP, the Irish Labour Party, or Gerry Fitt at almost every election.


Come the crisis of 1969, the party system, such as it was, collapsed, and took ten elections over the next thirteen years before it again achieved a form of stability. I’ll talk about the overall political picture in a moment, but first I think it’s important to note that the 1969 Stormont election saw the first real attempts to conceptualise what we would now call cross-community voting.


On the Unionist side, supporters of pro-O’Neill candidates, particularly those independent candidates backed by the New Ulster Movement, claimed that they were enlisting the support of moderate Catholics as well as moderate Protestants. The electoral evidence would seem to bear this out: the total share of votes cast in the election for Unionist candidates of all varieties comes to almost two thirds – before you take into account that several Unionists were elected unopposed. Then there is another 9% or so for the NILP and the Ulster Liberal Party. So, given that Paul Compton estimates the Catholic share of the population in 1971 as being 36.8%, and that turnout was fairly even across Northern Ireland, there must have been a fairly substantial chunk of the ‘Catholic’ vote cast for Labour, Liberals or even the least worst Unionist option.


At the same time, from the other side, the three civil rights leaders who were elected to Stormont as independents in 1969 all claimed at the time to have had some Protestant support, and in the case of Ivan Cooper he presumably at least voted for himself. So although the Northern Ireland political scene is often stereotyped as one where there is a one-to-one mapping between a party’s perceived confessional affiliation and its voter base, there are occasional elections when this is not so, and 1969 was one of them.


The next thirteen and a half years saw ten full elections and a number of important by-elections as well. They saw the collapse and recovery of the UUP vote. They saw the appearance and disappearance of Vanguard, the UUUP, the UPNI, and the Irish Independence Party. They saw the Protestant Unionist Party become the DUP, which gradually consolidated its position as the only credible force on the more hard-line side of Unionism, to the point where in the 1979 European and 1981 local elections the party actually outpolled the UUP. They saw the foundation of the SDLP, consolidating the three independents elected in 1969, and most of the smaller Nationalist-leaning groups that had existed before then; and then its shedding of its less Nationalist and more socialist founder members, Gerry Fitt and Paddy Devlin. They saw the foundation of the Alliance Party, which more or less absorbed the voters (though not the personnel) of the NILP, with perhaps a more overtly Catholic tinge to its presentation than the NILP had ever dared have.


And finally, perhaps most importantly, those years saw the engagement of the Republican movement with electoral politics, starting with Bernadette McAliskey’s candidacy in the 1979 European election, and dramatically sealed with Bobby Sands’ 1981 by-election victory in Fermanagh-South Tyrone. When Sinn Fein contested the 1982 Assembly elections, they brought in a whole section of the electorate that had not been regular voters before. Although they won only five seats, they had several near misses, and got over 10% of the vote – more than most observers had anticipated.


The 1982 Assembly election results gave the SDLP and Sinn Fein a combined dominance of the Nationalist vote, which they have never lost. They confirmed also that the DUP and UUP were the major players on the Unionist side, disturbed only by a succession of North Down mavericks and the very small Loyalist parties based in urban areas. They also showed an Alliance party dominance of the centre ground.


If you look at the 2003 Assembly election results, twenty years later, you’ll see all of those characteristics repeated again. There are some important differences, of course. Notably, the total Nationalist vote has increased from less than 30% to over 40%; the DUP and Sinn Fein have overtaken the UUP and SDLP respectively; and the centre parties have lost almost half their vote from 1982, down from 12.7% to 7%. But the two results tables are recognisably the same political system, in a way that neither can be compared to the 1969 election result.


So, having established 1982 as a baseline


 


 


What is a non-confessional party?


 


 


 


 


 


What future for non-confessional parties?

Posted in Uncategorised

On mature reflection…

…just watched last weekend’s Doctor Who again, thanks very much indeed to who handed me the videotape in a pre-lunch rendezvous on the back steps of the European Parliament which surely would have passed muster with any decent intelligence agency.

Look folks, I apologise, I take it all back. It’s very different watching it comfortably on the TV compared to squinting at a jerky downloaded version. It was good. Having Davina, Trinny, Susannah and Anne Robinson doing themselves was a stroke of brilliance, Captain Jack was great, Rose was great, the Doctor was great and the last five minutes were (as I even grudgingly admitted first time round) fantastic.

I still hate cute anthropomorhphic robots, but at least these ones got their HEADS BLOWN OFF. And Russell T Davies seems to have got over his pacing problem.

Also, as someone unsportingly pointed out on a friends’ friends list, the plot was full of massive holes. But it was very much fun to watch. , thanks once again.

In tribute to the whole concept I finished the evening by re-watching the last half of the last episode of Frontier in Space, the only Doctor Who series I own on video. (And the only DVD I own is The Green Death which closed that season.) That moment when the Daleks first appear – still great. And yet so 1970s.

I’ll be on a plane on Saturday night when the last episode is broadcast. Question is, can I wait until Sunday evening to watch it?

Posted in Uncategorised

Belfast tomorrow

Looks like my possible Belfast trip this weekend is going to happen. Will fly into Dublin from Charleroi tomorrow morning, rent a car and drive north. Interested parties will find me in the office with my name on it in the QUB Institute of Governance during the afternoon. Any Belfast lj’ers feel like meeting up tomorrow evening? Then at a conference on Saturday, driving back to Dublin airport early evening to arrive home before midnight (I hope).

Posted in Uncategorised

Job latest – steady as she goes

Had a chat with potential employer last night. He was reassuring about a number of things to do with the nature and conditions of the work. But on the other hand he’s not in a position to make me an offer yet as he’s still fund-raising. So it looks as if I will not start with him (if indeed I ever do) before the end of this year.

Meantime I saw one of the Brussels lobbying firms advertising for new people and sent them my CV. They replied saying their deadline was the end of this month and they will do the screening and interviewing in July. Which may well mean September.

I’m in no big hurry, though I am glad to have however small a sense of momentum, and to feel that I have a Plan B.

Posted in Uncategorised

Appeal for youthful idealists

I’ve been copied on this message from a French writer looking for material. Up to you guys if you want to respond – I have no direct contact with her.

Sorry for the mass email but this is important: I am in the early stages of the preparation to go around the world – both the developed and the developing – to meet young people who are trying to improve the world we live in and write a book about all of them.I already have an editor in France interested in the project.

We – international students and professionals – all know someone in their home countries or elsewhere who is trying to change things around them. I would like to write about all these initiatives undertaken by people under the age of 35 who – each in their own fashion – are trying to make the world a better place. It can be people who have started their NGOs, who try and achieve political freedom, respect for human rights, and end to local conflicts, environmental initiatives, recycling, renewable energies… any project!

If you know someone like that, if you yourself have started such a project please contact me at le_clairon@hotmail.com or on +33 6 07 46 19 39.

I have an editor interested in the book, and I would ideally like to start out on January 1st 2006.

Thanks for your help and please forward this message to anyone who could help out! Let’s try and show that our generation is not entirely cynical yet!

Take care,

Claire

Anne-Claire [Goupy]
+33 (0)6 07 46 19 39

Skype: leclairon

Posted in Uncategorised

Bosnia update

TOL has a decent article about the latest government crisis in Bosnia. However, I feel it also illustrates a number of the problems one encounters in reporting Bosnia. Perhaps I am biased because when I lived there it was in Banja Luka rather than Sarajevo, and happen to know all the Serb politicians mentioned – Ivanić, Dokić, Trisić-Babić, Dodik. But it has always seemed to me that the internal politics of the Bosnian Serbs are a fascinating and totally under-reported story, and this article does little to shed any more light.

Fully half of the article is an interview with Sarajevo-based opposition leader Zlatko Lagumdžija, someone whom I do respect, but who is not himself directly involved with the current crisis. Tanja Topić, who was always a pretty good analyst of what was going on, does make interesting predictions about the likely future behaviour of the Serb politicians but gets only one paragraph to do so. Another Sarajevo-based political scientist is interviewed about the internal dynamics of the RS, and takes refuge in conspiracy theories (presumably because he knows nothing about the topic).

I don’t think I’ve seen any decent English-language reporting from Banja Luka since the disappearance of the Alternative Information Network. No doubt the recent death of Perica Vučinić will mean we have to wait even longer.

Posted in Uncategorised

Ludicrous

Languages spoken in the EU (from this pdf source)

  1. 106.951.000 German
  2. 60.307.000 English
  3. 55.207.000 Italian
  4. 52.027.000 French
  5. 38.638.300 Polish
  6. 29.350.000 Spanish
  7. 17.720.000 Dutch/Flemish
  8. 10.886.000 Portuguese
  9. 10.013.000 Greek
  10. 10.543.000 Hungarian
  11. 10.063.000 Czech
  12. 8.498.000 Swedish
  13. 6.170.000 Catalan
  14. 5.150.000 Finnish
  15. 5.080.000 Occitan
  16. 5.008.000 Danish
  17. 4.771.000 Slovak
  18. 3.054.000 Lithuanian
  19. 2.400.000 Galician
  20. 2.205.900 Arabic
  21. 2.045.000 Slovene
  22. 1.507.700 Latvian
  23. 1.032.000 Russian
  24. 1.000.700 Romani
  25. 1.000.000 Sardinian
  26. 952.800 Estonian
  27. 700.000 Basque
  28. 700.000 Limburgian
  29. 530.000 Welsh
  30. 550.000 Friulian
  31. 408.000 Frisian
  32. 354.200 Ukrainian
  33. 350.000 Maltese
  34. 345.000 Luxembourgish
  35. 332.000 Turkish
  36. 317.000 Belarusian
  37. 350.000 Albanian
  38. 300.000 Aromanian
  39. 300.000 Kashubian
  40. 200.000 Breton
  41. 175.000 Creole
  42. 170.000 Corsican
  43. 150.000 Macedonian
  44. 135.000 Croatian
  45. 119.300 Yiddish
  46. 115.000 Marrocan
  47. 106.000 Irish


All languages in bold were, until yesterday, the 20 official languages of the EU. Now there is a 21st. Which do you think it is?
Irish readers are excluded from guessing.

Maria, over at Crooked Timber, explained last year why this move would be a stupid idea. She stands by what she said then.

And another thing. Why do the English have difficulty calling the language by the name used to describe it in English by most of its speakers? Almost all the headlines I found on a quick google said “Gaelic to become official EU language”. Quite apart from the fact that “Gaelic” is ambiguous it’s simply not the word normally used by those who encounter the language in their daily life.

Here is the full pdf text of today’s decision (officially in French, thanks to the Luxembourg Presidency, who don’t insist on anything being put in Luxembourgish though it has more native speakers than certain other languages):

Régime linguistique de l’UE * – Conclusions du Conseil

Le Conseil a adopté un règlement conférant à la langue irlandaise le statut de langue officielle et de travail de l’Union européenne (9645/05 et 10020/05 ADD1).
Suite à cette incorporation, le nombre de langues officielles et de travail des institutions européennes est fixé à 21 [footnote: l’allemand, l’anglais, le danois, l’espagnol, l’estonien, le finnois, le français, le grec, le hongrois, l’irlandais, l’italien, le letton, le lituanien, le maltais, le néerlandais, le polonais, le portugais, le slovaque, le slovène, le suédois et le tchèque.].

Le règlement, applicable à partir de 2007, modifie les règlements de 1958 fixant les régimes linguistiques de la CEE et de l’Euratom.

Le Conseil a en outre adopté les conclusions suivantes :

“Les présentes conclusions concernent les langues, autres que les langues visées par le règlement nº 1/1958 du Conseil, dont le statut est reconnu par la Constitution d’un Etat membre sur tout ou partie de son territoire ou dont l’emploi en tant que langue nationale est autorisé par la loi.

Le Conseil considère que, dans le cadre des efforts déployés pour rapprocher l’Union de l’ensemble de ses citoyens, la richesse de sa diversité linguistique doit davantage être prise en considération.

Le Conseil estime que la possibilité pour les citoyens d’utiliser des langues additionnelles dans leurs relations avec les institutions est un facteur important pour renforcer leur identification au projet politique de l’Union européenne….” et cetera et bloody cetera.

I mean, really, does anybody actually think that the 106,000 native speakers of the Union’s newest official language are suddenly going to have their identification with the European Project reinforced by today’s decision? That is, any more than the 25 million native speakers of the 26 languages more widely spoken in the EU will feel alienated from it as a result?

Posted in Uncategorised

I hate cute anthropomorphic robots

OK, so the robots weren’t particularly cute. But they were anthropomorphic. And I think that the episode in general was an extended version of what I hate about cute anthropomorphic robots.

Robots have already been invented and are around in today’s world, folks. But they are built to look like machines that do a job, not like mechanical human beings. There will never be robots built to be ersatz human beings. Never. Because it is too difficult; because real human beings are better at pretending to be human beings; because if you had to design a robot to do a human-like job, you’d end up redefining the job specs to suit your available technology, not try and produce a robot that could pass for human.

Real robots with anything approaching artficial intelligence, when they are eventually made, will be stranger than we can imagine, not mannequins with chest bumps. So anyone who writes sf where the robots are in fact mannequins with chest bumps, be it Russell T Davies or James Patrick Kelly, loses my sympathy immediately.

(Just to be absolutely clear, it’s not really the chest bumps I object to on fictional robots, let alone anywhere else that I encounter them. Bipedal robots, or robots with vision sensors only facing forwards, are as objectionable in my view as robots with chest bumps.)

I’ve been out of the UK now for almost eight and a half years, and so have missed the whole Weakest Link / Big Brother / What not To War phenomenon, so large parts of the episode were pretty much lost on me. But I think even if I had been around for the last few years, I would have felt the same sense of crashing disappointment. The future is going to be very different from now. In the very unlikely event that public entertainment in the year 20100 does feature robots with fake breasts, and eyes in the front of their heads, and two legs, I feel there may perhaps be other differences as compared with the present day.

Redeemed somewhat by the last five minutes, of course, and we’ll just see if there is some convincing reason why the Daleks’ plan had to involve creating cute anthropomorphic robots. I live in hope.

Posted in Uncategorised

Weekend

First off, if you’re one of the people I don’t know, who I just asked via lj-comment about last night’s Doctor Who, sorry to intrude, but the version I downloaded doesn’t play very well. (Perhaps because the watching environment was so uncomfortable, I have to say I think I can summarise the whole episode in three sentences. But I won’t.)

And if you’re reading this and you did video it, get in touch and we’ll talk.

Apaprt from that, a good weekend. Took the two smaller kids to a barbecue last night, thanks to very kindly agreeing to babysit B (NB: she and exhaust the potential babysitting pool from livejournal). They both seemed to have fun, though it meant F faded a bit early this evening (but it’s school tomorrow so that’s no bad thing either). also brought Firefly, of which I’m sure I will have more to report in due course.

Today was Father’s Day by Belgian reckoning. F had painted a cup with pictures of flowers at school, and B had made painty markings on a t-shirt. So I felt valued. I took F out an a very slow bike ride through the woods later – he would insist on walking his bike over the bits where the tarmac was not completely smooth, which slowed us down a bit. But he seemed to have enjoyed it.

Managed to get out for dinner with Anne this evening which was nice. Going to bed now.

Posted in Uncategorised

Back to basics

Have abandoned BitTorrent and am using the oldest and biggest distribution on-line network to download last night’s Doctor Who – thanks to UseNeXT v3.10.

Posted in Uncategorised

The Book Meme

I haven’t been specifically tagged for this, but a couple of of you have done it and then ducked the tagging question by saying that anyone else who feels like it should do it. Well, I feel like it.

1) Total number of books I own: Must be in the area of 3,000. There’s a few hundred in various places in Ireland, and a hundred or so at work whose ownership may be disputed in the event of my ever leaving (though probably disputed in the sense of “You can hold onto it!” – “No, please, you keep it!”). In this room there’s about 30 two-metre shelves’ worth of books, and probably half as many in the rest of the house. Some day I shall be disciplined like and enter them all onto an on-line catalogue.

2) Last books I bought: At lunchtime on Thursday I managed to track down a new English-language bookshop just off Place Stephanie, ventured within and got i) Pippi Longstocking for F, who had been doing Pippi Langkous in school last week, and ii) Kafka’s The Trial, which I’d started reading this time last year but lost my previous copy in a sleep-deprived moment in the car park of Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport. Also last weekend I bought The Hallowed Hunt by Lois McMaster Bujold, but Anne is getting first crack at it. I’m trying to buy With Stars In My Eyes by Peter Weston, but PayPal won’t let me make the transaction.

3) The last book I read: The Trial. Before that, The Best of Xero.

4) Five books that mean a lot to me:

  1. Bible
  2. Lord of the Rings, by JRR Tolkien
  3. What Color is Your Parachute?, by Richard Nelson Bolles – changed my attitude to work completely.
  4. The New Hugo Winners Volume IV, ed. Gregory Benford & Martin H. Greenberg – basically rekindled my interest in SF
  5. The Fall of Yugoslavia, by Misha Glenny
5) Five people whose answers I’d like to see: Basically, anyone of you who hasn’t yet done this, I’d be very interested to see your answers! And that’s a lot more than five…

Posted in Uncategorised

June Books 3) The Trial

3) The Trial, by Franz Kafka

Part of my continuing programme of literary education, this is listed as one of the Top 100 Books by the Norwegians, Robert McCrum and Bookslut. The most difficult thing about getting into it was the very long paragraphs, but after I’d found the right gear I found it a very quick read – only 177 pages, and even though you know pretty much what is going to happen, you keep turning to find out how it is going to happen. I was really struck by the main theme, and also by a couple of details illustrating it. In so far as there is a plot, it is well summarised here, and I found the whole text in the original German – fairly easy German, at that – here. I waited to read the introduction of my Penguin Classics edition until after I’d finished the main text, however was pleased to find it contained no spoilers, but rather a good explanation of what was going on in Kafka’s life at the time he was writing the book.

The main theme of the book is often summarised as paranoia; and yet that word has been so devalued by psycho-speak over the ninety years since The Trial was written that it no longer really conveys the full weight of hopeless struggle against the irrational barriers erected by the hostile behaviour of other men depicted here. In fact I think it’s better to think of depression, rather than paranoia, as the biggest part of the picture. The symptoms are pretty clear: the offers of help from friends or family which simply make matters worse; the inability to concentrate on normal tasks; the obsession over details of the problem that you can’t actually change. The justice system in the book doesn’t represent the Austrian Imperial justice system, nor even is it a metaphor for bureaucracy in general – it represents life as a whole.

One of the repeatedly used themes that I found particularly vivid (and contra what I just wrote, this is a particularly paranoid part of the book) was the way in which the agents of the Court are able to interpenetrate ordinary domestic and business life. The initial intrusion of the agents into K’s lodgings is normal enough, a sort of invasion; but then the weirdness begins with the difficulty of finding the interrogation chamber in what appears to be an ordinary apartment block, and then even more so when K returns and finds that the ante-room to the chamber has become a fully-furnished apartment. The most disturbing bit is when he discovers that a room in his own place of work is actually a punishment chamber for the guards who first arrested him. I guess we all sometimes suffer from the delusion that there is Stuff Going On in our immediate vicinity that we just don’t know about – it certainly features in my own dreams sometimes – and Kafka really captured that feeling here.

Another point that caught my eye was Kafka’s treatment of sex. K has a girlfriend, who works as a waitress and “received her visitors in bed”; but he also then scours Frau Bürstner’s face and neck with kisses, flirts with the usher’s wife, and goes considerably further with Leni (and they fondle each other while he is talking to his lawyer). Yet none of this is explicitly linked with his judicial problems – when I wrote of the “hostile behaviour of other men” earlier I chose my words carefully (though perhaps I was unfair not to include Frau Montag, who is Frau Bürstner’s first line of defence). Are we meant to think that, of course, all of these things are interconnected, but K is too deluded to see it?

I was left a bit puzzled by the symbolism of the paintings, and the painter Titorelli. No doubt all will become clearer if I re-read the book.

I must try and hunt down The Insurance Man, in which Kafka is played by Daniel Day-Lewis and Geoffrey Palmer gives what is reputedly one of his best performances. I only ever saw a couple of clips from it, but I think I’d enjoy it, especially now I’ve read this.

Job advert: Secretary General of Liberal International

Just in case anyone is interested – I’ve been trying to persuade a friend to apply, but he enjoys his current job too much (“you only have that job until your next election!” I tell him, but to no avail). Will be happy to give feedback to anyone interested.

Vacancy for a Secretary General

Liberal International (LI) is the worldwide association of liberal political parties, founded in 1947 and currently including 90 members. LI supports those who strive for liberal democracy and human rights. Its Secretariat is responsible for maintaining the network of liberal parties, parliamentarians and policy makers as well as organising its international meetings and conferences.

Liberal International is seeking a Secretary General. The Secretary General is responsible for the development and implementation of political initiatives and campaigns of Liberal International, within the framework set by its Bureau and the Executive Committee. As head of office, she/he is in charge of the general management (financial, administrative and human resources) of LI’s headquarters and for the organisation of its Congresses and other meetings. As spokesperson of the organisation, the Secretary General represents LI in its relations with its member parties, international institutions and with the media. Based in London, UK, the position involves extensive international travel.

The successful candidate will be a supporter of liberal policies and principles as stated in the Liberal International basic documents (available on www.liberal-international.org). She/he will have a degree, probably in one of the humanities or social sciences; be fluent in English with a good command of at least one of the following: French, Spanish and German; and be highly computer literate.

Experience in working in international politics, preferably with liberal political parties, in managing projects and in financial administration will be an advantage. Experience in organising publics events, especially at international level, will be of major importance.

She/he will have excellent analytical skills and be politically aware with ability to communicate across cultural divides and with the media. She/he will be proficient in writing policy papers and resolutions and she/he must be able to coordinate and motivate a small team.

Qualified candidates are invited to apply by 17 June 2005 to the following address:

Liberal International
1Whitehall Place
London
SW1A 2HD

Tel: 020 78395905
Fax: 020 79252685
Email: lordalderdice@liberal-international.org

For further information please contact Treasure of Liberal International, David Griffiths +44.1442.834562, or see www.liberal-international.org

Liberal International is an equal opportunities employer. Interviews will take place on Wednesday 29 June 2005 in Brussels, Belgium.

Job description (pdf)
Application form (word)

Posted in Uncategorised

New (perhaps) Bosnian foreign minister?

Amusing stuff from Bosnia, where me old friend Mladen Ivanic was unexpectedly sacked as foreign minister earlier in the week. He had actually tendered his resignation back in December, but it was never implemented, and everyone assumed that it had been forgotten. Then he had a row with the prime minister a few days ago, and the PM unexpectedly accepted the resignation that had been on hisdesk for almost six months. Hilarious!

And the new acting Foreign Minister (subject, I suppose, to parliamentary approval) is another old friend of mine, Ana Trisic-Babic. She worked across the road from my office when I lived in Banja Luka, and we used to gather with her colleagues and bottles of beer on Friday evenings, and tell jokes. I remember one she told us, in the days when mobile phones were not yet ubiquitous in Bosnia:

Q. What is the difference between a mobile phone and a tampon?
A. Mobile phones are for assholes.

I sometimes miss that Balkan humour.

Posted in Uncategorised

So, on reflection…

1) Communications safely restored with my colleague. A good thing.

2) Warned by a European Commission friend over lunch that there will be a concours coming up for people wanting EU jobs at the end of this year, for citizens of the “old” 15 member states – and probably it will be the last one for several years. So if you think you might like an EU job in five or ten years’ time, you really have to decide pretty soon whether you are going to apply. Will post this in an unlocked entry when it’s official but I’m particularly thinking of people like , , perhaps or . And maybe even me too.

3) Sent an email to potential employer with questions for our meeting next week. We’ll see what transpires.

Posted in Uncategorised

Opinions – last round

If there are any more takers, ask here.

: Massachusetts’ natives’ driving – Are you at that stage yet yourself??? I don’t have too many complaints, based on my experience driving to Boston from NY last month and then Boston to Gloucester and back the following day. I found the heavy traffic around the intersection of the 93 and the 95 near Stoneham a bit annoying, but bypassed it on the way back by detouring through the town to see the house where I lived in 1973-74. The worst congestion was encountered in southern Connecticut, and though some of them may have been Massachusetts natives, I’m willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

: spam, spammers and possibilities (if any) to fight them – you may or may not be aware that I managed part of the campaign to make spam illegal in the EU a few years back. In those innocent days, content-related filters were frowned on by us enthusiasts; what was wanted was a one-click LARTing mechanism (LART being an obscure acronym for the process where you complain about a spammer’s behaviour to their service provider). Things are very different now – one of the most attractive things about Gmail is that its spam filters are very good. These days I have less time for such activism, but once or twice a week I look in the spam folder of my Gmail account and run the most recent few through spamcop. The big picture is that we’re winning – the major service providers in the US have clearly decided to take legal action, the OECD is coordinating other countries’ responses and even the Chinese, I understand, are cracking down. But it’s ging to get a bit worse before it gets better.

: Fear – I have little time for it. FDR of course famously said, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”. If in a state of apprehension and worry, the thing to do is just take a piece of paper and write down the worst that can happen. Think through it, think through the consequences, and (normally) how the world will keep on turning afterwards. It’s a much better use of your time that going round in circles worrying about the same thing over and over.

: how the world could be made a better place – not unrelated to the last. First of all, on the geopolitical level, I’m a total supporter of the Make Poverty History concept and also therefore of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals. As I’ve made clear before, I’m not an economist, but it seems to me that these are achievable and desirable concepts. Second, on levels stretching from the purely personal to the highest levels of politics, everyone should “seek first to understand, rather than to be understood”. So much conflict is based on an inaccurate knowledge of what the other side’s goals really are. I would like to make people just sit down and listen to each other for a change.

: Parenthood. What’s the most important things you want your children to learn, what’s the most important thing you think you can teach them/do for them? – Hmm, a very tricky one. First off, I think parenthood is the most worthwhile and enduring challenge of my life. But second, given our particular family circumstances, I’ve learned not to invest too much hope in my children learning any particular skill or pattern of behaviour. I think I’d be content for each of them, in their different way, to reflect in their interactions with the world the joy that I believe God feels in his creation. And I don’t think I can ask for anything more.

Posted in Uncategorised

June Books 2) The Best of Xero

2) The Best of Xero, by Pat and Dick Lupoff

This is part of my attempt to educate myself about the Hugo nominees for Best Related Book, though really it will be a travesty if the Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction doesn’t win.

The Best of Xero is a compilation of articles and letters from the US science fiction fanzine Xero, which ran from 1960 to 1962. None of this is of huge literary merit. There are some bits that I did find very interesting – the articles by James Blish on Kingsley Amis’ New Maps of Hell, and by Donald Westlake on getting sf stories published, and the ensuing slew of correspondence. There were several long articles on comics I will never read which I skipped. There are a couple of really bad articles – the one on Clark Ashton Smith is a nadir, and I was unimpressed by Lin Carter’s book reviews.

So I’m sure this book will appeal to those fans who were around at the time (surely not a huge number) and to those who are interested in the history of the genre (including me). But I wouldn’t put it top of my list, at least not with in competition.

Posted in Uncategorised

More opinions

If you want to know more of my thoughts on anything else, ask away.

Following on from yesterday, we have:

: A liberal or a social Europe? Frankly I think it’s a false dichotomy. The EU member states have a wide variety of approaches to making their economies work; the EU isn’t (clearly isn’t) going to be able to impose a single model on them. Even the states within the euro vary widely. I was at a talk about the referenda last week where it was stated that there are five consistently underperforming economies in the EU – France, Germany, Italy, Portugal and the Netherlands. Belgium and Ireland are not on that list despite both being in the euro and having almost diametrically opposed answers to your question. My personal instincts are probably towards the liberal end – especially with regard to the side issue of visa liberalisation with third countries – but I think a middle way can be found, and in fact usually has been. (American readers may need to be aware that the word “liberal” in this paragraph has connotations of “right wing” not “left wing”.)

and then with a change of theme:

: children’s television – all in favour of it, myself; it can be very educational, and also an excellent babysitter. Having said that, I very much draw the line at the abomination of desolation and won’t have it in the house. Fimbles and Balamory seem to be particular favourites right now, and I don’t have a problem with either.
Going back to my own childhood, we were a strictly BBC household, Blue Peter twice a week, etc etc. Apart from the bizarre Eastern European children’s dramas with the same actor dubbing all the voices in English – presumably it was cheap TV and helped with détente, but seemed pretty pointless then and I suspect would seem even more so now.


: Winnie the Pooh – generally in favour, though I’ve never become obsessed by it. I was very amused by Neil Gaiman’s observations on A.A. Milne a while back. I take no firm stance on the great Disney vs Classic Pooh debate; the original Milne does have a certain pleasing unity of style, especially with the Shepard drawings, but the Disney songs are better (though my aversion to Milne’s verse is not as great as Dorothy Parker, who famously wrote “…And it is that word ‘hummy,’ my darlings, that marks the first place in The House at Pooh Corner at which Tonstant Weader fwowed up.”)


: SF television – any all time favourites? – Oh yes. I’ve had to go and consult a list to refresh my memory.
Those where I’d call myself a serious fan: Doctor Who. Blake’s Seven. Buffy. The Clangers. H2G2. Red Dwarf.
Those where I’ve enjoyed what I’ve seen and would watch an episode I randomly switched on through to the end: Angel. Star Trek (particularly TNG). Third Rock From The Sun. Babylon Five. Lois and Clark.
However I’m not a big fan of the X-Files. As a series it never quite seemed to make up its mind where it was coming from, and by the time the ghosts stole Christmas I thought it had seriously jumped the shark.

Posted in Uncategorised

On the radio tonight (maybe)

Fingers crossed, since last time I pre-announced a media appearance on livejournal it didn’t happen, but I may be doing Radio 4’s The World Tonight tonight, they tell me around 10.20 pm British/Irish time, 2320 here. So, we’ll see if it happens or not. A bit of a bummer as I’ll have to drive into Brussels for it (they’re doing it live) but such is the price of fame.

Posted in Uncategorised

Shakespeare was Shakespeare

There was a period when I wasted my precious spare time in debate on the true authorship of Shakespeare. (I’m particularly pleased with my killer arguments on Shakespeare’s knowledge of astrology/astronomy , the unlikelihood of Hamlet drawing from Sophocles, and the Bohemian coast.) Tom Veal now has written a long but worthwhile review of Scott McCrea’s The Case for Shakespeare, which basically should (but won’t) end the debate.

Posted in Uncategorised

The Enchanted Duplicator

Got around to reading this at last, partly because  mentioned it in a recent piece on, of all things, technorati (which I use religiously), partly because it is of course the joint production of the only two Irish Hugo winners to date. It is of course based on the concept best known from Bunyan, and even if it’s true that the authors had not read Pilgrim’s Progress I think it would have been impossible to grow up when and where they did and not know enough about it to take the piss as they did. (To take another example, Anne has read no Lovecraft but has absorbed enough from my frothy mumblings to get most of the jokes such as the first comment here).

Well, it’s good fun, and I suppose that’s all that need be said.

Posted in Uncategorised

June Books 1) The Best of the Best

1) The Best of the Best: 20 Years of the Year’s Best Science Fiction, ed. Gardner Dozois.

Meaty, meaty stuff. Dozois’ annual collection of his choice of the best sf of the year is always the one I look forward to most, the other similar volumes just really keeping me going until the big one appears. Here he’s picked three dozen or so of the best stories, all by different authors, from his first twenty volumes; I had previously read around half of them. (Three are joint Hugo/Nebula winners.) I’d originally planned to go through it and single out my favourites, but I’ve been reading it off and on over the last two months and can’t do anything so systematic; in summary, I don’t think there was a single duff story in the collection. It’s excellent: buy it.

Though I was a bit surprised when one of the authors represented in the book contacted me to ask if he could take up my room share offer at WorldCon.

Posted in Uncategorised