Thursday reading

Current
The Future We Choose, by Christiana Figueres and Tom Rivett-Carnac

Last books finished 
Blood in the Bricks, ed. Neil Williamson
The Tribe of Gum, by Anthony Coburn
Drunk on All Your Strange New Words, by Eddie Robson 
Who Will You Save?, by Gareth Powell
A Power Unbound, by Freya Marske (did not finish)
“The Paper Menagerie”, by Ken Liu
Drome, by Jesse Lonergan 
When There Are Wolves Again, by E.J. Swift
“The Man Who Bridged the Mist”, by Kij Johnson

Next books
From Kosovo to Kabul and Beyond: Human Rights and International Intervention, by David Chandler 
Among Others, by Jo Walton
Rebellion on Treasure Island, by Bali Rai 

Knights of the Round TARDIS, by LR Hay, and Return to Marinus, by Jonathan Morris

A couple of recent Big Finish audios set in a slightly divergent First Doctor continuity, with the initial TARDIS team from the TV drama An Adventure in Space and Time – David Bradley as the Doctor, Claudia Grant as Susan Foreman, Jamie Glover as Ian Chesterton and Jemma Powell as Barbara Wright. They have already done several audios from 2017 to 2021, but I had not heard them. These two are very recent, released last September and in January this year, but are being marketed as “Doctor Who Unbound”, as an alternative timeline not constrained by TV continuity (though I didn’t really spot anything in either that would have been constrained).

David Warner is as ever great at channeling William Hartnell as the First Doctor. Jemma Powell and Jamie Glover are OK as Ian and Barbara. I find Claudia Grant a bit squeaky.

Knights of the Round TARDIS sets us up in Oxfrod just before the Battle of Evesham, with Simon de Montfort pitted against the forces of King Henry III for the sake of the future governance of England, and the famous friar, Roger Bacon, offering technological innovation. It won’t take the informed Who fan very long to work out who ‘Bacon’ really is. The cast are all having a good time, but it didn’t really work for me; historical stories run the risk of just doing the events as they happened, by the numbers, and at the end Simon de Montfort is given a very Whiggish briefing on the future constitutional history of England by the Doctor and team. You can get Knights of the Round TARDIS here.

Return to Marinus is a different matter. You can enjoy it without having previously listened to Knights of the Round TARDIS (in fact, that’s what I did myself), but I think you’ll be mystified by it unless you have at least a passing familiarity with the 1964 TV story The Keys of Marinus. I happen to love The Keys of Marinus, and stories of Team TARDIS coming back to societies that they have already irrevocably altered on a previous visit are often fun (witness The Ark). I’m really impressed that Morris has found new riffs on each of the sub-plots within the main story; it ends up being a bit episodic, but that’s not always such a bad thing if that’s what the material requires. The ending puts a truly impressive twist on several of the established plot elements. You can get Return to Marinus here.

I’m looking forward to the third of this trilogy, Battle of the Acid Sea by Simon Guerrier, but it looks like I will have to wait until next year.

The Big Wave and The Pavilion of Women, by Pearl S. Buck

This is the next in my series of explorations of winners of the Nobel Prize for Literature who were not white men. Pearl S. Buck, born in 1892, won the award in 1938, making her the third youngest winner after Rudyard Kipling and Sinclair Lewis (just edging out Sigrid Undset). I had already read and enjoyed her best known book, The Good Earth (1936); her short 1948 piece The Big Wave is her second most popular on LibraryThing, and her novel Pavilion of Women second-placed on Goodreads, so since the financial and time costs were not excessive, I read them both.

Both of those books postdate the Nobel award, which was explicitly for “for her rich and truly epic descriptions of peasant life in China and for her biographical masterpieces”. The first half of that refers to The Good Earth (1931) and its sequels, Sons (1933) and A House Divided (1935), and the second half to her less well-remembered biographies of her mother and father, respectively The Exile and Fighting Angel, both published in 1936.

One has to be alert to the potential difficulties of a Western author being presented as the world’s expert on Chinese life, and I must say that in her favour, Pearl S. Buck’s Nobel lecture contains almost nothing about her own work, but urges he audience to get acquainted with Chinese literature, particularly The Water Margin, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms and The Dream of the Red Chamber (she mentions Journey to the West as well, but doesn’t put it on the same level, though today it is generally counted as one of the Four Great Novels).

A video of the ceremony survives, with Pearl S. Buck and Enrico Fermi (who is significantly the shorter of the two) receiving their awards from the very tall King Gustav V, who had turned 80 earlier that year.

As I said, The Big Wave is quite a short book for younger readers. The second paragraph of its third chapter is:

But each day Jiya was still tired. He did not want to think or to remember—he only wanted to sleep. He woke to eat and then to sleep. And when Kino’s mother saw this she led him to the bedroom, and Jiya sank each time into the soft mattress spread on the floor in the quiet, clean room. He fell asleep almost at once and Kino’s mother covered him and went away.

It’s the story of two friends, Jiya and Kino, who live in a fishing village in Japan. Kino and his family live on the hill; Jiya’s family live by the shore, and along with the rest of their village are wiped out by a tsunami. Jiya, devastated beyond words, is adopted by Kino’s family, and as he grows up, he puts his life back together, declining to be adopted by the local aristocrat and falling in love with Kino’s sister. It’s well-expressed and compact. You can get The Big Wave here. I am pretty sure that I had read it as a child.

The second paragraph of the third chapter of Pavilion of Women is:

“I must choose the woman at once,” she told herself. The household could not be at ease in this waiting. She would therefore today send for the old woman go-between and inquire what young women, country bred, might be suitable. She had already brought to her own memory all others that she knew, but there was not one whom she wanted. All were either too high or too low, the daughters of the rich, who would be proud and troublesome, or so foreign-taught that they might even want her put away. Or they were the daughters of the poor who would be equally proud and troublesome. No, she must find some young woman who had neither too much nor too little, so that she might be free from fear and envy. And it would be better, she reflected, if the young woman were wholly a stranger, and her family strangers, too, and if possible, distant, so that when she came into the house she would take up all her roots and bring them here and strike them down afresh.

Pavilion of Women is a longer book, but not too long. It is about Madame Wu, of a wealthy family, who on her fortieth birthday decides that she will no longer have sex with her husband, procures him a concubine and embarks on her personal voyage of self-discovery, with the help of the foreign priest Father Andrei. It is not just about China, but about the development of women’s rights across the world, and about how Westerners who blunder into an ancient society thinking they have all the answers are doomed to failure, while those who take the time to sit and listen may learn something. But the core of the book is Madame Wu and her relationships with her husband, his other lovers, and their sons and daughters-in-law, at a time of massive social change in China. She is not a completely sympathetic character, but she and her environment are vividly drawn. You can get Pavilion of Women here.

I won’t go out of my way to complete my Pearl S. Buck bibliography, but at the same time I’ll snap up any other books that I happen to spot in passing.

Next in this sequence is the Chilean writer Gabriela Mistral; her work is not easily available in English translation, and I will have to be satisfied with a volume of Selected Prose and Prose-Poems.

The Big Wave was also my top unread book by a woman. Next on that pile is Enchanted April, by Elizabeth vom Arnim.

Britain’s Other D-Day: The Politics of Decimalisation, by Andy Cook

Second paragraph of third chapter:

In this chapter I will seek to address three interlinked themes which underpin the narrative described above.  Firstly, I will examine the extent to which decimalisation was seen as diluting a British idea of identity based on exceptionalism; secondly I will discuss how this related to British efforts to join the European Common Market; and finally I will seek to determine the extent to which decimal currency was forced on an unwilling population.

In November 1963, the title character of a BBC science fiction episode called “An Unearthly Child” drew unwelcome attention to herself by thinking that the UK was already using a decimal currency. Of course, at the time there was no plan for decimalisation and the dialogue is meant to reinforce the science fiction credentials of the new show, Doctor Who, rather than to make serious predictions of the future.

The first ever episode of Doctor Who predicts decimalisation.

I had read the last chapter of Andy Cook’s 2020 PhD thesis a couple of years ago, because of the role played by my grandfather in the Irish side of the story, but last month I sat down and read the whole thing. (Well, lay down really; it was bedtime reading for a few days.)

Cook here unpacks the politics behind the British government’s decision to move to a decimal currency in the late 1960s, and the choices that were made at the time. He rejects the right-wing rewriting of history which portrays the process as a plot by European integrationists to dilute British national identity; the consideration of the UK’s European future was a marginal issue (mainly because everyone in the political mainstream assumed that future European integration went without saying).

The two crucial practical factors were, first, that South Africa, Australia and New Zealand had gone ahead with decimalisation in the early to mid 1960s, moving away from the pounds, shillings and pence that they had inherited from the Empire; and second, that the development of business machines for sale internationally made the old system seem even more antiquated. There was no serious push against decimalisation at the time (though the old sixpence, now worth 2½p, was saved from oblivion for a few years).

I was surprised to find that the main controversy was whether the pound should be kept as the main unit, or whether a new currency worth ten shillings should be adopted, as had been done with the South African rand and the Australian and New Zealand dollars. (There was also a very small lobby for keeping the old penny and creating a new unit worth 8 shillings and 4 pence, ie 100 old pence.)

Here the Bank of England mobilised the City of London to lobby strongly for the retention of the pound, for the sake of continuity and international prestige, and James Callaghan, the Chancellor of the Excequer, was easily persuaded. Cook is hilarious about the lack of professional qualifications at the top of the British financial services industry in the 1960s, compensated by full participation in the various Old Boys Networks. The role of the Royal Mint, newly relocated to near Callaghan’s constituency in South Wales, seems also to have been a factor.

Cook also looks briefly, perhaps a bit too briefly, at the South African, Australian and New Zealand cases. The early 1960s British Conservative government had wanted to take any reforms slowly and in step with the major Commonwealth partners (and South Africa); but was then caught out when they went ahead without the UK, motivated by a desire to show independence. India too had decimalised the rupee in 1957 (and Pakistan in 1961), but the British seem to have felt that they had less to learn from countries that were not ruled by white people.

I have written about the Irish side of the story previously. The extra bit of context that I got from reading the rest of the thesis is that the notion of using a unit worth ten-shillings as the basis of a new Irish currency, which was the favoured option until quite late in the day when Jack Lynch and Charles Haughey together decided otherwise, was a reflection of the debates in the UK, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. In the end, the convenience of keeping the Irish currency linked to the UK, given that the two countries were effectively in a currency union, compelled even those (like my grandfather) who had originally backed the ten-shilling system to accept that the best solution was simply to copy the new UK coinage.

You can get the thesis here. I have done a cursory search for Andy Cook’s current co-ordinates on LinkedIn and other networks, but have not found him; I wonder what he is doing now?

Books I have read about Ireland in the last year

I marked St Patrick’s Day last year by noting the books about Ireland that I had read in the previous twelve months, and it seems like a nice idea to do that again.

Fiction

Autobiography

  • Apostate, by Forrest Reid – first volume, taking the (now mostly forgotten) writer through childhood in late nineteenth-century Belfast up to the start of his literary career.
  • Private Road, by Forrest Reid – second volume, recounting a literary life between Northern Ireland and England in the first third of the twentieth century.

History of Literature

Northern Ireland

Twentieth century history

Nineteenth century history

Earlier history

My favourites of these are Our Song, by Anna Carey, Prophet Song, by Paul Lynch, The Irish Assassins, by Julie Kavanagh, and Ireland in the Renaissance, eds Thomas Herron and Michael Potterton.

Finally, some Irish biographical blog notes which were not based around books:

Nebula shortlists: Goodreads / LibraryThing / StoryGraph stats

As usual, I have looked at the extent to which the works shortlisted for the Nebula Award (and the related Andre Norton Award) this year have gained traction on the most popular book-logging sites, Goodreads, LibraryThing and StoryGraph. To repeat, I do this not to predict winners, but to assess the extent to which each book (of those which have been published individually as standalone volumes) has measurably penetrated the wider market.

Best Novel

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
KatabasisR.F. Kuang139,4662,86345,260
The Buffalo Hunter HunterStephen Graham Jones47,9621,06715,977
Death of the AuthorNnedi Okorafor20,3458087,967
The IncandescentEmily Tesh10,7454874,984
Sour CherryNatalia Theodoridou3,2601181,288
When We Were RealDaryl Gregory1,653103473
Wearing the LionJohn Wiswell1,19688503

A consistent pattern with a clear leader, and almost exactly the same ranking across the three systems.

The Kindle edition of Sour Cherry is currently going for $1.99 on Amazon.com (where I buy most of my ebooks). It has 306 pages, so that’s 154 pages per dollar – amazing value. (Skipping ahead, the most expensive books listed here by this measure are The Sloneshore Register, at 8.5 pages per dollar, and The River Has Roots, at 8.9.)

Best Novella

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
The River Has RootsAmal El-Mohtar40,88266917,670
Automatic NoodleAnnalee Newitz19,6385128,161
But Not Too BoldHache Pueyo4,009991,718
Disgraced Return of the Kap’s NeedleRenan Bernardo81531
The Death of MountainsJordan Kurella411014
“Descent”Wole TalabiNot published separately

Again a consistent pattern with a clear leader, if not quite as far ahead as in Best Novel.

Best Novelette

Not surprisingly, only one of the finalists has been separately published.

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
The Name ZiyaWen-Yi Lee63135

None of the short stories or poetry on the ballot has been published separately.

Andre Norton Award

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
Sunrise on the ReapingSuzanne Collins1,122,5934,739174,106
Into the Wild MagicMichelle Knudsen3295
Wishing Well, Wishing WellJubilee Cho12510
The TowerDavid Anaxagoras, narrated by Christopher Gebauer2514
Gemini RisingJonathan Brazee2400
Goblin GirlK.A. Mielke302

The top book here has a colossal lead, with more Goodreads raters and StoryGraph reviews than all the other books listed in this post, combined. (Also by far the most owners on LibraryThing, but not quite as dominant as in the other two cases.) The other five nominees have only 15 LibraryThing owners between them. If I ran the Nebulas, I would worry that this category is drifting out of step with popular taste.

Finally, Best Comic

Helen of WyndhornTom King1,79252386
Strange BedfellowsAriel Slamet Ries82535580
FishfliesJeff Lemire57125131
The Flip SideJason Walz39924138
Carmilla Volume 3: The EternalAmy Chu111845
The Stoneshore RegisterG. Willow Wilson1111032
Second ShiftKit Anderson69939
Mary Shelley’s School for Monsters, Volume 2: The Killing StoneJessica Maison000

The only category where there is a divergence at the top, with StoryGraph users favoring Strange Bedfellows over Helen of Wyndhorn. Also the only category to feature a finalist that is completely invisible on the book sites.

I have been tracking these statistics every year since 2012, and one of these days I shall sit down and see if any lessons can be learned.

Hugo voting statistics since 1971

I was cheered yesterday to hear that LACon V, this year’s Worldcon, has received 1293 Hugo nomination votes so far, two weeks before the deadline. This compares to a total of 1338 nominating votes last year, so it’s pretty certain that LACon will have more, and will meet the 1700-1900 level which has been ‘normal’ since 2014.

I have figures from almost every year since 1971, and until 2008 Hugo nomination votes were mostly in the 400-500 range, the peak being 738 in 2003 (median 480, average 473, standard deviation 117). For final ballot votes it’s about twice as much, peaking at 1788 in 1980 (median 899, average 922, standard deviation 324).

YearNomsFinal
1971343732
1972270550
1973350708
1974?930
1975267600
19764861595
1977500800
19785401246
19794671160
19805631788
19814541247
19826481071
19836601322
19845131467
1985222443
19865681267
1987567990
19884181178
1989539980
1990291486
19913521048
1992498902
1993397841
1994649491
1995477744
1996442939
1997429687
1998471769
1999425438
20004271071
20014951075
2002626>885
2003738805
2004>4621093
2005546684
2006533>660
2007409>471
2008483895

Things shifted from 2009, with every year from 2009 to 2016 setting a new record for nominations, and unprecedented numbers of final ballot votes from 2011.

YearNomsFinal
20097991074
20108641094
201110062100
201211011922
201313431848
201419233587
201521225950
201640323130

I think there are three things going on here.

1) It began with a concerted move to make the Hugos more relevant, after a couple of years in the late ’00s where there were few or no women or writers of colour on the ballot in any category, particularly for written fiction. This campaign was successful. Part of the Puppy propaganda campaign was the lie that Hugo participation had been falling as the awards became more ‘woke’. In fact, participation had risen.

2) If I may say so myself, I think Loncon 3’s 2014 campaign to market the convention and the Hugos was particularly effective. (I was the Division Head for Promotions.) If the Worldcon is committed to making the Hugos a success in terms of PR, great things can be achieved.

3) Most notably in 2015 and 2016 there was the Sad / Rabid Puppies factor, as hundreds joined the 2015 Worldcon to nominate vile rubbish, and thousands then joined (and nominated in 2016) to vote against them. I wrote an awful lot about this at the time, but the classic account is Camestros Felapton’s Debarkle.

The period since then is the period when I was personally involved with the Hugos. The numbers are below. For the sake of transparency, I am noting my presence or absence beside each year, and it is cheering but probably unconnected that the three highest final ballot votes of the last decade were in the three years that I was the Hugo Administrator. It may be more relevant that all three of those Worldcons took place in smaller European countries (Finland, Ireland, Scotland) with a strong local fanbase.

YearNomsFinalnotes
201724643319(I was Administrator)
201818132828(I was not involved)
201918003097(I was Administrator)
202015842221(I was on the team)
202112492362(I was on the team, but resigned after noms were counted)
202213682235(I was on the team)
202318471674(I was not involved)
202417203436(I was Administrator; 377 final ballot votes were disqualified)
202513381962(I was on the team, but resigned after noms were counted)

Again there are several things going on here.

1) The 2017 nominations number is inflated by post-Puppy nominators who had joined in 2016 to vote against the Puppy slates.

2) The 2020-2022 numbers were depressed by the pandemic. (Hugo participation is a lagging indicator of geopolitics.) We also had software issues in 2020 which meant that the voting window on the final ballot was unusually short, but I don’t think that made a huge difference.

3) The 2023 numbers cannot be trusted, for reasons that have been well aired, though they can probably be taken as a lower bound on the real level of participation. In addition, the final ballot vote will have been depressed because a lot of regular participants worried about data transfers to China.

Even so, to put it in perspective, all of the last nine Worldcons have had higher Hugo nomination numbers than any year before 2013; and all of them except 2023 had higher Hugo final ballot numbers than any year before 2011.

The “new normal” level of nominations these days for a functional Worldcon looks like 1700-1900 voters. The “new normal” level of final ballot votes for a functional Worldcon looks like 2000-3500. By “functional”, I mean a Worldcon where the Promotions Division, or its equivalent, actively helps to promote Hugo participation, and where there is an understanding of the importance of adequate software, provided in good time, for the Hugo voting process.

All that said, I look forward to LACon V proving me wrong and blasting through the existing records. I am not involved this year but I wish the team well.

The best known books set in each country: Czechia / The Czech Republic

See here for methodology, though NB that I am now also using numbers from StoryGraph. Books are disqualified if less than 50% of them is set in the Czech Republic. 

These numbers are crunched by hand, not by AI.

I had expected a lot of confusion with Slovakia here, but in fact most people are pretty clear on whether a book is set in the one country or the other.

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
The MetamorphosisFranz Kafka 1,445,79730,000+128,460
The Unbearable Lightness of BeingMilan Kundera 547,80524,49042,366
The TrialFranz Kafka 399,28522,29333,296
Daughter of Smoke & BoneLaini Taylor 385,3287,46555,852
Days of Blood & StarlightLaini Taylor 171,3023,80129,219
The CastleFranz Kafka 76,2559,3516,490
The Book of Laughter and ForgettingMilan Kundera 54,5176,5534,548
Letter to His FatherFranz Kafka 63,4591,9144,869

This week’s winner is a bit confused and variable in form, which is appropriate enough. Both Goodreads and Storygraph have combined individual printings of The Metamorphosis with collections of Kafka’s short fiction where it is the title story, while LibraryThing tallies every edition and collection separately. However, I did enough lumping of the options on LibraryThing to assure me that the winner there is definitely the same as on the other two systems.

In case you don’t know, the story is about a man who is trasformed overnight into an enormous beetle or cockroach (the German word is “Ungeheuer”, which means “monster”). One could query whether The Metamorphosis is really set in Prague, in that the location is not specified, but it can hardly be anywhere else. (Similarly for the other three Kafka books on the list; they are certainly set in what was then Bohemia rather than anywhere else.)

The runner-up is a novel by Milan Kundera which was made into a famous film starring Daniel Day-Lewis and Juliette Binoche, about a randy doctor and his girlfriend whose lives are up-ended by the Prague Spring of 1968. Another of Kundera’s novels makes the list and several more are bubbling under.

The result when I last measured this, less systematically, in 2015 was much the same.

The effect of including the Storygraph numbers was to lose The Complete Stories of Franz Kafka and gain his Letter to his Father.

The third author on the list, Laini Taylor, is American, and her very successful series of fantasy novels are set in today’s Prague.

The top book by a woman author who is actually from the Czech republic is Hana by Alena Mornštajnová, which scores decently on Goodreads and StoryGraph but very poorly on LibraryThing. Unless you count Madeleine Albright, who was born in Prague and whose autobiographical Prague Winter scores better.

I disqualified several of Milan Kundera’s later novels set in Paris, Letters to a Young Poet by Rainer Maria Rilke as the letters were written when he too lived in Paris, Amerika by Franz Kafka which is, oddly enough, set in America, and The Lost Wife by Alyson Richman which is a Holocaust survivor story mostly set elsewhere than the Czech Republic.

Next up are Azerbaijan and Portugal, followed by Togo and then back to Europe again for Greece.

Asia: India | China | Indonesia | Pakistan | Bangladesh (revised) | Russia | Japan | Philippines (revised) | Vietnam | Iran | Türkiye | Thailand | Myanmar | South Korea | Iraq | Afghanistan | Yemen | Uzbekistan | Malaysia | Saudi Arabia | Nepal | North Korea | Syria | Sri Lanka | Taiwan | Kazakhstan | Cambodia | Jordan | UAE | Tajikistan | Israel
Americas: USA | Brazil (revised) | Mexico | Colombia | Argentina | Canada | Peru | Venezuela | Chile | Guatemala | Ecuador | Bolivia | Haiti | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Cuba
Africa: Nigeria | Ethiopia (revised) | Egypt | DR Congo | Tanzania | South Africa | Kenya | Sudan | Uganda | Algeria | Morocco | Angola | Mozambique | Ghana | Madagascar | Côte d’Ivoire | Cameroon | Niger | Mali | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Zambia | Chad | Somalia | Senegal | Zimbabwe | Guinea | Benin | Rwanda | Burundi | Tunisia | South Sudan | Togo
Europe: Russia | Türkiye | Germany | France | UK | Italy | Spain | Poland | Ukraine | Romania | Netherlands | Belgium | Sweden | Czechia | Azerbaijan | Portugal | Greece | Hungary | Austria | Switzerland
Oceania: Australia | Papua New Guinea

The Eleanor Crosses. (And book by Alice Loxton.)

On 28 November 1290, Eleanor of Castile, queen of England, died at the age of roughly 49 in Harby, close to Lincoln. She had been married to Edward I for 36 years, and they had been king and queen for 18 of those years. She was pregnant at least fourteen times, and was survived by five daughters and one son, the future Edward II, who was only six when his mother died.

Her body (well, most of it) was slowly transported to London over twelve days before her funeral at Westminster Abbey on 17 December. Over the next five years, King Edward commissioned monumental crosses to be erected at every town where the funeral procession had stopped for the night. Whether there were eleven or twelve is disputed (see below); what is certain is that only three of the originals now remain, along with a Victorian reconstruction of a fourth that many of you have walked past, probably without realising what it is doing there.

I was at a loose end in London last Sunday, and, inspired by Alice Loxton’s book (again, see below), I decided to rent a car and visit the three remaining original Eleanor crosses. I left the Budget office near Victoria Station at 1045, reached the Northampton cross at 1245, left Northampton (after lunch) at 1415, reached Geddington at 1500, spent twenty to twenty-five minutes there, reached Waltham at about 1720, did not stay long, and had dropped the car back by 1900. So that was more than eight hours on the road, of which about six and a half were driving, for one long stop in Northampton and two short stops at the other two crosses. It was a bit mad, I must admit. But it was worth it.

I started with the cross at Hardingstone near Northampton. It’s easy to get to, as it’s on what is still the main road between London and the town centre. Parking, and then crossing the busy highway, were both exciting experiences. But the cross itself commands its surroundings, and would have dominated the pedestrian, mounted or horse-drawn traveller’s experience of approaching or leaving Northampton in the centuries before the railway or the car. It is about 10 metres tall, but stands on a prominence, somewhat obscured by trees which would not have been there in the 1290s.

My old friend Tommy, who comes from Magherafelt but has been working across the water for many years, happens to live within a stone’s throw of it. We failed to take any selfies together, so you’ll just have to take my word for it that he was there. It’s particularly appropriate to meet an Irish friend at Hardingstone, because according to the royal financial accounts, the sculptures of Eleanor on the Hardingstone cross were created by one William of Ireland between 1292 and 1294. This makes them literally the oldest surviving artworks by any Irish artist whose name is still known today.

Queen Eleanor, regal and unruffled, looks down at passers-by. The northern statue appears least weathered (or perhaps the restoration of the monument in 1713 was more long-lasting here). It’s sobering to think of the Irish sculptor seven centuries ago, pressed to meet a government-imposed deadline, and at the same time trying to preserve a sense of the dead queen’s personality for the ages. And he succeeded.

We went for lunch at the nearby Delapré Abbey (I actually ordered breakfast there, having skipped it earlier due to oversleeping), and I left Tommy to it and proceeded to Geddington Cross, the northernmost of the three survivors, in the middle of a quiet little countryside village. When I was 18, I worked for two months on an archaeology site at Raunds, 20 km away, so it’s a part of the country that I have some vague if increasingly distant experience of.

Geddington is a charming place. If driving to the Cross from the southwest (as I was) you have to brave a ford across the river Ise, the roadbridge being OK for pedestrians but not vehicles. Any objective assessment would rate the Geddington Cross as the best of the three survivors. At 13 metres, it is the tallest of them. It has only three sides, at a triangular junction in the middle of the village, so it is much slimmer than the other two. Eleanor looks sternly down in all three directions. The sculptor here is not known, but is thought to have been local, and unlike the other two crosses the stone was definitely local rather than imported from Normandy. (NB that although the soot and weathering makes Eleanor’s face look a bit skull-like, she’s just in need of a scrub.)

By great good fortune, local guide Kam Caddell was finishing up a tour as I arrived. He pointed out that the cross is rooted in an ancient sacred spring, mounted on pilings that will disintegrate if the water is ever drained. Then he took a few minutes to lead me through the history of Geddington – a major medieval centre of economic and political activity, which however was cut off in the Age of Steam. “If the railway had come to Geddington, we’d be 60,000 people. Instead it went through two tiny little farming villages called Kettering and Corby and everyone forgot this was the center of the Midlands.” You can hear him on this podcast with Alice Loxton, produced by Brigham Young University.

Kam is full of heterodox theories about the Crosses. He doubts that there was ever one at Grantham – the documentation is lacking. He doubts that there is a single original stone left in the cross at Waltham. Most provocatively, he doubts that they ever actually had crosses at the top. The picturesque stump at the top of the Northampton cross is a later addition. There is no room for one atop the Geddington cross. Myself, I kinda wonder why they would have been called “crosses” in that case. But Kam puts his case passionately.

Perhaps it was the long hours of driving, and the light (such as it was) beginning to dwindle, but I was unable to summon much enthusiasm for Waltham Cross, in one of the more godforsaken corners of Essex just outside the M25. Perhaps at a time of week other than Sunday evening, it would not feel like it is sitting at the core of a decaying Home Counties burgh, asserting history despite its neighbours, covered with bird mesh to minimise the amount of poo on the dead queen.

The original statues were also created by a known sculptor, Alexander of Abingdoni. They were moved to Cheshunt Public Library in the 1950s, and are now in the the V&A. The replacements are putting on a stiff upper lip, under the mesh.

Waltham Cross is a depressing place, with St George’s Cross flags drooping from the lamp-posts around the unloved monument to a forgotten foreign royal. I did not stay long.

The last of the Eleanor Crosses was originally erected on a spot now occupied by the equestrian statue of King Charles I on Trafalgar Square – 350 years before King Charles was beheaded, more than half a century before the Battle of Trafalgar after which the square is named. It is still the spot from which distances from and to London are measured. I went and took a couple of photographs on Tuesday (it is not far from my employers’ London office).

Like the other missing crosses, the original was destroyed by anti-monarchist Puritans in the 1640s, 350 years after Eleanor’s death. Unlike the others, the Victorians decided to recreate it in 1864, about 200 metres from where it had originally stood, doing their best to echo the monument originally built near the ċierring, the bend in the river Thames. And they put a railway station beside it. It is blackened with a century and a half of soot now, but if you look for even half a second, you can see the best known work of Thomas Earp – the replica statues of Queen Eleanor in the replica of the old Charing Cross in the station forecourt.

Are the crosses England’s Taj Mahal? Yes and no, I suppose. They are a visible monument constructed at the direct order of the monarch to express his private grief. Many other memorial structures in England are based on the structure of the Eleanor Crosses (though having said that, there are only so many ways to build a tall stone thing). The Albert Memorial, also commemorating a deceased royal consort, was explicitly modelled on the Eleanor Crosses by Gilbert Scott, and boasts a representation of William of Ireland on its frieze, complete with the shadow of the Hardingstone Cross in the background.

Photo taken by me in March last year

We know nothing about William of Ireland except that he was alive and sculpting in the early to mid 1290s. We know more about Eleanor of Castile, and much much more about Edward I (memorably portrayed by Patrick McGoohan in that awful film Braveheart). The crosses were erected on main roads and significant interchanges, so that people would remember Eleanor. People don’t remember her, most of the crosses are lost, and the paths of commerce and politics have diverted to other routes. But 730 years on, an unimaginable length of time, three of the crosses are still there; so I think that as a building project, it counts as a success.

I was inspired to take this journey by reading Eleanor: A 200-Mile Walk in Search of England’s Lost Queen, by Alice Loxton. The second paragraph of its third chapter is:

Your body was laid with feet pointing east and head to the west – the idea being that you were looking east towards Jerusalem and, on the event of Jesus’ second resurrection, the Second Coming, you could easily sit up and watch it all unfold. So everyone in the churchyard was ready to sit up, where theyd be facing the same direction, like theatre stalls. No swivelling required. It’s worth keeping this in mind – if you want to make the front row, make sure you’re buried in the east corner of the churchyard. And make sure your plot isn’t near someone who coughs.

Alice Loxton went the whole hog, recapitulating Eleanor’s funeral procession on foot in December 2024, matching the dates of 734 years earlier to her own progress as far as possible, finding the traces of folklore and history at each stop, and documenting the process with photographs which are integrated nicely into the text. The tone is breezy and breathless, but also respectful of the histories through which she is walking. She is a bit more cheerful than me (on the whole she had better weather than I did last weekend, though she is frank about the days when she did not). The reader will cheer for her when, at the end of the journey, she is admitted to the closed chapel in Westminster Abbey where Eleanor now rests. She also reports on a mural about the history of the crosses in Charing Cross tube station – I must look for it next time I am passing and not in a rush. It’s a book that you could comfortably get for someone with at least a vague interest in English history, whether or not they are particularly interested in the thirteenth century. You can get Eleanor: A 200-Mile Walk in Search of England’s Lost Queen here.

I also managed to get hold of Carsten Dilba’s Memoria Reginae: Das Memorialprogramm für Eleonore von Kastilien, a massive scholarly assembling of everything that is known about the Eleanor Crosses and the other funerary art commissioned in Eleanor’s memory by Edward I, and I have dipped into it for my notes above. The second paragraph of the third chapter has 387 words in the original German with another nine footnotes, so I won’t post it (also I have really only read a few pages so I feel it’s cheating to tick it off my list). The list price is €78, but I was able to get it for €7.80 here.

I hope this will inspire you to go and look at the local equivalent to an Eleanor Cross in your own neighbourhood.

The Recollections: Fragments from a Life in Writing, by Christopher Priest

Second paragraph of third essay (“Ersatz Wines”):

To be a writer is in fact a fairly common ambition – in a recent survey by YouGov, sixty per cent of British adults said that they wanted to become an author, and not as a casual dream but as a wish for a career. An equivalent survey in the United States revealed an even higher rating: eighty-one per cent of adults questioned felt they had a book in them, and that they should or would write it. In the USA there are approximately one-and-a-half million people who run or conduct courses in creative writing, providing tuition for more than twenty million students. The success of book groups and writers’ circles also underlines what a persistent aspiration authorship is for many people. Most of them will inevitably not achieve the dream, although in these days of internet publishing and print-on-demand, many more will do so than would have been able to in the past.

This is a book of non-fiction essays by the late great Christopher Priest, mostly (but not only) about the craft of science fiction and writing, with some autobiography thrown in. The publishers kindly sent me an advance copy in the expectation that I would review it here – normally I reject such requests (I get half a dozen or so every year), but in this case I was more than happy to oblige.

There are 16 pieces in 300-plus pages here, but they vary wildly in length. The longest single piece, a reflection on Christopher Nolan’s film adaptation of his novel The Prestige, is almost a hundred pages. The shortest, about his life in a flat in Harrow from 1969 to 1985, is only four pages long.

Most readers will hope to get insights about Priest’s own career from this collection, and they will not be disappointed. The early autbiographical pieces are fascinating and add to the work of Paul Kincaid. The very first piece, about an unrequited teenage love, is especially moving; it was apparently the last to be written. He writes a lot about other people’s writing, but he also writes a lot about his own, disarmingly frank about the limitations of his analysis.

I don’t know how to write a book. I don’t even know how to write one of my own books.

The key to his own thinking about sf is probably best expressed in “‘It’ Came From Outer Space: The World of Science Fiction 1926-1976 by Lester Del Rey”, which brutally dissects Del Rey’s choices and commentary in a now forgotten anthology (56 ratings on Goodreads, which is close to nothing for a book almost 50 years old). Priest always wanted science fiction to be ambitious and outward-looking; he writes of Del Rey’s

major fallacy… that the creation of the genre magazines by Hugo Gernsback and his imitators in the 1920s and ’30s was a good thing.

He pushes back against narrow interpretations of the genre in several of the other pieces too (most notably in his 2000 Novacon Guest of honour speech) but this is its crispest expression.

He’s very funny about his own early career, though his remarks about Michael Moorcock are pretty salty, to the extent that Nina Allan notes in the foreword that the two of them reconciled at the end. At his very first science fiction convention, he is upstaged by Terry Pratchett:

To my not entirely impartial eyes, Terry seemed to be getting a disproportionate amount of recognition for a single short story, “The Hades Business”, which had appeared in an anthology, having first been published in his school magazine. Terry was then only fifteen years old; he was short and slight, had a mass of bushy dark hair, and spoke in a rather distinctive treble. I, with my writing light hidden under a bushel, could hardly complain that he was getting more attention as a promising young writer than I was, but even so I felt annoyed with him. I privately resolved to outdo him one day, but never in fact did so …

I wrote last year about Priest’s relationship with Doctor Who. One surprise here was a personal reminiscence of Ian Marter, who played Harry Sullivan, and was a neighbour in the Harrow years:

Marter, whom I found pleasant but distinctly odd, once advised me to wax my car because he said it would help strengthen it in the event of a head-on collision (or, presumably, a tree branch falling on it).

The long piece about the filming of The Prestige is interesting even for those (like me) who have not actually seen the film. Although Priest claimed to be fully stiff-upper-lip about it, he was clearly very emotionally invested in his own story and in what was done to it, and the reader will cheer on his behalf when he is generally pleased (to put it mildly) with the result.

It’s (almost) all worth reading. My one reservation is a 2002 piece supporting the conspiracy theory that Rudolf Hess was secretly replaced by a double. Perhaps it’s useful as an illustration of Priest’s interest in doubles and hidden histories, but I think an editorial note should have been added to say that the duplicate Hess theory, improbable in the first place, was conclusively disproved by DNA testing in 2019. Priest also had odd ideas about 9/11, but luckily doesn’t seem to have committed them to writing, or at least not to writing printed here.

But we’re on much more solid ground with the final piece, his Guest of honour speech from the 2005 Worldcon in Glasgow, where he again restated his theory of the genre:

Long ago, I realised that whenever someone says “Science fiction IS”, or “Science fiction SHOULD BE”, I immediately start thinking of exceptions to that rule. Those exceptions are almost invariably stuff I like precisely because it can’t be pinned down. What we call science fiction as a kind of unified lump should consist of a literature of unexpected ideas, found in individual works, written by individual writers in individual ways. The rest is hackwork.

Even those who don’t know Priest’s work will probably enjoy the insights into the creative process that he gives here. For those of us who did know the man and his writing, it’s an essential volume. You can get The Recollections here (starting next month).

Outpost: Life on the Frontlines of American Diplomacy, by Christopher R. Hill

Second paragraph of third chapter:

Though the Foreign Service emerges on the stage every so often— Benghazi, Libya, being one of the most recent examples—it is not well known outside Washington, D.C. Nor does the State Department have much continued resonance anywhere in the United States other than certain offices in Washington. “The state department of what?” is a question I would often get in response to my explaining where I worked.

The autobiography of American diplomat Christopher Hill, published in 2014, so before his most recent post as ambassador to Serbia, but covering all of the other points of his career. I don’t know him personally, though we have shaken hands a couple of times. I did enjoy highlighting the names of people who I do know as I read through my electronic copy – a good dozen or so from the Kosova and (North) Macedonia chapters, and a fair number from elsewhere.

Hill’s key posts were, in order, briefly Ambassador to Albania in 1991; assisting Richard Holbrooke in negotiating the Dayton Accords in 1995; Ambassador to what is now North Macedonia, 1996-99; overlapping with special envoy to Kosovo, 1998-99; Ambassador to Poland, 2000-04; Ambassador to South Korea, 2004-05 and then Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, 2005-2009; and Ambassador to Iraq, 2009-10.

I was particularly interested in the Balkan chapters, but to be honest I did not learn much new from these sections, except that Hill’s views of the situation are pretty similar to mine. He moved on from the Balkans in 2000 (eventually returning as ambassador to Serbia in 2022, after this book was published) so the rest of the book is about his more recent career in areas I know much less well, and here I found a lot of fresh material.

His four-year term as Ambassador to Poland occupies only nine pages of the 350 of the main text, but the Korea and Iraq sections are much more substantial. On Korea, he claims credit for rebooting the USA’s image in South Korea and for making glacial but real progress in the denuclearisation talks with North Korea, in both cases by simply applying the classic skills of diplomacy – empathy and tact, with a firm grasp of your own vital interests and of shared goals. At the same time, he was being cut off at the knees by the neocons in Washington, led by Vice-President Cheney, who believed that the negotiations with North Korea were futile and tantamount to surrender, and briefed against him and the process incessantly.

The Iraq chapters are particularly sad. Hill is eloquently silent about the justification for the war in the first place, and does his best to get the USA to accept that the Iraqis should be allowed to get on with determining their own future. Unfortunately the political situation was distorted by factionalised politics in Washington, obsessed with picking favourites and winners, not to mention the unhealthy relationship between the US military and civilian missions on the ground in Baghdad. He preserves particular bile for an unnamed aide to General Ray Odierno; it did not take me long to work out who it was (nobody I knew).

As a whole, the book is defensive of diplomacy as an activity, but not especially of American diplomacy as it has been practiced; there’s a clear line to be drawn between the hard work of doing a job on the ground, and the craziness of the policy formation process in Washington, and Hill clearly has more patience for serious-minded foreigners than for his own country’s crazy politicians. As a serious-minded foreigner myself, I appreciated that.

You can get Outpost here.

This was my top unread book about Kosovo (though in fact most of it is about other topics and places). Next on that pile is From Kosovo to Kabul and Beyond, by David Chandler.

PS: I wrote this before the attack on Iran, but have not changed any of it.

Thursday reading

Current
Drunk on All Your Strange New Words, by Eddie Robson
Blood in the Bricks, ed. Neil Williamson
The Tribe of Gum, by Anthony Coburn

Last books finished 
The Mind Trap, by John Peel
Eleanor: A 200-Mile Walk in Search of England’s Lost Queen, by Alice Loxton
The Last Resort, by Paul Leonard
Wright of Derby: From the Shadows, by Christine Riding and Jon King
A Granite Silence, by Nina Allan
The Woman in White, by Wilkie Collins

Next books
The Future We Choose, by Christiana Figueres
A Power Unbound, by Freya Marske
“The Paper Menagerie” by Ken Liu

Stone and Sky, by Ben Aaronovitch

Second paragraph of third chapter:

‘Also in the springtime,’ he said. Then, after a pause, ‘And the autumn, of course.’ Another pause. ‘Once or twice during the summer.’

Latest in the successful Rivers of London sequence, this takes Peter Grant and his cousin Abigail, along with Indigo the talking fox, to Aberdeen rather than their usual haunts, to investigate the disappearance of a human scientist and the discovery of a mysterious dead humanoid with gills. By about half way through, it becomes clear what the story is really about, but the whole thing has very enjoyable attention to detail and some great character moments, and sometimes a bit of entertainment is all that is needed. You can get Stone and Sky here.

This means that I have finished the Rivers of London books, at least as they stand for now. For my next trick, I’m going to work through Mick Herron’s Slow Horses books, on which the TV show is based.

Cloud Eight, by Lauren Mooney and Stewart Pringle

My resolution for 2026 is to be a bit more consistent about recording the non-book entertainment that I consume. I have been listening to the Big Finish series of audios with Billie Piper and Christopher Eccleston, but not always remembered to blog about them. This is the fourth in the series; I enjoyed the previous three as well. This is the trailer for Cloud Eight:

See also press release here.

Fan reaction to this story seems to have been a bit meh, but I really liked it. The Doctor and Rose find themselves in High High Wycombe, a city in the sky in the 47th century; and it rapidly becomes apparent that something weird is going on, with the steadily decreasing number of inhabitants doomed to repeat their every waking hour a la Groundhog Day. There’s a single excellent concept behind it all, with extra chrome and detail, the small cast (four guest actors, one of whom is written out early and another half way through) portraying an entire metropolis of unwitting residents. The Doctor and Rose are also affected by The Thing That Is Really Going On, and the Eccleston/Piper chemistry remains strong. I think it’s one of the good ones. You can get Cloud Eight here.

The Doors of Midnight, by R.R. Virdi

Second paragraph of third chapter:

I reached deeper then, to the folds of my mind. I had nothing to fill them with but longed for their old familiarity, and hoped they would help me figure out what to do next.

One of the books from last year’s Hugo packet, this turns out to be the second in a fantasy series in which the protagonist is a professional story teller and also under suspicion of political murder. I bounced off both the prose and the structure and put it aside after fifty pages. If you want to, you can get The Doors of Midnight here.

This was my top book by a writer of colour. Next on that pile is Rebellion on Treasure Island, a Doctor Who novel by Bali Rai.

Killing Thatcher: The IRA, the Manhunt and the Long War on the Crown, by Rory Carroll

Second paragraph of third chapter:

At the moment, Magee was on a break from the war and living in Shannon in County Clare on the west coast of Ireland, a world away from Belfast, 250 miles to the north. Shannon was a collection of housing estates built on reclaimed marshland next to an airport and factories. It was Ireland’s newest town, but poor design gave it no center, no heart, and exposed residents to wind and rain. Magee had moved here several months earlier under instructions to lie low and take it easy, but that plan, too, had design flaws. He was on edge, restless, and gazing north.

In September 1996, I attended the Liberal Democrats’ party conference in Brighton, wearing several hats – I was the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland’s Party Organiser and an aide to their delegation in the talks which resulted in the Good Friday Agreement, but I was also the Chair of the vestigial group of Liberal Democrat party members in Northern Ireland. An earnest BBC radio reporter sat me down for an interview in the Grand Hotel at breakfast time. “The situation in Northern Ireland is rather a distant concern for us here at this conference, isn’t it?” she asked me.

I looked back at her. “This building, where we are sitting right now, was blown up by the IRA twelve years ago.”

I know Rory Carroll, and have occasionally given him quotes. In this book he goes in depth into one of the IRA’s most audacious operations, the attempted assassination of Margaret Thatcher at the Conservative Party’s annual conference in September 1984. She narrowly escaped; five party activists were killed; others suffered life-changing injuries. I vividly remember the coverage of Thatcher’s lieutenant Norman Tebbit being dug out of the rubble.

The book goes into intense detail of how the Brighton bomb, and the bomber Patrick Magee, fitted into the IRA’s overall strategy. The leadership were not immediately convinced of the return on investment of such a high risk act, in the wake of the Mountbatten murder. But in the end they were persuaded and the plot went ahead, with Magee planting the bomb with a slow but precise timer weeks in advance.

Magee himself was one of the IRA’s top bomb-makers, but had a complex personal life. I was interested that at one point, while on the run, he found accommodation and work at Venray in the Netherlands, which is where my cousin Gerard Ryan died and is buried. Carroll also gives vivid details of the police side of the story; the forensic investigation of the fragments of the bomb, the identification of Magee’s handprint from his hotel registration, the mixture of chance and preparation leading to his finally being arrested in Scotland in June 1985, while planning more action with a team including Martina Anderson, who I got to know decades later when she was a Member of the European Parliament.

Assassinations, and attempted assassinations, are big and important events, and Rory Carroll’s book gives answers to a lot of the questions that I suppose I had been vaguely wondering about since 1984. It has a couple of minor flaws – the opening chapters jump around the timeline in a way that could be confusing to readers less familiar with the history, and there are a couple of weird repetitions of detail between early and later chapters. So I rank it just below From A Clear Blue Sky and Say Nothing. But overall it’s a fascinating read about the biggest political bombing in British history. (The Gunpowder Plot doesn’t count, because it was thwarted.)

You can get Killing Thatcher here.

This was my top unread book acquired in 2023. Next on that pile is Annette Vallon: A Novel of the French Revolution, by James Tipton.

Joseph Wright and Victoria Stanley at the National Gallery

I went to the National Gallery in London on Friday, and paid a tenner to go and look at the temporary exhibition of paintings by Joseph Wright of Derby. I particularly love Wright’s work for its significance in recording the history of science and science education, and I was a little disappointed that the text around the exhibition puts the emphasis his technique of light and shade and use of candles, slightly excluding what it is that the paintings are actually about. (See also a critique by Rebecca Owen-Keats, who unlike me is an actual expert on Wright.)

But it is all great stuff. Here is a scientist pumping air out of a jar in which a bird is desperately fluttering; one of the little girls cannot look, while the other is grimly fascinated.

Here the kids are looking at an orrery, a mechanical model of the solar system. I always wanted one of those. The two youngest are complete rapt in the turning spheres.

And three men look at an ancient Roman statue, one of them sketching it.

Two young men exploring a cave find a scraggy philosopher, looking for the meaning of life and death in a skeleton. He will not find it.

The full title of this painting is “The Alchymist, in Search of the Philosopher’s Stone, Discovers Phosphorus, and prays for the successful Conclusion of his operation, as was the custom of the Ancient Chymical Astrologers”. It does what it says on the tin.

Finally, Wright in his own self-portrait looks out at us from the shadows.

I bought the souvenir book of the exhibition, but have not read it yet; perhaps it will have more on the content as well as the style.

There is plenty else to see in the National Gallery, and my attention was caught by John Singer Sargent’s portrait of seven-year-old Victoria Stanley.

Dressed for hunting, she is clearly ready to have fun but also won’t take any nonsense from anyone.

I was delighted to find that there are two portraits of her from the 1920s, one by Sir John Lavery (in the collection of the London art dealers Colnaghi) and the other by Minnie Agnes Cohen (recently sold at auction). You can clearly see the little girl in the adult Victoria. There are plenty of photographs of her taken during her life, but none captures her character as these portraits do.

Victoria was the daughter of the Earl of Derby; her great-grandfather served three terms as prime minister. Her first husband was Neil Primrose, son of the former Liberal prime minister Lord Rosebery and himself a Liberal MP. They married in 1915 and had a daughter a year later, but he was killed in 1917 during the Third Battle of Gaza. During her widowhood, her father was appointed British Ambassador to Paris and she became a fixture in the Anglo-French social scene. She then married Malcolm Bullock in 1919 and they had another daughter in 1920; he too served as an MP (but a Conservative) from 1923 to 1953.

Nineteen of her letters are preserved at the Borthwick Institute at the University of York. The earliest is from 1902, three years after she posed for John Singer Sargent. It is about her brothers, and their horses.

Victoria became a leading figure in the world of horse racing and hunting. Her two daughters were among the first three women admitted to the Jockey Club, and her great-granddaughter Clare Balding is a well known sports journalist, particularly on racing. Her father, her mother, her first and second husbands and her daughters Ruth and Priscilla all have Wikipedia pages, but she does not.

When hunting at Lowesby Hall in Leicestershire on 25 November 1927, Victoria risked riding under a low bridge, and was fatally injured when she hit her head on the stonework. (See report by the local history society.) She was 35.

The best known books set in each country: Sweden

See here for methodology, though NB that I am now also using numbers from StoryGraph. Books are disqualified if less than 50% of them is set in Sweden. 

These numbers are crunched by hand, not by AI.

This was pretty straightforward; there is not much doubt about what books are set in Sweden, and there was not really much doubt about which book was going to win.

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo Stieg Larsson3,459,22447,185155,356
A Man Called OveFredrik Backman1,222,08513,882136,951
The Girl Who Played with Fire Stieg Larsson989,20533,15470,309
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s NestStieg Larsson778,14727,65457,445
Anxious PeopleFredrik Backman816,1776,363128,278
Beartown Fredrik Backman606,9325,78893,031
The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed
Out the Window and Disappeared
Jonas Jonasson304,4608,75229,072
My Grandmother Asked Me to Tell
You She’s Sorry
Fredrik Backman291,2565,67535,205

This week’s winner, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, is the first of a trilogy published after the author’s death, about a punk computer genius who helps the viewpoint character Solve Crime. It’s violent, sexy and compelling. The other two books of the trilogy also make the list.

Fredrik Backmann’s books, four of which are on the list, are slice-of-life stories from contemporary Sweden, some of which I suspect may be funny.

The 100-Year-Old Man Who Climbed Out the Window and Disappeared is another slice-of-life story with a humorous tone. I was not quite sure if it met my geographical criteria, but I got a friend who has a copy to count the chapters (thanks, Mike!) and indeed a majority of it is set in-country.

One surprising thing jumps out at me from this list. All eight of the books are by men, ironically for a post on International Women’s Day. Looking through my archives, this has happened four times before: Russia, South Africa, Colombia (a special case) and Spain. Also, for two of the countries where I was only able to compile a list of five rather than eight books, all five were by male authors: Uzbekistan and Guinea-Conakry. On the other hand, I’ve had seven countries where seven of the eight books were by women (nowhere yet has had a clean sweep on that side).

This turns out to be thanks to my including the StoryGraph numbers. On Goodreads and LibraryThing alone, Pippi Longstocking by Astrid Lindgren would have made the list; but My Grandmother Asked Me to Tell You She’s Sorry, by Fredrik Backman, has more than twice as many owners on StoryGraph and nipped into the eighth place. Backman is relatively more popular with StoryGraph users; indeed his top two books are very close behind The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo there.

It’s also quite a turnaround from my previous research in 2015, where the only books that scored were the Stieg Larsson trilogy and Pippi Longstocking. Obviously the recent surge in popularity of Fredrik Backmann had not yet taken off at that point. Perhaps surprisingly, Henning Mankel was quite a long way down, both in 2015 and in 2026. The next highest woman writer after Astrid Lindgren was Camilla Läckberg.

For once, I did not disqualify any books – the top eight from my calculations are all set mainly in Sweden. Other countries where I did not disqualifiy any books: JapanEgyptDRCVietnamColombia.

Coming next: three more European countries – Czechia, Azerbaijan and Portugal – followed by Togo.

Asia: India | China | Indonesia | Pakistan | Bangladesh (revised) | Russia | Japan | Philippines (revised) | Vietnam | Iran | Türkiye | Thailand | Myanmar | South Korea | Iraq | Afghanistan | Yemen | Uzbekistan | Malaysia | Saudi Arabia | Nepal | North Korea | Syria | Sri Lanka | Taiwan | Kazakhstan | Cambodia | Jordan | UAE | Tajikistan | Israel
Americas: USA | Brazil (revised) | Mexico | Colombia | Argentina | Canada | Peru | Venezuela | Chile | Guatemala | Ecuador | Bolivia | Haiti | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Cuba
Africa: Nigeria | Ethiopia (revised) | Egypt | DR Congo | Tanzania | South Africa | Kenya | Sudan | Uganda | Algeria | Morocco | Angola | Mozambique | Ghana | Madagascar | Côte d’Ivoire | Cameroon | Niger | Mali | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Zambia | Chad | Somalia | Senegal | Zimbabwe | Guinea | Benin | Rwanda | Burundi | Tunisia | South Sudan | Togo
Europe: Russia | Türkiye | Germany | France | UK | Italy | Spain | Poland | Ukraine | Romania | Netherlands | Belgium | Sweden | Czechia | Azerbaijan | Portugal | Greece | Hungary | Austria | Switzerland
Oceania: Australia | Papua New Guinea

BSFA Shortlists

The BSFA shortlists are out! And my own nominations were not particularly in tune with those of other voters; I voted for two of the shortlisted books for younger readers, one each in the artwork, long-non-fiction, and short fiction categories, and none of the successful nominees in the novel, short non-fiction and shorter fiction categories (I didn’t vote in the rest). So it goes.

As usual, I’ll look at the ranking of the shortlisted books on Goodreads, LibraryThing and (new) StoryGraph, comparing also with my similar analysis of the long lists. I do this not to predict winners, but to assess the extent to which each book (of those which have been published individually as standalone volumes) is notable, to the extent that they have penetrated the market of GR / LT / SG readers.

(I have done this every year for a number of years; since the BSFA Award categories were increased in number, see 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025.)

I’m taking this in descending order of the popularity of the top nominee in each category. None of the finalists in Best Audio Fiction, Best Artwork, Best Short Fiction or Best Non-Fiction (Short) has been logged on any of the three websites, which is not surprising. I note that the shortlist for Best Audio Fiction includes both a series and a single story from that series.

Best Fiction for Younger Readers

TitleAuthorGR 
raters
LT 
owners
SG 
reviewers
Sunrise on the ReapingSuzanne Collins1,105,1504,625171,448
Secrets of the First SchoolT. L. Huchu3483496
Doctor Who: LuxJames Goss692314
Doctor Who: The Robot RevolutionUna McCormack492311
The Secret of the Sapphire SentinelJendia Gammon writing as J. Dianne Dotson400

(ranks of the 17 books on the long list that I analysed: 1st, 8th, 10th, 12th, 16th)

Sunrise on the Reaping has more owners / raters / reviewers on the three websites than all of the other books in this post put together.

The Secret of the Sapphire Sentinel is one of several books that has made it to the shortlist despite not having a massive pickup on the ownership sites.

I am really puzzled by The Ghost Merchant, by Rick Danforth, which is also shortlisted in this category. When I did this analysis for the long-lists, I recorded that it had 72 ratings on Goodreads, 1 owner on LibraryThing and 24 reviewers on StoryGraph. Now I can’t find anyone listing it on any of the systems. It’s part of a larger publication, The Colored Lens, but it doesn’t have a lot of ratings either. It’s almost certainly my own mistake, but a strange one for me to have made.

Incidentally Rick Danforth has five short-listed works across four categories. Nobody else has more than three.

Best Shorter Fiction

TitleAuthorGR 
raters
LT 
owners
SG 
reviewers
The River Has RootsAmal El-Mohtar39,89334717,074
Cities are Forests Waiting to HappenCecile Cristofari320

(ranks of the 32 long-listees that I analysed: 1st and 28th)

Only two of the five finalists have been published as standalone volumes, and only one of those has made much of an impact – but what an impact! Leaving aside Sunrise on the Reaping from the previous category, The River Has Roots has more owners / raters / reviewers on the three websites than all of the other books in this post put together.

Best Collection

TitleAuthorGR 
raters
LT 
owners
SG 
reviewers
The Black Fantastic: 20 Afrofuturist Storiesed. Andre M. Carrington844054
Uncertain Sons and Other StoriesThomas Ha1351527
Who Will You Save?Gareth . L Powell2868
Blood in the BricksNeil Williamson7162
Black FridayCheryl S. Ntumy662
Creative Futures: Beyond and Withined. Allen Stroud 432

(ranks among the 41 long-listees that I analysed: 9th, 11th, 15th, 18th, 23rd, 25th)

A bit more of a spread here, with the winner on Goodreads coming in second on StoryGraph and third on LibraryThing. The top two books are in the same zone as the top two finalists for Best Novel.

Best Novel

TitleAuthorGR 
raters
LT 
owners
SG 
reviewers
When There Are Wolves AgainE. J. Swift1631640
Project HanumanStewart Hotston782331
A Granite SilenceNina Allan56911
The Salt OracleLorraine Wilson36319
Edge of OblivionKirk Weddell800

(ranks among the 82 novels on the long-list by my analysis: 59th, 58th, 66th, 70th, and 81st; all of the finalists were in the lowest third of the popularity rankings of the long-list.)

Again, there is a nominee on the ballot which has failed to make a mark with the users of two of the three book ownership sites.

Also I think that the Chair of the BSFA ought to recuse themselves from the awards, or perhaps even be barred by the rules. It is risky for them and for the awards. It’s not so long since the British Fantasy Award scandal. I am not in any way alleging misconduct, I am expressing an opinion about good practice. I expressed this view previously in private to the previous BSFA Chair, and now I am expressing it in public.

Best Non-fiction (long)

TitleAuthorGR 
raters
LT 
owners
SG 
reviewers
Fantasy: A Short HistoryAdam Roberts17123
Writing the MagicDan Coxon and Richard Hirst852
Colourfields: Writing About Writing About Science FictionPaul Kincaid650
That Very Witch: Fear, Feminism and the American With FilmPayton McCarty-Simas504
Dispelling Fantasies: Authors of Colour Re-imagining a GenreJoy Sanchez-Taylor010
Speculation and the Darwinian Method in British Romance Fiction, 1859-1914Kate Holterhoff000

(ranks among the 18 books on the long-list, by my analysis: 6th, 8th, 10th, 11th, 15th and joint last)

These are low numbers, and none of those who voted for Speculation and the Darwinian Method in British Romance Fiction, 1859-1914 seems to have logged it on Goodreads or LibraryThing, let alone StoryGraph, whose users seem uninterested in academic literary analysis in general.

I found Kindle prices on Amazon.com for sixteen of the 23 books listed in all the tables above (I didn’t check the three that I already own). Speculation and the Darwinian Method is the most expensive by far – Amazon gives me a price of $59 for the Kindle edition, more than twice the cost of any of the others. At 203 pages, that’s 3.5 pages per dollar. Dispelling Fantasies: Authors of Colour Re-imagining a Genre is the second most expensive, both in absolute price and in value for length, $27 for 187 pages, 6.8 pages to the dollar.

At the other end of the scale, the Kindle edition of A Granite Silence by Nina Allan costs $4.52 for 350 pages, 74 pages per dollar, more than twenty times better value than Speculation and the Darwinian Method and ten times better than Dispelling Fantasies. (The median is 31 pages per dollar.)

Again, I am not suggesting malfeasance in any way. I have no reason to suppose that the rules have not been applied. But I think these numbers are a problem for the BSFA Awards. Do they, or should they, reflect the wider judgement of the BSFA membership and Eastercon community, let alone British SFF readers as a whole, about notability? Several of the books listed above objectively fail the notability test of measurable visibility on three popular library sites. If it becomes too easy to get your work on the ballot, the value of the award itself is diminished.

I don’t know to what extent the solution might be a change in marketing, a change to the rules or both. But that is a secondary question; if the BSFA does not think that there is in fact a problem, no action need be taken anyway.

One more data point. I am in London at the moment, for PicoCon today and work stuff on Monday. I popped into the Waterstone’s on Trafalgar Square yesterday, and could not find a single one of the books listed above on the shelves, not even the Suzanne Collins. It’s only one shop, of course, and the SFF section is not huge, and maybe they had all been bought after the announcement last week. I hope so.

Country Christie, by Agatha Christie

Second paragraph of third story (“The Case of the Missing Will”):

She arrived punctually—a tall, handsome young woman, plainly but neatly dressed, with an assured and business-like manner. Clearly a young woman who meant to get on in the world. I am not a great admirer of the so-called New Woman myself, and, in spite of her good looks, I was not particularly prepossessed in her favour.

The subtitle here is “Twelve Devonshire Mysteries”, but in fact several of them are set in Cornwall rather than Devon – just warning anyone who is expecting Dumnonian exactitude. The stories were originally published between 1923 and 1940 – Agatha Christie’s peak – in a variety of different magazines and collections, and they feature individually Poirot, Miss Marple, Parker Pyne and Tommy and Tuppence, so a decent sampling from across the spectrum of her protagonists. The collection was assembled between hard covers only last year.

One story, “The Hound of Death“, is not about crime at all but a horror story involving a Belgian nun in Cornwall. There is a foreword, extracted from her autobiography, about Agatha Christie’s love of Torquay. Some of the short stories depend on an obvious twist, but the point is more about Christie’s convincing portrayal of the West Country’s landscape and society than the actual plot. Worth it for the Christie fan.

You can get Country Christie here.

Thursday reading

Current
The Woman in White, by Wilkie Collins
The Last Resort, by Paul Leonard 
Eleanor: A 200-Mile Walk in Search of England’s Lost Queen, by Alice Loxton

Last books finished 
Appointment With Death, by Agatha Christie
Ghost Stories, by George Mann et al
Firefall, by Beth Axford
De gekste plek van België: 111 bizarre locaties en hun bijzondere verhaal, by Jeroen van der Spek 

Next books
The Tribe of Gum, by Anthony Coburn
Drunk on All Your Strange New Words, by Eddie Robson 
A Power Unbound, by Freya Marske

Stung With Love: Poems and Fragments, by Sappho, translated and edited by Aaron Poochigan

Second poem fragment from third section (Greek original not given in my edition but included anyway for completeness) plus analysis.

Οὐδ᾽ ἴαν δοκίμοιμι προσίδοισαν φάοσ ἀλίω
ἔσσεσθαι σοφίαν πάρθενον ἐισ οὐδένα πω
χρόνον τοιαύταν.
I truly do believe no maiden that will live
To look upon the brilliance of the sun
Ever will be contemplative
Like this one.
‘I truly do believe no maiden that will live’ may simply mean: I think no girl will ever be as sophos (clever) as this one.’ However, ‘To look upon the sun’ (a stock epic and tragic phrase meaning simply ‘to live’) raises the register, and the lines may express admiration for a girl who has already come to appreciate all that the sun symbolizes in the preceding poem. The sun here contains, in the abstract, qualities of shiny luxury items – glitter and glamour.

Translated poetry is always a bit problematic; you just can’t get the nuances exactly as intended by the original writer – especially when the original writer wrote in a dead language more than two and a half thousand years ago, and most of her known poetry survives only in fragments. But Poochigan seems to me to have made a good effort here. I’m not familiar enough with other translations to make a firm judgement, but I also appreciate his explanatory notes for each poem.

Most of the fragments are short, and have been preserved because of a single arresting image or turn of phrase. A couple of the longer ones jumped out at me. There’s an intense moment of jealousy (pp 22-23 here) when she sees the girl she likes talking to (?flirting with?) a man, and her heart throbs and her tongue “shatters”. The next poem (pp 24-25) is a break-up story, of the last conversation with your lover when you both realise it is over. The langauge is ancient but the sentiments are eternal.

The (very short) book ends with two poems which were very recently discovered on scraps of papyri, one about Sappho’s brother not yet having returned from a sea voyage, one a brief entreaty to Aphrodite about love. Poochigan does not mention it, because the scandal had not yet broken, but both of these passed through the hands of the notorious Dirk Obbink, so their provenance is very murky indeed; on the other hand, scholars do seem united in believing that these are genuine Sappho texts. It is awful and shameful that Obbink muddied the waters so much, both in this case and in the more notorious cases of the New Testament manuscripts.

Anyway, you can get Stung With Love here.

The Doctor Who Yearbook 1995, eds Gary Russell and Peri Goodbold

Second paragraph of third chapter (director Kevin Davies’ retrospective on the making of 30 Years in the TARDIS):

I had been entranced by Dr. Who and the Daleks since I was very young. I can remember cowering behind my father as a big red Dalek glided through Selfridges when we went to see the movie exhibition in 1965. The opening scene of the documentary shows the young boy looking up at one in awe, just as I did all those years ago. I was a skinny little lad, and as she watched it my mother spotted the reference immediately, assuming that I must have cast Josh Maguire because he looked so much like the younger me. Maybe I did, subconsciously. The whole project had been very dear to my heart right from the start…

I hadn’t been aware of the existence of this annual-sized publication to mark the thirtieth anniversary of Doctor Who (which then came out a bit late). But it’s a nice piece of work, with very short stories featuring all of the first seven Doctors by Mark Gatiss, Justin Richards, Gareth Roberts (yeah, I know, but this was 1994), Daniel Blythe, Steve Lyons, Simon Messingham and Andy Lane, with comic strips by Paul Cornell and Warwick Gray (now Scott Gray), when all of them were at or near the beginning of their Whovian writing careers. There are also personal reflections from Nicholas Courtney, Sophie Aldred and director Kevin Davies. It’s a great little package, and better than some of the more recent annuals. You can get the 1995 Doctor Who Yearbook here.

The Windup Girl, by Paolo Bacigalupi

The Windup Girl won the Nebula for Best Novel in 2010, and was the joint winner of the Hugo for Best Novel along with The City & the City, by China Miéville. It also topped the Hugo nominations ballot.

This is the only tied result for the winner of any category for the regular Hugos since 1993. (In the forty years before that, there were eleven ties, including one for the then Campbell Award; but voter participation was much lower.) We also had a tie for the Retro Hugos in 2020; I remember vividly spotting it as I went through the results while driving through France (I was not at the wheel).

The second paragraph of the third chapter of The Windup Girl is:

And then she wonders if she has it backwards, if the part that struggles to maintain her illusions of self-respect is the part intent upon her destruction. If her body, this collection of cells and manipulated DNA—with its own stronger, more practical needs—is actually the survivor: the one with will.

When I first read it, shortly after it won the Nebula, I wrote:

Emiko, the girl of the title, is an artificial human being of a near-future world ravaged by agricultural disaster, created as an escort for a Japanese businessman and abandoned by him in Thailand. She, like all her kind, is easily identifiable by her jerky body movements, and is subject to instant destruction at the whim of the law (not to mention the risks of metabolic overheating). Her personal dilemma, trading her body for self-preservation, intersects with a political and environmental crisis in Thailand, with fairly catastrophic consequences. It is a fast-paced book which beat out Miéville’s The City & The City for the Nebula, and I’ll find it difficult to choose; while Bacigalupi’s vision is less audacious, he carries it off rather more consistently. Some nasty sex and violence so not for all readers.

In the end, my thinking was matured by reading several feminist critiques of The Windup Girl, and I put it third on my ballot, behind both The City & the City and Palimpsest by Cat Valente (so mine was one of the 24 votes that transferred from Valente to Miéville on the third round). I also put it second last on my BSFA ballot the following year.

Rereading it now, I have to be honest, I really didn’t like it. The lushly imagined Thailand is rather Orientalist, and the protagonist is not just a whore with a heart of gold, she’s a robot whore with a heart of gold. (To be crystal clear: my objection is not to sex work, but to clichés.) There is a lot of sexual violence which doesn’t advance the story at all. Maybe it was just my jet lag in California, but I also found the plot difficult to follow. I’m dropping my opinion of it from mediocre to actively bad, as has happened occasionally in this sequence of reading.

But if you want to, you can get The Windup Girl here.

Incidentally I have also found that it is the best-known book set in Thailand, as measured by LibraryThing. (The Beach by Alex Garland has a lead on Goodreads.)

That year, the Hugo for Best Novella went to “Palimpsest”, by Charles Stross; for Best Novelette to “The Island”, by Peter Watts; and for Short Story to “Bridesicle”, by Will McIntosh. This was the last time (so far) that the four traditional fiction Hugo categories were all won by white men.

The Nebula for Best Novella went to The Women of Nell Gwynne’s, by Kage Baker; for Best Novelette to “Sinner, Baker, Fabulist, Priest; Red Mask, Black Mask, Gentleman, Beast”, by Eugie Foster; and for Short Story to “Spar”, by Kij Johnson.

The following year, the Hugo and Nebula Awards for Best Novel both went to Blackout/All Clear by Connie Willis, but I am going to skip it as I wasted far too much time on reading it the first time round. That means that the next post in this sequence will be about Ken Liu’s short story “The Paper Menagerie”, Kij Johnson’s novella “The Man Who Bridged the Mist”, and Jo Walton’s novel Among Others.

Elfland, by Freda Warrington

Second paragraph of third chapter:

It was when he shifted his sight into the Dusklands that it became something else. A dolmen mound. A monumental structure, silvery and solid yet alive… set there by the Ancients, a crossing point between this world and the Underworld.

This is a massive book that kept me going all through my trip to Gallifrey (though in fact I had very little time for reading when on the ground there, it was more for the plane flights). It’s a fantasy of a contemporary England where our protagonists are two generations of two families of Aetherials, who come from the otherworld of Faerie, to which however the path is barred. It’s a bit of an Aga saga, but with magic and demons. I got very drawn into the family dynamics, though I groaned at one (early) revelation in particular. Lots of sex and drama, and agonized psychological traumas manifesting as politics in the human world. I wasn’t really expecting to enjoy it, but I did. You can get Elfland here.

This was both my top unread book acquired in 2022, and the sf book that had lingered longest unread on my shelves (another Eastercon purchase). The next on those piles respectively are The Future We Choose by Christiana Figueres, and Drunk on All Your Strange New Words, by Eddie Robson.

The Rebel and Phoenix Awards

Last week I got sucked into an internet slapfight on the naming of a science fiction award. This was sparked by the news on File 770 that at last weekend’s DeepSouthCon, the Phoenix Award, for the professional (writer, editor or artist) who has done the most for Southern Fandom, and the Rebel Award, for the fan who has done the most for Southern Fandom, were both presented. (Photo from ceremony on Facebook)

The name of the latter award jumped out at me. It’s kind of difficult to see the word ‘Rebel’ being used for a celebration relating to those who live in the former Confederacy, and not draw the obvious conclusion. I therefore asked,

The Rebel Award presumably commemorates the defenders of slavery?

This provoked a defensive and vituperative set of responses, mainly from a former winner of the Rebel Award, which really failed to convince me (and other commenters) that the name of the award was intended to have any other meaning than commemorating the defenders of slavery. (Although the case for changing its name was none the less conceded as having been made.)

During the discussion, my attention was drawn to a flier for DeepSouthCon III, held in the centenary year of 1965, where the Rebel Award was presented for the first time. The flier informs us that:

Any of the Trufen wishing to pay in Confederate money should apply to the Chairman for conversion rates between real money and that of the USA.

Ha ha, very funny.

Here is the membership badge for that DeepSouthCon III in 1965 (which by the way had only 19 attendees, so numbering the badges up to 74 was optimistic):

I think it is fair to say that there is a pictorial element of this badge which weakens the assertion that no reference to the defenders of slavery was intended, and I said so, provoking another vituperative response:

…even as late as the mid-1980s that flag was a key design feature of the paint scheme of the General Lee, the automobile that was an iconic image of the popular CBS prime time television show The Dukes of Hazard. It was after that when the flag became hijacked by racist white supremicists as their totem.

If it was only after The Dukes of Hazzard that the flag was hijacked by racist white supremacists, who was using it between 1861-1865? (Actually a question with a slightly more complex answer than might first appear, but not by very much.) And let’s not forget the Dixiecrats who won four states in the 1948 presidential election on an explicitly racist white supremacist platform, under this flag – and held their founding convention in Birmingham, Alabama, just seventeen years before DeepSouthCon III.

And as for The Dukes of Hazzard themselves, hmm, what was the name of that car again? General who? What was he fighting for, and in which army?

See also an interesting 2015 retrospective piece on The Dukes of Hazzard from Time, which points out that:

You can’t feature the flag of Dixie and not be about the South and race, like it or not, even if only by passively feeding into the argument that the flag is only about family pride, good ol’ boys and good ol’ times.

The debate (such as it was) was terminated by the appearance in the discussion of the Administrator of the Southern Fandom Confederation, who actually administers the Rebel and Phoenix Awards:

Anyways, here’s my thoughts on the Rebel award name. I think it is clear that the name is meant to reference Confederate iconography. It’s paired with the Phoenix award, which is another common Confederate symbol. It was adopted during the centenary of the Civil War and during the Civil Rights movement when southern states started really leaning into the Lost Cause as a reaction to the gains made by blacks. I cannot claim to know the hearts and minds of the people who made these decisions more than a decade before I was born. But I think it’s unavoidable that this was an influence on their thinking. It may have meant pride in their heritage to them. But Confederate iconography and Lost Cause propaganda is harmful and has always been, even if not everyone realizes that.

I appreciate her honesty about what the name of the award clearly meant and means, and actually I did not expect to see the question extended to the Phoenix Award as well. It’s easy to see how the iconography of the phoenix could tie into the narrative of the Lost Cause, but I found it surprisingly difficult to identify real-world examples of this (internet searches kept bringing me instead to the handful of Confederate monuments near Phoenix, Arizona). However, I’m also certain that the Southern Fandom Confederation has done more research on this question than I have, so I will take their word for it.

I wish the Administrator and her colleagues well in the search for new and more acceptable names for the awards. For the other participants in the debate, perhaps a reminder that “Shut up, you fugghead!” isn’t the clincher argument that some of you seem to think it is. There are actually some interesting things to be said about how the Rebel Award came into existence, but you chose not to make those points, and I’m not going to make them here either.

The best known books set in each country: Papua New Guinea

See here for methodology (though NB I am now also taking Storygraph into account, as well as LibraryThing and goodreads). Books are disqualified if less than 50% of them is set in Papua New Guinea.

These numbers are crunched by hand, not by AI.

This was one of the most fiendishly difficult of these lists to produce, because there are a lot of books set in western half of New Guinea, now part of Indonesia but formerly ruled by the Dutch, and to make matters more complicated the Indonesian part is also known as Papua (the names of the Indonesian provinces are Papua, Central Papua, Highland Papua, South Papua, Southwest Papua and West Papua).

Tell me if I have got any wrong, but I have done my best to keep to books which are set in the borders of what is now the state of Papua New Guinea, formerly ruled by Australia, Britain and Germany. This includes the troubled autonomous island of Bougainville, which despite a strong independence movement remains under Papua New Guinean sovereignty. One helpful point that I had not previously realised is that the majority of the WW2 fighting in New Guinea took place in the eastern half, so in general, books about those campaigns qualify by my criteria.

TitleAuthorGR
raters
LT
owners
SG
reviews
EuphoriaLily King102,5103,01014,134
Mister PipLloyd Jones 24,1363,6442,400
No Friend But the Mountains: Writing from Manus PrisonBehrouz Boochani 9,0954951,274
Imperium: A Fiction of the South SeasChristian Kracht 4,412384516
KokodaPeter FitzSimons 1,92231592
A Death in the Rainforest: How a Language and a Way of Life Came to an End in Papua New GuineaDon Kulick 1,049132211
The Ghost Mountain Boys: Their Epic March and the Terrifying Battle for New Guinea–The Forgotten War of the South PacificJames Campbell 1,32729057
The White MaryKira Salak99726879

This week’s winner, Euphoria, is a novel about three anthropologists carrying out research in New Guinea in 1933, very much based on the real life of Margaret Mead. Anthropology pops up a lot in books about both parts of New Guinea.

This week’s LibraryThing winner, Mister Pip, is a novel about a schoolteacher and his class caught up in the conflict in Bougainville. I read it a few years ago and was very moved.

No Friend but the Mountains is an autobiographical account of being imprisoned in an Australian immigration detention camp on Manus Island, one of the off-shore islands of Papua New Guinea.

Imperium is based on the true story of August Engelhardt, who founded a German colony based on the principles of nudity and eating coconuts in the part of New Guinea under German rule at the start of the twentieth century.

Kokoda and The Ghost Mountain Boys are both about the Second World War fighting, the former about the Australians and the latter about the Americans, in both cases trying to secure safe routes across the island.

A Death in the Rainforest is an anthropologist’s account of the disappearance of a language and a culture in Papua New Guinea. The country is estimated to have over 800 languages, 12% of the world’s total, and this diversity is fragile. (This book’s relatively high Storygraph rating bumped another anthropology book, Throwim Way Leg: Tree-Kangaroos, Possums and Penis Gourds, by Tim Flannery, off the list.

The White Mary is about a journalist who goes in search of her missing mentor in the jungle and Learns Things. It starts in America but as far as I can tell, most of it is set in Papua New Guinea.

All of the above are about and by foreigners. Papuan writers are few and far between. The top book I found by a Papua New Guinea-born writer is The Shark Caller by Zillah Bethell, but her family background seems to be British. The top book by a writer who was born and still lives in the country is Maiba, a Papuan Novel, by Russell Soaba. The top writing by Papua New Guinean women (if we don’t count Bethell) is My Walk to Equality: Essays, Stories and Poetry by Papua New Guinean Women, edited by Rashmii Amoah Bell.

The top book that I excluded because it is mainly set in the western half of the island (then Netherlands New Guinea, now Indonesia) is Lost in Shangri-la: A True Story of Survival, Adventure, and the Most Incredible Rescue Mission of World War II, by Mitchell Zuckoff. It would have ranked below Imperium but ahead of Kokoda.

We have a run of European countries coming now: Sweden, Czechia, Azerbaijan and Portugal; indeed nine of the next twelve countries are European. I might pause for breath when we get to Switzerland, which is the

Asia: India | China | Indonesia | Pakistan | Bangladesh (revised) | Russia | Japan | Philippines (revised) | Vietnam | Iran | Türkiye | Thailand | Myanmar | South Korea | Iraq | Afghanistan | Yemen | Uzbekistan | Malaysia | Saudi Arabia | Nepal | North Korea | Syria | Sri Lanka | Taiwan | Kazakhstan | Cambodia | Jordan | UAE | Tajikistan | Israel
Americas: USA | Brazil (revised) | Mexico | Colombia | Argentina | Canada | Peru | Venezuela | Chile | Guatemala | Ecuador | Bolivia | Haiti | Dominican Republic | Honduras | Cuba
Africa: Nigeria | Ethiopia (revised) | Egypt | DR Congo | Tanzania | South Africa | Kenya | Sudan | Uganda | Algeria | Morocco | Angola | Mozambique | Ghana | Madagascar | Côte d’Ivoire | Cameroon | Niger | Mali | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Zambia | Chad | Somalia | Senegal | Zimbabwe | Guinea | Benin | Rwanda | Burundi | Tunisia | South Sudan | Togo
Europe: Russia | Türkiye | Germany | France | UK | Italy | Spain | Poland | Ukraine | Romania | Netherlands | Belgium | Sweden | Czechia | Azerbaijan | Portugal | Greece | Hungary | Austria | Switzerland
Oceania: Australia | Papua New Guinea

February 2026 books

Non-fiction 6 (YTD 12)
The Ark, by Philip Purser-Hallard
Killing Thatcher: The IRA, the Manhunt and the Long War on the Crown, by Rory Carroll
Outpost: Life on the Frontlines of American Diplomacy, by Christopher R. Hill
The Recollections: Fragments from a Life in Writing, by Christopher Priest
Britain’s Other D-Day: The Politics of Decimalisation, by Andy Cook
Liberation: The Unoffical and Unauthorised Guide to Blake’s 7, by Alan Stevens and Fiona Moore

Non-genre 5 (YTD 11)
Cards on the Table, by Agatha Christie
Country Christie, by Agatha Christie
The Big Wave, by Pearl S. Buck
Pavilion of Women, by Pearl S. Buck
Appointment With Death, by Agatha Christie

Poetry 1 (YTD 1)
Stung With Love: Poems and Fragments, by Sappho, translated and edited by Aaron Poochigan

SF 8 (YTD 15)
Red Planet, by Robert A. Heinlein
House of Open Wounds, by Adrian Tchaikovsky
The Dead Take the A Train, by Cassandra Khaw and Richard Kadrey (did not finish)
Elfland, by Freda Warrington
The Doors of Midnight, by R.R. Virdi (did not finish)
Stone and Sky, by Ben Aaronovitch
The Fifth Elephant, by Terry Pratchett
Serbian Folk Tales, ed. Jake Jackson

Doctor Who 5 (YTD 15)
The Penumbra Affair, by Paul Magrs (audiobook)
Reckless Engineering, by Nick Walters
Whodle: a Whodunit Adventure Through Time and Space, by Tim Dedopulos, Roland Hall and Dave Knowles (did not finish)
Doctor Who: The Ark, by Paul Erickson
The Doctor Who Yearbook 1995, eds Gary Russell and Peri Goodbold

~6,900 pages (YTD 16,000) (counting 100 for the audiobook)
10/26 (YTD 23/59) by women (Moore, 3x Christie, 2x Buck, Sappho, Khaw, Warrington, Goodbold)
2/26 (YTD 4/59) by writers of colour (Khaw and Virdi)
5/26 reread (The Big Wave, Red Planet, The Fifth Elephant, Reckless Engineering, Doctor Who: The Ark)

195 books currently tagged unread, up 11 from last month (thanks to Gallifrey One), down 38 from February 2025.

Reading now
The Woman in White, by Wilkie Collins

Coming soon (perhaps)
Ghost Stories, by George Mann et al
Last Resort, by Paul Leonard
The Tribe of Gum, by Anthony Coburn

De gekste plek van België: 111 bizarre locaties en hun bijzondere verhaal, by Jeroen van der Spek
Drunk on All Your Strange New Words, by Eddie Robson
The Future We Choose, by Christiana Figueres
From Kosovo to Kabul and Beyond: Human Rights and International Intervention, by David Chandler
Mantel Pieces, by Hilary Mantel

A Power Unbound, by Freya Marske
“The Paper Menagerie” by Ken Liu
Drome, by Jesse Lonergan
Rebellion on Treasure Island, by Bali Rai
Enchanted April, by Elizabeth Von Arnim
Oscar Wilde: A Biography, by Richard Ellmann
Selected Prose and Prose-Poems, by Gabriela Mistral
Sourire 58, by Baudouin Deville et al
Trouble With Lichen, by John Wyndham
Annette Vallon: A Novel of the French Revolution, by James Tipton
Slow Horses, by Mick Herron
Moving Pictures, by Terry Pratchett
Brideshead Revisited, by Evelyn Waugh

Beyond the Doctor: Bessie Come Home, London 1965, Sleeper Agents, The Penumbra Affair, all by Paul Magrs

The BBC released a series of short audiobooks in 2021-22, each taking a companion or companions from the classic series and imagining what happened after their time with the Doctor ended. The first of these is The Kairos Ring, by Stephen Gallagher, bringing Romana and the Tharils to the American Civil War, and I had read it as part of the expanded Warrior’s Gate novelisation, though you can get it separately here. The next four are a connected set of stories by Paul Magrs, and I listened to them several weeks ago with the intention of writing them up in time for Gallifrey (but did not have time).

We start with Bessie Come Home, narrated by Stephanie Cole as Bessie. She is best known (by me anyway) as co-star with Graham Crowden in the sit-com Waiting for God. (Playing a pensioner, she turned 50 while that series was being made.) It’s a nice idea to give a voice to Bessie, the yellow Edwardian car acquired by the Third Doctor and driven also by the Fourth and Seventh Doctors, and the story is an amusing recapitulation of the adventures that Bessie participated in, a real nostalgia fest. The ending has a twist that I was not really sure about; the majority of reviewers felt that it capped the story nicely, but I found it a bit contrived. (I know, I know, an odd complaint to make of a story about a sentient car…)

You can get Bessie Come Home here.

I felt the sequence getting a little more into its stride with London, 1965, which tells the story of Ian and Barbara returning to London after two years away. It is read by Jamie Glover, who has been playing Ian Chesterton in recent Big Finish plays (and played William Russell in An Adventure in Space and Time). Rather than floating into a fairytale ending, the two former time travellers find it very difficult to readjust to life in London and become distant from each other; Ian is sucked into writing a science fiction show by the mysterious Mr Harman, while Barbara becomes a subject of the psychic researches of the enigmatic Angela Leaman. There are lots of knowing nods to Who continuity and to Sixties culture. I felt that this was the best of the four, and the story is sufficiently independent that you could enjoy it on its own.

You can get London, 1965 here.

Sleeper Agents takes us to and beyond the other end of the First Doctor’s era, with Ben and Polly returning to London on the day that they left. This time the narrator is Anneke Wills, the only one of the four to have actually been on TV Who, reprising her role as Polly. Again we have Mr Harman and Miss Leaman, and a good role for Polly’s pet cat, and a mysterious Arctic Island; but it’s a bit of a middle story in the arc, with the ending leaving some plot strands to be resolved.

You can get Sleeper Agents here.

Finally, The Penumbra Affair brings back Susan Jameson as Mrs Wibbsey, the Fourth Doctor’s housekeeper in the Nest Cottage series of BBC audios written a decade earlier by Paul Magrs, featuring Tom Baker before he decided to work with Big Finish. Mrs Wibbsey receives a letter warning that all of the Doctor’s former companions are in danger, and falls into correspondence with Polly Wright, now retired, who ends up on her doorstep for Christmas. The Nest Cottage setting is beautifully realised, and there’s a good twist on exactly how Angela Leamann fits into the story. It wouldn’t make much sense to listeners who are not familiar with both the previous three stories, and the Nest Cottage series, but in that context it works perfectly well. It’s a shame that Susan Jameson has never been in TV Who.

You can get The Penumbra Affair here.

There is technically a sixth audiobook in the series, but it’s a reading of Ian Marter’s novel Harry Sullivan’s War, the narrator being Christopher Naylor who also plays Harry Sullivan for Big Finish, Ian Marter being sadly unavailable. I didn’t feel compelled to revisit it. You can get the audio version of Harry Sullivan’s War here.

In conclusion: give London, 1965 a go, and if you like it, try the others as well.

Thursday reading

Current
The Woman in White, by Wilkie Collins

Last books finished 
Britain’s Other D-Day: The Politics of Decimalisation, by Andy Cook
Pavilion of Women, by Pearl S. Buck
The Fifth Elephant, by Terry Pratchett
Liberation: The Unoffical and Unauthorised Guide to Blake’s 7, by Alan Stevens and Fiona Moore
Serbian Folk Tales, ed. Jake Jackson

Next books
Ghost Stories, by George Mann et al
De gekste plek van België: 111 bizarre locaties en hun bijzondere verhaal, by Jeroen van der Spek (if I can find it)
A Power Unbound, by Freya Marske