Another film set in 2025, and another 2025 story set around a ridiculously violent reality game, in this case called Futuresport. It has been invented to resolve gang violence by getting them to play Futuresport against each other instead. The top American team is led by a guy who looks like Superman, because he is played by Dean Cain. The top Asian team challenges the American to a match to decide who owns Hawaii, because Hawaiian terrorists have been blowing things up. It is exactly as stupid as I make it sound. You’ll never guess who wins in the end.
In its favour, there is one half-decent sex scene, right at the beginning to make you keep watching in hope that there is another, and the violence is not as gruesome as, say, Endgame / Bronx Lotta Finale. But the game itself is rather dull, which doesn’t help.
From 1969 onwards every nuance of every utterance by anybody of note, in all parties in the South, but especially in Fianna Fáil, was analysed for the minutest divergence from stated policy on the North. Any inconsistency led to an avalanche of publicity, followed by another avalanche of restatements of official policy by virtually everybody concerned; there was then relative calm until the next occurrence. Along with the Taoiseach, the Department of Foreign Affairs had overall responsibility for Northern issues, but the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Garret FitzGerald, spent much of his time abroad (much to the satisfaction of some of his own cabinet colleagues, according to one of my sources in the Department of the Taoiseach), so Conor Cruise O’Brien was given a free run at Fianna Fáil. He seemed to have Liam Cosgrave’s permission to badger the party about its Northern policy and could not resist stirring the pot from time to time.
A really interesting insider account of Irish politics particularly in the period from 1974 to 1982, when the author started out as press secretary for Fianna Fáil, then in opposition, and was then appointed spokesman of the government when they unexpectedly won a huge majority in 1977; under the Fine Gael / Labour coalition, he was not as central but still had plenty of scope to observe.
I found the first two thirds of the book totally gripping. Dunlop had a front seat as Jack Lynch built Fianna Fáil up from its bitter defeat in 1973, and takes us through the 1977 election campaign and the stunning result. He then sees Lynch slowly losing his grip over the next couple of years, until he is forced to resign in 1979 and replaced by Charles Haughey (“Charlie” to everyone). His description of the Lynch government, having won an unexpectedly huge majority which was in fact built on a very fragile electoral margin, is grimly reminiscent of the problems faced by Keir Starmer and the Labour Party in the UK today.
Dunlop defends Haughey strongly against all allegations of corruption and wrong-doing, and tells stories of his humanity – and also of monstrous behaviour and gross political misjudgements. It’s clear that Haughey was his favourite Taoiseach. Alas, Dunlop’s defence of Haughey’s probity rings a little hollow in the light of his own subsequent criminal conviction for bribing Dublin councillors, not to mention what has since come to light about Haughey. But for me, coming from a perspective where my family were distinctly not Haughey fans, it is healthy to read another view. (Even if it is wrong.)
Dunlop was less close to the centre under Garret Fitzgerald, and spent most of his time in the coalition governments of 1981-2 and 1982-7 assisting the Fine Gael minister John Boland (I must admit I had completely forgotten about him). He then retreated into private sector public affairs and lobbying, though was recruited again by Fianna Fáil for the 1992 election. The book was published in 2004, ten years after the events it describes, and contemporaneous with Dunlop singing like a bird to the Mahon Tribunal.
There is very little about ideology here and a lot about political character, psychology and motivation. In particular there’s very little about Northern Ireland, other than complaining about the difficulties it raised, praising Haughey’s attempts to build a relationship with Thatcher and explaining his own perfunctory contacts with British diplomats, and regretting the (peripheral) impact of the hunger strikes in the first 1982 election. It shows how little the reality on the ground in the North mattered for Dublin (and other southern) politicians.
I am personally sympathetic to the anthropological approach to politics, and I love gossip anyway (who doesn’t?) so I generally enjoyed Dunlop’s account. It is occasionally a little too hand-wavey – he never quite says what he thinks the facts were behind the Arms Trial, except that in his view Lynch was more guilty and Charlie less so than most people think. But some of his observations about the relations between politicians and the media, politicians and the voters, and indeed politicians and reality itself, are spot-on. You can get it here.
This was my top unread book acquired in 2018. Next on that rapidly dwindling pile is Irish Historical Documents, 1172-1922, eds. Edmund Curtis and R.B. McDowell.
Concluding the series of albums featuring the Twelfth Doctor, library assistant companion Alice Obiefune, and sentient tree The Sapling, here we have the showdown between the TARDIS crew and The Scream, a Silent so silent that even the other Silents can’t remember him. I felt the previous volume a bit lacking in energy, but it really picked up here to race us towards the conclusion of the story. You can get it here.
I guess this is saying good bye to Alice as well – a nicely developed comics only companion, with perhaps a bit more consistency than some of them (indeed, than some of the TV companions). She’s also in The Lost Dimension which I haven’t got to yet.
It seems like only yesterday that I posted about being 20,000 days old. But actually it was a thousand days ago. When I was born on 26 April 1967, Lyndon Johnson was President of the USA; Harold Wilson was Prime Minister of the UK; Jack Lynch was Taoiseach; and Walter Hallstein was President of the European Commission. It was the day that Italy launched an earth satellite from an ocean platform, and Harry West was forced to resign as Northern Ireland’s Minister of Agriculture due to a corruption scandal. My birthday twins include the wrestler Glenn Jacobs aka Kane; the actress Marianne Jean-Baptiste; the former Estonian Minister of Finance and his twin brother; and the British Ambassador to Indonesia who incidentally was my college flatmate in our final year.
1,000 days: Tuesday 20 January 1970 I was two and three quarters, living in Belfast. The Troubles were going through a deceptive lull – the first violent deaths of the year in Northern Ireland would not be until June. The Biafrans had just lost the Nigerian civil war. The first commercial Boeing 747 took off the next day. Born that day: Mitch Benn. (Between episodes 3 and 4 of Spearhead from Space.)
US President: Nixon UK Prime Minister: Wilson Taoiseach: Lynch Northern Ireland Prime Minister: T O’Neill President of the European Commission: Rey
2,000 days: Monday 16 October 1972 I was five and a half, attending primary school. The Troubles were in full flow with four people killed by the British Army that day, two IRA, two Loyalists, and Maze prison inmates starting a fire which caused serious damage. Congressman Hale Boggs died in a plane crash in Alaska (at least that’s what most people think; the wreckage was never found). The first episode of Emmerdale was broadcast.
US President: Nixon UK Prime Minister: Heath Taoiseach: Lynch Northern Ireland Prime Minister: vacant President of the European Commission: Mansholt
3,000 days: Sunday 13 July 1975 I was eight and a quarter. I remember being at my grandparents’ in Dublin later that week, watching the Apollo-Soyuz mission; possibly we were already there on the 13th, avoiding the Twelfth. Two people were killed in the Troubles that day, a Catholic teenager shot by the Army and a loyalist killed in in an internal feud. The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) process was nearing an end, with the Helsinki Accords signed on 1 August. Born that day: Alan Kelly, former leader of the Irish Labour Party.
US President: Ford UK Prime Minister: Wilson Taoiseach: Cosgrave President of the European Commission: Ortoli
4,000 days: Saturday 8 April 1978 I was nearly eleven, in my last year at St Anne’s primary school. The IRA kidnapped and shot a Catholic man from Twinbrook that day; his body was not found until 2014. Star Wars had just won six Oscars, to four for Annie Hall. Monty Python and the Holy Grail was released the following day. (It seems not.)
US President: Carter UK Prime Minister: Callaghan Taoiseach: Lynch President of the European Commission: Jenkins
5,000 days: Friday 2 January 1981 Weirdly enough, I remember actually working out that I was 5000 days old on that day. I was thirteen, still enjoying the Christmas holidays, in the third form at Rathmore Grammar School. We were in the lull between the two hunger strikes; the IRA killed a Castlewellan man the previous day. Jimmy Carter was preparing to hand over to Ronald Reagan. Greece had just joined the EEC. (Episode 1 of Warrior’s Gate was broadcast the next day)
US President: Carter (just) UK Prime Minister: Thatcher Taoiseach: Haughey President of the European Commission: Jenkins (in his last few days)
6,000 days: Thursday 29 September 1983 I was sixteen, in Lower Sixth at Rathmore Grammar School, with a long-distance girlfriend in England. The previous weekend 38 prisoners escaped from the Maze Prison, the biggest prison break in UK or Irish history. Neil Kinnock was about to be elected leader of the UK Labour Party.
US President: Reagan UK Prime Minister: Thatcher Taoiseach: Fitzgerald President of the European Commission: Thorn
7,000 days: Wednesday 25 June 1986 I was nineteen, working on an archaeology site near Heilbronn in Germany, still with the same long-distance girlfriend. That evening West Germany beat France and Argentina beat Belgium in the World Cup semi-finals (Argentina won the final on Sunday). I actually remember that we had a barbecue at work the next day, lots of roast meat and beer. Born that day: Leonora Knatchbull (1986-1991) after whom the Leonora Children’s Cancer Fund was named.
US President: Reagan UK Prime Minister: Thatcher Taoiseach: Fitzgerald President of the European Commission: Delors
8,000 days: Tuesday 21 March 1989 I was 21, single, preparing nervously for finals at Cambridge, and had just been elected Deputy President of the students union for the following year. The previous day, the IRA killed two policemen in south Armagh. Serbia was about to revoke Kosovo’s autonomy, as Communism crumbled across Eastern Europe. The People’s Action Movement won six of the eleven elected seats in the Assembly of St Kitts and Nevis. Dick Cheney became the U.S. Secretary of Defense.
US President: Reagan UK Prime Minister: Thatcher Taoiseach: Haughey President of the European Commission: Delors
9,000 days: Monday 16 December 1991 I was 24, living in Belfast again and working as a researcher on the project that became my PhD, long-distancing with Anne, my future wife. The following day a Belfast bar manager was killed by a leading INLA man who had been thrown out of his bar. Kazakhstan declare independence from the Soviet Union, which was formally dissolved on Christmas Day (though functionally it had collapsed months before). The People’s National Movement won the election in Trinidad and Tobago.
US President: GHW Bush UK Prime Minister: Major Taoiseach: Haughey President of the European Commission: Delors
10,000 days: Sunday 11 September 1994 I was 27, had been married to Anne for almost a year, in the middle of my PhD; I actually had a 10,000-day party that evening, having done the calculations in advance. We were in ceasefire time, with the IRA having announced theirs two weeks before, and the Loyalists preparing for theirs a month later. I was already active in the Alliance Party as the grandly titled Director of Elections. Frasier won four Emmys.
US President: Clinton UK Prime Minister: Major Taoiseach: Reynolds President of the European Commission: Delors
11,000 days: Saturday 7 June 1997 I was 30, working in Bosnia, nervously ready for the arrival of B a couple of weeks later – I think we already knew by the 7th that Anne (who had stayed in Belfast) would have a Caesarian on the 19th. The Irish general election was the previous day, with Bertie Ahern placed to start his eleven-year term as Taoiseach. The IRA ceasefire was reinstated the following month.
US President: Clinton UK Prime Minister: Blair Taoiseach: Bruton (just) President of the European Commission: Santer
12,000 days: Friday 3 March 2000 I was 32, working at the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels; we were still getting to grips with B’s disability, and F was a happy seven months old. I think this was actually the weekend that I went to Szeged in Hungary to meet with the Serbian opposition. My first visit to Kosovo was later that month. The Northern Ireland Assembly had been suspended again. George W. Bush and Al Gore clinched their respective presidential nominations the following Tuesday. The Anguilla United Front won the election in, of all places, Anguilla.
US President: Clinton UK Prime Minister: Blair Taoiseach: Ahern Northern Ireland First Minister: Trimble Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: Mallon President of the European Commission: Prodi
13,000 days: Thursday 28 November 2002 I was 35, working for the International Crisis Group, expecting U’s arrival a few weeks later. We had just published a report on [North] Macedonia and NATO. Back in Northern Ireland, the Assembly had been suspended after Stormontgate the previous month, and did not come back for years. There were terrorist attacks in Mombasa, Soweto and Beit She’an.
US President: GW Bush UK Prime Minister: Blair Taoiseach: Ahern President of the European Commission: Prodi
14,000 days: Wednesday 24 August 2005 I was 38, still working for the International Crisis Group, briefly at home between our holiday in Northern Ireland (including the 2005 Glasgow Worldcon) and a particularly fun trip to [North] Macedonia which started the following day. The USA was about to be hit by Hurricane Katrina. As part of the ongoing Northern Ireland choreography, the IRA had declared a permanent end to its campaign the previous month (which had also seen the 7/7 bombings in London).
US President: GW Bush UK Prime Minister: Blair Taoiseach: Ahern President of the European Commission: Barroso
15,000 days: Tuesday 20 May 2008 I was 41, working with Independent Diplomat, just back from a trip to Montenegro and Albania, and reading lots of Doctor Who books. B had moved out a few months before, and into the place where she now lives the previous month. Bertie Ahern had just stepped down as Taoiseach, followed by Brian Cowen, and Ian Paisley was about to step down as First Minister of Northern Ireland. Boris Johnson had just been elected Mayor of London. (Between The Unicorn and the Wasp and Silence in the Library)
US President: GW Bush UK Prime Minister: Brown Taoiseach: Cowan Northern Ireland First Minister: Paisley (just) Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: McGuinness President of the European Commission: Barroso
16,000 days: Monday 14 February 2011 I was 43, still working with Independent Diplomat, probably took the evening to celebrate Valentine’s Day with Anne. In Ireland, voters were preparing to give Fianna Fail a massive kicking, and across the Arab world governments were toppling; in Iran it was a ‘Day of Rage’ for protesters.
US President: Obama UK Prime Minister: Cameron Taoiseach: Cowan (just) Northern Ireland First Minister: Robinson Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: McGuinness President of the European Commission: Barroso
17,000 days: Sunday 10 November 2013 I was 46, at Novacon in Nottingham with F, having a damn good time. Still working with Independent Diplomat but actively looking. Preparing for the 50th anniversary of Doctor Who two weeks later…
US President: Obama UK Prime Minister: Cameron Taoiseach: Kenny Northern Ireland First Minister: Robinson Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: McGuinness President of the European Commission: Barroso
18,000 days: Saturday 6 August 2016 I was 49, on holiday in Northern Ireland from my work at APCO, where I had been working for almost two years. The Rio Olympics were about to start. We went to Tyrella Beach and Downpatrick that day, and saw the Red Arrows fly overhead.
US President: Obama UK Prime Minister: May Taoiseach: Kenny Northern Ireland First Minister: Foster Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: McGuinness President of the European Commission: Juncker
19,000 days: Friday 3 May 2019 It was the week after my 52nd birthday, and I spent all day in the BBC TV studio in Belfast commenting on the results of the previous day’s local council elections. The next day I did more TV in the morning and went south to a Dublin Worldcon planning meeting in the afternoon. The Emperor of Japan had just abdicated. This is me exploring the green screen with the BBC’s Mark Simpson.
US President: Trump UK Prime Minister: May Taoiseach: Varadkar President of the European Commission: Juncker
US President: Biden UK Prime Minister: Johnson Taoiseach: Martin Northern Ireland First Minister: Givan (remember him?) Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: Michelle O’Neill President of the European Commission: von der Leyen
21,000 days: Wednesday 23 October 2024 Last Sunday (three days ago) was the tenth anniversary of my joining APCO. I’m having a party to celebrate that next week – let me know if you’d like to come and I somehow forgot to invite you. But it’s pleasing that it almost coincides with my 21,000th day on the planet.
US President: Biden UK Prime Minister: Starmer Taoiseach: Harris Northern Ireland First Minister: Michelle O’Neill Northern Ireland Deputy First Minister: Little-Pengelly President of the European Commission: von der Leyen
Current A Friend of the Earth, by T.C. Boyle Barcelona, âme noire, by Ruben Pellejero, Eduard Torrents, Martín Pardo, Denis Lapière, Gani Jakupi Irish Historical Documents, 1172-1922, ed. Edmund Curtis & R.B. McDowell The Moonstone, by Wilkie Collins
Last books finished Sunstone, vol 2, by Stjepan Sejić 1066 and All That, by W.C. Sellar and R.J. Yeatman Midnight, by Philip Purser-Hallard Neurotribes: The Legacy of Autism and How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently, by Steve Silberman Richard II: A Brittle Glory, by Laura Ashe Ireland under Elizabeth and James I, ed. Henry Morley Night Watch, by Terry Pratchett Return to Kosovo, by Gani Jakupi and Jorge González
Next books The Peshawar Lancers, by S.M. Stirling The Geraldines. An Experiment In Irish Government 1169-1601, by Brian Fitzgerald Forever Peace, by Joe Haldeman
When [James] Watt was born on 19 January 1736, his father was a substantial figure, a general merchant, builder, shipwright, carpenter and cabinet-maker, and part owner of several vessels. He made the first crane in Greenock for unloading the heavy, scented bales of tobacco, and into his workshop the captains brought their instruments for repair. This was the trade Watt set his heart on. Instrument-makers were the unsung heroes of the scientific revolution. The sixteenth-century burst of exploration had fostered the mathematics of navigation and the improvement of astrolabes, quadrants and compasses, while on land surveying instruments were vital to map new territories.¹ Meanwhile the clock- and watchmakers were developing their craft, and the spectacle-makers and glass-grinders were working on new optical instruments, telescopes and microscopes. Yet the theoretical aspects of their work had little status: in Cambridge in the 163os, ‘Mathematicks … were scarce looked upon as Academical Studies, but rather mechanical, as the business of Traders, Seamen, Carpenters, Surveyors of Land, or the like.’² ¹ For a survey see Gerard L’E. Turner, ‘Scientific Instruments’, in Pietro Corsi and Paul Weidling (eds), Information Sources in the History of Science and Medicine (1983) 243-58. ² John Wallis, in Heilbron, 10; see her careful introductory survey.
A lovely in-depth look at the men behind the Industrial Revolution and the Age of Enlightenment in the mid-19th century West Midlands of England, focussing especially on Erasmus Darwin as the key figure, but also looking at Matthew Boulton, Josiah Wedgwood, Joseph Priestley, James Watt, Richard Lovell Edgeworth and Samuel Galton, and a number of others whose names I was less familiar with. They were all members of the Lunar Society, which met monthly in Birmingham from the 1760s to around the end of the century.
There is a lot of loving detail about their lives, with common threads including Methodism and other minority Protestant traditions (especially Quakers); pottery; lots of children (Darwin had fourteen with his two wives, and maybe more besides); investments; the abolition of slavery; and of course engineering. It could have been overwhelming, but it’s broken up with black-and-white illustrations and some lovely plates. I was particularly struck by Joseph Wright’s paintings of the orrery and the air pump.
A Philosopher Lecturing on the Orrery (1766)An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump (1768)
I learned a lot from this; in particular I realised how well the author had managed to gain my sympathy when I found myself horrified by the 1791 Priestley Riots, where a right-wing mob targeted the local religious minorities in Birmingham, including especially the vulnerable and visible Joseph Priestley; the local authorities appear to have colluded in the outbreak of violence and then (as usual) blamed the victims for bringing it on themselves. Some things never change.
Anyway, this is a tremendously engaging book about a part of history that I should have known more about; and now I do. You can get it here.
There was lots of time for Matt to do what he intended and then get on to his homework.
A YA novel, the first in a sequence related to the series of Net Force novels (and TV movie) by Tom Clancy, published in 1998 but set in 2025. I think I probably got enough of a flavour from this not to need to try out the rest of the series of 18 books. Our protagonist, Matt Hunter, tracks down a bunch of hackers who are not only disrupting important cultural events like baseball games, but also infiltrating embassies in Washington and stealing information. The virtual world in this version of 2025 is much more hologrammy and immersive than we have actually managed to generate in real life. It’s the least dystopian future of any of the books and films set on Earth in 2025 that I have tried so far – the future of John Varley’s Titan also seems fairly rosy, but it’s set among the moons of Saturn. You can get it here.
An odd bit of historical trivia that I came across: the Duke of Ireland was killed by a wild boar in the woods near our house, on 22 November 1392.
I was not aware that there had ever been a Duke of Ireland. It was a title given in 1386, for his lifetime only, to Robert de Vere, the ninth Earl of Oxford, by King Richard II. Richard II was the only king of England to visit Ireland between 1215 and 1690. One of the ways he demonstrated his regard for Ireland was to give titles to his very good friend the Earl of Oxford. In 1385, Richard made de Vere Marquess of Dublin, the very first title of Marquess granted in England, and in 1386, Duke of Ireland, the first duke in England who was not closely related to the royal family.
There was speculation then and now about exactly how close the relationship between King and Duke was. In 1385, when the unprecedented title of Marquess was granted, Richard II was 18 and Robert de Vere 24. Both married twice; neither is known to have had children. It should be added that de Vere married his second wife, one of the ladies of the household of Richard II’s first queen, Anne of Bohemia, after a very public love affair. This of course does not exclude anything.
It all ended horribly. Richard II was not a consensus-minded guy and tried to rule England and Ireland with the assistance and advice of a very few chosen friends. The regional magnates, banding together as the Lords Appellant, rebelled against him, and defeated the pro-Richard forces, led by de Vere, at the Battle of Radcot Bridge in 1387. De Vere was forced into exile; this medieval illustration shows him after his defeat, sadly crossing the Thames on his way to exile in Flanders.
The “Merciless Parliament” of 1388 consolidated control of England by the Lords Appellant, and condemned de Vere to death in absentia. It lasted less than a year; the Lords Appellant proved even worse at government than Richard II had, and his uncle John of Gaunt returned and brokered a restoration of power to Richard in 1389. One of the Lords Appellant who Richard persuaded to change sides was John of Gaunt’s son Henry Bolingbroke, Earl of Derby. Henry and Richard were the same age and had been childhood playmates.
Richard elevated Henry to the title of Duke of Hereford (incidentally, Richard II created nine dukedoms, a record not broken until Charles II three hundred years later). But ten years later, they quarrelled, Henry was sent into exile, and so the plot of Shakespeare’s Richard II begins. I must admit that until I came across the trivial point of the identity of the Duke of Ireland, I was not aware of the whole 1380’s crisis and knmew nothing about Richard’s reign between the Peasants’ Revolt in 1381 and the exile of Bolingbroke in 1397, leading inexorably to Richard’s overthrow and death two years later.
Although Richard regained power from 1388, he made no attempt to recall de Vere from his exile in Leuven. As I said up top, de Vere was killed in a hunting accident in the woods close to our house in 1392, aged 30. The titles of Duke of Ireland and Marquess of Dublin died with him, and his uncle inherited the title of Earl of Oxford. Three years later his body was brought back to England and reburied. It is reported (in the St Albans Chronicle) that the king had the coffin opened to kiss his lost friend’s hand and to gaze on his face one last time. Ironically, the emblem of the de Vere family was a boar, the same animal that killed the Duke of Ireland.
Elephant Company: The Inspiring Story of an Unlikely Hero and the Animals Who Helped Him Save Lives in World War II
Vicki Constantine Croke
10,885
535
A Well-Tempered Heart / Herzenstimmen
Jan-Philipp Sendker
12,054
284
Finding George Orwell in Burma
Emma Larkin
3,602
734
As is so often the case, it’s a shame that this list is all about Westerners encountering Myanmar. The top authors from the country, a bit further down the table, are Pascal Khoo Thwe, Thant Myint-U and Aung San Suu Kyi. The only one on the list that I have read is Guy Delisle’s graphic novel.
I disqualified three books: The Narrow Road to the Deep North, by Richard Flanagan, seems to be more than half in Australia; The Glass Palace, by Amitav Ghosh, seems to have enough excursions to India and Malay(si)a to push the Burmese sections below 50%; and A Fortune-Teller Told Me / Un indovino mi disse, by Tiziano Terrari, is set all over Asia.
In Glasgow last weekend, with a hired car, and with the help of the Megalithic Portal website, I thought it might be interesting to find three megalithic monuments to the north of the city. Spoiler: I found only one.
The Machar Stones
The Machar stones (far left of the map) are in a Forestry Commission plantation, just west of the Carron Valley Reservoir. Alas, it proved impossible to get very far into the Forestry Commission territory from the B818 which skirts the northern edge of the reservoir. The western edge, at Todholes, was completely closed off. The eastern entrance, which looked more promising at first, was also closed off before you got much further.
There is an educational medieval village at the eastern end of the reservoir, and it has some mock standing stones.
They wobble when you touch them; made of fibre-glass (at best). So that was that.
The Broadgate Stone
This was the only one of the three that I was actually able to reach: conveniently beside the A891, just east of Strathblane. Some doubt has been expressed about whether it’s a genuine megalith, or possibly commemorating a 16th century murder. I thought it was nicely shaped to mimic the outline of the Dunglass volcanic plug across the road.
And the view in the other directions was good too.
But it’s actually rather small, maybe 1 metre 20 in height? All these pictures were taken crouching in the wet grass.
The Dumgoyach Stones
This looked promising, though it was a bit of a walk; I parked in a layby beside Dumgoyach farmhouse, and walked in a light drizzle along the West Highland Way (marked by the green diamonds on the map), passing many campers and a few non-campers who were out taking the weekend air, around the hill of Dumgoyach, which is really striking.
I hoped to find the row of half a dozen megaliths on the next rise. One of them was at least visible from the path, so I know that they exist.
But there was a small river and a large fence between me and the hilltop, and I realised that to get over to the stones I would really need to have had much better boots, or to be twenty years younger, or both. So I gave up and went back to the car.
An additional deterrent was provided by scary notices about the local wildlife.
At Edinburgh airport on the way home, I bought two venison haggis, which seemed like fine revenge (and was also not expensive).
The vagaries of my reading list threw up two short pieces with some similarities, so I am bracketing them together.
Second paragraph of third chapter of Desdemona and the Deep::
She read the article through twice: headline, byline, lede, body, conclusion, then straightened up on a sharp inhale.
A novella that came with the 2020 Hugo packet, which I have now reached as I drill down through that pile. It’s set in an alternative 1920s; Desdemona is the daughter of an evil mining magnate, who does a deal with the underworld, and she pledges to undo it, along with her trans best friend. Lots of mythic resonances with legends from all over the world, and of course a critique of capitalism and gender conformity. I found it rather refreshing. You can get it here.
This was my top unread book acquired in 2020, from the Hugo packet that year. Next, from the same source, is Echoes: The Saga Anthology of Ghost Stories, ed. Ellen Datlow. (Which is a bit longer.)
Second paragraph of third section of “They Will Dream in the Garden”:
—Oye, ¡no hagas eso, Tomás! Todavía ni la conoces. Salúdala, dile cómo te llamas primero –el tono de la auxiliadora no será de reproche y procurará ignorar los pucheros del niño producidos por la corriente eléctrica.
“Hey, don’t do that, Thomas! You don’t even know her yet. Greet her, tell her your name first” the tone of the assistant will not be one of reproach and she will be able to ignore the pouts of the boy produced by the electric current.
Translated by Adrian Demopulos
A short but powerful piece about how commemorating the women killed by men, using AI to bring their stories to life, can play a role in transforming society, told from a number of perspectives with characters seen from different angles. At less than 5000 words, it must be the shortest piece to have won the Tiptree / Otherwise Award, but it packs a heck of a wallop. You can read it here (and original Spanish, “Soñarán en el jardín”, here).
This was the last winner of the Tiptree Award under that name, with the translator getting a special citation from the judges. Also on the Honor List were six novels, three short pieces and a magazine issue, none of which I have read, and also Janelle Monáe’s superb album Dirty Computer. I have to say I’d have voted for Janelle Monáe if I’d been on the panel.
That year the Arthur C. Clarke Award went to Rosewater, by Tade Thompson; the BSFA Award to Embers of War, by Gareth L. Powell (I voted for Rosewater); and the Hugo and Nebula to The Calculating Stars, by Mary Robinette Kowal (I was the Hugo Administrator). Spinning Silver, by Naomi Novik, and Trail of Lightning, by Rebecca Roanhorse, were on both Hugo and Nebula ballots. Revenant Gun by Yoon Ha Lee was a finalist for the Hugo, BSFA and Clarke awards.
The first winner of the Otherwise Award, and so next in this sequence for me, is Freshwater, by Akwaeke Emezi.
Do I decide for myself what to do next, or let someone else decide for me? If I decide for myself it seems I have two options. I can move on from here with Stewart. Or I can return underground.
An Australian YA post-apocalyptic novel, where a teen girl and boy (and his faithful basset hound, Stewart) take the first tentative steps to rebuilding society. Her parents have eked out a living on the surface of a devastated and polluted world for years; his people have retreated underground to hide from the poisoned planet. Nothing very remarkable plot-wise, but the protagonists’ voices are caught distinctively and believably. You can get it here.
We discover at the very end of the book that the whole story is set in 2025, which was my reason for reading it – yet another dystopia for next year…
Second paragraph of third essay (“Wandering Scholars and Saintly Cults: The Liturgical Legacy”, by Ann Buckley)
Waddell never seemed drawn to ‘Celtic’ nationalism and its tendency towards cultural narrowness and isolationism which in the past has so often dogged progress in research on Irish liturgical and ecclesiastical history and the history of the arts in Ireland. And yet her account fully acknowledges and values the critical importance of Irish achievements in early medieval Europe. Her focus is largely on the intellectual impact of these churchmen (we do not know of any women), illustrated through references to literature and poetry. Complemented by her characteristic eye for detail and signs of individual introspection, she also provides vignettes on their thoughts and emotions culled from anonymous marginalia in manuscripts from former centres of Irish activity which still survive in libraries such as Reichenau, St Gallen, and St Paul in Carinthia. These include verses about Pangur Bán (the monk’s cat), the weather, homesickness, a blackbird – being given new voice today in the poetry of Seamus Heaney and Ciarán Carson, and the singing of Pádraigín Ní Uallacháin. The excitement at these discoveries took Waddell ‘in the legs’, as she said in a letter to her sister Meg.¹
They have an odd grace, the names of wild earth side by side with the sophistication of the older world, something of the strangeness of the Irish glosses in the ninth century manuscripts of Berne, Leyden and St Gall: ‘We are from Inch-madoc, Cairbre and I’, and most moving of all to one who remembers the low grey ruins on the island in Strangford Lough, ‘Mahee of Nendrum.’²
¹ Quoted in Felicitas Corrigan, Helen Waddell: A Biography (1986; London: Gollancz, 1990), 229; Helen Waddell, The Wandering Scholars (1927; London: Constable, 1980), 34-5. ² Waddell, Wandering Scholars, 33-4.
This is a collection of academic essays about Helen Waddell, who I have written about here occasionally – if you still don’t know who she was, I recommend this short and powerful piece by Kate Mosse. I’m far enough out of the academic game that I rate such pieces for entertainment value rather than resonance with the scholarly Zeitgeist, and I found all of these entertaining and enlightening.
I was struck that several of the essays separately mentioned two crucial points from Helen Waddell’s career: the first, her stay in hospital in Paris in 1924, when she remembered hallucinating as Heloïse; and the second, the death of a rabbit at the end of her Peter Abelard novel. Both are moments of intense personal experience, which connect life and art inextricably. You can get it here.
A little bit of a side track, but I was interested to learn from Helen Carr’s essay that although both Helen Waddell and Ezra Pound translated lots of Chinese poetry, there was only one poem that they both published in English, a “brief, enigmatic poem by the painter-poet Wang Wei“. The two translations are as follows:
Helen Waddell
Ezra Pound
Peach blossom after rain Is deeper red; The willow fresher green; Twittering overhead; And fallen petals lie wind-blown, Unswept upon the courtyard stone.
Peach flowers turn the dew crimson, Green willows melt in the mist, The servant will not sweep up the fallen petals, And the nightingales Persist in their singing.
It took me a while to track down the original, and of course my Chinese is largely machine-translated, but here it is:
The peach blossoms are still tinged red with the night rain, and the green willows with spring mist. The fallen flowers have not been swept away by the boy, and the orioles are singing though the mountain visitor sleeps.
It’s interesting that both Waddell and Pound omitted the sleeping visitor (山客, shān kè) at the end. Daniel Skeens has done a much deeper analysis (based on better knowledge of Chinese than mine) but his headline conclusion is the same as mine: these are both good translations in their own right, which demonstrate the difficulty of translating poetry.
This was the non-fiction book that had lingered longest on my shelves. Next on that pile is Ireland Under Elizabeth and James I, ed. Henry Morley.
Current NeuroTribes: The Legacy of Autism and How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently, by Steve Silberman Ireland under Elizabeth and James I, ed. Henry Morley Night Watch, by Terry Pratchett Midnight, by Philip Purser-Hallard
Last books finished Burning Heart, by Dave Stone New State, Modern Statesman: Hashim Thaçi – A Biography, by Roger Boyer and Suzy Jagger The Hanging Tree, by Ben Aaronovitch Monica, by Daniel Clowes Doctor Who: 73 Yards, by Scott Handcock
Next books A Friend of the Earth, by T.C. Boyle Irish Historical Documents, 1172-1922, ed. Edmund Curtis & R.B. McDowell The Moonstone, by Wilkie Collins
“Just swallow two of these tablets, Peter, to render you more susceptible to controlled hypnosis, then we’ll get to work and knock all that silly sex stuff clean out your head,” Miss Delarge told me confidently.
I read a couple of Peter Pook’s books when I was a teenager and rather enjoyed them, though I remember thinking even at the time that the humour was pretty basic. Out of curiosity I decided to have a look at one of them again, forty years later. I don’t know if it is typical, but this one was dull and sexist. It is 1968, and our hero signs up as the only male out of 600 students at a teacher training college, and boring and unfunny antics ensue. A total waste of time. You can get it here, but honestly, don’t bother.
Румата остановился перед таверной и хотел было зайти, но обнаружил, что у него пропал кошелек. Он стоял перед входом в полной растерянности (он никак не мог привыкнуть к таким вещам, хотя это случилось с ним не впервые) и долго шарил по всем карманам. Всего было три мешочка, по десятку золотых в каждом. Один получил прокуратор, отец Кин, другой получил Вага. Третий исчез. В карманах было пусто, с левой штанины были аккуратно срезаны все золотые бляшки, а с пояса исчез кинжал.
Rumata stopped in front of a tavern and was about to go in, but then realized that his coin purse was missing. He stood in front of the door in complete confusion (he just couldn’t get used to such occurrences, although this wasn’t the first time) and spent a long time digging through his pockets. There had been three pouches, with ten gold pieces in each. He gave one to the procurator, Father Kin, and another to Waga. The third one had disappeared. His pockets were empty, all gold buckles had been carefully cut off his left pant leg, and the dagger had disappeared from his belt.
Translate by Olena Bormashenko
This is billed as a new translation of one of the classic Soviet science fiction novels. Our hero, Don Rumata, has been dropped as an observer into a planet with a feudal society, as one of a team from a future (Communist) Earth guiding the society in the Right Direction. There are actually quite a lot of Western sf books with this sort of theme, but the ultimate concerns here are different to what I am used to; the lurch towards fascism on the planet clearly spelt out as a cause for possible intervention by the Earth folks.
It’s not brilliant on women characters, but it does have both action and thoughtfulness. My edition also has an afterword by Boris Strugatsky explaining the difficulties of sneaking the book through the process of political approval for publication. I’m glad they succeeded. You can get it here.
This was my top unread sf book, and my top book acquired last year that isn’t by Ben Aaronovitch (who I’m breaking out into his own sequence, as I have done with Wells and Pratchett). Next on those piles are The Word for World is Forest, by Ursula Le Guin, and The Light We Carry, by Michelle Obama.
I received the following query with regard to the 2024 Hugo Awards:
Can you clarify one point for me?
Under Best Fanzine, File 770 apparently got 14 nominations and was carried through the EPH procedure (until eliminated in Round 33). Yet Brother Glyer in 2018 withdrew himself and File 770 permanently from all future consideration.
If nominators fail to become aware of this, or choose to disregard it e.g. by way of making some kind of public statement, I do not see that the administrators are at fault.
But why was File 770 not excluded at once, with a suitable notice, as e.g. for System Collapse, under Best Novel?
I have replied:
You ask why we did not exclude the nominating votes for File 770 from the 2024 Hugo nomination vote tallies, bearing in mind Mike Glyer’s declared withdrawal back in 2018.
In my view, the duty of the Hugo Administrator is to ascertain the will of the voters, and then (and only then) to assess the conformity of voters’ choices with the rules.
For that reason, we do not check the eligibility of any nominee other than those that make it to the top six, or which replace any of the top six which are disqualified or withdrawn. Had File 770 qualified numerically for the ballot, we would then have contacted Mike Glyer, who would have then had the option to decline or not. In fact this is precisely what happened in 2019, when I was also Administrator.
It is not realistic or reasonable to expect Hugo Administrators to track every public statement of intent from potential finalists – there are an awful lot of them! Also, Mike Glyer would have been within his rights to change his mind and accept the nomination if File 770 had qualified; it is not the Hugo Administrator’s job to hold a nominee accountable for a statement that they made in 2018.
You also ask “Why was File 770 not excluded at once, with a suitable notice, as e.g. for System Collapse under Best Novel?”
I’m afraid you are under a misapprehension here. As noted above, File 770 was neither included nor excluded; we did not make a formal determination of its eligibility in 2024 at any stage. (Though our researchers gave us a strong indication that it would be eligible if it qualified for the ballot.)
As for System Collapse, Martha Wells had not made any prior public or private statement of her intention to decline the nomination. After we counted the nominating votes, we contacted Ms Wells with the news that two of her novels had qualified for the ballot. She replied declining the nomination for one of them and accepting for the other. System Collapse was not excluded “at once”, but only after the votes had been counted and the author consulted.
I hope that this clarifies the situation.
Here for reference are the statistics for Best Novel and Best Fanzine.
I disqualified only three books this time – Eat, Pray Love (as previously discussed under India and Indonesia, less than half of it is set in Italy), and Dante’s Inferno and Divine Comedy, tallied separately, which are set not in Italy but in the afterlife.
I’m allowing The Prince, however, because the great majority of the historical examples given are Italian. I’m also allowing A Farewell to Arms (Hemingway is doing well in these lists) because although some of the action is in Switzerland, and some in today’s Slovenia, I think the majority of the book is set within Italy’s current borders – the town of Gorizia is on the Italian side of the river Isonzo, even if most of the battles were on the other side.
When I first did this exercise in 2015, Angels and Demons was the runaway winner, so I’m delighted that a surge of Shakespeare fans on LibraryThing has now pushed it into second place. Romeo and Juliet is one of my favourite Shakespeare plays anyway. I know that is not a widely held view, and I’m also aware that a play supposedly set in Verona somehow manages to avoid mention of the whacking huge landmark which defines the city, but I’d rather have it at the top than Dan Brown.
I did not realise that Dan Brown has written another terrible book set in Italy as well, also called Inferno.
Sources differ as to whether Myanmar or Kenya is next in the list of countries by population, but they agree that Colombia and South Korea are both close behind. I will take them in that order, I think.
This is the earliest film set in 2025 that I have been able to identify (the initial scene has a radio announcer announcing that it is 10 May 2025). It actually made rather an interesting pair with Stephen King’s The Running Man – it starts with our hero as a player in a survivalist game show in what we are told are the ruins of New York. Violent reality TV is a surprisingly frequent theme in sf set in 2025; there’s another one coming up. The second half of the film then switches to Mad Max mode as our hero leads his gang across the desert (that flat desert which, as we all know, is located in the vicinity of New York). This very very graphic trailer will give you an idea.
It’s a silly and violent film, which you can skip in good conscience. The script barely makes sense and jumps from place to place without explanation. Al Cliver as the protagonist is pretty wooden. Laura Gemser, playing the leader of the mutants who he rescues, is much better known as the title character of the eleven Black Emmanuelle films, most of which were also directed by Joe D’Amato. Here she mostly keeps her clothes on, and effortlessly dominates any scene she is in.
The music is good, by Carlo Maria Cordio who went on to score Terminator 2: Judgement Day six years later. There’s also a very memorably unpleasant blue mutant. But this is not going to be more than a footnote in my roundup of sf set next year.
Another of the books set in 2025 which I have been reading through, this one a grim grim dystopia from 1983 where inequality has soared and the public get their kicks from watching a reality TV show where the contestants are hunted to death across the urban streetscape of a decaying USA. Several of the sf stories set in 2025 feature violent reality TV; a couple more to come.
Our hero does his best to beat the system, but the odds are stacked against him. Like Disch’s 334, it starts in New York, but the hunt for the protagonist takes him up the northeastern seaboard as far as Portland, Maine (where the author actually lives). You can get it here. The dystopia hits uncomfortably close to home, and…
.
SPOILER
.
…the book ends with a rather prophetic denouement as our hero flies his plane into a skyscraper to wreak vengeance on the system.
War releases other aggressions too — all those hostilities that have been present in peacetime, but restrained — and so when war comes, other, ‘little’ wars come too: the war of the old against the young, the war of the old-fashioned against the modern, the war of the national against the foreign and of the conforming against the non-conforming. It is not surprising, then, that once the Great War had begun, conflicts of values began, and grew violent, or that qualities that cultivated Edwardians had taken to be the very signs of their nation’s civilization were seen to be the symptoms of a national disease.
I enjoyed this tremendously, a survey of the impact of the First World War on British culture – although the subtitle uses the word “English”, I’m glad to say that Ireland at least is referenced throughout. In 470 pages, Hynes looks at the brutal reset of the UK’s way of life that started in 1914, climaxed in 1916 and continued to reverberate long after the guns had formally fallen silent.
Almost every European family has a story here – my grandfather, born in 1880, was wounded three times in combat; his younger brother was gassed; one of his sisters lost her oldest son at Gallipoli, another lost her husband at Ypres. But Hynes’ focus is culture rather than combat, mainly prose writing, but also poetry, theatre, painting, sculpture, architecture and the nascent cinema industry, and he weaves an intense and diverse tapestry of how art responded to crisis and horror.
A lot of the names were familiar to me – Wells and Woolf dominating, of course, and Owen in poetry. Hynes does a great job of connecting them all together, mapping their mutual influences and in particular drawing out the changing perceptions of the war over time – those directly exposed to it realising the true horror of the situation quicker than those at home.
There is plenty of social commentary in the art, including the changing roles of women, and attitudes to sexuality. I had to grimly laugh at one quote from Asquith’s son, prosecuting a court-martial against a soldier for being gay, who he described in a letter to his wife as
a nephew of Robert Ross, lately a scholar at Eaton, who aroused everyone’s suspicions by knowing Latin and Greek and constantly reading Henry James’ novels.
Sounds like a wrong ’un, for sure!
The book gave me a lot to think about, and I picked up a couple of intriguing recommendations. Sonia: Between Two Worlds, a novel by Stephen McKenna, seems to pick up the Irish dimension and do a bit more with it. And the Sandham Memorial Chapel sounds like it is well worth a detour next time I have reason to venture to northern Hampshire.
This is a great summary of an awful time, and the art that it generated, some of which was great and lasting. You can get it here.
The loyalists of Ireland were far more exposed to suspicion for resisting the royal claim to supremacy over the Church than were those of England. In England, refusal to submit might be regarded as the outcome of loyalty to the pope rather than of disloyalty to the king. In Ireland, those at first called on to conform were the inhabitants of the Pale, and resistance to the law was exceedingly difficult for people with such a strong tradition of loyalty. Disobedience to the king’s laws was their perpetual complaint against the Anglo-Irish outside the Pale, and they hesitated to act in any way which might result in their being identified with the older colonists. Hence their tacit acceptance of the ecclesiastical changes. There was an equally tacit acceptance by those Irish or Anglo-Irish lords who were coerced or persuaded into submitting to the royal authority during the course of the reign. In the actual operation of the new laws can be traced the real attitude of each class in the country.
I did not know Robin Dudley Edwards, though I saw him in action, heckling shallow Nationalist interpretations of Irish history at a UCD seminar only a few months before he died in 1988. He published this in 1935 when he was 26; it is the book of his PhD thesis from a couple of years earlier. It’s a remarkable piece of research for the day, looking in detail at the records for the efforts by the governments of Henry VIII, Edward VI and Elizabeth I to impose the Reformation in Ireland (and Mary I’s efforts to reverse it).
He concentrates a bit more on the early part of the period, which I am less interested in, rather than the 1560s and after, but I can understand first of all that any writer have more energy for dealing with the earlier bit of research and second that there was simply more going on in the 1530s, 1540s and 1550s in terms of the dynamics of religion and government.
There are two stories here. The first is that the government of Ireland was weak and London was not prepared to put in enough resources to make it effective, so the story of Tudor Ireland is of one chief governor after another failing to make much impact until the very end, in 1603. The second is that the Protestant side was unable to find resources to staff the religious effort; most Irish people spoke Irish, but the state was constrained to operate in English; any sensible rising Protestant evangelist stayed in England where it was safer and the monetary rewards better; and the ability of the state to enforce religious behaviour (let alone belief) even in the most loyal areas was correspondingly weak.
Despite its weight I also found it quite a quick read. I know that much more research has been done on the topic since, but it’s good to go back to basics sometimes. You can get it here (at a price); I was lucky enough to get my father’s copy.
This was the shortest unread book that I added to my shelves in 2018. Next on that pile is New State, Modern Statesman: Hashim Thaçi – A Biography, by Roger Boyes.
Current The Hanging Tree, by Ben Aaronovitch Burning Heart, by Dave Stone New State, Modern Statesman: Hashim Thaçi – A Biography, by Suzy Jagger NeuroTribes: The Legacy of Autism and How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently, by Steve Silberman
Last books finished The Lunar Men: The Friends Who Made the Future, by Jenny Uglow The Sapling: Branches, by Alex Paknadel et al Yes Taoiseach: Irish Politics From Behind Closed Doors, by Frank Dunlop
Next books Doctor Who: 73 Yards, by Scott Handcock Ireland under Elizabeth and James I, ed. Henry Morley Monica, by Daniel Clowes
And, sure enough, when the rescue team pulled the car out of the Dula, all the passengers in it — a bull, a goat and a rooster — were indeed found dead, the bodies still strapped to their seats. But there was no sign whatsoever of the vice president. While the rescuers painstakingly searched for him, those who really know about things ventured to declare it a waste of time; the horse had most probably been saved by his talismans and escaped. They weren’t, in fact, too, too far from the truth. By the time the car landed at the bottom of the Dula, Tuvy’s hooves were busy eating the road, tholukuthi bearing the vice president to the safety of his sorcerer’s homestead.
One of the Clarke Award submissions from last year that was clearly fantasy rather than science fiction, but which I found interesting enough to come back to. It’s a parable of politics in a post-colonial African country with a strong resemblance to the author’s native Zimbabwe, but with the difference that all of the characters are animals; the old president and his successor are horses, the central character is a politically aware goat, and we have dogs, hens, cows, everything.
Obviously the root is Animal Farm, but it’s a bit less heavy-handed and the plot is more complex; also the language is effervescent, with the word “tholukuthi ” frequently interjected – it means something like “you find that…” in Ndebele, but seems to be used here to mean something more like “that is to say” or the German “beziehungsweise”; also “Tholokuthi Hey” was a massive hit song at the time of the 2017 revolution in Zimbabwe, which is part of what the book is about.
So, quite a lot of fun. Also shortlisted for the Booker Prize that year, and for a couple of other awards, so I don’t feel too bad that we overlooked it for the Clarke. You can get it here.
This was my top unread book by a non-white author. Next on that pile is The Way Spring Arrives and Other Stories, edited by Yu Chen and Regina Kanyu Wang.
The Happiness Patrol, from the dying days of 1988, is a fairly standard rebels against the system story, lifted by some fairly memorable characters and concepts – especially Sheila Hancock as the dictator, and her vicious pet Fifi. It comes close to looking convincing – the coherent style of the Happiness Patrol themselves is almost genius. I started off being quite impressed by how well the Candyman worked, but I had completely gone off him in the end, and the musician and the census official, while nice touches, didn’t quite seem to integrate into the whole thing. Not awful, but definitely not one of the great ones either.
When I came back a couple of years later for my Great Rewatch, I wrote:
Continuing along this theme of rehabilitation [after Remembrance of the Daleks], I found The Happiness Patrol an excellent piece of sinister dystopia, following on from Paradise Towers. The interaction between Helen A and her retainers and servitors is tremendously engaging, with Fifi one of the great non-speaking parts (like the dog in Two Gentlemen of Verona, only much more vicious); and one wonders why it came as a surprise to anyone to learn that it was a deliberate though not hugely accurate tilt at Thatcherism. Doctor Who does not do space opera terribly well, but this is not space opera, it is allegory played with bitter ironic comedy, and fits McCoy’s portrayal beautifully.
Watching it again I find myself somewhere in between. Great performances, but a lot of running around in circles in terms of plot, no real sense of how the various bits of city connect with each other, and people just standing around to be captured or executed. We’ve had more violent assaults on our willing suspension of disbelief in the Moffat and Chibnall and Davies years since, but it felt like the director was working more on the script than the audience perception.
The second paragraph of the third chapter of Graeme Curry’s novelisation of his own script is:
She could not believe her eyes – the TARDIS was pink. From the shadows of Forum Square they had a clear view of the Happiness Patrol carrying their pots of paint and putting the final touches to their work. Daisy K stood some distance from the others, overseeing the job.
I wasn’t overwhelmed by the original TV story, but Curry has produced a novelisation which is passionate and convinced – the rather odd plot holes remain, but liberated from cheap-looking special effects, it turns into rather a good yarn. Definitely one of those where the book is an improvement. Also an easy pass for the Bechdel test, with Helen A and her women warriors running around after Ace.
Nothing more to add. You can get it here. (Incidentally I tried tracking Bechdel passes and fails for all the fiction I read this year, but ran out of steam in June.)
Mike Stack’s Black Archive monograph on the story looks at its reception rather than its creation, which is fair enough given the changes in public notoriety the story has enjoyed. The first chapter, “Evaluation” looks at how poorly the story was rated by fans at the time and since, and asks “So, Is it Any Good?” He disarmingly admits its weaknesses: the padding of the plot, the unambitious design, the controversial Kandyman, the ambiguous postcolonial treatment of the Pipe People, Fifi; but comes back to the good performances.
The second and longest chapter, “Political Readings”, starts with the media flap in 2010 when several British newspapers discovered that the story had a critique of Thatcherism, and goes on to point out that spoofs of Thatcher were so universal on TV in 1988 that The Happiness Patrol easily slipped below the radar of contemporary critics. The real target, Stack argues convincingly, is authoritarianism of all kinds.
The third chapter, “Queer Readings”, addresses one of the other key points about the story. Its second paragraph, with the quote it introduces and its footnotes, is:
However, such bold statements are not universal or uncontested. In The Television Companion, Howe and Walker gave only a brief mention to the interpretation of gay themes, tentatively noting ‘some commentators have suggested that there is a gay rights message here’⁴. They do not take this observation further. Tat Wood, in About Time, went further:
‘While we’re debunking fan lore, the dispatched Andrew X (or Harold L, it hardly matters) isn’t wearing a pink triangle badge. Novelist / new series writer Matt Jones’ reading of the story as being explicitly and exclusively about gay rights misses the point, although none of his evidence (except the mention of the triangle badge) is actually invalid.’⁵
⁴ Howe and Walker, The Television Companion, p518. ⁵ Wood, About Time 6, p252.
The chapter points out that the story is actually very ambiguous in its use of queer / gay imagery. Pink is the colour of the oppressor here, not the liberator. The two main male villains escape together at the end – romantically, perhaps? On the other hand, the enforcement of happiness has echoes of the Section 28 debate of the 1980s (weirdly being played out again in attacks against trans people today). Personally I think that the ambiguity is itself rather successful.
The fourth chapter, “Happy Readings”, starts by citing the Easter 2011 sermon delivered by then Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, in which he mentioned the story in the context of the importance of happiness as a societal aim. (I met Lord Williams once, in passing, as I was heading to a meeting at the House of Lords and bumped into him at the entrance to Parliament.) Stack looks at the concept of happiness, and why Helen A is doomed not to find it. (Certainly she ain’t gettin’ much from Joseph C.)
A Coda comes back to the question of whether the story is any good. Admitting his own personal love for it, Stack concludes:
I leave myself open to the criticism that I have credited The Happiness Patrol with more intellectual clout than it deserves. However, what strikes me is the story more than holds its own when held up to scholarly scrutiny. It elegantly depicts totalitarianism, anticipates the reclaiming of the word ‘killjoy’, and provides a parable about the need to negotiate our emotions.
Again, the Black Archives have given me new appreciation for what a Doctor Who story I don’t especially love. You can get this one here.
Incidentally, the Seventh Doctor is proportionately by far the best represented in the Black Archive (apart from the special cases of the Eighth and Shalka Doctors). 64% of the Seventh Doctor’s episodes are covered in Black Archives as of late 2024; the closest of the rest is the Thirteenth with 46%. The gap is even bigger just counting stories: 7 of the 12 Seventh Doctor stories now have Black Archives, 58%, twice the score of the Fourth Doctor, with 12 out of 41, 29%.
(Since you asked, the end of the table has the Second Doctor, with only 13% of his episodes and 14% of his stories, though we have also yet to see any Black Archives covering either the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Doctors.)
The Battle of Ramillies in 1706 was one of the biggest battles of the War of the Spanish Succession, also crucial for the future career of the Duke of Marlborough, and the cause of what is now Belgium switching from Spanish to Austrian rule. 62,000 troops of the Anglo-Austrian alliance inflicted s severe defeat on 60,000 French troops, a quarter of whom were killed. I have seen a claim that it was the largest cavalry battle in history. On a much more intimate level, the doctor treating one of the veteran British soldiers for injuries received at the battle realised that the patient had breasts; this was the famous Christian Davis, aka Mother Ross., who had joined the army disguised as a man many years before.
But in 2016 I was unable to find any memorial of the actual battle in 1706. The memorial at the centre of the village of Ramillies is to a First World War skirmish, not to the much bigger fight of two centuries earlier.
However, dedicated Googling eventually found a small plaque, placed in 2006 beside a shrine to St Donatus way to the north of the battlefield. I have marked it on the below map (taken from Wikipedia, showing the order of battle at the beginning of the fighting) with a blue X. I’ve also marked the Hottomont tumulus, to the southwest, with a blue circle.
So I set off with B to find it today. It’s about 30 minutes’ drive from her home, and she likes car journeys. I was unable to persuade her to smile for the camera when we located it, but she gives a sense of scale.
The plaque, placed by local enthusiasts for the tercentenary of the battle, speaks for itself, though I do find the placement a bit odd; it’s at the junction of two minor, unnamed roads, some way from the most intense point of the fighting.
The chapel is in poor shape. It could date from anywhere between the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries, and the various heritage websites offer no clue. It is referred to in some sources as “la Chapelle des Quatre Tièges”, but I am unable to find a translation for “tiège” – it could perhaps be a dialect form meaning “tree trunk” from “tige”, which means “stem”. Within the chapel, St Donatus looks out cheerfully through a protective grille. (This is probably St Donatus of Münstereifel, who protects you against lightning and was a Roman soldier, hence the tunic.)
I also tried to find the nearby caves of Folx-les-Caves, which I visited in 2005; but they have been closed since 2019.
Born a Crime: Stories From a South African Childhood
Trevor Noah
723,706
6,349
Disgrace
J.M. Coetzee
109,054
11,011
Cry, the Beloved Country
Alan Paton
75,975
9,603
Long Walk to Freedom
Nelson Mandela
88,752
4,980
The Power of One
Bryce Courtenay
90,350
4,752
Life & Times of Michael K
J.M. Coetzee
19,789
2,858
The Promise
Damon Galgut
44,804
1,146
The Covenant
James A. Michener
21,305
2,062
Trevor Noah has clearly made a big hit with Goodreads users, and somewhat less so with LibraryThing where his book is only third, behind two more traditional classics. There’s only one foreigner (Michener) on the list; unfortunately however it is an all-male list, with Doris Lessing’s The Grass is Singing just missing the cutoff.
I disqualified two other books – Waiting for the Barbarians, by J.M. Coetzee, which is set in an unnamed colonial outpost which doesn’t sound very much like South Africa, and The White Lioness by Henning Mankel, which is mainly set in Sweden.
This is an update to my previous research on Benjamin Cleveland (1783-1853). He had eleven children with his wife Lydia nee Cooper, between 1805 and 1830; all but two survived to adulthood. However the DNA evidence fairly clearly indicates that he was also the biological father of my great-great-grandmother Sarah Smith, who was born in 1815; her legal father is recorded as a mysterious and largely absent Scot, embroiled in the misleadingly named War of 1812.
Through Benjamin Cleveland, I am related to my sixth cousin three times removed President Grover Cleveland, to my ninth cousin, sf writer Fritz Leiber, to Leiber’s third cousin, also my ninth cousin, Shirley Temple, and to my Worldcon colleague and seventh cousin twice removed Jesi Lipp. (NB there was a military Benjamin Cleveland, also born in 1783, who lived to 1858, five years longer than mine; but mine is a Yankee and the general was from Georgia.)
Poring through Ancestry.com on an insomniac night recently, I came across an interesting cluster of eight DNA connections who were linked to me and to other known descendants of Benjamin Cleveland. I found a family connection for all of them to Glens Falls, New York, and for seven of the eight I found a clear genealogical line of descent from a couple who I will identify here as John and Ophelia. Ophelia was born in 1840; John was born either in 1817 or 1820 – the documentation is unclear. One of my eight connections, F.W., is their great-granddaughter; five of them are great-great-grandchildren of John and Ophelia, including two daughters of F.W.; and one is the son of one of the great-great-grandchildren, making him the 3x great-grandson of John and Ophelia.
The eighth, C.P., caused me some head-scratching. He has researched a beautifully detailed family tree going back generations. However it seemed to me pretty clear that his mother was F.W.’s half-sister, born to a 17-year-old girl who then married her first husband (who is the person C.P. has in his tree as his grandfather) ten months later, but fathered by a grandson of John and Ophelia who later became F.W.’s father as well. C.P.’s DNA link to F.W. is that of half-nephew to half-aunt, which matches this theory exactly. His DNA links to F.W.’s daughters, N.K. and K.K., are also consistent with this hypothesis (half first cousins).
So the full family tree as I have reconstructed it is as follows:
(Click to embiggen; those on Ancestry.com are indicated with thicker box outlines, along with the strength of their DNA link to me)
The descendants of John and Ophelia listed here are:
C.P., provided that we believe my theory about his mother being the biological daughter of John and Olivia’s grandson C
F.W., definitely the great-granddaughter of John and Olivia, half-aunt to C.P.
N.K., daughter of F.W., half first cousin to C.P.
K.K., daughter of F.W. but with a different biological father so half-sister to N.K., also half-first cousin to C.P.
C.H., descended like the above four from the John and Olivia’s Son A, whose mother was F.W.’s first cousin and he is himself second cousin to C.P., N.K. and K.K.
D.W., descended from John and Olivia’s son B, second cousin once removed to F.W. and third cousin to C.P., N.K., K.K and C.H.
J.U., D.W.’s first cousin who therefore has the same relationships to the others mentioned above
G.T., J.U.’s son who is therefore first cousin once removed to D.W., second cousin twice removed to F.W. and third cousin once removed to all the rest.
If I am also descended from one of the parents of John or Ophelia, then F.W. is my half-third cousin once removed, G.T. is my half-fourth cousin once removed, and the other six are all my half-fourth cousins, ie we share a single 3x great-grandparent. My DNA connection to all of them is around 20 centimorgans, which is consistent with a relationship of around third/fourth cousin-ish. Significantly, we all also share connections with other descendants of Benjamin Cleveland.
I know that I am not descended from John or Ophelia, because all my recorded ancestors in America at that date are accounted for, and I have other DNA connections through all of them. (And also I would expect to see stronger DNA connections with John and Ophelia’s known descendants if I was also one of them.) On the other hand, I know that Benjamin Cleveland had at least one child out of wedlock, my great-great-grandmother Sarah Smith, born in 1815. So the likelihood is that either John or Ophelia was Benjamin’s extramarital child.
Both John and Ophelia came from the same village near Glens Falls. Benjamin Cleveland was living in Unadilla in the 1810s, over 200 km away across the state of New York, but if he was able to father Sarah Smith over in New Hampshire in 1815, a short excursion from Albany doesn’t seem unreasonable at the time of John’s conception in 1816 or 1819. By 1839 Benjamin had moved to Pennsylvania, a step in the westward trek that eventually took him to Wisconsin where he died in 1853. So it seems less likely that he was Ophelia’s father, since she was born only in mid-1840.
John’s mother, who rejoiced in the name Annis or Annice, was born in March 1797. She married Samuel, the man generally recorded as John’s father, on 15 October 1820. John’s gravestone says that he died on 3 October 1889, aged (rather precisely) 68 years, 11 months and 26 days, giving a birth date of 8 October 1820. The 1880 federal census and the 1865 New York state census both give ages for him consistent with being born in late 1820. But there’s one crucial detail here – if Annis married Samuel on 15 October 1820, she can hardly have given birth to John the previous week! So the gravestone must be wrong.
The 1870 federal census gives John’s age in that year as 54, and the register of his Civil War service gives his birthday firmly as 8 October 1817. To me it’s pretty clear. The war service record is the one document that John is likeliest to have completed by himself, and it’s also the only one (apart from the gravestone, which we know cannot be right) that gives a precise date of birth. It was probably Ophelia who gave the census takers the information they wanted in 1865, 1870 and 1880, and also who gave instructions for the tombstone in 1883, and she may have been vague, perhaps deliberately so, about his precise age.
I am certain that John was born on 8 October 1817, three years before his mother Annis married Samuel; and that Benjamin Cleveland was his biological father. I still have no idea what business Benjamin was on, travelling so much around New York and New England, impregnating my married great-great-great-grandmother in 1814, and 19-year-old Annis in 1817. But the evidence of his active life runs in my veins, and in the veins of dozens of his living descendants.
Second paragraph of third chapter (and the quote that it illustrates):
The pattern and character of local government must be such as to enable it to do four things: to perform efficiently a wide range of profoundly important tasks concerned with the safety, health and well-being, both material and cultural, of people in different localities; to attract and hold the interest of its citizens; to develop enough inherent strength to deal with national authorities in a valid partnership; and to adapt itself without disruption to the present unprecedented process of change in the way people live, work, move, shop and enjoy themselves (Royal Commission on Local Government in England, 1969a, p. 1). This is a typical statement about the functions of local governments. Sharpe (1976), for example, recognizes three major functions for local governments. The first is the liberty function, with a strong local government system providing a division of power and responsibility and preventing the growth of a centralized autocracy. Secondly there is the participation function, with local government allowing individuals to participate in local democracy-often as a training-ground for later service in higher levels of government—and diffusing power amongst the populace. Finally, there is the efficient provision of services function. Certain services are local in scope, being concerned with local consumers only, and are best provided by local governments.
I had some very friendly correspondence with the late great Ron Johnston, professor of geography at Bristol, back in 2015-2016, culminating with him sending me an old paper of his, in which I spotted that he quoted from a document I had written twenty years earlier. Sadly he died in 2020, two months after his 79th birthday. (Though not from COVID, I understand.)
This is a basic undergraduate-level textbook looking at the politics of human geography, examining political systems in the UK and USA, getting deep into the weeds of why more government money is spent in some places than others, and the difficulties of designing good systems for the sharing of resources. I got it for the bits about electoral systems and gerrymandering, but I stayed for the wider analysis of the role of state and local governments in society. It’s all stuff that I more or less knew, but it was helpful to have it laid out like this. It would have been good to see some nods towards gender and geography, and some more countries than the USA and UK, but it is what it is. You can get it here.
I got this second hand (obviously) and, to my delight, I spotted that the previous owner is a retired Cambridge don who was a university official during my years in student politics. I have sent him a note but he hasn’t replied; he must be in his eighties by now.
This was the last of the stash of books acquired in 2016 that I had mislaid when I thought I had reached the end of that pile. Though I am still looking out for a couple that have not turned up yet.
Information emerges on a computer screen as lines and dots, but there are pieces missing. The DNA extracted from this tooth has spent more than a millennium in the ground, resulting in incomplete genome coverage.3 It doesn’t show the individual’s eye colour or provide information on their appearance. However, while the minute sequences of the DNA prove difficult to decipher, the chromosomes are clear. The team members search repeatedly, yet across every sample they find no evidence of a Y chromosome anywhere. Instead, there is a clear pattern of two X chromosomes. 3 Charlotte Hedenstierna-Jonson et al, ‘A Female Viking Warrior Confirmed by Genomics’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 164, No. 4 (2017), pp. 853-860.
A book asserting that there are lots of interesting stories to tell about the centrality of women in the Middle Ages, which basically is preaching to the converted as far as I am concerned. It starts however in 1913: Emily Davison, who was trampled to death by the King’s horse when her suffragette protest went wrong at the Derby, was a qualified and enthusiastic medievalist who saw the political empowerment of women as fully consistent with history.
Ramirez goes on to look at the Loftus Princess; Cyneðryð and Æðelflæd of Mercia; the Viking woman from Birka; Hildegard of Bingen; the women who made the Bayeux Tapestry; the women of the Cathars; Jadwiga of Poland; and Margery Kempe. It’s a solid piece of work which simultaneously rides the two horses of “these were remarkable individuals” and “women in general were much more important in the Middle Ages than you have probably been told”.
I didn’t know much about any of these particular cases, and had never heard of some of them – and I’ve read quite a lot of medieval history in my time. So I felt enlightened and encouraged by the end of the book. You can get it here.
